Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 41,851 through 41,880 (of 47,862 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from off the net

    ===

    CoachO

    Some follow-up re: OL

    CoachO

    Doesn’t matter what team you want to look to when you get to the point where you’re forced into playing you’re 9th & 10th linemen you’re gonna struggle. And this is now the 3rd year that they’ve been in this position.

    You prepare for a season with the idea of playing the same five guys as much as possible. Therefore in this age of the salary cap you just cannot afford to invest in your 8th 9th & 10th offensive linemen. But somehow some fans expect Fisher and Boudreau to have a stable of all-stars waiting in the wings. Not realistic expectations?

    If they are forced to playing Donnal I hope it’s at RT and not at LG.

    Reynolds needs to remain at LG But Donnal is s natural RT and will be much better suited there.

    The plan they put in place since they’ve been here has made a lot of sense to me. The ONLY reason it didn’t pan out was the abundance of injuries. And unless you’re using hindsight to be critical, there was no realistic way to predict the overwhelming number of injuries.

    They tried the veteran option. Now they’ve chosen to go in the direction of youth. Bottom line for me anyway. When you are forced to play the 9th & 10th players in a unit, it’s never gonna be good. Regardless.

    in reply to: 101, 11/19 … Adam Caplan #34462
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    All the praise given Wichman means nothing to me. I have heard Noa, Spikes, and I don’t know who all, praised before they were cut. And if Wichman were any good,

    Wichman missed most of camp so just in terms of preparedness he is behind Donnal.

    In terms of the praise he gets, I don’t think this is anything like Noa or Spikes. I think the buzz on Wichman is a good sign.

    We’ll make a bet. If in the future turns out you’re wrong, you have to cut off a finger. If you’re right, I have to cut off one of your fingers.

    .

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson struggling this season, but says Ciara, big contract not the reason

    http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/seahawks/seahawks-quarterback-russell-wilson-struggling-this-season-but-says-ciara-big-contract-not-the-reason/

    By Jayson Jenks
    Seattle Times staff reporter

    RENTON — Russell Wilson has always tried to “ignore the noise,” but he is not immune from it.

    Wilson entered a different level of fame over the last six months — that of a celebrity. He started dating the singer, Ciara, and signed a new contract that pays him among the game’s top quarterbacks.

    Both have upped the spotlight’s intensity, and he has acknowledged the scrutiny even while downplaying it.

    On if his new contract has brought more pressure: “No, I don’t think so at all. People want to make it something else, but for me I just love the game of football. I love working. I love coming to work. I love getting here early and leaving late. That’s what it’s about. I think ultimately I love the guys on this football team. Nothing has changed.”

    On why he shares his private life on Twitter: “I keep most of it private. My private life is my private life, but at the same time, there’s no fear or anything like that. I’m grateful for the people I have in my life and the surroundings from the team to my friends. I’m sure you’re referring to Ciara, too; she’s an unbelievable person. That’s a part of, but I think ultimately when it comes down to football, the focus is on football. That’s just how it has to be and how it always is.”

    This came a day after offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell made his most pointed remarks about Wilson’s performance in the pair’s four seasons together.

    Wilson completed just 44 percent of his passes (including a couple of drops) in a 39-32 loss against the Cardinals. That’s his worst completion percentage since the second game of the 2013 season. He also had two turnovers.

    Wilson had both Doug Baldwin and Tyler Lockett deep in the third quarter but misfired for an interception. An accurate throw to either would have been a touchdown.

    On Seattle’s first two-point conversion in the fourth quarter, down two, Wilson floated a pass over the head of Baldwin, out of bounds.

    “He just has to make a better throw on it,” Bevell said. “He had an opportunity to give Doug a chance and really didn’t give him a chance.”

    On Seattle’s next two-point conversion later, the Seahawks tried to unleash the three-headed monster that had people drooling before the season: Wilson could hand the ball to running back Marshawn Lynch, run it himself or throw it to tight end Jimmy Graham, who was one-on-one outside.

    Wilson kept it, rolled out and threw the ball incomplete to Graham late in the play.

    “We feel like that’s about as good as we can get with three of our best guys,” Bevell said. “Russell is obviously the facilitator in that. He’s got to be able to make really good decisions when he does that. Again, you’ve got to give the guy an opportunity to make a play.”

    Carroll made similar comments about Wilson this week: “I think that in this game, we talk about the ones that got away, the throws that got away from us, and the opportunities that got away, there were plenty of them in there,” he said.

    Wilson is completing a career-best 66 percent of his passes, but he has already thrown as many interceptions (seven) as he did all of last season.

    He is playing behind an offensive line that has allowed 33 sacks, second-worst in the league, although some of those fall on Wilson. Carroll said the leaky play of the line has had an effect on Wilson, but Bevell didn’t think Wilson had “happy feet.”

    Interestingly enough, against the Cardinals, the Seahawks allowed 17 quarterback hurries, according to Pro Football Focus. The Cardinals allowed 30 quarterback hurries, and quarterback Carson Palmer dealt with the pressure by passing for 363 yards and three touchdowns.

    Wilson, for his part, said he was “just a bit off.”

    Wilson still made some thrilling plays, but with the contract and attention come heavy expectations. He has missed throws he normally makes. He has had uncharacteristic turnovers, including a fumble that turned into a safety against the Cardinals.

    “He’s just trying to get better, like all of us are,” Carroll said. “But he made some marvelous plays to give us a chance, and we missed a few opportunities that we needed to make a difference, too.”

    It has been that way for most of the season.

    in reply to: Three & Out: An Early Look at 2016 QBs #34455
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    one opinion from off the net

    jrry32

    If the Rams stick with two QBs that are sitting on the bench currently, they’re fools. They better know Mannion is Dan freaking Marino if they’re doing that.

    In order:

    1a. Paxton Lynch
    1b. Jared Goff
    3. Connor Cook
    4. Carson Wentz

    But if Wentz has a strong showing at the Senior Bowl, I’ll likely put him over Cook.(we’ll see still working on my evaluations of all four)

    Do not want Hackenberg, Cardale, or Brissett. They’re all talented but far too risky and need too much development imo.

    Cook is streaky. It’s an issue. And that’s why he doesn’t seem accurate. Because it’s not consistent enough. But I think he’ll be a good enough QB even with the streakiness to be worth a first round pick. If he cleans up his mechanics and becomes a more consistent QB, he’ll be very good.

    People had a lot of these same concerns with Cam Newton. His footwork and game have matured and he’s become a more consistent passer. Will Cook do the same? Maybe. Maybe not. That’s the risk. But if you’re drafting a QB outside of the top 10, there are going to be more than minor flaws you have to deal with.

    fter watching some of his games from this year, I’m bumping Connor Cook up to a first round grade.(had him as a 2nd rounder on my first QB rankings)

    But I have to say…he’s the second most frustrating QB I’ve ever evaluated. The first is Matthew Stafford.

