Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 22,111 through 22,140 (of 47,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Feathers are Flying #111457
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This is the best debate ever.

    Not watching it!

    Explain…if you would be so kind.

    in reply to: progress on new CBA? #111454
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Adam Schefter@AdamSchefter
    More on the transformational CBA proposal now on the table, per sources: As part of the new deal, players go from 47% share under current deal to 48% share at 16 games, and then to 48.5% share if they go to 17 games, shifting $5 billion of revenue to players’ side.

    Geoff Schwartz@geoffschwartz
    Players need more.

    tim rominger@timrominger
    So players are now making 40+million a year. That is more than most teams profit each year. So if you own a bussiness and took all the risk wouldnt you want to be the highest paid in that bussiness.

    Geoff Schwartz@geoffschwartz
    Yes the poor owners make no profits. Wtf are you talking about.

    in reply to: progress on new CBA? #111453
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Kurt Warner@kurt13warner
    Of course we’ll watch & players will play, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good thing 4 players in long run? So the point is be quiet bc we’ll watch?? We’ve got guys retiring earlier now than last couple decades 4 health reasons, but hey shut up & go back 2 something that matters?

    Andrew Brandt@AndrewBrandt
    Re questions on NFL CBA: (1) Nothing is agreed to until everything is agreed to; (2) the Players want a lot but the only thing of true value they have to offer are extra games; (3) the Players need to focus on higher team minimum spending; Cap increases are hollow without that.

    in reply to: tweets … 2/18 thru 2/22 #111452
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Charles Robinson@CharlesRobinson
    I’m hearing the #Rams are going to be promoting football administration staffer Sophie Luoto to Director of Football Operations, making her one of the #NFL’s highest-ranking female executives in the #NFL. She’s been very well-respected amongst the Rams staff and players.

    Rich Hammond@Rich_Hammond
    This is cool, and I can confirm the promotion. Bruce Warwick capably handled this role for years and it’s a huge one in terms of the team’s day-to-day operations, travel and much more.

    Rams also will be hiring/naming a “director of stadium operations,” which sounds like a fun job. That will just be for their games, not all events at so-fly SoFi.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Silver w/ inturrestinn stuff on the Rams (2/19) #111450
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Silver mentions Henderson was set back by minor inuries.

    Michael Silver@MikeSilver
    He pulled a muscle in training camp and it remained a factor

    in reply to: progress on new CBA? #111449
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    More playoff teams expected under new NFL CBA, sources say

    Adam Schefter

    https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28739375/more-playoff-teams-expected-new-nfl-cba-sources-say

    If and when a new collective bargaining agreement is finalized — and there is now mounting optimism it could be done sometime in the next week — it is expected to include a transformational change to the NFL’s playoff structure as it is currently constituted for next season, league sources told ESPN.

    Under the current CBA proposal that NFL owners are pushing for, the playoff field would be expanded to seven teams from each conference, while the regular season would be increased to 17 games per team and the preseason shortened to three games per team, sources said.

    As part of the proposed playoff format, only one team from each conference would receive a first-round bye as opposed to the two that currently do, league sources said. That would mean a revised postseason schedule that includes six games on wild-card weekend, with three on Saturday and three on Sunday.

    The changes to the NFL’s playoff format would take effect for the 2020 season, assuming the new CBA is ratified beforehand. Had the proposed format been in place this past season, the Los Angeles Rams and Pittsburgh Steelers would have been the next teams included in the expanded playoff field.

    “That’s been agreed to for a long time,” one source familiar with the CBA talks said about the NFL’s new playoff structure. “There wasn’t a lot of disagreement to that issue.”

    Additionally, the players on the teams that earn a first-round bye will receive postseason pay for that weekend. That was not the case under the current CBA, which has always rankled some players.

    Now the sides are trying to work through the final issues, including getting the players to sign off on a 17-game regular season. That has yet to be agreed to, and would not take effect until 2021 at the earliest.

    “The new CBA’s not done, there’s no term sheet yet, there still are issues being negotiated, but I’d be very surprised if there’s not a new CBA for the new league year,” the source said.

    in reply to: progress on new CBA? #111448
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Adam Schefter@AdamSchefter
    NFL playoff structure is about to be changed. Under the current CBA proposal, seven teams from each conference will make the playoffs, with only bye per conference, sources tell ESPN. It would go into effect this upcoming season.

