Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
InvaderRamModerator
yes way more distractions.
you’re getting way too touchy. i’m actually kind of in support of the rams moving back. for selfish reasons.
and rams would keep their name. it’s way too good of a story not to. rams return home… blah blah blah.
InvaderRamModeratorlos angeles by itself would be full of distractions for young athletic millionaires.
i think they should just tour the united states and move every year to a different city.
LOST – Ben Linus moves island & transports to Tun…: http://youtu.be/uWADvvG71SU
January 7, 2015 at 4:42 pm in reply to: Reports out of Georgia that Schottenheimer is the new offensive coordinator #15757InvaderRamModeratorwell. we’ll see. if the offense magically transforms next year and austin goes to the pro bowl it might tell us something.
it might. or it might not.
InvaderRamModeratorthe league knows and approves. i’m sure of it. they’ve known this for awhile. wouldn’t be the first shady thing they’ve done.
i bet even peacock knows while getting assurances that st louis will get a team in the future. maybe jacksonville.
InvaderRamModeratorme personally. i would have to root for the rams although i’d have an eye on that defense. i love the defense that snead and fisher have put together. but yeah. i’d eventually stop following them as players left.
but also. the selfish part of me would like to see them in la. but not at the expense of losing the local guys on this board. i think i’d rather they stay in st. louis in that case.
i also don’t think there is any sort of expansion team. any “new” team in los angeles or st. louis will have to come from some other city. i actually think the trade and move might be very possible.
or maybe they do something totally crazy. kroenke trades the rams to khan who then trades the jags to bowlen while kroenke gets the broncos. and bowlen moves to los angeles with the jaguars. thus solving several problems all at once… i’m calling it right now.
InvaderRamModeratorit’d be pretty funny if kroenke and khan traded teams, and the jaguars moved to los angeles.
ha ha ha ha!
i mean it has happened before.
InvaderRamModeratorhttp://www.rams-news.com/bernie-i-dont-want-to-cover-this-team-next-year-audio/
Bernie: “I dont want to cover this team next year…”
…
sweet!
InvaderRamModeratorsomething about this makes me believe this is actually going to happen. and i don’t think the nfl is being completely honest about this. my bet is they want this to happen.
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nfl/story/_/id/12125028/project-nfl-stadium-los-angeles-going-forward
L.A. stadium plans ‘going forward’
Updated: January 5, 2015, 6:05 PM ET
By Arash Markazi | ESPN.comLOS ANGELES — The St. Louis Rams could be headed back to Los Angeles as early as 2016.
A year after purchasing 60 acres of land in Inglewood adjacent to the Forum and Hollywood Park, Rams owner Stan Kroenke has teamed up with the owners of the Hollywood Park site to build an NFL stadium, the Hollywood Park Land Company announced Monday.
Stockbridge Capital Group, which owns the 298-acre Hollywood Park site, already had plans for a mixed-use community on the land that formerly housed the famed thoroughbred racing track, which closed in late 2013.
Signature gathering will begin soon for an initiative that would place the “City of Champions Revitalization Project” on the Inglewood municipal ballot in 2015. if it passes, construction on the project would begin by the end of the year.
“This project is going forward,” Inglewood mayor James T. Butts Jr. said at a news conference in front of Inglewood City Hall on Monday. “We’re thrilled in the City of Inglewood. Here we are in in the position to build that field of dreams and hope that they’ll come.”
Butts said he spoke to Kroenke about the project over the weekend but would not comment on any conversations with the NFL.
As described in the ballot measure, the project will include a stadium of up to 80,000 seats and a performance venue of up to 6,000 seats while reconfiguring the previously approved Hollywood Park plan for up to 890,000 square feet of retail, 780,000 square feet of office space, 2,500 new residential units, a 300-room hotel and 25 acres of public parks, playgrounds, open space and pedestrian and bicycle access.
At a separate news conference at the Hollywood Park site, Chris Meany, senior vice president of Hollywood Park Land Company, said they were committed to beginning construction on the stadium with or without a commitment from an NFL team. The declaration, not to mention the involvement of a current NFL owner, sets it apart from other “shovel-ready” stadium proposals that have always first required a team committing to playing there before construction could begin.
“I’ve heard that there’s a lot of talk about a lot of sites that have been out there for a very long time, for years and years and years,” Meany said. “I don’t see shovels in the ground on those projects. We’re putting our shovels in the ground and going forward. This is the location in Los Angeles that for decades was the best location for sports and entertainment.”
The stadium authorized by the ballot measure will be designed by HKS Inc., one of the world’s leading firms for the design of sports and entertainment complexes. A successful ballot measure would shorten the time frame for Inglewood’s approval of a stadium and would mean that professional sports could return to Inglewood by 2018.
Many proposed stadium plans have come and gone in the hopes of bringing the NFL back to Los Angeles after the city lost both the Raiders and Rams after the 1994 season, but none of those plans were ever backed by a current NFL owner capable of moving his team into the country’s second-largest market.
The 80,000-seat stadium would be designed to house multiple teams and would be covered but open from the sides and be able to not only hold football and soccer games but also be in the running to bid on events such as the Final Four and major prizefights. It would also conceivably be part of Los Angeles’ bid to host the 2024 Olympics and possible future bids for the World Cup.
