Marc Trestman for Rams OC in 2015

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Marc Trestman for Rams OC in 2015

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #14965
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    The man is a genius offensive mind. He simply had a coach killer at QB.

    I think the Rams could do worse things then replace Schotty with Trestman.

    Grits

    #14966
    rfl
    Participant

    I’d rather replace Greg Williams. He’s a coach-killer, IMO.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    #14968
    zn
    Moderator

    The man is a genius offensive mind. He simply had a coach killer at QB.

    I think the Rams could do worse things then replace Schotty with Trestman.

    Grits

    I don’t think they are going to replace Schott. I actually agree with them on that. I think Schott is solid–I don’t think he’s an issue. I think the issues we see on offense have to do with personnel, injuries, and execution.

    #14969
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    I think your partially right ZN. But Schotty is not going to make anyone forget Mike Martz or Sid Gilman as a play caller. I don’t think he knows how to utilize the talent he has in Austin and Bailey etc.

    I hope they replace him. He’s had three years to show what he has as a play caller. And even executing the plays still comes down to coaching.

    Grits

    #14970
    zn
    Moderator

    I think your partially right ZN. But Schotty is not going to make anyone forget Mike Martz or Sid Gilman as a play caller. I don’t think he knows how to utilize the talent he has in Austin and Bailey etc.

    I hope they replace him. He’s had three years to show what he has as a play caller. And even executing the plays still comes down to coaching.

    Grits

    We just disagree. Way I see it, I think he’s very solid and I actually had issues with Martz. I think he does know how to utilize talent. I think it’s the learning curve issue with those players. And no not all execution issues come down to coaching.

    #15004
    GreatRamNTheSky
    Participant

    I think this is kind of like just after the 1998 season and the Rams were about to can Dick Vermeil. They forced him to make changes to his staff and to bring in Martz as the OC. I think Fisher is only fooling himself if he thinks the offense will be any better next season with Schottenheimer. There are at least 4 guys who are OCs that are better than Schottenheimer, and they are available. Trestman, Chudzinski, Mike Shanahan, Mike Martz.

    Grits

    #15008
    TackleDummy
    Participant

    I think this is kind of like just after the 1998 season and the Rams were about to can Dick Vermeil. They forced him to make changes to his staff and to bring in Martz as the OC. I think Fisher is only fooling himself if he thinks the offense will be any better next season with Schottenheimer. There are at least 4 guys who are OCs that are better than Schottenheimer, and they are available. Trestman, Chudzinski, Mike Shanahan, Mike Martz

    I would not bet that any of the four would accept an OC job which would say they are not available. And Martz would not at all fit in with the Rams. He has a very large ego problem and cannot get along with anyone. He would not follow orders. I would not like his baggage at all.

    #15010
    wv
    Participant

    I think this is kind of like just after the 1998 season and the Rams were about to can Dick Vermeil. They forced him to make changes to his staff and to bring in Martz as the OC. I think Fisher is only fooling himself if he thinks the offense will be any better next season with Schottenheimer. There are at least 4 guys who are OCs that are better than Schottenheimer, and they are available. Trestman, Chudzinski, Mike Shanahan, Mike Martz.

    Grits

    Well, I am tired of bonehead mistakes on offense
    and defense. So, the last thing i want
    is for the players on either unit to have to learn
    a new System.

    Fisher and these coaches are gonna get a
    Year FOUR. Expectations will be high.
    Let us see what they do.

    w
    v

    #15012
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I think this is kind of like just after the 1998 season and the Rams were about to can Dick Vermeil. They forced him to make changes to his staff and to bring in Martz as the OC. I think Fisher is only fooling himself if he thinks the offense will be any better next season with Schottenheimer. There are at least 4 guys who are OCs that are better than Schottenheimer, and they are available. Trestman, Chudzinski, Mike Shanahan, Mike Martz.