    More details: Under the current CBA proposal that NFL owners are pushing for, the playoff field would be expanded to seven teams, while the regular season would be increased to 17 games per team, and the preseason shortened to three games per team, per sources.

    Sosa K@QBsMVP
    Couldn’t think of worse ideas, man. Player safety? Too bad, play an extra game. Good playoff competition? Nope, add two more bad and non-deserving teams. UDFA’s trying to make the league? Go ahead, you just lost 25% of your opportunities.

    Mike Sando@SandoNFL
    Adding to playoff field has potential to save coaching jobs & promote continuity.

    Andrew Brandt@AndrewBrandt
    So far reports on new CBA terms are all in favor of owners: extra regular season game, extra playoff game, etc. The Players better be making some gains (revenue split, minimum salaries, health care, gambling revenues, etc).

    Benjamin Allbright@AllbrightNFL
    I personally don’t think allowing 44% of the league into the post season is a good idea.

    in reply to: progress on new CBA? #111446
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    NFL owners to meet Thursday to discuss CBA talks

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001102482/article/nfl-owners-to-meet-thursday-to-discuss-cba-talks?campaign=Twitter_atn

    NFL owners will meet in New York on Thursday to discuss the status of labor negotiations with the NFL Players Association, NFL Network’s Michael Silver reported Wednesday. The players will discuss the owners’ proposal via conference call on Friday, NFL Network’s Tom Pelissero added.

    If all goes well during the next 48 hours or so, Silver added, a new collective bargaining agreement between the league and the NFLPA could be ratified before the start of the new league year on March 18.

    The new deal, however, would be predicated on implementing a 17-game regular season that would launch between 2021 and 2023, Silver reported.

    Adding a game to the regular-season schedule has been a point of contention between the sides. Some players — including 49ers receiver Emmanuel Sanders, who played 17 regular-season games this year because of a midseason trade — have already spoken out strongly against it.

    The central issue throughout negotiations has been the revenue split, and players are expected to receive an uptick from the 47 percent of total revenue they are guaranteed under the current CBA, which was approved in 2011, Pelissero and NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport reported in January. The union has long hoped to achieve that increase without adding games, but the league has pushed all along for a lever that would allow them to add games as part of the next TV deal.

    The CBA, if agreed to in the next month, could go into effect in time for the new league year, potentially altering the salary cap and state of free agency, among other things.

    The league, the NFLPA executive committee and player representatives were scheduled to meet Thursday in Washington, D.C., as Rapoport and NFL Network’s Mike Garafolo reported last week.

    The current CBA between the NFL and the NFLPA expires following the 2020 season.

    in reply to: progress on new CBA? #111445
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero
    The meeting of NFL owners and executives that @MikeSilver reported is tomorrow in New York. All 32 teams will be there to hear a report on the status of CBA negotiations and consider terms. Players expected to discuss the same proposal via conference call Friday. Big 48 hours.

    ProFootballTalk@ProFootballTalk
    Per source NFLPA meeting set for Thursday was canceled due to challenges of getting all 32 player reps in the same place at the same time. (Unlike owners the reps fly commercial.)

    in reply to: tweets … 2/18 thru 2/22 #111444
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Ranking the top 50 NFL rookies of 2019: https://draftwire.usatoday.com/gallery/nfl-rookies-2019-rankings-nick-bosa-josh-jacobs-kyler-murray/

    #27 | Taylor Rapp | S | Rams

    in reply to: tweets … 2/18 thru 2/22 #111442
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Silver w/ inturrestinn stuff on the Rams (2/19) #111438
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Silver mentions Henderson was set back by minor inuries. Here’s VB on that:

    Vincent Bonsignore@VinnyBonsignore
    Just an FYI: When I was at the scouting combine I heard there were a couple of instances where he got dinged early in games that he was expected to be featured more prominently. Both of which set him back a bit.

    in reply to: tweets … 2/18 thru 2/22 #111434
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    J.B. Long@JB_Long
    The assumption has been that the #LARams will debut @SoFiStadium in Week One. However, the last three franchises to open a new venue did so in Week Two on Sunday Night Football…

    Dane Brugler@dpbrugler
    Remember, the reasons the NFL Scouting Combine is important:

    1. Medicals
    2. Interviews

    (Gap)

    3. Testing drills

    in reply to: tweets … 2/18 thru 2/22 #111433
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Nate Tice@Nate_Tice
    I think (and I hate I’m about to use this phrase) in the “modern NFL” that a Center is much more important than a Guard. Protections and blitz packages are more sophisticated than ever and I’d rather have someone shoring down the rest of the OL.