“We’re going to have the most important, good-looking, best, state-of-the-art sports venue in the western United States, if not the world, and we’ll be ready when people want to use it,” Meany said. “We hope to attract more than our fair [share] of large-scale events here. I can’t speak for what the NCAA would do, but we have designed a building that would be perfect to house the Final Four. … We have not had any talk with the Olympic organizing committee, but we think we’ll have a venue that will enhance Los Angeles’ opportunities.”
Meany and Butts were careful not to call the stadium an “NFL stadium” or claim that it was being built to house an NFL team, but it was clear that was the underlying expectation as a handful of Rams fans cheered from a distance during both news conferences.
“When the Lakers and Kings left [Inglewood], they left for what was a better offer,” Butts said. “We’re not trying to take anybody’s team. These are businesspeople. They make business decisions. But if the best, newest stadium in the world is in Inglewood, I’d imagine that someone would be interested.”
The Rams are expected to convert their lease at St. Louis’ Edward Jones Dome to a year-to-year agreement later this month, and if the team and the city fail to come to an agreement to build a new stadium, the Rams could move back to the area they called home from 1946 to 1994.
On Monday, a representative of the two-man task force working on a St. Louis stadium proposal released a statement on behalf of former Anheuser-Busch president Dave Peacock and local attorney Bob Blitz.
“The news today is another reminder of how much competition there can be for National Football League franchises and projects that include NFL stadiums, but it does not change our timeline or approach,” the statement read. “It is important to remember this will be a long-term process, but one that the State of Missouri and the St. Louis region are fully pledged to seeing through. We are ready to demonstrate our commitment to keeping the NFL here, and to continue to illustrate why St. Louis has been and will always be a strong NFL market. We will present a plan to Governor [Jay] Nixon this Friday as scheduled, and we expect that it will meet his criteria, thereby allowing us to share our vision with the public shortly thereafter. In the meantime, we will continue to have discussions with the NFL, as well as Rams leadership.”
Developers of the Hollywood Park project said that no tax dollars would be used for the construction project — including the stadium and more than 4 million square feet of retail, office, hotel and residential space — which could be completed by 2018. Before construction can begin, however, the project must pass several political and environmental hurdles and the Rams must, of course, commit to moving back to Los Angeles after the 2015 season.
“We are excited to unveil an expanded plan that will bring a world-class sports and entertainment district to Hollywood Park,” Terry Fancher, founder of Stockbridge, said in a release. “We are committed to working with [the Kroenke Group] to build a project that will put Inglewood back on the map as home of the truly great sports and entertainment venues.”
Any NFL franchise interested in relocating for the next season would have to apply between Jan. 1 and Feb. 15 of that year, according to league bylaws, and prove it has exhausted all attempts to remain in its current location. The earliest a team could relocate to Los Angeles would be January 2016, and that team would likely play in either the L.A. Coliseum or the Rose Bowl until a new stadium is completed.
NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said last month that no teams would be moving to Los Angeles for the 2015 season. The two teams that have always made the most sense to relocate to Los Angeles are the last two NFL teams to leave Los Angeles 20 years ago: the Oakland Raiders and the Rams.
The Raiders’ lease to play at O.co Coliseum, formerly known as the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, has expired, and the team is now on a year-to-year agreement. Meanwhile, the Rams can get out of their lease agreement with the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission to play at the Edward Jones Dome, as well. The third team in play for L.A., the San Diego Chargers, can announce its intention to leave San Diego between Feb. 1 and May 1 of each year through 2020 if it pays an early-termination fee tied to the bonds used to expand Qualcomm Stadium in 1997.
InvaderRamModeratori bet they add a defensive back later in the draft.
InvaderRamModeratori was hoping there was a stud defensive back who’d be available. maybe landon collins… doubtful with barron on board. i think they need another cornerback.
- This reply was modified 10 years ago by InvaderRam.
InvaderRamModeratorgoodness.
i can’t see any logical reason to make me think that kroenke isn’t planning on moving to los angeles.
and my guess is he moves whether or not the nfl approves of a move.
InvaderRamModeratorummm…
wow.
InvaderRamModeratorthat would require the rams d to be the 2001 ravens or the 2002 bucs.
garsh i hope bradford can stay healthy next year. i hope he can play next year.
InvaderRamModeratorRG3, the legend
foles, ???
Jeff George.trading for rgiii would have to be the most hilarious trade in the history of the nfl.
i think i’d do it just for the laughs.
- This reply was modified 10 years ago by InvaderRam.
InvaderRamModeratorother trade possibilities
robert griffin iii (ahahahahahahaha!!!!)
nick foles (also coming off an injury)
jay cutler (a bit on the older side i would think)
InvaderRamModeratorlocker is intriguing but like ag says he’s inconsistent. and he’s coming off shoulder surgery.
i guess i just don’t see any long-term solution. or solution i like better than bradford. i see another shaun hill coming.
i wonder what trade possibilities there are. glennon was mentioned earlier. i want a younger prospect with some upside. again locker fits that category but he’s coming off major surgery.