    When I watch Cook, he’s very streaky. He has 5-10 plays where he looks like Aaron Rodgers and then another 5-10 plays where he looks like Nick Foles. The closest comparison I can think of is Eli Manning.(Jay Cutler is another possible comparison…but Cook doesn’t have the same level of arm strength)

    Like Eli, he has some issues with lower body mechanics and makes too many derpy decisions. But also like Eli, you see a lot of flashes of greatness, serious competitiveness, underrated mobility, and a whole lot of toughness.

    I think a couple of his issues with his lower body are that he has too narrow of a base when sitting in the pocket so he’s not stepping into his throws and incorporating his lower body like he should. He also throws off balance too often.(either of his back-foot or without his feet set)

    One thing Daniel Jeremiah pointed out was his tendency to allow his front-shoulder to fly open…after he mentioned it, I noticed it happening a bit when he wasn’t setting his feet.

    His decision making needs to improve. He’s too aggressive at times and makes derpy decisions…that’s the best way I can describe it. He refuses to give up on a play and does something inexplicable and extremely stupid. I think he might have an issue with his confidence. Seems to get mentally rattled at times when his performance is off…like he keeps digging the hole deeper and it takes him a little while to pull himself out of the funk.

    On the other side of the coin, he murders the blitz. He’s special at reading the blitz, finding the match-up advantage, and getting the ball out on time. He’s patient in the pocket and willing to take hits but his internal clock and feel for pressure are both very good. Will move defenders with his eyes. And he has a good feel for the pocket.

    His instincts in the pocket are very good. He feels pressure, moves within the pocket, remains calm, and finds a throwing lane. He’s deceptively athletic and strong which allows him to slip/avoid tackles and extend the play. He moves well in the pocket with a good feel for space. Doesn’t get rattled by a muddled or collapsing pocket.

    And the most impressive part of his game to me is his ability to throw guys open. True anticipation passer that throws the ball to spots and allows his receivers to make a play. Timing is also excellent. He doesn’t hesitate to throw before a WR has made his break and put the ball right on the money. Stood out to me in how good he is at sticking the ball into tight windows even before his WR breaks. When his accuracy is on, to make a baseball analogy, he paints the corner of the strike zone. There’s hitting the strike zone and then there’s painting the corners. I like my QBs to hit the strike zone…but I drool when my QB paints the corner. When Cook’s accuracy is on, he puts the ball in the one spot where only his guy can get it. And he’s especially good at making touch throws against defenders that have their back turned in man coverage…he drops it in right over the top.

    In terms of physical tools, he’s good but not elite. His arm strength is good and I think it’ll be considered very good once his lower body mechanics are ironed out a bit. Prototypical NFL frame at 6’3″/6’4″ 220. Could add a little weight but it’s not an issue. Solid mobility…I think it’s gotten better as he’s matured. I think he’s more coordinated and his feet are quicker than 2013 Connor Cook.

    So yea, I’m giving him a first round grade. There are flaws in his game. There are issues to iron out. There are frustrating inconsistencies. But there are also a lot of really good things that translate well to the NFL game. As always, I think you should give him a year to develop…but he is capable of starting as a rookie. Just prepare yourself for streakiness and interceptions.

    Hackenberg holds the ball too long, doesn’t feel pressure, and takes far too many sacks. When he does throw, his accuracy is seriously inconsistent. I totally understand that he has had poor talent around him. But it’s hard for me to ignore how bad he’s looked the past two years.

    Could you hit it big with this kid? Yes. But he’s too risky for me to bet it all on. He’s the type of guy that a team like the Patriots, Cardinals, Saints, Chargers, etc. can bet it on. Because they have time to develop him and don’t lose a bunch of games if he doesn’t pan out.

    in reply to: 101, 11/19 … Adam Caplan #34453
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    It is entirely possible that Foles can return to at least his 2014 level, which IMO is the real him. That’s good enough.

    I think some people are taking the recent meltdown as being all about lack of talent.

    He didn’t do anything in his meltdown that didn’t show up before. None of that is new, in terms of just info. It was all there out in the open to see from 2014. It all came up in the off-season after the trade.

    BUT this version is extensive…his flaws magnified.

    All of this is hiding the fact that he does have virtues too.

    What accounts for the meltdown then? IMO—protection issues, confidence, knowing the offense. Not “knowing the playbook,” knowing how to execute this offense in real time. In this offense, as I understand it, he has to call protections and scheme against the blitz pre-snap, he has to get used to sight adjustments with the WRs, and he has to drop back a lot from center. My understanding is that most if not all of that is new.

    Things like that exaggerate confidence and execution issues (which is the same thing). And that in turn exaggerates flaws and hides strengths.

    Now 2 things.

    First, I ain’t promising it. No guarantee he gets it back together but it can’t be ruled out.

    Second, this has nothing to do with whether or not they draft a qb. He can come back and they still could draft a qb. One thing does not preclude the other.

    .

    in reply to: reporters preview Rams vs. Ravens #34450
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Intriguing Matchup: Case Keenum vs. Baltimore Blitz

    Posted by: Bernie Miklasz i

    http://www.101sports.com/2015/11/20/intriguing-matchup-casey-keenum-vs-baltimore-blitz/

    OK, so it isn’t exactly Dan Marino taking aim at the infamous 1985 Chicago Bears defense. This isn’t Kurt Warner and the “Greatest Show” Rams cast taking their performance art into Baltimore to challenge Ray Lewis, Ed Reed and Terrell Suggs.

    But with the Rams changing their starting quarterback, trying to wrestle their way back to .500 and revive their faint playoff hopes in Sunday’s game in Baltimore offers a little something extra to go with the Chesapeake Bay-style crab cakes and Maryland crab soup I plan to make in time for kickoff.

    Before we get into it, let’s set the premise:

    — New Rams quarterback Case Keenum has made 10 NFL starts, all with Houston. Keenum hasn’t distinguished himself. He’s no long-time starter or lasting solution. But with the Rams passing game in a torpor under somnolent quarterback Nick Foles, a shakeup makes sense. Keenum can be a string of firecrackers. He can jar the Rams’ passivity on offense. He can extend plays by roaming to his left or right. He likes to heave the long ball, and can make some connections. That string of firecrackers makes noise, draws some attention, then quickly burns out. But the Rams don’t need Keenum to be Johnny Unitas. They just need him to make some plays.

    — Torn by injuries, the Baltimore defense is no longer the Baltimore defense. The Ravens have allowed an average of 25.4 points on offense per game, ranking 28th among the 32 teams. They’ve been stung by 34 completions of 20+ yards. They rank 30th in third-down defense, yielding for a conversion rate of 45.1 percent. Opposing quarterbacks have pitched their way to a 101.4 passer rating (2They’ve given up 35 “quick-strike” points this season — scores that come on possessions that last fewer than four plays. And the league average for quick-strike points is 25. The Ravens have allowed opponents to put points up on 44 percent of their offensive possessions; that ranks 30th. This defense has only five takeaways. This defense has been seared for 18 touchdown passes and made only four interceptions. (Where have you gone, Bobby Boyd? Where’s Rick Volk? Has anyone in Bawlmer seen Mike Curtis?)

    In other words: you can make plays against this Baltimore defense.