    Brandon Thorn@BrandonThornNFL
    Yeah I definitely think that’s the case in certain schemes especially (where young QBs are, heavy OZ). But then again guards usually have much tougher roles post-snap facing off against what I think is the most talent-rich position in the sport (3T). Case by case basis really.

    in reply to: meet Brandon Staley #111432
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Khalil Mack’s ‘After-School Tutor’ Has Helped With the Learning Curve in Chicago
    Khalil Mack has put in extra work with outside linebackers coach Brandon Staley to get up to speed in Chicago

    SEP 14, 2018

    https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/09/14/khalil-mack-chicago-bears-after-school-tutor

    LAKE FOREST, Ill.— Eddie Jackson filed out of the defensive meeting room after the full-team post-practice meeting, the last event of the day on the team’s in-season weekly schedule. It was quitting time, around 5:30 p.m., so Jackson, the second-year safety, headed toward the front entrance of the facility with most of his teammates. Halfway down the hall, he noticed one player separate from the group and duck into a position room.

    Curious, Jackson glanced inside the position room door that read OUTSIDE LINEBACKERS in block-style capital letters. It was new arrival Khalil Mack sitting down to watch film with outside linebackers coach Brandon Staley. They both settled into their chairs, looking like they planned to be there for a good, long while.

    When Mack’s trade and contract extension with the Bears was finalized, he had exactly seven days before the season opener in Green Bay. Just a week to learn Vic Fangio’s 3-4 defense and Chicago’s game plan for the Packers. But in his debut as a Bear, Mack looked all caught up on his summer reading, despite cramming an entire playbook in a week. He sacked backup quarterback Deshone Kizer and forced a fumble, returned an interception for a touchdown and provided an assist on rookie Roquan Smith’s first sack. Mack was the first player since 1982 to record a sack, an interception, a touchdown, a forced fumble and a fumble recovery all in one half. And even though the Bears fell to the Packers in dramatic fashion, Mack nearly chased down Randall Cobb on his runaway, game-winning 75-yard touchdown.

    Mack is an incredibly gifted athlete, but the early and late hours he spent in the outside linebackers room with just Staley also played a part in his dominant debut. “This is a whirlwind for this guy,” Staley said Monday afternoon. “He’s left everything he has known, coming to a brand new city and meeting all these new people. And for him to be able to perform like he did each day last week—it wasn’t just Sunday night, it was a culmination of a great week of preparation and he deserves a lot of credit.”

    Mack’s week began when he flew to Chicago from New York City, where he’d been visiting his agent, on the Saturday night the deal was finalized. The overachiever didn’t have his playbook to study on the flight to Chicago, but once he touched down, he didn’t waste much time getting his hands on it. “I don’t know if I can say that,” Mack said coyly, not wanting to give away anything about his new team. “But I got it after I landed. I got it as soon as I landed and got to the hotel.”

    The sessions with Staley started right after Mack spent his first night at a Chicagoland hotel with his iPad playbook nearby. Halfway through his first week of practice, Mack referred to Staley as his “after school tutor.” The two met each morning around 6 a.m. and again after meetings were done for the day, from around 5:30 until 10 p.m. “The guy still had to get some sleep,” Staley conceded.

    Staley made a conscious effort to contain his excitement and not rush through any part of the teaching process. “We just really wanted to be purposeful in not skipping any steps,” he said. “You can jump ahead really easily and try and get too far ahead of yourself. We really wanted to build a foundation and get to know each other first and then get to know us on defense.”

    They started with technique and by going over how Staley wants his outside linebackers to play. Some things are still a work in progress, like Mack playing with his hand down during some of his snaps on Sunday. Staley mentioned he’d prefer Mack to play up, rather than down, but switching between the two shows how versatile he is. “He had his hand down, I know he can play hand up, hand down, either side,” Staley said. “That’s the great thing about him and what was neat is he really has adapted in seven days to the way we want to play.”

    Next, they learned Fangio’s scheme, and mastered all the base calls so that Mack would have a foundation to guide his assignments for the different looks he might see out of the Packers offense. Staley built on this day-by-day and added in the situational standpoint, the defense as it related to the game plan for Green Bay. A few times, Mack requested to take the studying out of the linebackers room. He and Staley walked through different assignments and techniques at the team’s indoor practice field, the Walter Payton Center. “He wanted to feel it,” Staley said. “He wanted to live it. It’s one thing to watch it on tape and see it in a playbook and its another to go out and move.”