    Grits

    Problem is, if the owner tells Fisher to make changes, Fisher may say “take this job and shove it,” or something like that. If Fisher would be let go, he would take his talents to Oakland or Chicago.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by JackPMiller.
    #15017
    zn
    Moderator

    I think this is kind of like just after the 1998 season and the Rams were about to can Dick Vermeil. They forced him to make changes to his staff and to bring in Martz as the OC. I think Fisher is only fooling himself if he thinks the offense will be any better next season with Schottenheimer. There are at least 4 guys who are OCs that are better than Schottenheimer, and they are available. Trestman, Chudzinski, Mike Shanahan, Mike Martz.

    Grits

    Well, though, actually, that;s not what happened in the 99 off-season. They did not force him to bring in Martz and in fact, the previous OC, Rhome, was in trouble with Vermeil as early as August 98 (DV even took over the playcalling for a spell). Firing Rhome was all DV and it happened before DV met with Shaw. All DV agreed to with Shaw was to hire a coordinator from outside. He in fact interviewed 2 (the other was Matt Cavanaugh) and the choice was his. (Shaw even directly said the Martz thing was all DV…meaning, it was DV’s choice to hire Martz not Cavanagh. And good thing too because it’s a really, really, really bad idea for management to force a coordinator on a head coach.) At one point in the process DV did speculate out loud that maybe they had their coordinator on the staff already (White), but, he backed down on that and went ahead and made his choice between the 2 guys he interviewed.

    We of course disagree on Schott. I think he’s a good coordinator and that even if SK did not think so he would not force Fisher to change.

    I think the offense WILL be better with Schott, an OL, and a qb whoever he is playing behind that OL. IN fact I think Schott is solid, and under-rated. I doubt anyone at Rams Park up to and including SK thinks otherwise.

    #15018
    Isiah58
    Participant

    I don’t understand what people genuinely expect from Schotty. I thought they were pretty darn creative on offense with what they had to work with. I saw plenty of motion, diversity, creativity, and effective play-calling this year. What I didn’t see is an offensive line that could consistently open up holes, or hold off blitzes in critical down and distances. And I saw a QB who was gutsy and a game, but severely limited who couldn’t make plays downfield or stand tall in the pocket and throw darts to receivers downfield. Not his fault, but that doesn’t fall on the Offensive Coordinator.

    Play-calling is a fans’ panacea. You never hear the players or the coaches talk about play-calling. Its about beating the man in front of you, you don’t trick people too often in this league. Schotty is plenty creative enough to get the job done – he just needs a few more pieces. Plus, you have to remember the Rams play six games against Top 5 defenses just in their division alone. Nobody is going to come in here and start putting up 30 point games consistently in this division for a while. And Marc Trestman’s Bears scored 15, 14, and 9 in their last three games (with superior offensive talent). Where was the brilliant play-calling there?

    “Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel.” - Homer Simpson

    #15023
    Eternal Ramnation
    Participant

    GreatRamNTheSky wrote:
    I think this is kind of like just after the 1998 season and the Rams were about to can Dick Vermeil. They forced him to make changes to his staff and to bring in Martz as the OC. I think Fisher is only fooling himself if he thinks the offense will be any better next season with Schottenheimer. There are at least 4 guys who are OCs that are better than Schottenheimer, and they are available. Trestman, Chudzinski, Mike Shanahan, Mike Martz

    I would not bet that any of the four would accept an OC job which would say they are not available. And Martz would not at all fit in with the Rams. He has a very large ego problem and cannot get along with anyone. He would not follow orders. I would not like his baggage at all.

    I agree Martz wouldn’t fit with these players but painting him as an ego maniac that can’t get along with anyone is simply wrong.If you need an OC to follow orders (which Fisher has stated many times he does not)then don’t hire someone to install their offense and call plays.With the exception of Chudzinski, Cutler is the common thread linking Trestman,Shanahan and Martz.Martz has improved the offense everywhere he’s been and when he leaves the opposite effect can be seen.