    Big plays at that. And while there’s no reason to expect sharp consistency from Keenum, he does have that helter-skelter style that you’d find on a playground. It’s oddly threatening to a defense that prefers going after the stationary Foles. But Keenum could be running around so much, we may see him fling a few passes from the adjacent Camden Yards.

    To compensate for their loose pass defense, the Ravens have cranked up the blitz. You know: mug the quarterback before he can lock in on a downfield target. Only seven NFL defenses have blitzed more frequently on passing downs than Baltimore this season. And the blitzkrieg can inflict some damage; the Ravens have 15 of their 24 sacks when sending extra pass rushers.

    But if the opposing QB can see through the heat waves and deliver the ball, it’s party time.

    The Ravens have blitzed on 114 passing downs. Let’s look through the rubble:

    Quarterbacks have completed 74 of 114 passes against the Baltimore blitz, or 65 percent.

    The QBs have 1,173 “blitz” passing yards vs. the Ravens — the most allowed by an NFL defense.

    Their yards per passing attempt vs. the Baltimore blitz is an inflated 10.29 yards; that ranks 31st.

    When give time to throw, the QBs have beaten this blitz for 12 completions of 25+ yards.

    Quarterbacks have charred the Baltimore blitz for 11 touchdown passes (tied for most in the NFL) with just one INT.

    When the Ravens blitz, opponents have counterattacked for a 127.6 passer rating.

    Yeah. I’d say you can make some plays when the Ravens send extra rushers after your QB.

    Now, there’s no guarantee the Ravens will release the hounds on Keenum. After looking at the Rams’ pass-protection issues, the Ravens’ defensive coaches may conclude that it makes sense to go with a four-man pass rush. Keenum isn’t the most accurate passer, so it makes sense to put the emphasis on coverage and reduce the number of blitzes. Why give Keenum a chance to wriggle or scamper from your blitz to find an uncovered receiver downfield?

    On the other hand …

    For all of his Run Rabbit Run! moments, Keenum doesn’t have killer career numbers vs. the blitz. He’s completed 48 of 105 passes (45.7%), been sacked 11 times, thrown two touchdown passes with one INT, and a 68.8 rating. Keenum has banged the blitz for nine passes of 25+ yards, so the playmaking threat is there.

    So we’ll have to see how this all goes down if the Ravens choose to aggressively attack the Rams’ vulnerable O-line with blitzes.

    But you have to think that Fisher had the Baltimore blitz in mind when he decided to go with Keenum over Foles. Early in the season Foles was very effective when blitz, but that performance deteriorated over his last five starts. Beginning with the game at Green Bay on Oct. 11, Foles has completed only 15 of 36 passes when blitzed (42%) with a passer rating of 51.7.

    As Nick Wagoner pointed out in his Rams’ coverage at ESPN.com, Keenum is superior to Foles on throws attempted outside the pocket. In his nine games Foles hit on 14 of 35 passes for 138 yards with no touchdowns or interceptions for a passer rating of 51.8. And in his 10 NFL starts, Keenum has completed 21 of 43 for 398 yards with three touchdowns and two interceptions for a passer rating of 86.5.

    I don’t think Fisher made the switch without studying the numbers and the video. There were plenty of reasons for benching Foles, but the matchup with Baltimore is also a matter of good timing.

    in reply to: Thomas: knee injury slows Quinn #34446
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    a gimpy quinn has really hurt the defense. more than losing long and ogletree combined.

    Yeah agreed. And with Long banged up 2 years now, and Sims and Hayes FAs, and Longacre and Westbrooks unknowns, makes it look like DE is a big draft priority in 2016.

    .

    in reply to: reporters preview Rams vs. Ravens #34443
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Known for defense, Baltimore has struggled in close games this season

    Joe Lyons

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/known-for-defense-baltimore-has-struggled-in-close-games-this/article_e42462aa-fa0b-5222-8331-c114b2424d82.html

    Baltimore Ravens’ football has been built around intimidating, dominant defense.

    That hard-nosed style was established just a few years after the Browns announced a move from Cleveland to Baltimore for the 1996 season.

    In the new franchise’s initial draft, it picked up its cornerstones, selecting Hall of Fame tackle Jonathan Ogden fourth overall and future Hall of Fame linebacker Ray Lewis at No. 26.

    In 1999, the Baltimore defense, led by Lewis, Jamie Sharper, Rod Woodson, Michael McCrary and Peter Boulware, began to flex its muscle, finishing second in the NFL in both total yards and rushing yards allowed.

    The next year, after a 5-4 start, the Ravens went on an 11-game win streak capped by a 34-7 rout of the New York Giants in Super Bowl XXXV.

    The 2000 Ravens’ defense is viewed as one of the best ever. Baltimore set NFL records for rushing yards (970) and points (165) allowed in a 16-game season. The Ravens also forced and recovered 26 fumbles, twice as many as anybody else in the league, and picked off 23 passes.

    In four playoff games, the Ravens allowed just 23 points.

    Ray Lewis was voted Defensive Player of the Year and was named to the Pro Bowl along with defensive teammates Woodson and defensive tackle Sam Adams.

    “That defense, those guys, they’re legendary,” Rams middle linebacker James Laurinaitis said. “They set a standard. I’ve always been a huge fan of Ray Lewis and all those guys. And of (safety) Ed Reed later on. I just have a huge appreciation for the brand of football those guys played.”

    And Baltimore maintained that level of excellence over time. From 1999 through 2011, the Ravens were ranked in the top five in at least one major defensive category — total defense, rush defense or pass defense — in all but two seasons. Baltimore led the league in total defense in 2006, was second in 2008 and third in 2011.

    At the end of the 2012 season, with John Harbaugh as head coach, the Ravens defeated the San Francisco 49ers 34-31 to win Super Bowl XLVII. The championship capped Lewis’ 17th and final season.

    “Seems like they had the draft of their lifetime that first year, built upon it and sustained it for a long time,” Laurinaitis said. “To do what they’ve done, with completely different players, different coaches, different coordinators, and to somehow maintain their identity and high level of play from year to year, it’s super impressive. And being in this league, you realize just how hard that is to keep something like that going.”

    Rams receiver Wes Welker, who faced the Ravens numerous times while playing for AFC rivals Miami, New England and Denver, said Baltimore’s defense always seemed to be a step ahead of the competition.

    “First of all, they had a lot of good defensive players,” said Welker, 34 and in his 12th NFL season. “With guys like Ray Lewis and Ed Reed, you can run just about any defense and be successful. But they had really good coaches and they brought in smart players who fit their system. They were doing things that other teams weren’t prepared for and by the time the opponents adjusted, they had made their adjustments, too.”

    The Ravens, who host the Rams in a noon Sunday game at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore, have fallen off a bit defensively in recent seasons — they’re currently ranked 10th against the run, 26th against the pass and 20th in total yards allowed — but they’ve been competitive.

    Baltimore enters Sunday’s action with a somewhat misleading 2-7 record. The seven losses have come by a total of 32 points. Both wins, at Pittsburgh and at home over San Diego, were by three points.

