Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
InvaderRamModerator
goff looks good. i can’t discount that.
in the end, i think i gotta just trust what this front office sees with their own eyes.
this will be snead’s biggest test so far as a general manager. pretty exciting. this move pretty much will define his tenure with the rams. fair or not. he’s made good decisions in general so far, but this move will follow him warranted or not.
April 17, 2016 at 12:30 am in reply to: Goff or Wentz? Wentz or Goff? Der Wentz oder Goff entscheidung #42151InvaderRamModeratorWell, I just don’t know what to do with stuff like this. One place I read a knock on Goff is lack of poise under pressure. Here somebody is saying he is excellent because he is used to playing behind a porous line, and will make plays against blitzes.
So. How am I supposed to know?
it’s funny because you take one game and have two different people analyze it.
cosell says he looks rushed and has jittery feet.
waldman raves about how cool he is under pressure.
literally. the same game. opposite opinions. i think you’d have to actually talk to the players and talk them through plays to get more insight.
you’ve got one group of guys who think goff is the more pro ready of the two. the other group says the exact opposite.
one thing that stands out to me about wentz is interviews with gruden and mariucci. they give him a play and have him spit it back out on a board. i have no idea what they are talking about, but wentz seems to have no problem with it. jeremiah says that he is light years ahead of anybody in this draft in terms of understanding how a pro-style offense operates. gruden says he is the most pro-ready qb of the last couple of years. the last time he said that i believe was russell wilson.
my opinion. goff would be more ready to go in and just start passing the ball. but i think carson would be more ready to be a manager of the game. which trait do the rams value more? for me i would think they’d value wentz more but maybe they adapt to goff’s strengths like zn says.
chris weinke said at the time that russell wilson would have been the number one pick if he was 6’5″. really curious as to what he thinks of the two qbs. i’d assume he’ll have significant input on this decision.
April 16, 2016 at 11:45 pm in reply to: Goff or Wentz? Wentz or Goff? Der Wentz oder Goff entscheidung #42146InvaderRamModeratormax makes some good points but you gotta remember that goff has so many more reps on wentz. give carson time and i suspect he gets better. waldman reviews the national championship game against illinois state from last year. his second year as a starter. including high school.
wentz was a late bloomer so i don’t worry as much about the age gap although carson is pretty old for a draftee. it might be the biggest hangup i have about him.
InvaderRamModeratorand it should also be noted. he only has 3 years of experience as a starting qb – high school and college combined!
so while he does have that valuable experience playing in a pro-style offense. he could have loads of potential for improvement still! yeah. i’m liking this guy the more i think about it.
InvaderRamModeratorhe made one really bad throw in the third quarter. just a really bad throw for an interception. but otherwise, he played a really efficient game.
InvaderRamModeratori’m just wondering if wentz’s skill set is a better fit for an offense that will feature a lot of the running game.
I know what you’re saying because Wentz offers a bit of the read option. But it’s also possible, though, that with Goff being (at this point anyway) the more sophisticated passer, the Rams scheme for those strengths more.
I always thought the Rams passed as much as the qb let them. In 2012, for example, they were a 59% passing team. In 2015, they were a 53.4% passing team.
That IMO is just the difference between having a (non-melted down) starting caliber veteran qb…and, not.
i think wentz has the potential to improve as a passer, but he could also provide the offense things immediately which goff might not be able to do immediately. i think the playing under center and playing in that offense can’t be underestimated. even if it was against lower competition.
it’s interesting. it could go either way at this point.
April 16, 2016 at 10:25 pm in reply to: Goff or Wentz? Wentz or Goff? Der Wentz oder Goff entscheidung #42139InvaderRamModeratorgruden thinks carson wentz is the most nfl-ready qb in the last couple of years.
he’s smart. scored a 40 on the wonderlic. he comes from a pro-style offense. his qb coach was an assistant coach in the nfl. he must have received good coaching there. the program won a fifth consecutive national championship this year.
could he come in right away and be a manager of a run-oriented offense? he could…
we hear all the time how russell wilson and kirk cousins both benefited from coming from a pro-style offense. connor cook gets credit for it. so it stands to reason that wentz should too. and the success of wilson and cousins is obvious.
InvaderRamModeratorin the first half he had one interception at the end on a great great play by the defensive back. 38 seconds left, and i’m not sure he would have attempted that throw if not for how little time was left.
halftime they’re showing how many great players have come from fcs schools. some of the best of all time.
InvaderRamModeratorok. they just showed a highlight of jacksonville state almost beating auburn. ended up losing to them 27-20. north dakota state shredded them in this game.
