Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 871 through 900 (of 1,055 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    sdram wrote:
    I had the same experience. The only radio we had until I was 12 was the family car radio so I’d sit in my parents 66 BelAire station wagon and listen to the game. They bought me a radio for Christmas when I was 12 and I wore that thing out listening to the Dodgers, Angels, Rams and Lakers in the late sixties and early seventies. Gawd how I loved to listen to Enberg, Vinny, Jerry Dogget, and Chicky Baby.

    Who was chicky baby? Only heard that phrase once before.

    Chick Hearn voice of the LA Lakers for 3338 consecutive games 1965 – 2002.

    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Very cool to hear that voice, the one that seemed to say Deacon Jones on every play back when I was 8 or 9yrs old. I grew up in L.A. as well.

    in reply to: Best WR in the NFC West? #14239
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Makes me wonder how Quick would have ended up with out injury.

    in reply to: How good is Shaun Hill? Hill after the last 5 games #14023
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Eternal Ramnation wrote:
    I don’t know about the numbers but after watching the Washington game Hill was not at all impressive in my view anyway.Looks like the same thing that happened to Davis when he started playing against good Defenses, they have recent film on him now. When he gets rattled he throws way too high and ball security goes to shit. A number of the “good throws” were in reality great plays by Britt and Bailey on poorly thrown balls.Vermeil said backups can have a good game or two but to win consistently you need more talent at the QB position. He also said they should get rid of Long because he gave up the hit that took Bradford out.

    It is true that the ARz defense got to the Rams OL and that had an effect on Hill. But from what I saw, nothing about it was Davis level. And in fact all that happened there, to me, was that a defense that matches up well with the Rams offense did to Hill what the Rams defense did to Manning this year and Luck last year.

    Not that Hill is Luck or Manning, but he is better than that one game. Evidence of that was the way they broke out late in the 4th and drove on ARz, and that included some timely sharp throws from Hill. It wasn’t enough that game, but he did not melt down Davis style.

    I agree zn, I did not mean he had a melt down only that he came back to Earth once teams got some film on him. He is a very good backup but , he is definitely a back up

    in reply to: How good is Shaun Hill? Hill after the last 5 games #13951
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I don’t know about the numbers but after watching the Washington game Hill was not at all impressive in my view anyway.Looks like the same thing that happened to Davis when he started playing against good Defenses, they have recent film on him now. When he gets rattled he throws way too high and ball security goes to shit. A number of the “good throws” were in reality great plays by Britt and Bailey on poorly thrown balls.Vermeil said backups can have a good game or two but to win consistently you need more talent at the QB position. He also said they should get rid of Long because he gave up the hit that took Bradford out.

    in reply to: Rams determine NFC West QBs #13855
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    That goes way back , remember when the Rams knocked the Vikes Brad Johnson out opening the door for Randall Cunningham and a 15 and 1 season ?

    in reply to: Offensive line woes dragging down Rams #13824
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I thought that our defensive line whipped their offensive line pretty solid,” Arians said. “When they were making tackles behind the line of scrimmage, there was usually an offensive lineman holding onto their legs but somehow those flags never got called.”
    “But we were tackling them for losses, so it didn’t matter.”

    w
    v

    The guy’s an asshole. The Cards were holding Donald and Quinn throughout the game.Arians has got so many calls his way especially in AZ. How many late hits did Hill take ? Most were blows to the head and a least one at the knees well after the throw.He has nothing to complain about, the Refs have been the Cards MVP’s this season. Reminds me of the Cowboy fans.

    in reply to: We will be drafting a QB nextyear. #13775
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I think the Rams should just go OL in the draft ,we need a center and R&F Guards,I like Saffold but he gets hurt a lot. A dominant OL would help more than any rookie QB the Rams can draft.

    in reply to: arizona game reaction thread #13693
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    To me Hill looked the same tonight as against Wash. No consistency ,one good pass one WTF pass.He reads defenses better than Davis but the erratic accuracy is about the same.