    “Learning the defense so fast, it shows you what type of player he is,” Jackson, the Bears safety, said.” He is always in the meeting room with his position coach by himself. I’m like, okay, yeah, he’s getting his work in. He is fitting in well. You would think he’s been here forever.”

    Mack hasn’t even been in Chicago long enough to move out of the hotel where he’s been staying for almost two weeks. He told The MMQB he’s closing on a house this week, so he’ll be moving soon. About time, he said at his locker on Thursday. He’s getting tired of hotel living.

    Maybe it seems like he’s been here forever because it was clear from Mack’s first practice rep that he wouldn’t need much of a breaking-in period before performing exactly like Bears brass expected when they traded for him. “When he first got here, everyone was anxious to see, ‘Is he going to ease his way into this?’” Staley said. “But his first practice rep, he was shot out of a cannon and you just knew then, that he’s fresh.”

    “His first get-off, it was effortless but it was super fast,” outside linebacker Aaron Lynch said Thursday before the Green Bay game. “So it’s like, yeah, we alright. It’s a done deal. If anybody blocks him, I don’t know who that person is. Nobody should block him. Everybody gets blocked, but no one should block him. Good luck to them.”

    Green Bay’s right tackle Bryan Bulaga was Mack’s regular matchup Sunday night and was asked to solo-block the Bears outside linebacker for the majority of Mack’s 42 snaps. The first half was rough for Bulaga, who had a false start and allowed much of Mack’s damage to occur. After the game, Bulaga said that at halftime, he sat at his locker and visualized all the ways Mack had beaten him in the first half. He decided to change up his technique, varying his set points and his hands to counter Mack. It worked better, but Bulaga was also helped by the quick passing game Rodgers employed in the second half, which was designed to get the ball out before the rush had time to get him.

    After the Packers win, Bulaga was asked if he’d had any fun at all with the challenge of facing off against one of the greatest pass rushers in the league. “Oh yeah,” Bulaga deadpanned. “It was my favorite thing ever.”

    Staley said his favorite thing ever was watching Mack and fellow outside linebacker Leonard Floyd running after Randall Cobb as he headed for the end zone on a short pass from Rodgers that he took all the way to the house. Mack was about six yards behind Cobb when he started running and made up the space to dive at him a yard out from the goal line.

    Jackson said he preferred Mack’s pick-6, where he juked past Green Bay left tackle David Bakthiari on his way to a score. Staley did have one note for him though. “I was a little bit worried about his ball security,” he joked. “We may need to get that cleaned up.” “He was at about the 10 yard line and I saw 17 [Davante Adams] running up and I said, ‘Oh baby, this is going to be close.’ So we will have to work on that a little bit extra in practice.”

    Staley and Mack both agree that their bonus sessions—whether focused on ball security or more pressing matters—will continue for the foreseeable future. There’s still plenty of work to be done. “He’s made it real easy for me, transitioning in,” Mack said. “We will continue to do [the sessions] as time goes on and I get the full grasp of the defense.”

    And for Staley, it’s become more than just a one-sided coach-player relationship.

    “A lot of times when guys come off the field, they may not be exactly sure of what happened out there,” Staley said. “But he is keenly aware of what happened in practice and in a game. He can tell you exactly how a tackle set or he can tell you something about the cadence. I think he is going to be able to help me and our team out that way because he has outstanding field vision.”

    A new narrative was set for the Bears’ 2018 season as soon as the deal for Mack went through. Many interpreted it as a vote of confidence for second-year quarterback Mitchell Trubisky, and as a sign that the front office felt the team had enough pieces to contend and enter win-now mode. But inside the locker room, players think everyone is reading way too much into that angle.

    “Mentally, I don’t think anybody was like, ‘Oh, now they think we can win,’” outside linebacker Aaron Lynch said. “Oh, ‘Now we can win because we got him.’ We knew we could win before we got him, but now he’s just added so much more power.”

    Staley has 11 years of collegiate coaching experience, but he’s just 35 years old and in his second season in the NFL. So he was beyond excited when a talent like Mack fell into his lap so early in his NFL career. He first heard about the trade from his wife, Amy, who had seen the news break online. He joked that Amy is probably the only person who would really know how many hours he and Mack put in last week. When asked about his tutoring hours with Mack, Staley talked openly and energetically. For him, the overtime was not just necessary, it was fun.