    Harbaugh, who has led the Ravens to the playoffs in six of his seven seasons, knows his defense can be better.

    “Statistically, we’re not very good (but) most of it’s because of big plays,” he said of his defense. “We didn’t have big-play issues last week, we had some penalties. If we can eliminate those kind of things, I think we’re capable of being a top-notch defense.”

    The 2015 Ravens’ defense is keyed by veterans Daryl Smith (81 tackles), Elvis Dumervil (29 tackles, 4½ sacks), Jimmy Smith (40 tackles, two interceptions) and youngsters C.J. Mosley and Brandon Williams, who starred at Rockwood Summit High.

    A second-year linebacker from Alabama, Mosley (55 tackles, 3 sacks) grew up a Ravens’ fan.

    “Especially Ray Lewis,” said Mosley, who finished as runner-up to Rams’ defensive tackle Aaron Donald in the rookie of the year voting a year ago. “People have tried to compare me to him, said I was filling his role. … He led the team on the field. His defense trusted him. The team trusted him. When plays had to be made, he made them or put players in the right position to make them. For any linebacker, those of the kind of standards you want to hold, that you want to bring to the table.

    “But (Lewis) has his own face here with this organization. … I’m here to do my job as a linebacker, make calls and be a leader by example for this team.”

    Williams, a nose tackle from Missouri Southern selected by Baltimore in the third round of the 2013 draft, is in his second season as a starter He has 32 tackles, two sacks, two passes defended and a forced fumble.

    “He’s one of our best players,” Harbaugh said. “He’s a dominant nose guard. … Really great personality, fun guy to be around. Hard worker.”

    With Mosley and Williams as a foundation, the Ravens hope to re-establish the franchise’s defensive reputation.

    “That’s the goal — to win games, win Super Bowls, win our division, win our conference,” Mosley said.“That’s why we’re here. That’s why they drafted us. It’s always great to look back on tradition because it reminds you where you came from,” Mosley said. “There always has to be a next generation that comes up and makes the program that much better and that much more elite. That’s why we’re here and what we want to do.”

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    CoachO

    I have come to find out that it’s been a huge chore to get Mr. Robinson in the film room.

    I am in a position to know that CoachO is in a position to know that. It’s not speculation on his part.

    .

    in reply to: Rams tackle Greg Robinson working to correct 'technical' issues #34439
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from off the net

    ===

    CoachO

    “Honestly, I thought my athletic ability would make up for a lot of it, but I’ve come a long way and I’m just taking the coaching,” Robinson said. “Coach Bou and Andy, they have worked a lot with me and I feel like I’m making progress. It’s just coming with time.”

    This right here is the biggest cause for all his struggles.

    I have come to find out that it’s been a huge chore to get Mr. Robinson in the film room. Veteran members of the unit have approached him numerous times trying to teach him how to prepare as a pro.

    His unwillingness to put in the time because of his athleticism has been a source of frustration to more than just the coaches.

    As much as they want to focus on technique IMO his lack of preparation has as much to do with it as anything else. The hesitation stemming from the uncertainty of not knowing his assignment on any given play causes a lot of the technique issues.

    It’s also a big reason to have a veteran lining up next to him.

    They aren’t gonna bench him. Even before the injuries. They’re stuck with him. They have too much invested in him. Both financially and in draft status.

    I know for a fact that he’s been approached more than once. Apparently the light is starting to come on. He’s starting to realize he can’t just show up and rely on his athleticism anymore. It’s no coincidence that that quote was uttered by him.

    He’s got all the PHYSICAL tools to be a great player. But unless and until the mental side come with some maturity, he’s gonna continue to struggle. And I’m not calling him dumb. I’m calling him immature.

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat the Ravens? #34434
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    No. It is all over.

    Go Oakland.

    There. I’ve said it.

    C’mon. Scoff. This routine is old. Where the Seattle fans on the board pretend to be Oakland fans so they can openly root for the Ravens.

    Then accuse US of being “paranoid.”

    Right.

    .

    in reply to: keenum's 2014 numbers #34424
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Not many yards rushing.
    He’s no Russell Wilson.

    w
    v

    Well if he were they couldn’t have gotten him for a 7th round pick.

    Keenum is streaky. IMO he’s kind of an Austin Davis without a Tilt function.

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat the Ravens? #34421
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Oh. I didn’t realize the board had so many Ravens fans. So when the Ravens are on defense, do you chant “nevermore!” at the opposing offense?

    in reply to: wv is number one #34413
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    So. That must make you feel proud, right?

    in reply to: reporters preview Rams vs. Ravens #34412
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams notes: Welker getting more comfortable with each practice

    Joe Lyons

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/rams-notes-welker-getting-more-comfortable-with-each-practice/article_772019d1-5af0-5bb4-a058-53cb1ed27aa6.html

    Just a few days after signing with the Rams, veteran receiver Wes Welker made his debut Sunday. The 34-year-old was on the field for 11 offensive snaps, targeted six times and finished with three catches for 32 yards.

    “It felt good,’’ Welker said following his first game action since a Denver Broncos playoff loss Jan. 11. “It felt good just kind of getting my feet wet a little bit; just trying to get accustomed to everything.’’

    Signed after Stedman Bailey was suspended four games for violating the NFL’s policy on substance abuse, Welker entered the game on the Rams’ second series and was open when a third-down pass from Nick Foles missed the mark. On the next possession, Welker made a 6-yard reception on a third-and-7 play.

    “Obviously I want to get my depth on that third down and make sure I get the first down,” said Welker, who was open and overthrown on a second-half pass from Foles. “It’s a tough situation but at the same time you still have to make those plays for the team.’’

    Welker hopes to play an even bigger role in Sunday’s game against the Ravens in Baltimore.

    “This being my 12th year, you kind pick it up and go,’’ he said. “Obviously not the outcome we wanted, but I felt comfortable. Every day, you’re learning more and more. I’m trying to study, getting in a lot of mental reps, watching the other guys. I’m standing next to ‘Sherm’ (wide receivers coach Ray Sherman) and (offensive assistant Jeff) Garcia and getting the play calls, and figuring out what’s what. It’s coming along.’’

    Rams coach Jeff Fisher likes what he has seen from Welker.

    “He was exact in his play,’’ Fisher said. “He ran the routes appropriately. He got open. We hit him a few times and missed him a few times. He looked like he’d been doing it for a long time, which is good to see.’’

    A five-time Pro Bowl selection who led the NFL in receptions in 2007, 2011 and 2013, Welker must now adjust to a new quarterback. On Monday, Fisher announced that Case Keenum would replace Foles.

    “In Miami, I think we had six or seven QB’s, but it’s been a long time for me to deal with that,’’ said Welker, who has caught passes from future Hall of Famers Peyton Manning and Tom Brady during the last eight seasons of his NFL career. “I think you just go out there and try to do your job and do whatever you can to help your team win. I’m kind of focused on myself and playing how I need to play.’’

