Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 4,051 through 4,080 (of 7,414 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: First road game for G–informal poll on the SF game #74629
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    this game tells me much more about Goff than the first two. The first game had an astericks b/c it was Indy. The second had an astericks b/c it was too incestuous. If Goff performs well, on the road, than I’ll know that we have something. If he doesn’t, than there is still hope, but it’s like shit, here we go again.

    i actually wonder if mcvay gives it to gurley and sees if he can carry the offense. the niners defense hasn’t given up many passing yards. opposing offenses have gotten most of their yards off the running game.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Goff watch, week 2 #74625
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    whereas with mcvay you don’t know if it’ll be run or pass or where the qb will go with the ball. there’s more deception. that’s my guess anyway.

    IF that’s what he means.

    And even if he means that, IF that’s true. You would have to show me. The Rams got a lot out of play action last year and by definition that means that you don’t really know what they’re doing from the formation. I will say this.

    btw I don’t think that’s what he means.

    looking back it maybe he means plays are more conceptual. rather than being its own play. meaning if you learn the concept you can apply it different plays. or different formations…

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Goff watch, week 2 #74619
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I wonder what Benoit means, by “every play was its own entity” last year?

    my guess is the formation of the play totally telegraphed to the defense where the ball was going.

    whereas with mcvay you don’t know if it’ll be run or pass or where the qb will go with the ball. there’s more deception. that’s my guess anyway.

    in reply to: Goff watch, week 2 #74616
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    The designs are intricate but, for the quarterback, the reads are not. If the look is this, throw here; if it’s that, throw there.

    as goff plays more. sees more defenses. the plays become ingrained in his memory. his reactions will be quicker. he’ll be able to go from his first read to his second read quicker.

    but it’ll take time.

    my expectations are that he throw for over 60% on the season. ypa over 7. throws for double digits tds and more tds than ints.

    in reply to: Rams uniform for Thursday night game #74577
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t care what they wear as long as they spank that niner ass.

    seriously though. i kinda like the mustard yellow.

    in reply to: Goff watch, week 2 #74576
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    How many plays was it?

    Because…pictures can dominate our perceptions, so sometimes you have to count.

    My guess is that the only pics that went up were the “didn’t see open receivers” pics.

    How many of those in reality in the game? How many where he DID see the receivers?

    It’s always better IMO to do a real count and give percentages.

    i think it was 3-4. i know. not that many. but i said missed some open receivers. i wasn’t trying to make it out to seem he was playing horribly. like i said before. going into the fourth quarter his ypa was excellent.

    but the other thing that should be noted. i don’t think blue and gold was trying to make goff out to be some bust. he also made a point to say that goff made good decisions as well. just pointing out mistakes. mistakes that i’m sure goff has seen and will store away for future reference.

    i’m hoping in a couple years he will make defenses pay. meaning. instead of dropping 20 points on a defense like this, he’ll be dropping 30+ points. that’s when we’ll all know that it’s clicked for him.

    in reply to: Goff watch, week 2 #74572
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i was lurking over at the herd. blue and gold put up some stills of goff. man he missed some wide open receivers.

    i can only hope that the game is still just too fast for him. and that at some point the game slows down for him.

    yeah. i’m thinking it takes at least until 2019 before it all finally clicks for him. as he plays more and more i’m hoping the tunnel vision goes away. cuz this mcvay offense could be something else.

    in reply to: First road game for G–informal poll on the SF game #74569
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    the rams should win this game i don’t care how bad their run defense is.

    hoyer and that niner passing offense has to be the worst in the league.

    in reply to: What happened on the Goff INT ? #74543
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    sorry. going to add one more thing. i think for most qbs their first three seasons they’re still trying to figure things out. then by their fourth year something clicks. that’s just by looking at stats.

    and i’m just talking years of experience. not necessarily games started. now some get it a year earlier or a year later but it’s usually around 3-5 years.

    in reply to: What happened on the Goff INT ? #74542
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    let me just add to that.

    i think i’ll be able to say for sure if he belongs or not by the bye week.

    as far as how good he can be? assuming he belongs i don’t think we’ll know until his fourth year. so that’ll be 2019.

    in reply to: What happened on the Goff INT ? #74539
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Goff is young and will have “learning experiences” but he has already shown me he’s an NFL qb. The only questions are HOW good will he be, and how long before he becomes however good he will be.

    well let’s just say there are no penalties on that second to last drive. which were no fault of goff. and the rams defense is just enough to stop washington on their last td drive.

    hey all of a sudden we’re talking about how goff and gurley brought the rams back from a deficit and beat washington.

    let’s see how he does thursday and if he learned anything. i’m waiting until the bye week and see where he’s at then.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: What happened on the Goff INT ? #74535
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    overall i’d have to say though that goff did alright. even if he was missing receivers, through the first three quarters he had a 70 percent completion rate at over 10 ypa. his qb rating was at approximately 130.

    and the drive before the last they were in position to score another td and then the penalties.

    we’ll see.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: What happened on the Goff INT ? #74529
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    it concerns me too. i’m just hoping that at some point the game slows down for him. it’s only been 9 games. if at the end of the season we’re still reading things like this i’ll be more than concerned.

    in reply to: people around are asking, what is up with Gurley #74488
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    3 fumbles. too many fumbles.

    but otherwise a decent season.