    At some point in the blur of last week, Staley remembers head coach Matt Nagy asking him, “So, what do you think of Mack?”

    The outside linebackers coach had just two words to say: “Thank you.”

    in reply to: articles on changes Rams could/should make for 2020 #111431
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams could make changes on offense following disappointing 2019

    Lindsey Thiry

    https://www.espn.com/blog/los-angeles-rams/post/_/id/41385/la-rams-could-make-changes-on-offense-following-disappointing-2019

    THOUSAND OAKS, Calif. — The Los Angeles Rams’ offense lost its way last season but will attempt to correct course in 2020.

    Following a 9-7 season, the offense will continue under the direction of Rams coach Sean McVay but will also receive plenty of input from new offensive coordinator Kevin O’Connell.

    Similar to last season, the Rams are scheduled to return each skill position starter. It wouldn’t be shocking, however, if some shake-ups are made this offseason.

    The offensive line, like in 2019, is the biggest concern as it could potentially undergo another round of changes because of two experienced player who are scheduled to reach free agency next month.

    Here’s a look at questions facing each offensive position group this offseason.

    Quarterbacks

    Can quarterback Jared Goff return to form? And who will back him up?

    There’s no debate, last season was a disappointment for Goff, who passed for 22 touchdowns, with 16 interceptions and had a total QBR of 48.5, which ranked 23rd in the NFL.

    Goff’s upcoming fifth season is already notable because of his $36 million salary cap hit — the largest cap hit in the NFL. While Goff, who turns 26 in October, attempts this season to find the path he set in 2018 — when he passed for 32 touchdowns, with 12 interceptions, and helped lead the Rams to Super Bowl LIII — he must do so in the midst of another transition.

    O’Connell represents the fourth change at offensive coordinator since Goff was drafted in 2016 and the new OC also will work closely with Goff as a quarterbacks coach — his fifth in five seasons.

    The Rams signed Blake Bortles last season to a one-year, $1 million contract and Bortles is scheduled for free agency next month. It’s uncertain how much Bortles can earn on the open market after five uneven seasons starting for the Jacksonville Jaguars, followed by minimal playing time last season.

    Running backs

    Perhaps no group caused as much confusion about the Rams’ offensive identity last season than the running backs. An unstable offensive line was part of it, but the game plans, which relied on Goff and a platoon of backs, did not provide the group any favors. That must change in 2020.

    Todd Gurley is unlikely to ever appear as the same breakaway, hurdling star that he was in 2018, but that doesn’t mean he can’t be the offensive focal point. The Rams’ chances of winning correlate directly to the number of touches Gurley receives.

    Malcolm Brown and Darrell Henderson were expected to play significant supporting roles last season, but both were hindered because of an unstable offensive line and injuries. It will be interesting to monitor how touches are dispersed between the three backs moving forward.

    Receivers

    The Rams are scheduled to return their trio of starting receivers — Brandin Cooks, Robert Woods and Cooper Kupp — for a third consecutive season, but it wouldn’t be entirely surprising if this group underwent change.

    Cooks is in the midst of a five-year, $81 million contract, and while his speed provides a dynamic difficult to replicate, his production last season (42 catches for 583 yards and two touchdowns) did not match that of a No. 1 receiver. That was, in part, because of the multiple concussions he sustained, causing him to miss three games. Cooks’ history of head injuries could play a part in the Rams’ decision about his future.

    After experiencing a midseason lull, and missing a game because of what he cited as a family issue, Woods took his play to a new level in the final six weeks of last season. He is expected to return as a go-to target for Goff.

    Kupp shined through the first half of last season, highlighted by a 220 receiving-yard performance in a Week 8 victory over the Cincinnati Bengals. Now, as he enters the fourth and final season of his rookie contract, the former third-round pick is due a lucrative extension.

    Josh Reynolds remains as a solid option as a fourth receiver. He also is entering the final season of his rookie deal.

    Tight ends

    The 4-year, $29 million contract the Rams awarded Tyler Higbee before last season raised a few eyebrows, until Higbee produced a breakout December that included four games with more than 100 receiving yards. He is now one of the most intriguing Rams players to watch entering next season.

