Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 5,761 through 5,790 (of 8,019 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Jimmy Carter and Bernie #69477
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I would never have predicted 10 years ago that a Sanders would get as far as he did.

    Really, any optimism has to live right there.

    His elevation was actually remarkable.

    No party endorsement or support. No financial backing from power interests. Used the word “socialist.” Old guy, fairly high on the Nerd scale.

    And he had a LOT of popular, energetic support.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    That is fascinating data. I have never seen anything like that before. Boy, those are results one could live with.

    in reply to: Remember when you were young? (birthday) #69474
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Happy birthday.

    I think 27 or 28 was about my favorite age.

    Probably didn’t hurt that the Rams were still respectable back then.

    in reply to: May/June/July Russia thread #69452
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Okay, so we have what appears to me to be clear Obstruction of Justice. Twice. By Trump’s own admission. That’s the legal fishhook that led to articles on Nixon and on Clinton.

    And we have Flynn and Kushner, at least, who omitted information on a federal form, a felony.

    So…what are we waiting for?

    My guess is that they aren’t finishing investigating. I mean…impeachment of Trump isn’t the goal of the investigation. The goal of the investigation is to find out what the hell has been going on. All the way.

    Seems to me that we ought to have an Independent Investigation to also report on how to protect ourselves from cyber activity in the future.

    And how does Pence fit? I have seen suggestions that he is involved in the Russia stuff, but I have never seen anything to support that. AFAIK, he is just the VP who got tacked on because there had to be a VP. I have seen nothing that connects him in the Russia web. You know…apart from his telling the media things that are untrue about it. But there is no evidence yet that he knew it was a lie when he said it.

    in reply to: News on the Portland Or. stabbings + comments #69428
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    We are in a very bad place.

    The billionaires dominate the media conversation, and have won the propaganda war. Even if the Dems could flip the House, there is no getting control of the media message. A huge minority of Americans are brainwashed beyond repair, it seems to me, and the problems are not going away even if they can be rolled back slightly.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’m not going to OTAs, either, and what do I get? Nothing.

    You ran a 9.7 40.

    Not sure what you were expecting.

    .

    It was windy.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I’m not going to OTAs, either, and what do I get? Nothing.

    Just another example of the disparities in our system.

    in reply to: Prozac #69206
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator


    in reply to: Fisk on Trump and the Saudis #69202
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    It’s preposterous beyond words.

    But we will have our flags wave, and complain about how the government is taking our hard-earned money and giving it to poor people.

    in reply to: off-season grades, projections, & power rankings #69161
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Peter King is a fat assed wine sipper.

    Fuck him.

    I agree. I have them at 28.

    in reply to: Seattle news good and bad #69140
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Boy. There are times when I wish I could be the world’s grammar and spell checker. Many a great meme is ruined by illiteracy.

    Should we discuss the difference between “then/than?”

    This t-shirt was almost great. Instead…spectacular failure.

    in reply to: Seattle news good and bad #69127
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Not against the Rams, they won’t. They will mostly be punting.

    in reply to: Reich on the "special counsel" #69124
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    More on how Trump supporters see this thing: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/17/us/politics/trump-scandal-conservatives-media.html?emc=edit_th_20170518&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=66806393&_r=0&referer

    They have a completely alternative reality going, and there is no way to change that. I think we need to be clear about that. We aren’t going to change the minds of those people who have been brainwashed. Our only hope is to change the minds of people who have been apathetic about politics. Those are the potentially persuadable people.

    When I was much younger and fairly apathetic about politics I became enamored with JFK. His intelligence, attractiveness, personality, etc. From that point forward I have been given to politics in the form of campaigns, various committees, and so on. I suspect we need someone like that who can-as you wrote- “change the minds” of those uninterested in politics. After all Trump has the personality that turned on a whole lot more people than I ever could imagine. So-we can philosophize about socialism, capitalism, conservatism,liberalism, progressive, etc but to get people out to vote you need “star” quality-and unfortunately Trump had that. Hopefully that future star will have fundamental core beliefs that are far different than the little boy who now is the most powerful leader in the world.

    Yeah, I had some hope Obama would be that guy. I was never under any illusion that he would do anything but govern from the center right, but I hoped he might represent the end of the rightward swing of the country, and push the pendulum back towards a swing to the left. He didn’t. And I severely overestimated the possibility of his doing so because I severely underestimated how much racism still lurks in America. I think that a great deal of Trump’s support is a reaction against Obama – and not his policies so much as his race. There are still a lot of people in this country who hate blacks.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I dunno.