    128 yards rushing 3.7 ypc.
    104 yards receiving.

    over a full season that’d be 1024 yards rushing and 832 yards receiving.

    gotta get that ypc up though. gotta keep pushing.

    he does have 3 total touchdowns. so that’s good.

    in reply to: The good news… #74478
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well the cardinals without david johnson will be hurting a lot. so yeah. rams need to make a move now before he gets back. i agree. i think seattle is the best of the nfc west. niners. should beat them this week. if they don’t, it’ll be very disappointing. even with a leaky run defense. those niners have managed 12 points in their first two games… 12 freaking points. and 270 passing yards… for 2 games…

    gurley looked promising today. he needs to take care of the ball though. 3 fumbles already this season. he can’t keep coughing it up. as poorly as he ran last week, he’s still good for 7th in rushing. so far. he’s gotta keep getting better.

    the only thing that worries me is the rams are inexperienced. goff. only 9 games starting experience. mcvay first time head coach. 31 years old. there’s going to be a lot of inconsistency. that could hurt as the season goes on. palmer and wilson are veterans. they’ve been in their respective systems for years. so i expect a lot more consistency from them. i don’t know what to expect from a goff/mcvay led team yet. it’s only been 2 games.

    they should be better than the niners. it just depends on how much losing david johnson hurts the cardinals. i think seahawks are not reachable. hopefully, next year.

    in reply to: Washington game reactions #74474
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    gurley had a heck of a game. should have had more yards. maybe even another td if not for woods committing a boneheaded error. it was encouraging.

    goff had a good game up until staring down kupp. the linebacker read it the whole way. it had no chance. but you kind of figured goff would have these types of errors. this is only the ninth game of his career. i really do consider this a rookie season of sorts. he hasn’t played 16 games yet. he switched schemes. the team had just moved last season. lots of moving parts and he’s raw. he just needs to learn from this and move on. hopefully, he will.

    the receivers were completely silenced in the second half. watkins, kupp, woods, austin…

    run defense was atrocious. and just when we thought they might have the run game contained, they had a brain fart again on that last touchdown drive. i hope it’s fixable.

    donald looked disruptive. he can only get better as he knocks the rust off.

    in reply to: Rams with only 5 one o'clock games this year #74446
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I gotta get used to these late games.

    Even the London game is a 1:00 EST scheduled game. I hope that helps the players. I hate that they have to play the London game. I believe they are the 2nd most traveled team(in miles) this year–next to the Raiders. Last year they were first. I read that the London miles are more miles than the Steelers will travel with all their games combined. It doesn’t help. I know Kroenke loves London and has investments there but how about giving the team a break?

    didn’t i read that the rams were going to play somewhere in china at some point?

    i think that might be closer for the rams than london… so there’s that.

    i didn’t realize they were the most traveled team last year. that combined with also traveling from st. louis to los angeles. wow. that’s a lot of miles.

    in reply to: Hekker's sensational new technique #74445
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Okay, well, I admit I’m not a professional football player.

    But I have never understood how punters can be so damn inaccurate, and that when someone like Hekker comes around, he’s a bloody marvel.

    Punting.

    That’s your job. Your DAY job. It’s the thing you do all day, every day. Punt. How hard can it be to punt with accuracy when that’s what you practice all day?

    i’m telling ya. he’s gonna revolutionize the position. no one will think of punting the same way after hekker is done with his career.

    in reply to: people around are asking, what is up with Gurley #74443
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    But 2016 happened.

    yeah. normally you wouldn’t worry. bell and johnson, maybe the 2 best backs in the game, had atrocious game ones. but they didn’t have the kind of season gurley did last year.

    as herzog mentioned before, bettis is an example of a guy who showed promise as a rookie but then struggled early on in his career. and then came out gangbusters his fourth year on his way to hall of fame career. interestingly… the two years he struggled also came as his team was making a transition to a new city…

    his first three years (41 games started). 3.9 ypc. 3091 yards. 13 tds.

    the next three years (42 games started). 4.2 ypc. 4281 yards. 21 tds.

    ok. a little better.

    todd gurley through 2 years and 1 game (29 games started). 3.9 ypc. 2031 yards. 17 tds.

    he still has most of his third season left to play… i guess we’ll see.

    interestingly. another former ram… marshall faulk.

    his first three years (45 games started) he had 3.7 ypc. 2947 yards. 29 tds. he struggled through foot injuries though which obviously had to affect his production.

    his next three years (47 game started). 4.5 ypc. 3754 yards. 20 tds.

    i should also say those second three years doesn’t include a couple of the best years of his career.

    seventh and eight years (28 games started). 5.3 ypc. 2741 yards. 30 tds.

    ummm… so i guess there’s a small chance he can still turn this around.

    a big game from him today and a win would make a big announcement to the rest of the league.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: what will happen in the washington game #74405
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I hate Washington.