    #15028
    Mackeyser
    Moderator

    Here’s the knock on Schotty.

    His offense is brittle. It needs EVERYTHING and EVERYONE to be on point or it doesn’t work.

    Not every offense is like that. It’s like going into a battle with a rifle that needs to be perfectly cleaned and oiled and requiring perfectly loaded ammo and to then be held perfectly in order to even have a chance to be accurate. Otherwise, it hasn’t a chance to hit the broadside of a barn. Well, that’s Schotty’s offense. It CAN work and sometimes DOES work, but in the muck and mire of battle, things get messy… and his offense doesn’t allow for messy. Hell, the sight adjustments alone have accounted for more pick-6s against us than some other team’s TOTAL TDs given up as an offense. It’s ridiculous.

    And this draft had FOUR WRs who’ve had awesome years… NONE of them would have done dick in this offense. Why? Because the sight adjustments and overly complicated nature of it stymies WR development. Actually, I can’t think of ONE WR who’s flourished in this offense. Granted, it’s more of a running offense, but EVERY offense needs to be able to DEVELOP players at every position.

    And this one FAILS to develop WRs. Badly.

    Seriously, name me another team that HAS to wait 3 years on WRs to even start to judge? It’s one thing to say that guys don’t become complete until year 3… but this offense can make or break a WR totally and completely due to its complexity… some of it needless and counterproductive.

    Here’s my TL;dr take: when an offense can’t integrate talent because it’s too rigid, then it’s already failed. Joe Gibb’s offense (a Coryell variant) was very run heavy, but based on a passing offense. He adjusted to his team, climate, division and a host of other factors to ensure their success. Schotty and Fisher aren’t doing that. Years are going by while we wait on Tavon Austin to integrate into Schotty’s offense.

    Fucking WHY? If Tavon Austin were in Pittsburgh, he’d already be a 2k all around weapon. They’d be using him to do everything, but sell popcorn. If he were in Seattle, we would all be WISHING we’d taken him because Pete Carroll would make sure TA would be the bane of our existence…

    Lastly, and maybe this is personal… but this offense just doesn’t ask the QB to hit receivers in stride other than the TE down the seem or the super rare fly down the sideline. Where are the slants? Where are the crossing patterns? Why can’t or won’t Schotty call pass plays that allow for run after the catch?

    At its best, the Schotty offense with everyone at their best performing at their best… is a MIDDLING offense. It’s NOT a top 10 offense. Not over the course of a season. Over the stretch of a few games, maybe, but not a whole season. And that’s pegging the needle… with no injuries…and 100% execution… which happens in no universe in the multiverse. And that means that the Schotty offense is just NOT likely going to get us into the top half of NFL offenses.

    And to my mind, with all the talent we have… that’s just inexcusable. I don’t care if we have the greatest D to ever play the game. We have too much talent on O to be floundering like we are, to make the mistakes that we make, to have the poor calls made over and over and over again.

    Either we start over with the talent (which I think would be a massive mistake) because they just can’t consistently execute OR it’s a matter of coaching and the coaches need to go.

    It’s one or the other.

    And considering there’s also structural issues with this offense, I’m for moving on to better coaches…

    Jmho, ymmv

    Sports is the crucible of human virtue. The distillate remains are human vice.

    #15036
    zn
    Moderator

    Here’s the knock on Schotty.

    His offense is brittle. It needs EVERYTHING and EVERYONE to be on point or it doesn’t work.

    I don’t agree with that.

    I think it works just fine when it has all the normal stuff you would expect an offense to have.

    Like for example an interior line that isn’t banged up, together with a rookie OT.

    Here’s an example of what I mean.

    In 2007 Linehan’s offense were hit by multiple injuries in the OL. It was ranked 24th.

    In 2014 his Dallas offense is ranked 7th.

    The thing about Schott I like the most is that he is adaptable to personnel, and not a system first guy the way McD was. So I don’t think that offense is anything especially brittle or challenging. It’s just undermanned.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.