    NEW GUY IN TOWN

    The newest Ram, center Eric Kush, has had an eventful fall, spending time with the Kansas City Chiefs, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Carolina Panthers and Houston Texans — all since early September.“I’ve been running around, making the rounds, touring the country a little bit, grinding, grinding, grinding, doing whatever I need to do,’’ he said.

    On Monday, just 10 days after signing a two-year contract, the 26-year-old Kush was waived by Houston. He was claimed by the Rams on Tuesday. Wednesday, he took part in his first practice at Rams Park.

    “I’m coming in here to work my butt off,’’ he said. “I’m going to work hard, bring some energy, have fun and help out in any way I can.’’

    Kush, who stands 6 feet 4 and weighs 313 pounds, played in 49 games and made 32 starts for the Division II California University of Pennsylvania Vulcans and was selected by Kansas City in the sixth round of the 2013 draft. He spent the next two seasons with the Chiefs, playing in three games and making one start.

    With the University of Missouri’s Mitch Morse, a second-round draft choice in the spring, winning the starting job in Kansas City, Kush was cut at the end of training camp.

    “It’s nice to still have a job, to know somebody wants you,’’ he said. “I want to move forward. I’m excited to be here, the playbook’s very similar, which helps. I’m primarily a center, but I’m here to play some football and I’ll do whatever the team needs me to do.’’

    RAM-BLINGS

    The Rams’ first injury report of the week includes just four players. Defensive end Robert Quinn (hip) and tackle Rob Havenstein (calf) did not practice, center Tim Barnes (concussion) was limited and Chris Long (knee) was a full participant. Long was hurt on a knee-to-knee hit against Green Bay on Oct. 11 and hasn’t played since.For the Ravens, linebacker Elvis Dumervil (knee), and guard Kelechi Osemele (knee) and tight end Nick Boyle (foot) did not practice Wednesday. Dumervil and Osemele have started all nine games this season for Baltimore.

    • Not long the 3 p.m. waiver deadline Wednesday, defensive tackle Doug Worthington ran out of the locker room at Rams Park and rejoined the team. Worthington was waived on Tuesday and re-signed to the practice squad after clearing waivers.

    • After receiving contributions from everyone in the locker room, the Rams will partner with the Urban League of Metropolitan St. Louis for the 21st consecutive year of distributing turkeys and fixings to approximately 2,000 families. Players, cheerleaders and team mascot Rampage will pass out the turkeys Thursday at locations throughout the region.

    • The Denver Broncos released guard Shelley Smith on Wednesday. Smith was with the Rams in 2012 and 2013.

    in reply to: reporters preview Rams vs. Ravens #34410
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Practice Report 11/18: Austin’s Homecoming, Long Returns to Practice

    Myles Simmons

    http://www.stlouisrams.com/news-and-events/article-practicereport/Practice-Report-1118-Austins-Homecoming-Long-Returns-to-Practice/89291588-0e2f-4399-a3fe-3a95edd0a6b8

    Because he’s a member of a team in the NFC West, wide receiver Tavon Austin doesn’t get many opportunities to play in his hometown. He’ll get to do it for the first time in his career on Sunday, when St. Louis squares of against Baltimore just steps away from the inner harbor.

    “Definitely looking forward to it,” Austin said after Wednesday’s practice. “Just the fact that I get to go home, play in front of my family — a lot of people who don’t get to come see me play out here. And growing up in Baltimore, I was a Ravens fan. So just playing against one of my favorite teams growing up is definitely a blessing, too.”

    Austin came up in Baltimore during a time when the Ravens featured a bevy of talented players, winning Super Bowl XXXV to conclude the 2000 season. And Austin continued to follow the club as it continued its success through the last decade.

    “That’s when they had all the legends back then — Ed Reed, Jamal [Lewis] and all those guys, Ray [Lewis],” Austin said. “It was definitely good growing up and seeing them. And now, I would’ve played against one of them this year — Terrell Suggs — but unfortunately he’s hurt.”

    Neither of those players were his favorite wide receiver, though.

    “I was a [Derrick] Mason kind of guy,” Austin said, coincidentally referencing a receiver who played for his current head coach in Tennessee before going to the Ravens in 2005.

    While Austin has played in the D.C.-Virginia-Maryland area before — the Rams played at Washington in Week 2 of this year, for instance — the Baltimore native said this game will have a different feel to it.

    “I probably lived about 15 minutes from the stadium,” Austin said. “A lot of people wouldn’t travel to D.C. to come see me.”

    They will, however, make the shorter trip to downtown Baltimore.

    “It’ll probably be a good little section up there for me,” Austin said, adding he expects his friends and family to wear Rams gear.

    It may be Austin’s first trip to Baltimore as a pro, but he has played at the home of the Ravens before. At Dunbar High School, Austin was a key cog for a team that won three consecutive Class 1A state championships. And those championship games were played at M&T Bank Stadium.

    “I’ve got some good memories in that stadium,” Austin said.

    Austin set all kinds of Maryland records in high school, including 9,258 yards from scrimmage, 7,962 yards rushing, 123 touchdowns, and 790 points. But there’s one thing that sicks out in his mind from the last state championship he won in 2008.

    “My last play of my high school career, I scored the winning two-point conversion to win the game — to win the state championship,” Austin said.

    Now, he’ll go back seven years later with the goal of creating some new memories.

    “That’s the plan,” Austin said. “Go in there try to have a good game, don’t do too much — just play my game and try to get out of there with a win.”

    LONG’S BACK AT PRACTICE

    It’s been another trying year for defensive end Chris Long, who has been out the last four weeks since suffering a knee injury against the Packers. But the veteran is now a full participant in practice, after going through a limited session at the end of last week. He was listed as doubtful on the injury report heading into the matchup against Chicago, but admitted Wednesday that may have been a bit unrealistic.

    “That was probably more hopeful than I was realistically close,” Long said. “I appreciate coaches kind of saying, ‘Hey man, let’s be smart and wait one more week. Let this thing completely heal.’ And when I’m back, I’m back. I’ll be close to 100 percent. That’s all I can ask for.”

    But with this being the second straight year Long has had to miss games, it’s been a bit of a frustrating process.

    “I’m not the first guy to get hurt, injured. It’s out of your control. But when you’re hurt, you feel like you’re letting people down,” Long said. “You’re watching your buddies play football, and that’s your job. You don’t feel like you’re doing your job.

    “Especially two years in a row, it’s frustrating because there have been things that you just can’t avoid,” Long continued. “They’re freak things and I’m going to keep pushing to try to help this team, and do my part. I’m just excited to be back and help this team.”

    If there’s a silver lining to Long’s injury this time around, it’s that there was no ligament damage to the knee so he did not have to undergo surgery.

    “The bone just had to heal,” Long said. “It’s a fracture, so it’s not like something that when you’re back, you’re dragging around.”

    Long lamented how he didn’t feel like himself when he got back to playing the Rams’ final five contests in 2014.

    “So when I’m back, I’m back,” Long said. “And I’m really excited to help the team however I can. I’ve just missed being out there.”

