Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 40,951 through 40,980 (of 41,079 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams defense is loaded and hungry #1209
    zn
    Moderator

    This is a good one IMO

    in reply to: Various endless pre-camp media thoughts about Bradford #1205
    zn
    Moderator

    RamBill

    Sports Illustrated’s Doug Farrar and Chris Burke answer your NFC West questions from Twitter including if Sam Bradford will be resigned and who has the best wide receiving corps in the division. They also answer the question on how many other divisions would the 4th place finisher in the NFC West win. (4:05)

    in reply to: Sam Bradford Commercial….. #1199
    zn
    Moderator

    Without the opening & closing brackers (so you can see it)

    youtube width=”640″ height=”360″]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BireM8MZSJI[/youtube

    in reply to: Guardians of the Galaxy #1193
    zn
    Moderator
    in reply to: Coach O on Safeties #1191
    zn
    Moderator

    PHDram

    the rams have the [future] safety they want, his name is Mo Alexander. they didnt take him in the fourth for special teams value. fisher has said more than once that they really really like him paired with tj. they want interchangeable safeties, not free and strong.

    gw also said he plans on playing his safeties deep so they will typically be moving forward like LBs. this plays to the strengths of tj and moe.

    in reply to: Rams OLine ranked Fourth in NFL #1188
    zn
    Moderator

    pff

    2013 Offensive Line Rankings

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2014/01/13/2013-offensive-line-rankings/3/

    13. St Louis Rams (26th)
    PB: 17th, RB: 9th, PEN: 26th

    Stud: Many, ourselves included, wondered if Jake Long (+25.8) was done. He’d enjoyed a great start to his career in Miami but two so-so years left a lot to be desired. Well, this was the year he came back with a bang, and it’s a horrible shame his season ended with an ACL and MCL tear.

    Dud: He may be a former first-rounder but Chris Williams (-21.8) is just a liability as a lineman. Far too much pressure, not enough good run blocking, and he’s the team’s weak link on offense.

    Analysis: A step forward but perhaps not as much as they would have like to see. They nailed it with the pickup of Long and got surprisingly good play from Joe Barksdale, Shelley Smith and Rodger Saffold at guard. That would suggest a higher finish, but the interior trio of Williams, Harvey Dahl and Scott Wells really didn’t play up to the level that was needed of them.

    zn
    Moderator

    Neandertal trait in early human skull suggests that modern humans emerged from complex labyrinth of biology and peoples

    Washington University in St. Louis

    Summary: Re-examination of a circa 100,000-year-old archaic early human skull found 35 years ago in Northern China has revealed the surprising presence of an inner-ear formation long thought to occur only in Neandertals.
    Share This

    The Xujiayao 15 late archaic human temporal bone from northern China with the extracted temporal labyrinth superimposed on a view of the Xujiayao site.
    Credit: Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Science

    skull1 The Xujiayao 15 late archaic human temporal bone from northern China with the extracted temporal labyrinth superimposed on a view of the Xujiayao site.

    Re-examination of a circa 100,000-year-old archaic early human skull found 35 years ago in Northern China has revealed the surprising presence of an inner-ear formation long thought to occur only in Neandertals.

    “The discovery places into question a whole suite of scenarios of later Pleistocene human population dispersals and interconnections based on tracing isolated anatomical or genetic features in fragmentary fossils,” said study co-author Erik Trinkaus, PhD, a physical anthropology professor at Washington University in St. Louis.

    “It suggests, instead, that the later phases of human evolution were more of a labyrinth of biology and peoples than simple lines on maps would suggest.”

    The study, forthcoming in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is based on recent micro-CT scans revealing the interior configuration of a temporal bone in a fossilized human skull found during 1970s excavations at the Xujiayao site in China’s Nihewan Basin.

    Trinkaus, the Mary Tileston Hemenway Professor in Arts & Sciences, is a leading authority on early human evolution and among the first to offer compelling evidence for interbreeding and gene transfer between Neandertals and modern human ancestors.

    His co-authors on this study are Xiu-Jie Wu, Wu Liu and Song Xing of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, and Isabelle Crevecoeur of PACEA, Université de Bordeaux.

    “We were completely surprised,” Trinkaus said. “We fully expected the scan to reveal a temporal labyrinth that looked much like a modern human one, but what we saw was clearly typical of a Neandertal. This discovery places into question whether this arrangement of the semicircular canals is truly unique to the Neandertals.”

    Often well-preserved in mammal skull fossils, the semicircular canals are remnants of a fluid-filled sensing system that helps humans maintain balance when they change their spatial orientations, such as when running, bending over or turning the head from side-to-side.

    Since the mid-1990s, when early CT-scan research confirmed its existence, the presence of a particular arrangement of the semicircular canals in the temporal labyrinth has been considered enough to securely identify fossilized skull fragments as being from a Neandertal. This pattern is present in almost all of the known Neandertal labyrinths. It has been widely used as a marker to set them apart from both earlier and modern humans.