    Higbee’s extension and subsequent breakout leaves Gerald Everett’s future with the Rams in question as he enters the final season of his four-year rookie contract. After overcoming a knee injury that sidelined him three games, Everett played a minimal role in the final two games.

    Offensive line

    The Rams’ offensive line struggled last season and could be a concern again in 2020, especially since veteran left tackle Andrew Whitworth and guard/center Austin Blythe are scheduled to become unrestricted free agents next month.

    Without a clear-cut choice to replace Whitworth, the Rams must consider re-signing the 38-year-old. Last season, Whitworth earned a $10.3 million base salary. Finding a number that works for both sides must be a priority, but the Rams can’t overpay. Whitworth has some leverage given the Rams have no clear choice to replace him.

    Blythe, who has played left guard, right guard and center in his three seasons with the Rams, is expected to test the free-agent market.

    It remains to be seen how the Rams handle the situation at right tackle. Rob Havenstein regressed last season before suffering a knee injury that kept him sidelined several weeks. Havenstein returned to practice as a full participant in Week 15 but remained inactive for the final three games.

    As for the rest of the line? Bobby Evans showed steady improvement at right tackle in seven games and it appeared that David Edwards solidified a future at right guard and Austin Corbett provides an option at left guard.

    Left guard Joe Noteboom, who was drafted in 2018 as the eventual replacement for Whitworth, and center Brian Allen are expected to return from season-ending knee injuries.

    Expect this group to be under construction deep into training camp.

    in reply to: tweets … 2/18 thru 2/22 #111430
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    TMZ Sports@TMZ_Sports
    Browns’ Greg Robinson Arrested By Border Patrol with a Bunch of Marijuana

    Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero
    Greg Robinson will be a free agent next month and the #Browns had no intention of re-signing him anyway, I’m told. One fewer headache in Cleveland.

    Will Brinson@WillBrinson
    Reminder that the Browns released Greg Robinson and then re-signed him right before the 2019 season and like 90% of Browns fans said it was a genius move of manipulating the waiver wire and not to worry about the offensive line.

    in reply to: tweets … 2/18 thru 2/22 #111428
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Bloomberg #111426
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Georgia@nationalparke
    imo one of the most incredible scams in media is the washington post letting jennifer rubin churn out daily anti-bernie vitriol then claiming in the same pages he has “escaped scrutiny”

    in reply to: Bloomberg #111424
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: John Oliver: Medicare for All #111423
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Bernies Ads are good #111421
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: uniform talk #111417
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: uniform talk #111410
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Derek Ciapala@dciapala
    Kevin, I don’t mean this to be in any way disrespectful, and I respect the fact that you are engaging the fans, but if you get this sentiment from about 75% of the fans, what does it matter if it’s current subset or future? If your brand is strong enough, then fans shouldn’t need a modernization. Have the Packers, Steelers, and Bears needed makeovers over the years? It’s not the uniform. It’s the story it tells, and the legacy it brings forward. You don’t need to impress the new generations of #LARams fans with some type of modernization.You’ve got gold (no pun intended) on your hands now. The current throwbacks evoke everything most of us love about this team. Those are the colors most recognized from LA, and that’s close to the uniforms the team won the Super Bowl with…in St. Louis. Best wishes.

    Kevin Demoff@kdemoff
    This is another common sentiment we get. I understand that perspective, but unlike those franchises where the uniform tweaks over time have been fairly minor or simple, our franchise has a history of different looks, color schemes and logos.

    If our franchise had never changed uniforms, logos or colors, this would be a much different conversation and we could continue the power of that brand. But our history is full of different looks and colors and great teams that played in all of those different uniforms.

    in reply to: uniform talk #111407
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    David Klug@davidpaulklug
    99% of the Rams fans I talk to want Royal Blue with Yellow that we wore during the Eric Dickerson years. In fact new variations of the 80’s uniforms is exactly what Rams fans want. If you present anything other than that, you simply aren’t listening to the fans. Don’t let us down

    Kevin Demoff@kdemoff
    David, I would say I get this sentiment from about 75% of Rams fans as well. But to be honest, that’s mainly surveying the current subset of fans that have memories of those teams and that era. Goal of redesign is to take those memories and modernize for next generation

    in reply to: tweets & suchlike … 2/14 thru 2/17 #111405
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    McVay is calling plays. O’Connell will help with game planning and in-game stuff, as well as serve as the QBs coach

    ==

Viewing 30 posts - 22,111 through 22,140 (of 47,664 total)