InvaderRamModeratorHe gives the defense something else to think about.
It really looks like he’s running the Rams offense. NDSU seems to have a similar philosophy. I don’t know who will be the better QB over the course of their pro careers. But considering what the Rams do right now–Wentz just seems like a very good fit for them.
my guess is the offense would look very different if this wasn’t his first game back from injury but yeah i could see him running the rams offense.
he shows touch on some throws but also can fire it in when he wants to.
InvaderRamModeratori’m at the end of the first quarter. people keep talking about how goff will be more pro ready his rookie year, but i’m not so sure. carson is supposed to be running a pro-style offense, and it looks like it. he plays a lot under center. can do play action. is making adjustments at the line. i remember people talking about how much it helped russell wilson that he played in a pro style offense at wisconsin. same with kirk cousins i believe.
granted. the big ten is a big step up in level of competition. still. i’m not in agreement with trading up. but now that they have. i can’t help but think that wentz should be the guy. i think he’d be a better complement to todd gurley. and when things break down, he can make plays with his feet. a lot like a russell wilson.
InvaderRamModeratorgreat find. i’m gonna watch this game.
already seeing wentz playing under center and making adjustments.
April 16, 2016 at 3:25 pm in reply to: Goff or Wentz? Wentz or Goff? Der Wentz oder Goff entscheidung #42111InvaderRamModeratorwhile it is hard to find a great qb with 9″ hands, it doesn’t necessarily mean goff will be a bad qb.
romo has 8 3/4″ hands. i don’t know what to make of the whole hand size thing. just that there are very few qbs with 9″ hands.
on the other hand, wentz’s age is a little worrisome. he’s 23 years old and will be 24 before the 2016 season is over. how many great qbs were drafted that old? the only one i can think of is russell wilson, and some might debate whether he’s great or not. i happen to think he’s great. he turned 24 his rookie season. there have been qbs drafted when they were 23 but didn’t turn 24 until the after the season was over.
so between goff’s microscopic hands and wentz being a fossil, i’m really torn as to who the rams should pick.
when it’s all said and done, outside of tom brady i don’t really care for california qbs. they’re not tough enough. i’ll go with the qb from the midwest – carson wentz. all great qbs come from the midwest.
InvaderRamModeratori can see that. i could see a little luck in wentz.
wentz is a smart guy. one report had him scoring a 29 in the wonderlic. another report had it at 40. who knows what the truth is or even what that means in terms of making split second decisions on a football field but you’d think he’d have no problems learning a playbook.
April 16, 2016 at 10:03 am in reply to: Goff or Wentz? Wentz or Goff? Der Wentz oder Goff entscheidung #42080InvaderRamModeratorif it makes you feel better boylhart has wentz graded as a second rounder.
- This reply was modified 8 years, 7 months ago by InvaderRam.
April 16, 2016 at 8:29 am in reply to: Goff or Wentz? Wentz or Goff? Der Wentz oder Goff entscheidung #42067InvaderRamModeratorwentz has all the signs of being a late bloomer. didn’t develop until late physically. not much experience playing qb. if they’re going to roll the dice might as well bet big.
InvaderRamModeratorbut like you said, he hasn’t had a lot of snaps. and isn’t the fine tuned passer that goff is. but will that matter in an offense that features a lot of todd gurley anyway?
Personally? Yes I think passing matters. I don’t think the Rams intend to be a run-heavy team. I think they intend to be a more balanced team, and in this day and age, balanced doesn’t meant 50/50…it means something more like 52-6/48-44…that kind of range.
I don’t think that it’s passing isn’t as important. I just think that this year, the best qbs available have some developmental aspects in their make-up, so AT FIRST you can’t throw with them as much as you would like to.
But, since I see this as a 12-15 year starter pick and not as a 2016 season pick, starting out slowly is fine with me. I just simply never believe the guys who say Fisher wouldn’t pass much even if he had a good veteran passer. No, I think he doesn’t pass as much when he has Davis, Keenum, and Hill. Give him a matured Goff or Wentz and my take is they would pass the ball more than Seattle and Carolina currently do.
.
…
not trying to say it isn’t important. but not as important as if this was a pass oriented offense which it isn’t going to be. i’m just wondering if wentz’s skill set is a better fit for an offense that will feature a lot of the running game.
InvaderRamModeratora random note. it’s not listed on the official nfl combine site, but several sites report that carson wentz ran a 4.15 sec short shuttle. he also ran a 6.86 second 3 cone. that’s pretty ridiculous.
for comparison those numbers are better than the numbers jalen ramsey put up.
so yeah. the guy’s a stud athlete even though the 4.77 40 shows he doesn’t have long speed. he’s basically put up elite running back type numbers in the short shuttle and 3 cone.
