Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 530 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: life in computer-years #156512
    Hram
    Participant

    That was awesome, thank you for sharing. I’m a bit less than one computer behind you in both computers and computer years. 🙂

    Hram
    Participant

    Thanks for pointing that out. As I was reading through the draft analysis, I was trying to figure out the reason behind the couple of commentators who stated we needed help at linebacker, when We drafted help at linebacker… 🙂

    in reply to: our reactions to the 2025 draft #156184
    Hram
    Participant

    Everything they did made sense to me. I like that They scored the first round pick from Atlanta for next year.

    I also like that they moved around in the draft to get the players they wanted where need meets value for where they had them rated and where they did not want to take risk cause they might not fall further. I like that they seem to be taking Aaron Donald‘s advice to heart and getting players who wants to play. The game.

    The only potential positions they did not fill and I think, in my opinion, that would’ve been good to have was a swing offensive tackle and a cornerback, but the off-season also is not over.

    It wasn’t an exciting draft for me, it seemed very workman like and precise.

    Efficient and, in a way, calculating.

    in reply to: 5th Rd. Pick 178 Chris Paul, Jr. Inside LB #156166
    Hram
    Participant

    So you are saying he is even better than Jamie Duncan??!!

    in reply to: Rams trade to get rnd 5 pick 148, draft DT #156152
    Hram
    Participant

    Sure would be helpful if they could 🙂

    in reply to: round 2 pick 46 Rams take TE Terrance Ferguson #156082
    Hram
    Participant

    From Brady Balhorn

    Out of 100+ draft-eligible D1 tight ends in my database, Terrance Ferguson was:

    – 1st in YAC per reception (9.0)
    – 5th in receiving yards (591)
    – T-5th 40 yard dash time (4.63, fastest at the combine)

    Big time talent, nice pickup for the Rams.

    Me: comes from a team with a good culture and was productive with several QBs. I believe he only did 15 reps on the bench and his big issue , I think, is he probably he needs to get stronger

    • This reply was modified 1 month ago by Hram.
    in reply to: round 2 pick 46 Rams take TE Terrance Ferguson #156069
    Hram
    Participant

    I watched a lot of Oregon ducks games and the write up is spot on imo.

    The one thing it did not include is his yards after catch is excellent.

    Has the potential to be a solid number one tight end if he can continue to improve a few things.

    Not powerful as a run, blocker nor tenacious at it, but if he can improve that he could be used a little bit in the Cooper Kupp role imo

    Taken an earlier than most mock drafts, but I think there were only a couple consensus day two tight ends left on the board, it was one of the positions with less depth in this draft. And the consensus also is that players between about pick 16 and 100is not that different from each other, it’s just pick the one that you like.

    I’m surprised they did not trade down again, but McVay must really have wanted a pass catching tight end

    • This reply was modified 1 month ago by Hram.
    • This reply was modified 1 month ago by Hram.
    in reply to: so far Rams have 10 picks in 2026 #156043
    Hram
    Participant

    Thank you for posting this as I was wondering.

    I’m trying to figure out how they can accumulate two 6ths 🙂

    • This reply was modified 1 month ago by Hram.
    Hram
    Participant

    I’m guessing they’d trade out even if Dart was still there. They really have 15 to 20 players rated about the same and they don’t have any specific need, then they essentially traded a third round pick this year for a first round pick next year. Sounds good to me.

    Perhaps the humidity dropped to move around and get the quarterback they want next year? Let’s hope Atlanta goes zero and 17 next year. 🙂

    in reply to: Rosey Grier and Fearsome Foursome singing #155018
    Hram
    Participant

    That was fun, thank you 🙂

    in reply to: Actually moving to Minnesota #154858
    Hram
    Participant

    Mack, a belated best wishes from me. I trust your new home is just what you hoped it would be!

    in reply to: our reactions to the Eagles game #154847
    Hram
    Participant

    I agree with everything you said.

    It was tough to see them, not be able to get a yard or two when they needed it that many times in one game.

    They showed heart in this game, as they did for the whole season.

    in reply to: our reactions to the wildcard game #154644
    Hram
    Participant

    Fun game to watch as a rams fan. Defense, special teams, and just enough offense.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Seattle game #154459
    Hram
    Participant

    I think better than expected sums it up well.

    On to the first round of the playoffs!

    in reply to: our reactions to the ARZ game #154281
    Hram
    Participant

    They are just winning. Amazing.

    I’m unsure of their ceiling and I doubt they are suddenly going to put it all together for a deep playoff run, but I am enjoying the wins however they occur.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Jetz game #154087
    Hram
    Participant

    Tough cold-weather game across the country and early in the day for a West Coast team.

    Defense came up big on several 4th downs.

    I’ll take the gritty win 🙂

    in reply to: our reactions to the 9ers game #153863
    Hram
    Participant

    I think we can win reasonably often when we hold the other team to 6 points.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Bills game #153732
    Hram
    Participant

    Offense did alright. 🙂

    Rams kept punching back, that was good to see.

    And

    A Win!

    in reply to: our reactions to the Saints game #153587
    Hram
    Participant

    Love that the offense came alive in the second half.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Eagles game #153502
    Hram
    Participant

    Eagles just looked better.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Patz game #153341
    Hram
    Participant

    Those two WRs might be pretty decent. 🙂

    in reply to: our reactions to the Dolphins game #153276
    Hram
    Participant

    Defense played well enough to win.

    Oline needs some time together.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Vikes game #152746
    Hram
    Participant

    Fun game to watch.

    in reply to: our reactions to the Raiders game #152664
    Hram
    Participant

    Defense played well.  Got some pressure on the QB.

    if they can get healthy on offense, they would be competitive.

    in reply to: our reponses to the Bears game #152466
    Hram
    Participant

    They had chances

    I was hoping they could pull it out

    Just too many injuries

    in reply to: our reactions to Rams beating 9ers #152312
    Hram
    Participant

    Wow!

    in reply to: developments on defense? #150839
    Hram
    Participant

    You mean watch the Rams games this year?!

    hmmm, good plan 🙂

    in reply to: BT checked in, wish him well #150812
    Hram
    Participant

    Best wishes BT!

    in reply to: how Rams draft #150749
    Hram
    Participant

    Add Massey, that was the biggest loss for me, even more than Olsen and Youngblood.

    in reply to: our own takes on this draft #150612
    Hram
    Participant

    I don’t think they lost ground, I think the draft kept them even for this year.

    from the draft reports it seems that most of the players weaknesses are things that are coachable.  Given that most of the player’s strengths is tenacity, my guess is cumulatively, they will take to coaching.

    I like the idea that they will platoon the Dline.

    provided the Oline was fixed in free agency, they should be pretty darn good.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 530 total)