    in reply to: 90% pick Rams #13676
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    This team makes me feel stupid every time I watch them,no heart ,no brains the world champions of disappointment. I wish they would retire the name Rams while we can still remember the one good year they had.

    in reply to: Oakland vs SF #13358
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Yup you guys are right jeez I was still on the 3 division alignment. Still not likely but there is indeed a chance.

    in reply to: Oakland vs SF #13344
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I don’t think that is accurate. The Rams needed both Hawks and Cards to lose out and go 9 and 7 so they would win the division on tie-breakers. Wild card Dallas and Philly and vikes own tie breakers over Rams. Their shot was to win division.

    in reply to: Oakland vs SF #13330
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    And Arizona beat KC.
    Sets up a good game with the Rams.

    w
    v

    Actually means the Rams are officially out of playoffs

    in reply to: Cosell on 920, 12/5 #13254
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Eternal Ramnation wrote:
    The part about TA’s use as a threat to set up Mason’s screen is for me obvious TA is stressing defenses whether or not he touches the ball

    ER, I’d be interested in knowing what you see that causes you to say that.

    I don’t see it at all. TA has touched the ball many times in 2 years, and I rarely had any sense that the defense was finding it hard to close the door on him.

    People say that down field plays are set up by adjustments to TA. Well, how is what defenses are doing any different from what they would do A) trying to shut Tre down and B) not generally respecting our WRs?

    Honestly. What do you see? I don’t see it at all.

    Well RFL , it is a recent development but the whole sequence against Oakland screen TA left 1st down Screen Ta right 1st down. The next play to me anyways ( I’ve just watched that opening drive many times) Hill fakes another screen to TA left and it draws the whole defense in TA’s direction,not for long but with Mason’s speed a second is enough.Later on the next drive when Bailey starts heating up TA when he’s in is freeing up Bailey by drawing the better coverage towards TA.Then of course on Mason’s 89yrd run TA actually gets 2 blocks when he catches Mason and escorts him to the endzone, nice play without the ball.Also the speed sweep TA’s scored on looked to me like it was commanding respect the rest of the game.So I do think they use him effectively as a threat more so these last 2 games. On the negative side I do think TA is a slow learner, I mean they tried to run that sweep early against the Vikes and it didn’t seem he understood where and when he had to be for the design of the play and he would do the freelance stutter step dance for a 1 yd gain.

    in reply to: Cosell on 920, 12/5 #13236
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    The part about TA’s use as a threat to set up Mason’s screen is for me obvious TA is stressing defenses whether or not he touches the ball

    in reply to: S Mark Barron now a Ram…. #13146
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Looks like a brilliant move to me,he looked fine in coverage against Oakland but in any case love the way he hits!

    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    My beef is with the cops to have the gall to claim offense over a simple hand gesture that is in reality very good advice for anybody being approached by police. Some will point to looting and Browns thuggery and claim it was in support of such activity.There were at least 4 other unarmed black men killed within the month of Browns death and for the cops to try to pull the focus off that fact and make it about their egos, well that’s offensive to me.

    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I commend the players that did and wish it was the whole team.The KKK connected military armed incompetent cops were offended? Fuck em.

    in reply to: This Sunday in San Diego Lot P3 #12560
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>GreatRamNTheSky wrote:</div>
    There was a lot of good things in this game and you can see that Stedman Bailey and Tavon Austin are finally looking comfortable and becoming a big part of this offense. Still, this was the Rams game to win and that decision to throw that pass without any real pressure on him makes Hill look like an idiot.

    This could have been a huge win for the Rams and next week they could have been playing for 500 with 4 games left after that.
    Inexcusable is what that interception was and is. Hate to put all the blame on one player for that loss but in this case it is deserved and the goat horns belong to Hill.

    The more I think about what could have been and it makes me feel sick.

    Grits

    Except there’s a reason Tavon and Bailey are back in the game–Davis couldn’t make those throws. The re-emergence of the Rams receivers is directly related to Hill. Someone posted a stat–the qb in the entire NFL with the fewest percentage of throws outside the hash marks was Davis. He can’t drive the ball so a lot of the throws Hill made to Bailey would never happen.