    That may be changing. The internet is getting better and customizing links. So when I go to youtube now, I videos recommended to me that are liberal and leftist etc. I am sure that people who go to Breitbart get links to infowars and conspiracy sites, etc.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I think there is a big difference between promoting an establishment point of view which is narrow and selective and promoting outright lies, lies of omission, and basically hate speech in order to manipulate a large portion of the population into hostile partisanship.

    Those things are not equal.

    One of those things can actually be engaged; the other can’t.

    ====================

    Well, its true Fox is off-the-charts, with their NeoCon/Evangelical sales-pitch.

    But what IS the NYTimes? What does it stand for, what does it sell to the public exactly?

    My own view is that it essentially sells Obama/Clinton. Neoliberalism.
    And there is no neoliberalism without the CIA and the Corporations and the Pentagon and weapons manufacturers and the corporate-media, etc, etc etc. The whole shebang. The NYT is pro ‘system’. Pro ‘corporotacracy’.

    And what does the corporotacracy do to the biosphere? To the poor?

    So is that so much better than what Fox News is all about? Well…yes…i suppose…but still…. blah blah blah yall know my speech by now.

    I loathe the NYT.

    w
    v

    I go back to what I said.

    The NYT can be engaged.

    FOX cannot.

    A guy like Sanders has pulled the aperture wide enough now that tuition costs and national health care can now be debated respectably. The NYT will be able to give that issue coverage when Sanders introduces his bill.

    FOX never will, and nothing you can say will ever persuade a FOX viewer to look at things differently because they are completely misinformed, and have no critical thinking skills through which to reach them. No discussion is possible with that crowd. Is. Not. Possible.

    We have pulled NYT people over to our side on this board. And people to the right of NYT.

    Too little, too late, perhaps. But still… Not the same thing.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I think there is a big difference between promoting an establishment point of view which is narrow and selective and promoting outright lies, lies of omission, and basically hate speech in order to manipulate a large portion of the population into hostile partisanship.

    Those things are not equal.

    One of those things can actually be engaged; the other can’t.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think he has trampled all over their holy service and sacrifice, and shown total disregard for the meaning of all they hold dear. His actions have told them that he doesn’t respect them or value what they do.

    I don’t agree with that.

    His incompetence jeopardizes what they do.

    I don’t think it’s a peevish emotional thing.

    He’s brazenly and irremediably incompetent. It fucks things up for them.

    And that’s of course whether or not we approve of all the policies he fucks up.

    I don’t think it’s peevish, either.

    He’s ignorant and incompetent, and he is trashing around the place with disregard for the values they hold – which include steady dependability, among other things.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    And…..back to the right-wing narrative stuff. A subject I find very interesting. They have a completely different picture of what is going on in Trumpland. They are hearing that Comey is a revengeful prick who will be going to prison sometime in the future, and that all this stuff is backfiring on the liberals and the media.

    https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/18/15646098/right-wing-media-collective-memories

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    =================

    I suspect it is more than just ‘he offended’ them. It could be that. But that makes them seem awfully…thin skinned. I have NO idea what the truth is, but it could be more than just ‘personal offense taken’. It could be a deep-state-policy thing.

    I dont think we will ever know.

    As far as the word ‘conspiracy’ — we are dealing with a secret society, a secret culture, a secret organization — the CIA. So, i dont even know how to leave out the term ‘conspiracy’, or how to even talk about them.

    I see it as a pathological organization. Doesnt matter (to me) if a few of them are ‘good people’ or fighting for a less-monstrous-organization. Its no different than Monsanto or Blackwater. I see them as pathological. Reflections of a pathological system in general. I see them the way Smedley Butler saw the powers-that-be.

    Again, no ‘heat’ here. I’m just talkin calmly. No big thing.

    My views have darkened since about the beginning of the election cycle. Partly because of what i saw the Dems do to Bernie. Partly because of what the corporate media has become — its much worse now than ever. Its essentially nothing but propaganda now. The CIA disgusts me.

    w
    v

    I agree with all of that.

    By offended, I’m not talking about reaching into the snack bowl with his hands instead of using the tongs.

    I think he has trampled all over their holy service and sacrifice, and shown total disregard for the meaning of all they hold dear. His actions have told them that he doesn’t respect them or value what they do.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t think there is a “conspiracy,” either. And I doubt very much that everybody in Intel is anti-Trump.