    “When you’re staring the prognosis down in the face, you’re like, man, it’s going to take forever,” Long added. “And then you’re out there like that. So we’ve got at least seven weeks of football left — at least — and I can’t wait to keep playing.”

    INJURY REPORT

    Aside from Long being listed as a full participant, the Rams had three more players listed on their Wednesday injury report.

    Center Tim Barnes (concussion) was listed as a limited participant.

    Defensive end Robert Quinn (hip) and right tackle Rob Havenstein (calf) did not participate in Wednesday’s session.

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat the Ravens? #34409
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Anyway this isn’t the Baltimore we remember from legend. More O than D. On O, more passing effectiveness than rushing effectiveness.

    They are 10th on offense.
    23rd in rushing yards.
    9th in passing yards.
    3.9% sack percentage on O, which is very good.

    20th on defense.
    26th against the pass.
    10th against the run.
    5.7% sack percentage on defense, also good (ranked 10th)

    Their games are pretty much all close. A pretty evenly spread-out point differential of 26 in 9 games, which is just under 3 a game of course. The biggest score differential from any 2015 Baltimore game is 8 points in a loss to Arizona. Win or lose, the other 8 games avg. a 2.25 point differential. Should be a tough game.

    Not one of Flacco’s best seasons, and not among his worst. The infamous Steve Smith, formerly of Carolina, is their leading receiver. When he last played against St. Louis in 2013, Smith was very vocal about what he thought of the Rams D and its chippy attitude.

    in reply to: reporters preview Rams vs. Ravens #34408
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Now starting in Baltimore, Givens faces old team

    Jim Thomas

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/now-starting-in-baltimore-givens-faces-old-team/article_052419f3-829d-5af4-b348-83cadbfab5b1.html

    Jeff Fisher’s Rams teams have always been a tight-knit group. So just because a teammate leaves and goes elsewhere, doesn’t mean the friendship ends.

    And so it is with wide receiver Chris Givens. After three-plus seasons running routes against Janoris Jenkins and Trumaine Johnson on the practice field at Rams Park, he will now be trying to beat them as a Baltimore Raven on Sunday at M&T Bank Stadium.

    “That was my buddy when he was here,” Jenkins said. “We hung out a little bit. We got to know each other. I’m glad to see anybody that leaves here go somewhere and be successful.”

    So Jenkins will exchange pleasantries before the game; maybe a man-hug afterwards. But in between?

    “Between the white lines, it’s business,” Jenkins said. “I’ve got no words for him but Clamps. That’s all.”

    “Clamps” is Jenkins’ term to describe his playing style — as in clamping down on a receiver.

    Givens is expecting the trash-talking to start immediately if he’s lined up over Jenkins or Johnson.

    “Nothing’s gonna change,” Givens said. “It’s gonna be the same that it’s been when I played against those guys in practice.”

    Traded to Baltimore on Oct. 3 for a seventh-round draft pick, Givens faces his old friends seven weeks later.

    “It’s gonna be exciting,” Givens told the Post-Dispatch. “I just can’t wait to play. It’s one of those games you look forward to.”

    Givens still talks to Rams wide receivers Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey about once a week, and touches base with Rams wide receivers coach Ray Sherman “every now and then.” He sent Case Keenum a congratulatory text earlier this week after Keenum was promoted to starting quarterback.

    “That’s a good thing for him,” Givens said. “Case is a good guy, man. He’s a good quarterback; he just needed an opportunity.”

    So did Givens.

    He had that impressive rookie season with the Rams in 2012, when he caught 42 passes for a team-high 698 yards. He had a reception of 50 or more yards in five consecutive games that season, which set an NFL rookie record.

    But Givens’ playing time and productivity dropped with each successive season — to 34 catches in 2013 and just 11 in 2014. He had just one catch for 7 yards as a Ram this season before the trade.

    “It was very frustrating,” Givens said. “You put in a lot of work in the offseason … and you don’t get that opportunity. It just makes you frustrated. It makes you that much more hungry.”

    As to why his playing time decreased, Givens said, “I never really got a clear explanation. We started the season and it was like I was just another guy.”

    The trade to Baltimore has given him a chance to revive his career.

    “I was praying for something like this to happen, and then the day I got the call like all my prayers were answered,” he said.

    A week or so before the trade, Givens got a hint that something might be in the works. He got a text from Baltimore wide receiver Michael Campanaro, a former college teammate at Wake Forest, telling him the Ravens coaches had been asking about him.

    “And it kinda made sense because of everything that as going on,” Givens said.

    Ironically enough, after a season-ending back injury to Campanaro, Baltimore made the trade for Givens.

    In five games with the Ravens, Givens has 10 catches for 143 yards and a touchdown. His playing time has increased to the point where he moved into the starting lineup last week against Jacksonville, and he’s scheduled to start this Sunday against his old team.

    “He’s fit in well,” Ravens coach John Harbaugh said via conference call Wednesday. “He’s a hard-working guy and that’s a credit to how he’s been brought up in the league. Got some talent, and we like him.”

    Givens made what looked like the game-winning reception last week against Jacksonville, a 14-yard reception on a corner route. But what proved to be a controversial field goal as time expired gave the Jaguars a 22-20 victory.

    Givens said he and Ravens quarterback Joe Flacco already have a pretty good rapport, but work to build it every day in practice.

    “He’s one of the better quarterbacks in this league; he’s gonna be like that for a long time,” Givens said. “He will get you the ball at any different time, so you’ve always got to be ready for it. He makes things easier because of how good he is.”

    When they made the trade, the Ravens inherited what was left of Givens’ original Rams contract — a contract that expires after this season. Givens hopes the Ravens see enough that they’ll re-sign him beyond the 2015 campaign.

    “I’m loving where I’m at,” Givens said. “I love everything about it. And it’s just one of those things that feels right. From the first day I got here everything just felt right.”

    Come Sunday he’ll have some kind words for his former teammates, before and after the game. But when all is said and done he’ll be trying to beat them, and vice versa.

    “No one on either side, neither one of us wants to walk away saying we lost,” Givens said. “So it’s gonna be a high-intensity game.”

    “I’m not gonna go out there and kill him,” Johnson said. “We’re brothers still. He’s with the Ravens now, though, so we’re both playing for the win.”

    No matter what, Givens won’t leave the stadium empty-handed. How so?

    “I’m gonna take him his socks,” Austin said Wednesday, pointing to a box near his locker stall. “He left his socks here, so I’m gonna take him his socks. Just a little bit of memories.”

    Yes, nothing says old times like a box full of old socks.

    in reply to: reporters violently blast the BEARS game #34406
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PFF:

    CHI-STL GRADES: BEARS’ DEFENSE STUMPS RAMS

    The top takeaways and highest-graded players from the Bears’ 37-13 win over the Rams.