    42-16.

    Let the GSOT comparisons begin.

    not saying this offense is going to reach the heights that offense did.

    but i like the way they assembled this current offense.

    they signed a bright offensive mind to build a new offense.

    they signed a couple veteran offensive lineman.

    they traded for a very promising young receiver with some injury concerns.

    they signed a solid veteran wide receiver.

    they drafted an athletic tight end and a wide receiver who is advanced beyond his years.

    i just like how they assembled this offense on four different levels. by scheme, by free agency, by trade, and by the draft.

    much like how that gsot offense was assembled. they signed an olineman (timmerman) and a qb (green) that year. they drafted holt. they traded for faulk. they hired martz. and added that to a team that already had some promising young players on offense. they used every avenue possible. they had a coaching change, they added personnel by free agency, draft, and trade.

    the results might not be the same, but i like how aggressive they were this offseason.

    in reply to: Trumaine Johnson wins NFC defensive player of the week #74404
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i hope they find a way to re-sign this guy. he’s the leader of a group that i think a lot of us underestimated.

    i don’t know how possible it is with the cap and all that stuff. but if they can find a way to make it work, i’d be happy.

    in reply to: what will happen in the washington game #74403
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i will not be satisfied with anything but a blowout.

    in reply to: people around are asking, what is up with Gurley #74402
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I don’t know about that. Jerome Bettis sucked behind a bad Rams line. He had a hall of fame career behind Pittsburghs’

    i have looked at bettis’ career stats. and while he did have that one bad season, it was during a time where defenses were geared more towards stopping the run whereas defenses are now geared towards stopping the pass.

    but i’m also willing to give gurley the benefit of the doubt at this point.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    To put it another way: Only one team averaged under 300 yards per game on offense a season ago. So roughly half the NFL in Week 1 resembled the 2016 Rams offense.

    the fisher rams offense was ahead of its time.

    in reply to: people around are asking, what is up with Gurley #74387
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t know what’s obvious. what isn’t. i don’t know enough about football to say what the problems is.

    i do know that he hasn’t had a productive game in over a year.

    and my opinion is that the good rbs are able to produce despite their circumstances. meaning a poor line. poor passing game. whatever. steven jackson did it on piss poor offenses his whole career. i expected gurley to be at least as good as jackson.

    but like i said. i’m giving him 5 more games.

    in reply to: people around are asking, what is up with Gurley #74327
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    later he did bounce it outside. i think he must have been watching clips on the sideline. but then the line or a tight end would get called for holding.

    i’m giving him five more games.

    in reply to: people around are asking, what is up with Gurley #74326
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    that’s what i was alluding to before. gurley missed holes. if he had just kept his head up. he could have bounced it outside.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Speed_Kills wrote:

    I hear two people who clearly aren’t invested in the Rams… that are still learning a lot about this team

    They expect the Rams to be bad. Its clear in how the report on them. To me it sounds like they don’t know a ton about the Rams. I listened to the whole thing and afterwards I said hmmm that was a bad listen. They even made comments about Gurley and talked about how some don’t see what the big deal is with him because he hasn’t flashed since the Rams moved to LA. I get that take but I think its shallow. Why not talk about what McV plans are to get him going? Go get that story. They just aren’t invested yet

    By the way I’m not talking about being a homer although some of that comes from being invested in your hometown team… the Rams don’t have that yet. I just think there was way too much personal banter (If I have to hear about Gary’s wife one more time) and not enough hard stuff and inside stuff regarding the Rams

    Just my take

    well apparently gary didn’t even know donald was back at the rams facility until lindsey informed him. and she heard it from her boyfriend who saw it on the ticker watching college football. i don’t think they have any inside info to share to be honest.

    i like them though. i think lindsey’s actually pretty funny. they’re coming from the perspective of an la fan who wasn’t around when the rams were here 23 years ago. so i understand why they would make that comment about gurley.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: what will happen in the washington game #74305
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well quinn looked a little like the old quinn. the secondary has been lights out since maybe the minicamps. they’re coming off a dominant performance the previous week, and they’re getting arguably the best defensive player in the game back. i don’t think the defense will be a problem.

    on offense, mcvay will be motivated. i’m sure he’s got some tricks up his sleeve. some wrinkles to keep his old team off balance. i think there’s two questions that need answering. first, who is the real gurley? if he can be the gurley i hope he can be that’s one question answered. the second question is how much progress has goff really made? i think he’s going to have less time to throw. the windows will be just a little bit tighter. can he still make good decisions under those circumstances?

    if just one of those two can provide the answer we desire the rams have a chance. if both can step up, oh my. it’ll be something to behold. if neither can, well. everything will come crashing back to earth.

    i’m nervous.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: McVay, Goff, Donald…9/13…transcripts #74292
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i watched the interview with aaron. he seemed… a little edgy. i don’t know if that’s good or bad.

    i’m thinking it’s bad. for washington.

    i’m just glad he’s back. no other defensive player in the league i’d take before him.

Viewing 30 posts - 4,051 through 4,080 (of 7,414 total)