    And Hill alone did not lose that game.

    Here are 3 things that lost the game:

    * defense fell back on poor tackling, as opposed to the Denver game.

    * Mistakes. Rams mistakes led to a blocked punt, a basically unblocked qb sack and strip, 2 TDs called back cause of penalties.

    * Hill was solidly effective overall but misread that redzone play. He gets graded down for that because if you’re trailing late in the 4th with a chance to win the qb has to come through. But that doesn’t make him the sole cause of the loss.

    Those three things are off the top of my head and without re-watching the game.

    Subtract any one of those things and they win even if the other things still happen. For example, subtract #2 and it never gets down to 1 redzone play in the final minute.

    That’s my view anyway. So we see this one very differently.

    I agree it was not the sole cause of the loss. At least 2 td’s negated by bogus penalties. I do differ in your view of the wr’s re-emergence . Quick’s injury was a big factor there. Prior to KC Davis was spraying it around everywhere and TA couldn’t get of the line (remember Sherman holding his arm out straight pre-snap and TA still couldn’t make it into the play). In my view the OL implosion and resultant beating Davis took at KC changed Davis so I have pre KC and post KC Davis being different players.Also with the OL continuity and personnel issues we needed TE’s to help in pass pro add to that the Defenses that Davis faced SEA,SF twice AZ and KC were all quite a bit better than Denver or SD.Davis can throw those passes but not when he’s panicked shell shocked to the point where he doesn’t trust his OL enough to set his feet.After KC I don’t know that he will ever get it back. I know I noticed and Savard remarked early how he kept his eye’s downfield in the face of the pass rush reminded him of Warner. I don’t remember any comparisons after KC.

    in reply to: I will be gone for 4 days with limited access starting tomorrow #12536
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Good juju slingshot engaged .

    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    The Rams have a lot of talent but are deficient in intelligence. This has to be the dumbest team to ever wear the horns.It’s kinda strange we don’t see sweeps or screens anymore. I am wondering if TA’s problems are he can’t learn the offense ?Cook must really be hurting(back) so much though it affects his thinking.The officiating was horrible as usual,how many TD’s nullified ? It boggles the mind.Barksdale’s hands to the face did they even look at Quinn’s side of the field? It seems like whenever Fisher complains about something the refs lock on to the Rams to prove Fisher wrong.1st and Goal why is Stacy even on this team, he is the perfect back for those conditions.JL was awful in coverage

    in reply to: Sanders on the McCleod hit #12368
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Emmanuel Sanders: Was a legal hit

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1…-denver-broncos-says-hit-was-legal-ready-play

    ENGLEWOOD, Colo. – Denver Broncos wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders said Friday he’s ready to play Sunday against the Miami Dolphins and that St. Louis Rams safety Rodney McLeod made “a legal hit” on the tackle that resulted in Sanders’ concussion.

    Sanders did add, however, he believed McLeod could have made more of an attempt to go for the ball rather than the hit.

    “I think it was a legal hit,” Sanders said after Friday’s practice. “Obviously, [McLeod] didn’t hit me in the head or lead with the head. He hit me with the shoulder. But in terms of the intentions of targeting, I feel like the guy could have had an opportunity to go for the ball, but I think his intentions the whole time were to come over and deliver a blow. That’s the only thing that I’m not too happy about.

    “I feel like the National Football League, although it is a violent game, you’re also supposed to protect your brother. And most free safeties, they like interceptions. Obviously, his intent was to try and make a statement, and I guess he did.”

    Sanders was knocked out of last Sunday’s 22-7 Broncos loss on the fourth play of the second half. Peyton Manning threw a ball deep up the right sideline and McLeod arrived, with shoulder to shoulder contact, asSanders was diving to try to make the catch.

    Friday was also the first time Sanders had spoken extensively about the play.

    “Yeah, I remember the play,” Sanders said. “I remember everything. I had a go ball, I had the corner one-on-one, and I had beat the corner, and I was actually open, and I was running, and I laid out for the ball, and he came over and he didn’t even look at the ball the entire time, he was just looking at me and ready to hit me.”