    It is clear he has offended them. And I would be very surprised if there are not deep concerns about his mental health/ability to lead.

    It’s a bad idea to empower malignant narcissists. Absolutely everything is about them, and their egos.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    But ‘something’ about Trump just made some faction in the CIA go nutz.

    This is so simple.

    They’re professionals and he is dangerously incompetent when it comes to those issues.

    It’s nothing more than that. Notice none of the dissent is about policy (unlike in the courts with immigration). It’s about procedures.

    I think that’s 90% of it, but I can’t help but think there may be a bit more to it than that.

    I can’t remember the exact Nixon quote, but he said something to the effect that the FBI had enough dirt on everybody to bring all of Washington down. And I am sure the FBI and other intelligence agencies went to work on DJT when he announced his candidacy, and probably already had a pretty thick file even before that.

    Trump has some pretty suspicious connections around the globe, and I will bet that the intelligence community knows more than it has said. They have to be careful, of course, because the whole thing is a tangled web of money and power. But I think their distrust of him is based on more than his incompetence.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    “There is someone burrowed into the intelligence community who wants to hurt Trump,” the conservative author and radio host Laura Ingraham warned.”

    Well, i dont have much doubt that people/factions in the ‘intelligence community’ of the USA, are at war with Trump. Seems pretty clear to me.

    w
    v

    Yeah, that is one of a few things that jumped out at me, too. Two thoughts about that. First, I think it’s true that some people inside Intelligence are at war with Trump. But I don’t think that is because they are “liberals” and he is a “Republican,” as Ingraham reportedly implied. I think it’s because Trump is a disrespectful asshole.

    Secondly, this is the kind of thing that precedes “cleansing.” Not saying that will follow, but this kind of talk precedes that kind of action, and Trump has a history of cleaning out anybody who isn’t “loyal.”

    There is no prediction in these comments; only the observation that Ingraham – like her many, many counterparts whose voices dominate the liberal media – is saying dangerous shit.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Poor, poor San Diego. They have no home.

    I think they should move back to San Diego after a year. Now that the Raiders are fully committed to Las Vegas, that would be the smart thing to do.

    (at least from my pov because I hate the idea of the LA Chargers)

    in reply to: Song name game #69006
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I saw it opening weekend at my brother’s invitation. I was pretty wary since I knew nothing about it, and even warier once I was handed 3-D glasses at the door.

    I really, really liked it. I was very surprised. Thought it was very intelligent and entertaining.

    So my wife and I picked up the first film last weekend and watched it. I liked the second one better myself, though I liked the first one, too. I dunno how much my exceedingly low expectations factored into my reaction to II, but I think I stand by my opinion that II was better. I think the plotlines were tighter.

    in reply to: trailer for Star Trek Discovery #68997
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I miss Picard.

    w
    v

    I’m with you there.

    Patrick Stewart single-handedly revived the entire Star Trek franchise.

    in reply to: Reich on the "special counsel" #68996
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    More on how Trump supporters see this thing: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/17/us/politics/trump-scandal-conservatives-media.html?emc=edit_th_20170518&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=66806393&_r=0&referer

    They have a completely alternative reality going, and there is no way to change that. I think we need to be clear about that. We aren’t going to change the minds of those people who have been brainwashed. Our only hope is to change the minds of people who have been apathetic about politics. Those are the potentially persuadable people.

    in reply to: Reich on the "special counsel" #68994
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well-as I see it-unless there is-or are-criminal convictions the public -besides people like you and me-are not going to jump the Trump ship-as long as the economy continues to grow under his administration-which it has been. With few exceptions (i.e. crimes committed) it’s always about the economy. Good or bad its how we are wired. And if Mueller’s investigation shows no criminality then that will only beholden these idiots. I do hold out hope that your scenario comes to bear but I’m nowhere near as assured as you are.

    Trump is holding fast in Republican support – something like 84% approval.

    But only 38% of all voters.

    Historically, when one party has controlled the White House and both houses of congress, that party has lost an average of 35 seats in the midterm elections. The GOP majority currently sits at 22. So although gerrymandering has a huge effect now, it is possible that the turnout will be higher for people pissed off than for people who are content. We don’t need people to “jump the Trump ship.” We just need more people to turn out to vote for Democrats.

