Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 811 through 840 (of 1,028 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: interview with Foles (transcript) #21141
    Herzog
    Participant

    He said all the right things so far.

    3 or 4 comeback wins os a good thing.

    Herzog
    Participant

    Who do they have that’s as good?

    in reply to: JT chat….3/18 #21093
    Herzog
    Participant

    I don’t blame Fisher at all. He wants to control the flow of information. I get that.

    Herzog
    Participant

    I have a Real bad feeling about this years draft.

    in reply to: Foles has one year left…future at qb? #20879
    Herzog
    Participant

    at some point, we have to have people to step in for other people.

    We’ve been so low on talent, for so long, that it’s hard to conceptualizer that we need a constant influx of talent, even at positions that we feel good about.

    Last year we went HEAVY on secondary. Next year it’ll be time for these guys to earn their keep.

    in reply to: How good (or bad) will the Defense be? #20849
    Herzog
    Participant

    time for you to accept that and move Abandon this futile hope that JJ becomes a reliable and consistent corner because it’s not going to happen and I don’t want to see you get hurt.

    LOL you are freaking hilarious…. And probably right.

    Sucks though… All that God given ability…. Yet one blindspot ruins it all.

    in reply to: Lineman with Boudreau connection visiting #20846
    Herzog
    Participant

    I’m with you 100 %.

    You know what’s nutz? Last year we signed Saffold, and drafted Robinson…..and those two are the only starters we have. I really can’t believe it.

    in reply to: Foles has one year left…future at qb? #20844
    Herzog
    Participant

    Holy shiest. What that tells me is that we HAVE to draft our qb of the future in this draft.

    We also need to draft people to step in for the people that are gonna be cap casualties next year.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Herzog.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Avatar photozn.
    in reply to: Foles has one year left…future at qb? #20839
    Herzog
    Participant

    19 million over how many years? Or are you saying per year?

    in reply to: Lineman with Boudreau connection visiting #20838
    Herzog
    Participant

    Cheap help on the Oline…. Ain’t nothing wrong wth that

    in reply to: How good (or bad) will the Defense be? #20823
    Herzog
    Participant

    If GW is trustworthy, than top 5. However Jenkins alone could screw it up.

    If not, than first in sacks, blitzes, and big plays given up. Top 20 defense.

    IM not sure if I trust him yet.

    in reply to: So I'm wearing my Rams jacket to the gym today #20759
    Herzog
    Participant

    Hahahaha your wife is cool

    in reply to: the Philly/Bradford side of the trade story #20747
    Herzog
    Participant

    That’s the perfect word for Chip Kelly: Hubris. I see many differences in JJ and Chip.

    Kelly’s health and science program didn’t do much to prevent Vick and Foles from getting hurt. It can’t control what happens on the field.

    Jaworsky absolutely LOvED Foles in 2013. Said he had great vision and was light years ahead of his age. In 2014….. Not so much.

    Herzog
    Participant

    Arite, I’m getting nervous… It’s time Snisher started doing something about this Oline. AG….. Make the cal

    in reply to: Draft thots #20744
    Herzog
    Participant

    I was going to say the same thing. Being a Mizzou fan…The dudes a time bomb

    in reply to: where the cap stands now 3/16 #20700
    Herzog
    Participant

    I don’t want them to cut Givens. I want them to stop trying to use him as an all around receiver and make use them as they did his rookie year…as a deep threat specialist.

    Foley can sell the play action…. Givens could have value.

    in reply to: 920, 11/14 … JT, … & Torry Holt #20699
    Herzog
    Participant

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>zn wrote:</div>
    moklerman

    JT said in the radio interview that Bradford was willing to take a pay cut and they were working on that up until the combine when they found out he was being shopped by the Rams. That’s when talks broke down. Bradford wanted to remain a Ram and was willing to take a pay cut but the Rams low-balled him first and then started shopping him. Bradford decided not to take the paycut because it would just facilitate a trade.