InvaderRamModeratorummmmm…
….
reality and then depression sink in…
InvaderRamModeratorperhaps i’m being too harsh on kendricks. but i feel like they could do better. he’s been solid but not spectacular. just thinking of ways to upgrade the offense. i personally would target offensive line and tight end as positions to upgrade. assuming quick comes back healthy and they are able to bring britt back.
well. besides quarterback of course.
- This reply was modified 10 years ago by InvaderRam.
January 3, 2015 at 11:06 am in reply to: who are the best 6 OLs this year & how were they built? #15421InvaderRamModeratorno i don’t think they should count on that.
but. they shouldn’t draft a pure center. draft someone who can play multiple positions.
InvaderRamModeratori believe lance kendricks is a free agent. might be time for an upgrade. i haven’t been too thrilled with him thus far.
January 3, 2015 at 4:08 am in reply to: who are the best 6 OLs this year & how were they built? #15404InvaderRamModeratori was really hoping jones would just grab that center position. maybe he still can.
InvaderRamModeratormaxx williams in the second round?
InvaderRamModeratorcan’t find anyone with 11″ hands. but wilson came from a pro-style offense and has 10 1/4″ hands!
logan thomas has 10 7/8″ hands. but i think he was in a spread offense.
ha!
January 2, 2015 at 10:18 pm in reply to: who are the best 6 OLs this year & how were they built? #15387InvaderRamModeratoror they could draft ol in the second round and another in the later rounds. there should be plenty of talent left in the second round to choose from.
January 2, 2015 at 10:08 pm in reply to: who are the best 6 OLs this year & how were they built? #15385InvaderRamModeratorrams so far.
robinson – high 1st round
saffold – high 2nd round
wells – fa
joseph – fa
barksdale – waiversi could see them replacing wells and joseph with potentially a 1st rounder and a lower round pick.
personally i think it makes sense given the strength of this year’s draft. i don’t know what the fa market looks like. but the rams seem to be able to spot ol talent in the draft.
InvaderRamModeratoryeah. at first glance there doesn’t seem to be a russell wilson type guy in this draft.
i mean he didn’t just play in a pro-style offense. he dominated in a pro-style offense.
he averaged 10.3 yards per attempt and threw 33 touchdowns on just 309 attempts and had a 72.8% completion rate.
domination.
InvaderRamModeratorI think taking Petty at No. 10 would certainly be a risky pick. Maybe a trade down to pick up an extra pick, but the dilemma with Petty is getting to be pretty common given the nature of the college game these days. Quarterbacks have always had to be taught to play the game “the NFL way” coming out of college, but never more than now. The differences between the college game and the pro game have never been greater overall than they are now. Teams not only have to evaluate the quarterback on a physical level, but now have to determine what their capacity for learning a very different game is going to be. I think the NFL is going to have to consider a developmental league to develop their quarterbacks or they are going to have to make the adjustments in their offensive systems to accommodate the skill sets that the college quarterbacks bring with them to the league. The number of college programs that still utilize anything resembling a pro style system is rapidly shrinking and those quarterbacks are in shorter and shorter supply.
well this is a good point. what qbs coming out for the draft are coming from a more pro-style offense?
someone correct me if i’m wrong but i believe russell wilson came from a pro-style offense at wisconsin. that must have made a huge difference in his transition to the nfl. maybe the rams should be looking more in that direction.
January 2, 2015 at 7:14 pm in reply to: Bringing Sam Bradford back to be the Rams starter is the definition of insanity #15361InvaderRamModeratorhaha!
can’t wait for the combine! just waiting for that 37″ armed quarterback with 11″ hands!
draft him!
InvaderRamModeratorwell i wouldn’t be in favor of drafting hundley in the first round either. i’m just not in favor of drafting any qb at #10 unless mariota somehow falls down to that spot.
January 2, 2015 at 5:57 pm in reply to: Bringing Sam Bradford back to be the Rams starter is the definition of insanity #15354InvaderRamModeratorYou can’t call Bradford injury prone. Not if you believe in “The Gambler’s Fallacy”. I don’t exactly believe it myself, but the proof of that will not fit the margins of this post. For Bradford you can say it is true.
Bradford is your probably you best play, if for no other reason than it is your only play to field a QB cabable of winning a Superbowl. imo But, you don’t have to go all in on the salary. You can add protection by finding the next best thing at QB and getting insurance on Bradford’s salary.
Bringing back Bradford is the definition of sanity.
i’m not sure that applies to bradford. i think he is injury prone.
however. i agree that the rams best shot at winning next year is bringing bradford back. because while it’s only a small chance that bradford stays healthy next year. there’s still a chance. and if he’s healthy, i’m almost positive the rams have a winning season.
if, however, they have to play a new quarterback, i’m almost positive they have a losing season. it’ll be almost like starting from scratch, especially if he’s a rookie.
i think that makes sense. they’re better off drafting a rookie and hoping bradford can stay healthy for a season or two and then developing that quarterback in the meantime.
- This reply was modified 10 years ago by InvaderRam.
-
AuthorPosts