Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 5,821 through 5,850 (of 8,019 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Man-eating deer #68489
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Speaking of eating humans, I went to see this last night.

    I predict a short and unprofitable future for this show.

    in reply to: I like Hockey #68488
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I love hockey, too. Especially in person. And I’ve been watching hockey since I was about 14, and there are still some rules I don’t understand.

    in reply to: Hawking: We have 100 years left #68487
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I really feel bad for young children. They are going to have to deal with some really fucked up conditions when they are my age.

    That thought goes through my mind every time I see or hear of a pregnancy. I just feel sad. Cuz those kids are going to deal with some really fucked up conditions when they are my age.

    in reply to: The Onion #68486
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I took it as a jab at the ineffectuality of serious critical thinking in the face of the typhoon of ignorance and irrationality.

    I wonder how Zizek would see it.

    in reply to: The Onion #68438
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    If only.

    in reply to: This shouldn't surprise anybody… #68402
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Nope. No surprise.

    It’s jaw-dropping how quickly principle disappears. All the furor over Obama’s executive orders, and golfing, and all that. Republican presidents exceeded his totals on both accounts, and nobody cares.

    It’s never principle.

    in reply to: Sam Rogers #68357
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Madison. Hedgecock.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    One of the more troubling aspects of modern society is the ascendancy of stupidity as the co-equal in value to intelligence.

    How in the name of god is any of this allowed the courtesy of debate?

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Seems to me that apart from Woods, all the WRs are slot receivers. I know Kupp got used on the outside in college, and I’ve got to think that is where he’s bound with the Rams although that may not be where he is best suited. But I can’t see Austin, Spruce, or Cooper out there. And all the other guys – Thomas, Marquez, McRoberts, North – should pack lightly. Spruce and Cooper may be vulnerable, but Woods, Kupp, Austin, and Reynolds are 4 of the 6 unless IR comes into it. Reynolds is the one to watch, as far as I’m concerned. If that guy can actually run short and medium routes as well as flying downfield, then things get interesting vis a vis Austin.

    in reply to: Mel Gibson's next jesus movie #68273
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I have many skills.

    Bush will take his rightful place in the Pantheon of great artists along with the elephant that paints and the visionary who first applied Elvis’ visage to velvet.

    High praise, indeed.

    I have him rated just a bit lower than that, myself. But we can agree to disagree, I hope.

    in reply to: Mel Gibson's next jesus movie #68270
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Wasn’t Apocalypto the film that showed why the brutal and corrupt Mayans needed to be saved from themselves by the Christian Conquistadors?

    Is that true?

    Because that’s what flashed through my mind when I watched the clip with Gibson in mind.

    Some of the historians and others critical of the film said that appeared to be the underlying message.

    What do you think George Bush’s place in the history of art will be? Or do you just do science stuff.

    in reply to: Mel Gibson's next jesus movie #68268
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Wasn’t Apocalypto the film that showed why the brutal and corrupt Mayans needed to be saved from themselves by the Christian Conquistadors?

    Is that true?

    Because that’s what flashed through my mind when I watched the clip with Gibson in mind.

    in reply to: Mel Gibson's next jesus movie #68267
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Hmm. Looks interesting.

    But I’m still not buying one of Bush’s paintings.

    in reply to: Mel Gibson's next jesus movie #68262
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Okay. I liked Apocalypto though. And, I have no plans to buy any Bush paintings.

    I never heard of Apocalypto. Was he a Spanish Surrealist?

    in reply to: Mel Gibson's next jesus movie #68260
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’m sorry. I know it’s petty and silly and ridiculous of me, but Mel Gibson is dead to me.

    To quote Bladerunner, he’s done…questionable things.

    But he can be a very good director.

    And George Bush has developed into an artist of some skill.

    I’m not buying one of his paintings, though.

    in reply to: Mel Gibson's next jesus movie #68252
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’m sorry. I know it’s petty and silly and ridiculous of me, but Mel Gibson is dead to me.

    in reply to: Democracy for Realists #68176
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I second what zn said, Waterfield. I saw your post last night, but was too tired to respond to it. I have to say I find it surprising anyone would argue that the “system” doesn’t shape us. If that were true, there would be no such thing as culture. We are largely shaped by the value system of our society. And even the people who think independently still have the “system” as their initial platform for asking questions.

    I haven’t read the book, but I would guess that people who identify with the image of being tough, independent, and strong identify with the Republican Brand, as do a lot of religious types, and nationalists. People who identify themselves as caring, compassionate, compromising for the greater good, and so on, identify with the Democrat Brand. I think that is just largely true.