    This is very different from what we have been hearing.

    Well… It was from JT…. So….

    in reply to: "The Trade" — Yes, or No #20650
    Herzog
    Participant

    PS. About getting a #1 …

    You get a #1 … OR …

    You get a proven, starting QB.

    You don’t get both!

    Exactly. A number 1 draft pick and no proven starter equals a guaranteed bad season.

    in reply to: "The Trade" — Yes, or No #20634
    Herzog
    Participant

    It’s a resounding YES from me. I believe this was by far the smartest route to build our team for next year and beyond.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams mailbag #20562
    Herzog
    Participant

    Just passing along the info.

    Sorry bro, I meant no disrespect. Zooey’s right, I was just aiming my smartassery at JT, not you.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams mailbag #20552
    Herzog
    Participant

    as if JT knows.

    in reply to: Fairley #20551
    Herzog
    Participant

    This feels surreal. My first instinct is… What’s wrong with him.

    However, if he plays up to his talent, than I can’t comprehend how good this defensive line will be.

    Put ayers in as an additional pass rusher….. Just a nasty pass rush.

    Too bad other facets of the game matter.

    in reply to: Quinn, Donald, Fairley-Brockers, Long #20544
    Herzog
    Participant

    Wasn’t there a line with Leslie o’neal, Gilbert and Kevin Green (although he was technically a linebacker)

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Herzog.
    in reply to: #PleaseResignBarksdaleNow!!!! #20322
    Herzog
    Participant

    Right tackles aren’t that easy to find. Are they?

    in reply to: Welcome back -X- #20320
    Herzog
    Participant

    I’m a bit confused. It’s all good though

    in reply to: Nick Foles 2013-14 Highlightts #20311
    Herzog
    Participant

    I like the pocket presence and the play action. He’s the guy to steer the ship….. A ship with a good defense and a good running game.

    If either of those things don’t happen for the Rams, then Foles likely won’t elevate them. If all these things do happen, than I don’t see why he can’t take us to the promised land.

    I’m getting real worried about the o line though. I’m tired of “building” an online. We have to have something respectable.

    in reply to: Foles is not elevating this team #20103
    Herzog
    Participant

    Yeah? Well…Cignetti sucks.

    The playcalling sucks

    in reply to: Who Is Nick Foles? #20099
    Herzog
    Participant

    I just watched some highlights. I am really surprised at how many of his touchdowns came on play action. He does seem to have some decent pocket awareness.

    in reply to: the Wells/Long "bad signings?" debate #20088
    Herzog
    Participant

    I didn’t like the Long signing because I thought he was beat up and overrated. And, when he played here, he really didn’t look that good to me for a LT. I never really thought it was a great move. Now, if they lose Barksdale and they can re-sign Long cheap as a RT possibility, I’m OK with that. But, you better have a Plan B.

    I think that if we don’t sign Barksdale, we are royally screwed.

    in reply to: the Wells/Long "bad signings?" debate #20085
    Herzog
    Participant

    People say that and never prove it. Did Brady get hurt again? Did Adrian Peterson? Did Kendricks get hurt again, after his surgery?

    Wells had one routine scope. He wasn’t hurt in the way you mean that.

    Long had arm surgeries—why would that mean he would rip up his knee. The issue was entirely whether he could still function at a high level after the arm injuries. No one said “he will get hurt again, in a different way” when he was signed.

    I think the “guys get hurt again” thing is myth. Until someone gives me percentages, I just will always continue to think it is myth.

    They CAN get both old and beat up and find it hard to come back. That would describe Wells NOW. Not when he signed.

    Now there are guys like Saffold whose luck is so bad, if it’s not one damm thing it’s another. Over and over. But none of that described those 2 (Long and Wells) when they signed.

    I believe that you and Chip Kelly subscribe to the same philosophy.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Herzog.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Avatar photozn.
Viewing 30 posts - 811 through 840 (of 1,028 total)