Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Nick Wagoner: Rams mailbag, parts 1 and 2
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 4 months ago by snowman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 25, 2015 at 12:34 pm #27558znModerator
Rams mailbag: Do Rams get enough respect?
Nick Wagoner
http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/19680/rams-mailbag-do-rams-get-enough-respect
EARTH CITY, Mo. — Well, we are almost there. The St. Louis Rams are set to open training camp Friday with rookies reporting Monday and the veterans jumping in Wednesday.
But before we get there, we’ve got time for another edition of the Rams Twitter mailbag.
As always, you can find me on Twitter @nwagoner. Please use hashtag #RamsMail so I can see your questions. On to business.
Josh @josharace
Are the Rams are underestimated by other teams?Don’t see much respect despite tough play vs good teams, with a backup@nwagoner: I think I understand what you’re getting at here with the implication that the Rams are able to pull off upsets against teams you wouldn’t think they can beat, so perhaps those teams overlook the Rams? I think there might be something to that idea though I think it’s important to note that these aren’t the same Rams that were pushovers before Jeff Fisher arrived. Now by no means are these Rams a dominant team or even an accomplished one, but if you’re playing a .500 team, that tells you that at least half the time they are coming to play and they have a knack for knocking off some of the better teams. They also have a knack for losing to teams that some would say they should beat. I do think the teams in the division respect the Rams and understand that they can lose to them if they don’t bring their best. But some teams — the Denver Broncos last year, the Indianapolis Colts the year before — certainly seem like maybe they overlook the Rams. Of course, the Rams would probably prefer to take everybody’s best shot because that would mean they’ve actually earned a level of respect commensurate with a team that wins on a regular basis.
LA Rams Fan Zone @LARamsFanZone
4 QB’s are one too many. Would Keenum or Davis have trade value if one has to go? We need draft picks for next year.@nwagoner: I find the battle for the No. 2 quarterback job to be one of the most fascinating entering camp for this reason: The loser not only won’t be the No. 3 quarterback but will probably be out of a job. In how many other jobs can you find where they keep three people, you’re competing for the second spot and if you lose, you’re out of a job completely? I think you also bring up a valid point. Let’s say the Rams keep Case Keenum. If that’s the case, I would think there’d be a team that would covet Austin Davis enough to make a deal for him. Maybe not but wouldn’t you want a guy who has starting experience and has showed he can at least offer hope in a spot start here and there? Perhaps the Rams could recoup the seventh-round choice they gave up for Keenum in that scenario. Maybe that was part of their thinking in bringing him back and having him compete with Davis. Either way, it’s going to be a tough decision when the time comes.
Michael Chase @Michael_Chase23
Is Lamarcus Joyner going to have a bigger role in the defense in year 2?@nwagoner: I believe the Rams would like to see him take on the nickelback role and make it his own moving forward but there’s going to be competition going on around him that could alter that outlook. The competition for the outside cornerback job is between E.J. Gaines and Trumaine Johnson. If Johnson wins that job, it’s likely that Gaines would kick inside to handle the slot job when the team goes into nickel. Likewise, they could also decide that they want to have Gaines start outside and kick inside to the slot in the nickel with Johnson coming in instead of keeping Gaines in place and having Lamarcus Joyner come in to handle the slot. But I think in an ideal world, the Rams want Joyner to win the nickel job with Gaines and Janoris Jenkins on the outside.
Jordan Gallacher @Jordan3110
According to coaches, Saffold was playing at Pro Bowl level at RG. Why move him and play 2 rookies on right side of OL?@nwagoner: This is a good question and one that I have wondered about myself. It’s something I’ll ask about as we get into camp but I have heard the Rams would like to leave Rodger Saffold at the same spot he played last year for once and that right guard is considered to be an easier adjustment for a rookie like Jamon Brown than the left side. Why that is, I don’t really know. But I do like the idea of spreading out what little experience you have on the line to give Havenstein a sounding board in Saffold and Greg Robinson there to help Brown.
Adam Johnson @acjohnson_ruiz
I watched JJ Watt’s top 100 video. Could we see Donald move around the line to take advantage of the best matchup, a la watt?@nwagoner: I put nothing past the creative mind of DC Gregg Williams. I think you’ll see Aaron Donald moving around and with some of the ways they use Robert Quinn, it wouldn’t surprise me to see Donald in other spots, either. I tend to think Donald probably isn’t best used as an edge rusher, but I could see scenarios in which you see him coming from the edge off a twist or stunt.