InvaderRamModeratorin my unbiased opinion, wentz is the better fit. he brings more to the table than just passing. he can run the ball a little, and let’s face it the rams are never going to be a pass heavy team under fisher. so the fact that wentz can run the ball would seem to make him more valuable to the rams. plus he’s got that thick build like a cam newton and should be able to absorb punishment better. he also has experience in a pro offense and running play action which will help him.
but like you said, he hasn’t had a lot of snaps. and isn’t the fine tuned passer that goff is. but will that matter in an offense that features a lot of todd gurley anyway?
i see a lot of mcnair/george potential with a wentz/gurley combo.
InvaderRamModeratorand i’ll repeat this again. he was only 5’9″ as a freshman in high school and didn’t play quarterback until his senior year when he had a growth spurt. he also apparently was playing baseball and was dealing with injuries from that sport. as a result the only fbs school to give him a scholarship was central michigan. he decided to go with his home school ndsu – an fcs school. he redshirted a year and didn’t start until his junior year.
so this guy is pretty raw. lots of potential still in him. hasn’t had nearly the amount of reps that goff has had.
InvaderRamModeratorWell, I dunno.
I guess I’m just not sold on Goff or Wentz.
But what do i know.Wentz looks kinda slow to me. Like a big Kerry Collins
kinda guy. And Goff…well Goff has teeny tiny handsw
vwentz ran the 40 in the 4.7’s. 3 cone was 6.87.
he’s pretty athletic for his size.
By slow I mean his release. His release looks
slow to me. Not like Luck or Peyton or even Cam.can that be corrected? i’ve read that about him. one report said there was a little bit of a loop to his release.
one thing i like about carson is he’s not just a passer. he can run a little bit. i could see fisher using him similarly to how he used mcnair.
InvaderRamModeratorWell, I dunno.
I guess I’m just not sold on Goff or Wentz.
But what do i know.Wentz looks kinda slow to me. Like a big Kerry Collins
kinda guy. And Goff…well Goff has teeny tiny handsw
vwentz ran the 40 in the 4.7’s. 3 cone was 6.87.
he’s pretty athletic for his size.
InvaderRamModeratorit’s a big gamble. it’s just too much to give up for me. but i also readily admit i have not seen these guys play. only base it on what i read.
i do have one friend who has seen a lot of goff and thinks he’ll be good but still thinks the rams got fleeced. i’m having trouble thinking of an example where this does benefit the team trading up. maybe eli manning?
edit. one case where it did work is the rams trading up to number one for orlando pace.
- This reply was modified 8 years, 7 months ago by InvaderRam.
April 15, 2016 at 6:09 pm in reply to: Goff or Wentz? Wentz or Goff? Der Wentz oder Goff entscheidung #42006InvaderRamModeratorone thing about wentz is he was a late bloomer. Only 5’9″ as a freshman in high school. didn’t develop until later which is why he didn’t get any d1 scholarships.
April 15, 2016 at 6:02 pm in reply to: Goff or Wentz? Wentz or Goff? Der Wentz oder Goff entscheidung #42002InvaderRamModeratorsince the trade is done and i would have to choose one i would want wentz.
i know it’s not logical, but i just can’t get over goff’s 9″ hands. if his hands were a little bigger i’d take goff. silly i know.
wentz has the prototypical size and arm strength. he’s mobile. i wouldn’t worry about him taking a couple hits. just seems to have more potential.
of course i say all this without having watched either of them play.
for what it’s worth i have a friend who’s watched goff play. thinks he’s gonna be real good but not first pick worthy.
InvaderRamModeratorschefter reporting they are leaning toward goff.
InvaderRamModeratorIt was a Kroenke marketing trade, not a football trade.
yup.
just when i thought the rams couldn’t get any dumber.
April 13, 2016 at 9:44 pm in reply to: informal poll–for or against trading up? trading down? staying put? #41843InvaderRamModeratori don’t think the browns have any intention of drafting a qb. depodesta is an analytics guy. i just don’t see it happening. trade down and build up the defense is what they’re after.
InvaderRamModeratori agree. if jack were to fall to #15, they would pick him.
of course. that’ll never happen. but yeah. if jack were to fall to #15, the rams would almost have to pick him. the guy is an absolute stud. and might be a top 5 talent.
InvaderRamModeratori’m starting to come around on vannett. tight end might be a bigger need than receiver and i like his measurables. long arms big mitts. won’t jump out of the stadium but average athleticism.
versatile reading the reports.
-
AuthorPosts