Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ZooeyModeratorWhy not ?
Because there is NOT.
And it reeks of the LA Times trying to shape public opinion by pretending that there is. Just like the WaPo and NY Times.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator“Elections aren’t about policy”
Not sure about that. Was the democratic victories in 2018 all about policy- namely the issue of health care ?
Mmmm…yeeeah. I think. The ISSUES matter. The VISION matters. To some extent healthcare was a big deal in 2018. But I don’t think people were well-informed on that issue. I mean…nobody knows how the ACA works, but they know what little healthcare people have is better than nothing, and shouldn’t be repealed by the GOP. They know and care about it that much.
But people don’t sit around with their BINGO cards on issues with the answers they like all over the card, and making decisions based on how many squares each candidate aligns with. Very few voters are THAT discerning about the person they vote for. If they were, few of our representatives would win elections since Medicare-for-all, expanded social security, increased spending on public education, higher wages, and so on are desired by a significant majority of Americans, but opposed by almost all our representatives.
So…they go for the Vision Thing, and candidates lie about that.
August 28, 2019 at 5:00 pm in reply to: Gluten does not induce gastrointestinal symptoms in healthy people #104409
ZooeyModeratorI have always found – it’s cliche, but I have to say it – beans work better. If you’re trying to attract attention, gluten doesn’t work. It’s beans, man.
ZooeyModeratorElections aren’t about policy. Which means you can’t be “too far left” on those. If elections were about policy, the GOP would never win a single national election, because their policies are forever unpopular. Trump never described his. He won anyway.
Elections are all about “stories,” sales teams and united fronts. The side that tells the best stories, sells them, and keeps a united, confident front, wins.
I agree with that entire post, not just the part I copied here for emphasis.
This is what I have been saying. The Dems need to sell the Green New Deal as a job and wage-building investment that will lead to the coolest hi-tech world you can possibly imagine…while saving the planet from climate change.
They can sell that vision.
The “pragmatic” Baby Steps approach Biden et al offer is not going to get people out to vote.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorDidn’t he miss a full season? Was that the shoulder?
I was surprised he was in the league this long. Seems like just a couple years ago he was the hot, young prospect out of Stanford.
Goff’s heading into season 4 already. Time flies, etc.
I wonder if Luck might be one of those guys who tries a comeback after a year.
ZooeyModeratorNot only do atheists die earlier, they also don’t get to go to heaven.
ZooeyModeratorI think about 20 teams can win it. Its the NFL.
Best case scenario though, is, Rams vs Saints for the NFC Championship. Rams leading by two points with 20 seconds to go. Saints have the ball on their 35. Fourth down. Breez makes a perfect throw deep downfield, and Robey-Coleman breaks it up but gets called for P.I.
And of course. The call is overturned. By the new replay rule. Rams win.
w
vYa know, I have had a similar vision. But in mine, the Rams are driving to seal the game late, and there is a No Call against the Saints for P.I. McVay challenges the call, and it’s ruled Pass Interference. Rams 1st down. Game over.
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModeratorHunh.
He forgot to put the Rams in the top 5.
That was pretty careless of him.
…
It’s just the way it is ever since the Rams left the glamour of St. Louis.
August 21, 2019 at 7:49 pm in reply to: texts between Oregon police and far-right group prompt investigation #104183
ZooeyModeratorI don’t suppose anybody in this country would ever think of holding a conversation about “What Personality Types are Attracted to Police Work in the First Place?” and “Is That a Good Thing?”
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
ZooeyModerator
August 8, 2019 at 10:53 pm in reply to: Lawsuit Over Blown Call In NFC Title Game Forces Saints To Side With The NFL #103781
ZooeyModeratorHas the statute of limitations run out on the Tom Mack call?
Cuz, if we not, we should sue.
We should sue anyway. Just on the principle.
w
vI have to say…
I am GLAD that now, as a Rams fan, I am in a position to say to another team’s fans…”F you.”
Go forth and suffer.
Been there, done that.
ZooeyModeratorLook…Bernie….
ZooeyModeratorGood point. Thanks. I wasn’t even thinking in terms of positive/negative characteristics. At least not consciously.
ZooeyModeratorWebb, Walter Prescott. “Ended: 400 Year Boom. Reflections on the Age of the Frontier.” Harper’s, October 1951.
So I have two classes of English 11 this term, and…long story short…my kids are actually a Control group for a study by California State University. CSU developed a curriculum that they would like to impose on high schools throughout the state, but their first step is to conduct a study to determine if they actually get “better results” with their curriculum as opposed to mine. (Not just Mine…the study is being conducted at multiple schools). So all the other English 11 teachers here are teaching CSU’s curriculum, and I am left to do whatever I want.
In the past, English 11 has been taught through the lens of “The American Dream.” What is it, and is it a “real” thing, etc.” I haven’t taught this course in ten years, probably, and I’m still not recovered from my weariness at the theme, and I’m playing around with something different. I’m kind of more interested in the American Character. Who are we, and why? Then read a bunch of documents, and stories, and speeches, and a novel or two, and a play, or two.
So I’ve been thinking about this. And here are some characteristics I think are dominant features of our culture…I’d love everyone on the board to chime in with their thoughts and/or suggestions.
A. Our tendency to violent solutions to problems
1. Mass shootings
2. Incessant wars
B. Constant stream of “enemies” (Commies, Terrorists, Mexicans), and always
living under a threat to security
C. Anti-government i.e. “freedom.”
D. Conspicuous consumption – belief in limitless resources
E. Belief in “hard work + wit = prosperity.”
F. SuperioritySo those are characteristics, imo, of the American personality. I’m happy to entertain other thoughts on this.
I attribute these characteristics to our unique history which I think is this: America was colonized by a lot of people who sought freedom from social and economic restrictions faced in Europe, and elsewhere. European social and economic structures were fairly rigid and static for centuries…until the discovery of vast land that was rich in resources, and basically “up for grabs” to anyone with the balls to head west into the unknown armed only with wits and guns.
I started watching “Godless” this week with my wife (it’s set in Colorado in the 1880s) and I noticed how every time people encounter strangers, they pull out their guns. Now…I don’t think this is just Hollywood. If you were living in the middle of nowhere, basically, and the nearest sheriff was a 15-minute horse ride away, and there are a variety of hostile and/or desperate humans around…I mean, the idea of NOT having multiple guns would be laughable, right?
So the first 300-400 years of our cultural history was dominated by a “kill or be killed” mentality out on the frontier. Webb makes the point – in the article I want – that “frontier” in Europe means the thin international boundary between countries. In America, the Frontier means vast, practically limitless space and resources that have to be mastered by the individual rather than the state. It’s a completely different way of looking at the world. So the history of the Frontier really accounts for A through E above.
Our sense of Superiority, I think, can be traced to the Puritans and their “City on the Hill” concept. Also our puritanical attitudes towards moral issues. The Puritans were the first successful colonists, and they were successful partly because of their strict internal discipline.
So now…here we are with all these Frontier attitudes…but no frontier anymore. All filled up. But we treat our resources as if there is always more just over the horizon, and we are vigilant in our search for enemies.
Anybody got any thoughts on that? Or stories/poems/novels/plays that would help bolster any of these themes?
ZooeyModeratorI doubt that the Rams will keep 12 WRs, or 4 QBs. So I’d look for some cuts to be made there before the season starts.
Just a friendly football tip.
ZooeyModerator
-
AuthorPosts