    Meanwhile, study after study shows us that Americans, when it comes to actual policy positions, are largely to the left – significantly – of the Democrat Party. On all kinds of social and economic policies. But they continue to vote for politicians who oppose those policies. Why? Because they identify with the Brand. Just as people can’t tell the difference between one cola and another in blind taste tests, but are fiercely loyal to a single brand that you cannot convince them does not taste vastly superior to another brand, people’s own self-perception lines up with the marketing of the political parties.

    The authors also argue – and I agree with them – that if their Brand offers a policy view in contrast to the wishes of an individual, that person will adjust his view on the policy rather than vote for a candidate from a different party. “Well, I’m sure the President has some inside information that we don’t, so he knows what he’s doing….”

    So I can’t tell if we mean something different by the terms “system” and “machine” than you do, but it looks like it. I don’t think any of us sees the “system” as a conspiracy, or a “designed” force (although there are clearly people who have learned to manipulate the masses through Public Relations in all its many guises). It evolved into what it is, and it is mostly self-replicating. Just like culture is. Now it does morph, and it can be nudged this way and that through media exposure, and so on, but it mostly just reproduces its value system in the people who grow up in it.

    in reply to: informal poll…how do you rate this draft? #68169
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’d rate it Fairly Bleh, I guess. I don’t think I’ve been less inspired by a draft, actually.

    I just have no love for TEs to begin with. The Rams seem to draft them as much or more than any other position, and they are all JAGs, basically, with the star of the past couple of decades being Kendricks who was Adequate. And the guy is Division II, yeah? I dunno, but that doesn’t fire up the fans with the bags over their heads.

    Overall, I’m not wild about the positions drafted, though I certainly wanted WR. I like what I read about Kupp. That’s probably my favorite pick. I’m going to get over the fact that he looks like a pretty boy high school senior who thinks way too highly of himself because he is apparently a hard-working tough guy who gets the job done, so….

    There are some decent-looking prospects, but not one “steal.” I just wouldn’t be surprised if none of these guys made it six years in the league. And many of them played against Podunk U. every week, so it just seems dicey to me.

    However, none of that is a Prediction because I have no idea. And I have loved some drafts in the past that were complete disasters in retrospect, so I dunno.

    I am going to say, at this point, it looks like Snead got a lot of input from McVay and Phillips, and both those guys have good to great track records, and if Everett and Kupp and Johnson make impacts, I will just sit back and claim I saw it all coming from the beginning, I suppose.

    in reply to: Samson Ebukam #68054
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    FWIW, CBS says that “scouts say” he was figured to be a UDFA.

    in reply to: 2017 NFL Draft: 10 biggest remaining gems after Day 2 #68041
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Good. More TEs.

    in reply to: Cooper Kupp #68014
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’m digging this guy’s description. I like disciplined route running and hands of steel over lightning speed and jitterbug stuff. I mean, I like that stuff, but I’d rather have a guy who runs his route and makes the catch for 10 yards every time than a guy who busts a highlight every other week, and drops 6 passes in the same amount of time.

    in reply to: Drafting WRs #67961
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Not that having Cowherd agree with me substantiates anything, but I’ve always thought speed was a little overrated at WR. Good routes and good hands. That’s Bruce and Ellard. I will take them over Ron Brown.

    There are several WRs who fill that description, apparently. I’d love to get one by round 3.

    I don’t want that Ohio State guy, Curtis Something, who sounds like Tavon Austin.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #67952
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Oh, good god….

    in reply to: A woman's perspective on Sanders #67944
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, Clinton has disappeared for the most part, and the Sanders appears to be the only person on the left who makes headlines. He has become the de facto face of the Democrats. Where the hell are Shumer and Pelosi? And Shumer, btw, seems to have tacked left since the election defeat. Seems to me he is the only mainstream Dem who isn’t in denial about the currents.

    So far, most of the blowback has been coming from media riffraff I’ve never heard of. I agree with Nittany; it would be very dangerous to push away the Left because there is more concerted (and well-informed) energy there than in any other pocket of politics at the moment. I think they would be better off selling out the Left by doing a Clinton: saying conciliatory things, and behind closed doors, saying something else.

    We’ll see if this is just another tantrum from the Sallys, or something more of a strategy.

    in reply to: Fri. – Day 2 Draft Thread (best available etc.) #67938
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    This draft is still about Mr. Goff.

    w
    v

    You think the Snead will go offense at #37?