    I am not “assured.” I am hopeful. Given the circumstances, this is about as good as we could hope for, I think. A Republican party on the ropes. That is best case scenario, fwiw.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: Reich on the "special counsel" #68986
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t care if he gets convicted or not. I want the entire Republican deconstruction of the government snarled up in traffic. I want him stopped. I want the Republican party to catch fire, and voters to be so disgusted with them that 2018 changes the direction of the country.

    And there is a lot more here than just the possibility of criminal collusion with Russia. I mean…I think we already have obstruction of justice. How can we not? Trump pressured Comey to drop his investigation of Flynn, and then came out on TV and flat out said he fired Comey because of the Trump/Russia stuff. That is already enough to impeach Trump, and so that is a matter of due process. The Mueller investigation means this isn’t going away. And I believe we have hit the tipping point now that I’ve long expected where the benefits of having Trump in the WH (tax cuts, shredding the Big Government, etc) are from now on going to be outweighed by the collateral damage to the GOP. They are screwed. The only question is how long will it take for them to come to terms with that. IMO, from a GOP point of view, “If it were done when ’tis done, then ’twere well it were done quickly.” They should fry the guy, and go with Pence ASAP.

    My hope is they don’t act quickly because imo an ineffective Trump white house under investigation is preferable to a Mike Pence administration which could right the ship and swiftly enact all kinds of painful legislation.

    Additionally, there are all kinds of other questions that are going to be vented by both the House and Senate. And I think they are going to eventually appoint an independent counsel which is different from what I understand. Mueller can only investigate what has already happened, but an independent counsel would be investigating what happened with an eye for making changes for the future. So we are now going to investigate what external influences there were on this election and prepare for cyber attacks in future election cycles.

    In short, this is a big can of worms, and criminal conviction isn’t necessary as far as I am concerned. I want to see the fire spread throughout the GOP, and the knives to come out, and the GOP to suffer an internal war, and heads to roll.

    in reply to: Reich on the "special counsel" #68974
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    While I admire and agree with the appointment of a special counsel(i.e. prosecutor)and especially appointing Robert Mueller the problem is he is charged with determining if any crimes were committed be it by the President or others. It will be a secret process that could end up in two words: “No crimes”. And “no indictment.” Nothing will have been learned as to what really happened that would reflect on the competency of the President and his ability to lead this country. Simply put no matter how credible and respected Mueller is his job is narrow as a special prosecutor. What is still needed is an “independent investigation” into issues that may not rise to the level of criminality but nevertheless reflect on how dangerous this administration is acting and needs to be held accountable for -either at the polls or by impeachment or by resignation.

    Well, I don’t understand that. I saw the letter (can’t find it now), and it appeared to give him a mandate to investigate the connection to Russia, and anything else that comes up in that investigation, and I would think that he would have a tough time concealing any findings even if he wanted to do so. Don’t you think that findings will make their way into the public? And Schiff said that the House and Senate are both going to continue their investigations, so I don’t see how Trump gets away with this. It’s likely a matter of time, and anything he steps in from now on will only compound the urgency to do something about him.

    McConnell looked like he was going to his own execution today as he dodged reporters. I think we’ve finally hit the tipping point.

    I will add, btw, that I doubt there was direct collusion with Russia. Why would Putin let Trump in the loop of what he was doing? I’m sure they talked, and discussed mutual interests and possibilities, but I can’t see why Putin would reveal tactics to Trump or his camp.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: Reich on the "special counsel" #68971
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I am hopeful, btw, that this is about the best possible scenario right now. It appears to me that this past week rattled the Republicans quite a lot. It also appears that the Republicans are not going to do a “McConnell” – i.e. a complete denial of reality and total stonewalling. They have evidently started throwing the brakes on Trump.

    We have a special counsel who is respected by everybody. I haven’t read or seen a negative response to this guy, Mueller, by anybody. And although Trump theoretically CAN fire this guy, I can’t image that he will. If he does, congress will renew the Office of Independent Counsel,” and hostility to Trump will spread.

    In the meantime, the tax cuts and other projects have taken a hit, and are going to be slowed down if not killed as a consequence of this. This investigation has finally found some “real” traction, and the Republican agenda is going to proceed more slowly as this investigation dominates business.

    Furthermore, this is going to take months. If it does, in fact, gum up legislation and stays as the topic of conversation (and I’m sure Trump will keep adding fuel to the fire because that’s who he is), it improves the chances of turning the House in 2018. About the best we can hope for at the moment.

Viewing 30 posts - 5,761 through 5,790 (of 8,019 total)