    The skull at the center of this study, known as Xujiayao 15, was found along with an assortment of other human teeth and bone fragments, all of which seemed to have characteristics typical of an early non-Neandertal form of late archaic humans.

    Trinkaus, who has studied Neandertal and early human fossils from around the globe, said this discovery only adds to the rich confusion of theories that attempt to explain human origins, migrations patterns and possible interbreedings.

    While it’s tempting to use the finding of a Neandertal-shaped labyrinth in an otherwise distinctly “non-Neandertal” sample as evidence of population contact (gene flow) between central and western Eurasian Neandertals and eastern archaic humans in China, Trinkaus and colleagues argue that broader implications of the Xujiayao discovery remain unclear.

    “The study of human evolution has always been messy, and these findings just make it all the messier,” Trinkaus said. “It shows that human populations in the real world don’t act in nice simple patterns.

    “Eastern Asia and Western Europe are a long way apart, and these migration patterns took thousands of years to play out,” he said. “This study shows that you can’t rely on one anatomical feature or one piece of DNA as the basis for sweeping assumptions about the migrations of hominid species from one place to another.”

    Story Source:

    The above story is based on materials provided by Washington University in St. Louis. The original article was written by Gerry Everding. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

    in reply to: Sando on his rankings of NFL QB’s #1148
    zn
    Moderator

    ramBRO

    – According to Sando, 20 of the 26 evaluators ranked Bradford in Tier 3. 3 put him in Tier 4, and one in Tier 5. Though not specifically noted, I’ll assume that 2 evaluators rated Sam in Tier 2 or higher.

    – Sounds like the Tier 5 ranking may have come from another QB. According to Sando, the QB ripped into Bradford pretty good. But Sando also mentioned that this QB mentioned Sam’s rookie contract, so I’m wondering if there’s any “haterism” coloring his judgement.

    – The head coach who prefers Sam to Russell Wilson says that Wilson’s height (or lack thereof) results in him missing plays from the pocket. Sure, he gets out of the pocket to make plays, but he thinks defenses will adjust to keep him inside to force him to make those throws there. Sam? The coach feels he’s at home in the pocket and will make those throws that Wilson can’t.

    – Sando says that, despite the mobile QB’s out there, the personnel people he talked to place a lot of weight on QB’s who can make plays from the pocket.

    Interesting listen if you get the chance.

    He says the evaluators seem to be hedging their bets, they want to see him do it and so far he hasn’t. He just has the stay on the field.

    in reply to: Sando on his rankings of NFL QB’s #1146
    zn
    Moderator

    ramBRO

    – According to Sando, 20 of the 26 evaluators ranked Bradford in Tier 3. 3 put him in Tier 4, and one in Tier 5. Though not specifically noted, I’ll assume that 2 evaluators rated Sam in Tier 2 or higher.

    – Sounds like the Tier 5 ranking may have come from another QB. According to Sando, the QB ripped into Bradford pretty good. But Sando also mentioned that this QB mentioned Sam’s rookie contract, so I’m wondering if there’s any “haterism” coloring his judgement.

    – The head coach who prefers Sam to Russell Wilson says that Wilson’s height (or lack thereof) results in him missing plays from the pocket. Sure, he gets out of the pocket to make plays, but he thinks defenses will adjust to keep him inside to force him to make those throws there. Sam? The coach feels he’s at home in the pocket and will make those throws that Wilson can’t.

    – Sando says that, despite the mobile QB’s out there, the personnel people he talked to place a lot of weight on QB’s who can make plays from the pocket.

    Interesting listen if you get the chance.

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1116
    zn
    Moderator

    I thought we were going to get to the part where you accused X of reading peoples PMs..

    That;s alright, I already did.

    And now you are just in taunt/fight mode?

    If so movc on. That’s a direct mod statement.

    My summary. YOu should not have over-reacted to one line by me in email when I was blocked. If you didn’t know I was blocked you were negligent…a ghost admin is not supposed to take out a board mod on the basis of some ancient grudge. That;s bad management on your part. I apologize for calling you a dick that one time when blocked. That’s not very professional. However, I didn’t do that because I was blocked–I did it because I was frustrated because #1 I naturally assumed you had blocked me, and #2 didn’t get why you were doing that instead of just raising whatever issue you presumably had. Or, if you’re going to give in to your apparently considerable temper, you could have just banned me and given notice to the buzz posters (instead of shutting it down and re-directing posters to ROD).

    My bet is, yOu won’t apologize for heavy name-calling in this thread, for reasons anyone can speculate about. Running around on the Rams board with all those (several) little (now deleted) childish attack posts was beneath you (and that’s why you were banned…not because of this thread). To emphasize: you were not banned because of THIS thread. You were banned because you took it to the Rams board and kept putting up little TheRamsWon style flames, which I deleted. IMO, an owner with high aspirations for his own great site should not be acting like a PD board style flame warrior on someone else’s site.