    Well Sanders was definitely not a defenseless player. I don’t want my FS going for picks ,I want him doing his job as the last line of defense and saving a TD. McCleod took a lot of care in hitting a very quickly moving small target within the rules which is not an easy task in todays NFL.He did protect his brother not hitting with his helmet not hitting Sanders in the head or knees.That said I could understand that hit scaring the crap out of him but this is the NFL and the Rams D is going to hit as hard and often as they can,it’s what great D’s do.

    in reply to: Hill and some of the small differences he makes #12326
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Eternal Ramnation wrote:
    much better,snappier than the long looping release on the last pass in game 1.

    To be fair on that pass…that’s when he had the bad leg…the quad. There are references in JT, for example, to the fact that he made that pass on one leg. He couldn’t plant and use good form. He wound that one up to heave it.

    The thing about Hill for me is the brain-arm synergy. He has a pretty quick release, some nice velocity, but it’s combined with very quick decisions. Like on the TD to Britt–on the replay, endzone view, you can see it. The INSTANT he sees Britt it’s load it and zing it.

    Yeah it wasn’t meant as a rip on Hill it was just the one that stuck in my mind. When I went back and looked at the vikes game there were nice throws in that game but still he looked quicker to me last week.

    in reply to: Hill and some of the small differences he makes #12284
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    One thing that surprised me was arm strength. Fisher said something about Hill’s arm being fresh from the time off (he did throw a lot in camp and preseason,more than he is used to) Britt remarked how he must have spent the time off in the weight room. When I rewatched the game somewhere between 4 and 4 million times his delivery looked much better,snappier than the long looping release on the last pass in game 1.

    in reply to: JT, Rams chat #12155
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Agamemnon wrote:
    He could own 2 teams and move them both to San Diego.

    Only a two-headed man
    could do such a thing.

    w
    v

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN6PYJaJiV8

    in reply to: Hill #11976
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Yes I have to admit I underestimated Hill abilities . He had a few misfires but was very cool under fire and there were some throws that Davis doesn’t make. The running game was going well against the #1 rated Rushing Defense in the NFL.

    in reply to: OMG! OMG! OMG! (Denver post-game thread) #11968
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    That Jello pie is not pie!

    True that!

    in reply to: OMG! OMG! OMG! (Denver post-game thread) #11965
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Eternal Ramnation wrote: Hill looked good but when you hold the Denver Broncos to 7pts everything starts to look better! Tre Mason busting out into triple digit yardage.Safety’s knocking people out of the game week after week.It looked to be a much improved OL Hill had plenty of time and made good decisions and showed toughness when GRob turned Ware loose for a vicious sack fumble he was fortunate the ball bounced right back to him </span></span>

    Robinson did have that one screw up but overall he played fantastic and I’ll take him over Jake Long.

    I have no complaints with the line today–they gave Hill enough time and were able to run the ball.

    This was a true team win.

    Yes I agree I was stunned by watching the D take over and dominate the game!The blown coverage on the td would have sent this team into a tail spin in weeks past. Now let’s see if they can win 2 in a row

    in reply to: OMG! OMG! OMG! (Denver post-game thread) #11962
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    PA Ram wrote:
    I can’t remember when I enjoyed a Rams game so much.

    Very solid football.

    Rams D was everything I wanted them to be.

    Hill was fantastic. Well managed.

    Game balls all around.

    That was fun!

    Pie and cake for everyone.

    And that’s official.

    Real chocolate pie like my Mom use to make or the fake stuff made will Jello instant pudding that Grandma tried to pawn off on me ?

    in reply to: OMG! OMG! OMG! (Denver post-game thread) #11958
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Hill looked good but when you hold the Denver Broncos to 7pts everything starts to look better! Tre Mason busting out into triple digit yardage.Safety’s knocking people out of the game week after week.It looked to be a much improved OL Hill had plenty of time and made good decisions and showed toughness when GRob turned Ware loose for a vicious sack fumble he was fortunate the ball bounced right back to him

Viewing 30 posts - 871 through 900 (of 1,055 total)