    MICHAEL MOUNTFORD

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/11/16/chi-stl-grades-bears-defense-stumps-rams/

    Here are the top takeaways and highest-graded players from the Bears’ 37-13 win over the Rams:

    Chicago Bears
    – Jay Cutler (-1.7) had his lowest grade of the season, but was very effective on passes under 10 yards, going 19-for-20 for 258 yards and all three TDs. However, most of these were passes short of the sticks that the receivers did all of the work. Zach Miller going 87 yards for a touchdown was more about the Rams’ defense than anything Cutler did; he threw a short speed out, and Miller made one cut and the Rams defense overran the pursuit angle. Cutler was unable to complete a pass over 10 yards, as 209 yards came after the catch.

    – The Bears’ secondary performed at a high level versus the Rams; CB Kyle Fuller (+3.3) came away with the highest grade on the team, as he allowed just one catch on eight targets for 1 yard and had one pass deflection. On the opposite side of him was Tracy Porter (+2.5); while Porter was only targeted three times, he too only allowed one catch for a grand total of 6 yards and had two pass deflections. Both starting safeties, Antrel Rolle (+2.3) and Adrian Amos (+0.5) also held up in coverage, only giving up three catches on six targets for 12 yards combined. The longest play the starting secondary gave up was two 6 yard pass plays.

    – With Matt Forte out, neither Jeremy Langford (+1.8) nor Ka’Deem Carey (RB -0.7) did much as a runner versus the Rams; part of the problem was that the Rams’ defensive line gave the Bears’ running backs very little room to work with. Langford was able to escape on a couple of runs, however, these were few and far between. As a receiver out of the backfield, Langford was able to take a screen pass 83 yards for a touchdown.

    Top Performers:

    CB Kyle Fuller (+3.3)
    TE Zach Miller (+3.0)
    LB Willie Young (+2.8)
    CB Tracy Porter (+2.7)
    S Antrel Rolle (+2.3)

    St. Louis Rams
    – Nick Foles (-5.0) struggled against the Bears’ defense, only completing 47 percent of his passes; all of his completions were under 10 yards (there wasn’t a single completed pass over 10 yards in this whole game). When Foles tried to go over 10 yards, he was 0-for-14. With the Rams struggling to move the ball in the run game, St. Louis tried to open the Bears’ defense downfield, but neither Foles nor the receivers had any luck in getting a chunk of yardage on one play.

    – Second-year pro Aaron Donald (+11.7) had another one of his monster games. Donald had the second-highest pass rushing productivity of the week for defensive tackles at 18.4, thanks to four total pressures on 19 pass rushing snaps. While Donald only had three run stops on 30 snaps, he caused the Bears’ interior offensive line issues all game long with both his ability to penetrate into the backfield as well as using his strength to stand up the lineman at the point of attack, taking away the holes for the Bears’ runners that way.

    – First round pick Todd Gurley (-0.7) struggled to find any room as a runner, as the Bears’ defense committed to stopping Gurley first and forcing the Rams into long passing situations. They did so with great effect, allowing Gurley just 45 yards on 12 carries. The longest run allowed by Gurley all night was just 9 yards. The past two weeks for Gurley have been a realization that the NFL is not the SEC, and those first four starts where he gained 100+ yards each week will not continue with the NFL defenses focusing more and more on the run game.

    Top Performers:

    DL Aaron Donald (+11.7)
    OL Garrett Reynolds (+3.7)
    DL Nick Fairley (+3.4)
    OL Rob Havenstein (+2.4)
    CB Janoris Jenkins (+2.1)

    in reply to: Who's 'winning' the Foles-Bradford trade? #34405
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    REEVALUATING THE FOLES-BRADFORD TRADE

    With the news of Nick Foles’ benching, John Breitenbach revisits the QB-for-QB swap by the Rams and Eagles.

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/11/17/pro-nick-foles-sam-bradford-trade-re-evaulated/

    This offseason, the Rams traded Sam Bradford and a fifth-round pick to the Eagles in exchange for Nick Foles and a second-round pick. Neither team was overly-satisfied with the fit of their signal caller, but also found the options in free agency and the draft limited, forcing them to look around the league for solutions. It’s now the middle of November, and Foles has been benched for Case Keenum, while Bradford is likely to miss time for injuries sustained against the Dolphins.

    As is evident from the numbers, neither QB has played well through Week 10. Foles is better at generating big plays, but Bradford has better accuracy in general and under pressure.

    Foles’ biggest issue throughout his career has been consistency. Too often, good games have been followed up with terrible ones. Even in his outstanding 2013 season, Foles was dreadful against Dallas in Week 7. Overall, he has played four games with a +4.0 grade or better in his career, but another six with grades worse than -4.0. Three of those games have come this year, including the one that resulted in his benching against the Bears.

    Bradford, meanwhile, has done a decent job in Chip Kelly’s offense, but his limitations aren’t going away. He remains inaccurate and indecisive on downfield throws, even if his receivers have let him down on occasion with drops. Injury issues have resurfaced, with reports now that he may miss two games due to multiple injuries sustained in Week 10.

    The backups
    Jeff Fisher is desperately looking for a solution to save the Rams’ season, and probably his job, but recently-named starter Case Keenum does not look like the savior. Overall, he has a -10.6 grade in his performances in the pros (10 starts since 2013). There were some good moments in Houston, but passing under pressure proved a significant issue, along with accuracy in general.

    For the Eagles, Mark Sanchez remains a capable passer, but also more than capable of crippling decisions in key situations. His -7.9 grade in nine games last season suggests he’s unlikely to seize the starting job if Bradford is forced to miss significant time.

    in reply to: defensive rankings week 11 #34403
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PFF rankings, Rams D

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_team.php?tab=by_team

    Overall: 2nd

    Run defense: 1st

    Pass rush: 3rd

    Pass coverage: 7th

    The following D players are ranked highly at their positions:

    Quinn: 6th
    Hayes: 12th

    Donald: 1st
    Fairley: 8th

    Barron: 14th

    McCleod: 14th

    Jenkins: 7th
    Johnson: 15th

    in reply to: what the OL? Rams OL shuffling #34402
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    personally wouldn’t just rely on boudreau to work his magic with these young guys. i’d count on maybe two ot three of those guys panning out.

    Well at this point they have 14 linemen and counting.

    I also pay attention to the “ronin vet” types, because Boudreau has gotten things out of guys like that before.

    There will no doubt be other pick-ups, including UDFAS and other modest FAs and cuts.

    I think so far it looks like at least 3 of the 2015 draft picks have a future: Brown, Wichman, Havenstein. Jeez that’s a lot in one year.

    They have plenty to work with and now it’s more veteran than it was if you just average the years.

    in reply to: JT on 920 … re: Foles, Keenum #34401
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    chances are he’s done. we can hope for the best, but odds are he’s done.

    Well I see him as being set up for a return. Who gets benched with the coach saying he will be back?

    And I have seen signs at this point. He played better before in 2014 plus in the ARz and Seattle games, AND on top of it, in terms of what is wrong, has all the symptoms of not really “getting” this offense yet—which is something that can change.

    So I think JT is right about all that.

    And they can still draft someone. Setting Foles up for a return doesn’t preclude that.

    in reply to: JT on 920 … re: Foles, Keenum #34398
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This was a dramatic change in offense for him. If nothing else, just being under center every play. But also in terms of the reads and progressions.