    I do. I’m no football insider, but that’s my hunch.

    There is no getting around the Goff situation. They invested heavily in him, and the success of the Rams hinges on him more than any one other player or position. They need to help him. And whether that is OL, TE, or WR, I suspect it will be offense first. And I am guessing WR.

    I will guess, also, that the first defensive guy is probably going to be a pass rusher, unless some irresistible steal drops to them through luck.

    in reply to: Fri. – Day 2 Draft Thread (best available etc.) #67936
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    http://www.therams.com/news-and-events/article-1/RamsDraft-Best-Available-in-Round-2/97aa2c38-e729-415b-9fbd-1fd779996ef3

    The Los Angeles Rams will start day two of the 2017 NFL Draft with the fifth pick (No. 37th overall) in the second round.

    Mel Kiper’s Best Available Day 2 Prospects
    ESPN.com

    Forrest Lamp, OG, Western Kentucky
    Zay Jones, WR, East Carolina
    Kevin King, CB, Washington
    Cam Robinson, OT, Alabama
    DeMarcus Walker, DE, Florida State
    Budda Baker, S, Washington
    Dalvin Cook, RB, Florida State
    Chris Wormley, DT, Michigan
    Malik McDowell, DT, Michigan State
    Josh Jones, S, NC State
    Juju Smith-Schuster, WR, USC
    Zach Cunningham, ILB, Vanderbilt
    Tyus Bowser, OLB, Houston
    Marcus Maye, S, Florida
    Curtis Samuel, WR, Ohio State
    —————

    Todd McShay’s Best Available Day 2 Prospects
    ESPN.com

    Forrest Lamp, OG, Western Kentucky
    Dalvin Cook, RB, Florida State
    Cam Robinson, OT, Alabama
    Kevin King, CB, Washington
    Quincy Wilson, CB, Florida
    Tyus Bowser, OLB, Houston
    Zay Jones, WR, East Carolina
    Jourdan Lewis, CB, Michigan
    Marcus Maye, S, Florida
    Budda Baker, S, Washington
    Alvin Kamara, RB, Tennessee
    Malik McDowell, DT, Michigan State
    Curtis Samuel, WR, Ohio State
    Josh Jones, S, NC State
    Jordan Willis, DE, Kansas State
    —————

    2017 NFL Draft: Best remaining prospects
    NFL.com

    Cam Robinson, OT, Alabama
    Dalvin Cook, RB, Florida State
    Quincy Wilson, CB, Florida
    Kevin King, CB, Washington
    Chidobe Awuzie, CB, Colorado
    DeShone Kizer, QB, Notre Dame
    Curtis Samuel, WR, Ohio State
    Juju Smith-Schuster, WR, USC
    Marcus Williams, S, Utah
    Josh Jones, S, NC State
    Jordan Willis, DE, Kansas State
    Forrest Lamp, OG, Western Kentucky
    Marcus Maye, S, Florida
    Malik McDowell, DT, Michigan State
    Zach Cunningham, ILB, Vanderbilt

    in reply to: A woman's perspective on Sanders #67898
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I just had another thought on this.

    I am starting to see more “shots” taken at Sanders and the Millennials and the Progressives from the mainstream Democrats. It seems like there were a few potshots during the primaries, and up through the convention, but mostly they had a Circle the Wagons mentality of just ignoring the left for the most part.

    seems to me there is more action trying to discredit Sanders now than there was before – not that he was embraced. He certainly wasn’t. And his ideas weren’t. But it just seems to me now I am encountering a bit more active name-calling of the left. Is that just me, or does anyone else think it has stepped up a bit?

    in reply to: Kirwan on the Bettis trade #67862
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Never understood that move. With Dickerson, you could tell it was power/money, and the Rams at least got something in return (which they squandered). But Bettis…that made no sense whatsoever.

    Rich Brooks.

    That guy sucked at coaching about as much as a person can suck.

    in reply to: Anyone going to watch the 1st round? #67861
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Nah. Since the Rams don’t have a first round pick, I have read absolutely nothing about players, and I don’t care about other teams anyway. After the first round, I will start prepping for the draft. You know, read an article or two about the best players who didn’t go in the first round, and that’s about it.

    I am going to be working on the computer all night, though, so I will probably check in once an hour or so to skim the headlines, and make sure the 9ers drafted a bust, and so on.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Ooo. I’m interested. Gotta find half hour for that.

Viewing 30 posts - 5,821 through 5,850 (of 8,019 total)