July 26, 2015 at 11:48 pm #27619znModeratorRams mailbag: Identifying camp’s biggest position battles
Nick Wagoner
EARTH CITY, Mo. — Well, we are almost there. The St. Louis Rams are set to open training camp on Friday with rookies reporting Monday and the veterans jumping in on Wednesday.
But before we get there, we’ve got time for another edition of the Rams Twitter mailbag.
As always, you can find me on Twitter @nwagoner. Please use hashtag #RamsMail so I can see your questions. On to business.
SeattleRams @seattlerams
Headed into camp, which position battles look to be the most contested over the summer? Center? OLB? 3rd RB?@nwagoner: Center is certainly the one that takes the prize here. I legitimately wouldn’t be surprised by any outcome in that battle between Barrett Jones, Tim Barnes and Demetrius Rhaney. For perspective, last week I projected Barnes as the starter heading into camp (though it’s really a dead heat) but also believe that he could be cut when they get to 53. The Rams are going to rotate all three players with the first-team offense and I believe they’d like Jones to win the job and Rhaney offers more upside. At this point, Barnes has some starting experience but that might not be enough to save his job after we go through camp and the preseason. And for what it’s worth, had the Rams not drafted tackle Isaiah Battle, I could’ve seen a scenario in which all three centers made the cut to 53. Maybe injuries will factor in and change things again, but attempting to project who starts at center on Sept. 13 right now is a really difficult exercise.
John Palmieri @JPalmieri30
Are the Rams currently trying to get an extension done with Janoris Jenkins? I think he is a must keep player.@nwagoner: Currently? I don’t know if that’s in the works at the moment but I do know the Rams have had some preliminary discussions with some players they’d like to keep around. Remember, they have a lot of unrestricted free agents after the season, so it stands to reason that if they have decided fully that they want to keep some of them, getting them done sooner than later would be a good thing. I believe they have interest in keeping Janoris Jenkins and wouldn’t be surprised if he was in the mix for a deal. I’ll be sure to check in on this further as we get into camp.
derrick costoplos @costoplos
I really thought Mason was the future,but it’s looking like a Lendale White/CJ combo thing now with Gurley.true?
@nwagoner: I don’t think it plays out that way. Tre Mason will get his opportunities, and certainly more than his share, until Todd Gurley is healthy. But when Gurley is at full speed, he’s going to be the primary guy. The Rams view him as their Adrian Peterson or Marshawn Lynch. Jeff Fisher even acknowledged he could be his new Eddie George. In other words, the Rams didn’t draft him to be part of an elaborate timeshare. He’ll be the focal point of the offense sooner than later.Cody Zick @zick823
Do you think Andrew Donnal or Jamon Brown will win a starting spot on the O-line?@nwagoner: Well, Jamon Brown was already working with the first team at right guard in the spring and the Rams seem pleased with his progress. I suppose things could change, but he seems to be in a really good spot when it comes to winning that job. Andrew Donnal is probably going to settle into a backup spot.
Gerald S. Reynolds @ranchghost_g
How can the team seriously compete with that offensive line?@nwagoner: Well, I suppose one could argue that simply making some changes will make the line better than it was last season. Despite their line woes a year ago, the Rams were competitive. But I also am assuming you mean can they contend rather than compete? We know the Rams will compete and be in the majority of their games. To me, the offensive line is the single biggest question of any position group on the team. That’s not breaking any new ground, but it’s certainly the case. How do two rookies fare? Who starts at center? Can Greg Robinson elevate his game? Can Rodger Saffold stay healthy? That’s a lot of questions to answer. I fully expect there to be plenty of growing pains for that group, but if it can prove capable of at least getting the job done in the run game and not be a total sieve pass blocking, the Rams will have a fighting chance. Still, it’s probably going to be a constant work in progress for most of the season, and it’s fair to wonder if it will be good enough for the Rams to actually contend for a playoff spot.
July 27, 2015 at 1:42 pm #27634snowmanParticipantAre the Rams are underestimated by other teams? Don’t see much respect despite tough play vs good teams, with a backup
I think the Rams have been chosen by many sportswriters and fans as the next “breakout” team for the last two years. Maybe they feel like they have been fooled and are taking a wait and see approach. Ehh. Preseason forecasts are just time fillers before training camp and preseason games begin.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.