    That;s how I see it. There was more of an adjustment and he wasn’t executing.

    I don’t know if he had sight adjustments before, either.

    Or if the called protections against the blitz.

    He looked more uncomfortable and unconfident and pressing than just plain lacking.

    I still think the Foles of 2014 (not 2013) is possible with the Rams and that’s more than good enough.

    .

    in reply to: what the OL? Rams OL shuffling #34396
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    but i think they’d be making a mistake if they didn’t draft at least one olineman. doesn’t have to be a premium pick but somewhere in the middle rounds would do.

    My thinking is, they have young talent and then they added a bunch of developmental veterans of the kind Boudreau has done well with before. I can’t think of any team that drafted 5 linemen in one year. Plus they added a good UDFA find (Wms) and then 4 vets. 10 new linemen in one year. That’s a lot.

    And one of the ones who hasn’t seen the field yet (Wichman) has a lot of promise and word is they are high on him.

    They really don’t need to draft anyone. They’ve barely scratched the surface with what they have, in terms of potential going forward and good depth in camp.

    .

    in reply to: QB Change #34393
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from off the net

    CoachO

    I am shocked that Fisher made the move. Not that I don’t think it needed to be made.

    Some follow-up:

    CoachO

    Foles continually tries to force throws and when he is late it gives the defender plenty of time to close on the receiver. How many times does he attempt to throw an simple out route from the far hash mark? The problem isn’t that he lacks the arm strength to make the throw. It’s that he needs to have the ball gone as the receiver starts his break. Instead he waits too long and give the CB time to contest the throw. People like to flame on the receivers for their inability to get separation. But more often than not, they are open. But by the time the ball arrives they aren’t any longer. What are often called drops are often really contested balls made so much more difficult because the BALL IS LATE!

    I think Mannion has the one intangible that will make him succeed. INTELLIGENCE. He processes information quickly and as he gets more comfortable in this offense he will know what to do with the ball. Then it’s will be just adjusting to the speed of the NFL. He has the size and can make the throws. But so does Foles. The thing that could help Mannion brings is the decision making. I think he can and should be in the mix coming into 2016. But with this latest development, I think it means he will be held back even more. They aren’t going to cast Foles aside. He is still going to be entrenched as the #2 making it even less likely that Mannion will have any opportunity to step up anytime soon. Just not how Fisher does things.

    in reply to: La Confora: Rams probably won't owe Eagles a 4th #34392
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Sources: Bradford has separated shoulder

    http://www.theredzone.org/BlogDescription/tabid/61/EntryId/53122/Sources–Bradford-has-separated-shoulder/Default.aspx

    An MRI revealed that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Sam Bradford suffered a separated shoulder in Sunday’s loss to the Dolphins, league sources told Ed Werder of ESPN.

    Bradford left the game in the third quarter after he was sacked by Miami linebacker Chris McCain and landed on his left (non-throwing) shoulder. The Eagles announced after the game that Bradford also had been diagnosed with a concussion.

    Bradford, who is in the league’s concussion protocol, could miss this week’s game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, but wants to see how much improvement he experiences during the week before a decision is made on his playing status, sources told Werder.

    in reply to: Bears game stuff from all around the net #34390
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from off the net

    ===

    alyoshamucci

    So, gonna try to give this more attention than others this year because it has significant ramifications all across the board. I know that many were less upset about this loss than the Vikings, but I am not that guy …

    I am going to say a couple things to get them out of the way right now … Gase did an amazing scouting/coaching job. I don’t know if the Bears have just finally gotten his offense or he found ways to exploit us specifically, or both. But he called a game good enough to make me wonder if he was stealing our signs. He was that good.
    Along with that, the refs zeroed in on some stuff and ignored others … they didn’t lose the game for us, but I hate it when officials get wrapped up and fixated.

    The Good

    1) Donald played as well as I’ve seen him, and his six sacks make me happy.

    2) Fairley had another good game.

    3) Jenks and Tru held up well outside AGAINST WRS.

    4) Our first drive was emblematic of what I want us to be offensively.

    5) Havenstein is the kinda player an offensive line needs to have. He wins ugly, but is dependable.

    6) Marquez on ST … excellent.

    The Bad

    7) Nick, you’re late. Dude, I know you don’t trust you receivers to catch the ball, but you have to pull the trigger when you get the look you want.

    8) Kendricks. Cook. Britt … Catch. The. Ball. What’s the deal with drops on 3rd down? Those are like fumbles.

    9) Nick, what’s up with the inaccuracy? Are the WRs in the wrong spot?

    10) Nick, why are you staring the receivers down?

    11) Nick? Are you okay?

    12) Where are my safeties?

    13) Where’s my run defense? One play good, two bad?

    14) Brown’s injury. Ugh. 2 down.

    15) GW … not adjusting? Were you not tapped into reality this game? Dude had your number and you didn’t pull back?

    16) Seriously Mason, a fumble?

    17) No PI on Jeffery on Jenks would be INT? Jenks had position … maybe I missed that?

    The UGLY

    18) GRob … THREE DEVASTATING HOLDING PENALTIES … then you look like you gave up and were lost?

    19) WRs not coming back to the ball? WHAT?

    20) NICK YOU’RE LATE, THEY WERE OPEN EARLIER.

    21) TWO 80 YARD TDS?????!!!!!! You should have been running laps DURING THE GAME.

    22) You GAVE UP almost 200 Total yards to a rookie RB with Forte out.

    23) The defeated look, I don’t want to see it again.

    24) First game in a while I turned off.

    25) Cignetti … what’s going on?

    26) Quick, did you just give up on football?

    The Aftermath

    27) Sorry, benching Foles rather than benching the WRs who are dropping the ball and running the wrong routes? You best know what you’re doing Fish because it’s sending one of two messages 1) Foles is incompetent and we’re trying to light a fire under him … or 2) our WRs are incompetent and Foles needs a week away from having to deal with their inability to function in an offense.

    28) O line … I hope they give Wichmann the start, and honestly I hope they have Battle at the ready for going in at any moment.

    29) This seems to call some draft priorities in question, and I’ll address those … but for me nothing has changed. I will run the QBs down for everyone else, but I don’t think we need one.

    30) Can they come back from this? Yes. Will they? Dunno.

    31) Great, first Rams game seeing with my family (after a 5 hour drive) and a backup is starting this weekend. Ugh.

    32) I still think we have a shot to pull it together and get to the playoffs …

    in reply to: defensive rankings week 11 #34381
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PASSING YARDS PER GAME: 5th

    What does it mean?

    It means this:

    YARDS PER PASS ATTEMPT: 13TH

    +

    NFL Team Opponent Pass Attempts per Game: 7th

    in reply to: defensive rankings week 11 #34378
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Adding a new stat.

    Defensive big plays against.

    My source says “a passing big play is one in which the yards gained on the passing play equal 25 yards or more while a rushing big play is one in which the yards gained on the rushing play equal 10 yards or more.”

    Rams rank 23rd with 29.

    .

Viewing 30 posts - 41,851 through 41,880 (of 47,862 total)