thinking i would rather have had mcleod.

i wanted mcleod back. that’s what i’m most disappointed in.

and for what the steelers signed green for? but who knows if he even wanted to play for the rams.

otherwise job well done.

i liked him too. question is can tre bounce back?

if he can i don’t see a need for him. gurley should be able to take over third down duties.

even if rgiii goes to the niners it still helps the rams out as the qbs will start dropping in the draft. shoot maybe even goff will be available.

well. this pretty much eliminates lb in the first round. so most likely dlineman, quarterback, or wide receiver with the rams’ first pick.

i’m happy about the signing, but i read mcleod is gone.

i like it. i think he’d complement gurley well. i think he’d be an upgrade over keenum. and mannion maybe develops in a couple years.

then just concentrate on defense in the draft.

i like it. i’d totally be on board.

Winnbrad wrote:

I don’t know. I don’t think Fisher is terrible. That’s a strong word for a coach that’s been around this many years and has had some success.

I think Fisher still underestimates the “new” league. He doesn’t seem to get the importance of good QB play and good WRs. This is a QB ONLY league now. A team has to have a good one. Even Seattle’s D, which has been great for a few years, wouldn’t go far without the solid playmaking ability of Wilson.

The one good QB Fisher had was Steve McNair, and he wasn’t great, but he was good enough. Coupled with a great running game and a good D, Fisher had success.

So unless we can find our own version of McNair we’re gonna remain a .500 team, imo.

but superbowls have also been occupied by great defenses as well.

and this year. yeah peyton manning is a hall of famer but that’s not the peyton manning that won this superbowl. not to mention that the broncos defense was responsible for shutting down the reigning mvp qb newton.

i think fisher understands and maybe if there was one criticism of him it’s that he should not have traded bradford. but i was one of many who was on board with that decision so i made the same mistake as well.

well i don’t think adding roddy would hurt and i think that using premium draft picks on defense would be better given all the talent on that side.

and i agree that having welker last year was a big help to a young offense.

• This reply was modified 10 years ago by InvaderRam.

i think this kind of signing would be the way to go. get a receiver who can step right in and contribute. bringing in a rookie who doesn’t know all the nuances of a pro style offense and having to develop him. i don’t know.

i know a couple of the bengals receivers should be free agents as well.

give keenum or whoever the best chance for immediate success.

then the draft can be spent on defense and a developmental qb.

weakest offensive draft in years. i think the rams might be better off drafting a qb for the future and then just focusing on restocking the defense. maybe have the qb sit for a year and see what next year looks like in terms of drafting receivers.

there’s always free agency too.

i think he’s a more athletic version of joe flacco.

but it sounds like he’s gonna need a lot of time and development.

• This reply was modified 10 years ago by InvaderRam.

darron lee is intriguing. quarterback and defensive back in high school. only two years experience as a linebacker, but he’s explosive and quick. killebrew is another guy i’m looking at as well.

jj is gone. rams have to focus on bringing back mcleod, barron, and hayes.

sign one offensive weapon. and i think they’re ready to draft.

my guess is jenkins is gone. if he had signed the contract no tag of johnson, and johnson most likely is gone.