    We expect fake handles to show up here, but as long as they obey the rules they’re fine, and when they try to re-raise the old huddle wars it’s easy for everyone to spot.

    If you think all your (as yet unposted) emails and PMs somehow take the onus off of you for dumping a site without notice, fine. Think that. My view is, if you thought I was a problem long before the 28th, you should have just banned me THEN and given the buzz posters notice.

    That’s it. Thread closed. It’s now a repository for posts fighting about the take-down of the buzz and which also violate the rules (though I am going to draw a line on that, because some could take advantage and start writing attack posts just so I will move them here. I don’t intend to encourage that.)

    I edited this to make it less “heat of the moment.” Substance is the same.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by zn.
    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1114
    zn
    Moderator

    LOL.. you are yet again making shit up.

    Lying to my face?

    Lol. Time to delete this whole conversation.

    Remember to check your pm.

    ..

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1111
    zn
    Moderator

    Hey my fault.. Let me tell my wife and 19 mo old daughter that we shouldnt go on vacations or go out of town any longer. My APOLOGIES for not devoting all my free time to this internet forum and instead chose to spend time with my family.

    My bad.

    Oh come on. Lol. I wasn’t talking about recently. The thing I refer to goes back weeks and weeks. When we first started the board you sent your your phone number and said call any time. After you bought ROD you said never to call and you didn’t have time. I wasn’t talking about recently, I am talking about weeks and weeks of non-communication.

    And you have a pm.

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1108
    zn
    Moderator

    fair enough..

    So I am now going to assume that is fair game to post all PMs and Emails because you failed to answer that question 3 times.

    I did answer the question. I directly said I can’t tell you what to post. But I take that back.

    Those things serve no purpose unless you want to claim that we had issues. Since you never said we did, I am only going to tell you that you should have raised them. You seem to have enough time to talk tonight after weeks of saying you didn’t.

    So no you can’t post them. I don’t know what they are, who they’re from, and how they pertain to the 28th. If you feel strongly enough, email them to me. That’s where this should go anyway.

    zackneruda99@yahoo.com

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1105
    zn
    Moderator

    My work is done.

    No it isn’t apparently. It got edited somehow. Don’t know when. It’s minor though. I re=posted the original in my response.

    From X’s post: I blocked you from ROD because of your constant pilfering of my posts, and because of your incessant whining about being talked about by guys like Les and Thor and Albe and Boffo

    That stuff about “whining” is from him reading PMs. That’s the only thing it CAN be. And it’s exaggerated nonsense. Mods had to discuss Boffo because of a board conflict. We handled it professionally. I never mentioned Thor or Les or Albe in anything behind the scenes. You raised Boffo with me when he stopped posting for a short time. I asked you if you had deleted my name from posts attacking me. Actually that was mostly old, old ROD posters doing that. I thought it was very professional of you to do that, and I emphasized that old board wars were not to lead to personal sniping on the buzz. At the time I thought that was a professional exchange between a mod and a board owner. I didn’t know a ghost admin was reading PMs and was going to spin it his own little way in public later.

    This is from my original response to X, above:

    I never incessantly said anything about any poster at ROD (meaning, the ex-huddlers who still post there)…I double-checked on it with Bob to ask if he had zapped out the names posters were trying to bash. I asked if he had done that, and he said yes, and I basically said good job (because we had the same policy at the buzz, basically…no old wars. At the time I thought Bob and I were friends when I asked that…and for you to know it means you were reading buzz board PMs).

    in reply to: Bzzzzzzzzzz #1102
    zn
    Moderator

    That’s all I heard when I went to the old board. Bzzzzzzzz…

    Somebody had locked the front door, and I couldn’t get in. Had a bloody cake in the oven too.

    Oh, well.

    Where do you guys keep the sugar and flour around here?

    We;re still sorting that out. In the meanwhile, welcome back from the void.

    in reply to: Bailey Heading to Oklahoma for Workouts with Bradford #1099
    zn
    Moderator

    I hope Bailey has enough athleticism to make plays in the NFL. Without the PEDs.

    That’s what he was busted for, right? PEDs not pot?

    Welcome aboard old friend.

    .

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1097
    zn
    Moderator

    If it is really killing you to get an answer from me, read the post from X again. The answer is right in front of your face.

    It’s not killing ME. LOl. It’s killing YOU. Meaning, in the light of public perception. You want to come across as an honest guy who ended up in a conflict and stuff happens. But by not answering that question, you make it look like you have something to hide. By me continuing to ask, that perception gets reinforced.

    I mean it looks very different if you act all outraged about being accused when in fact that’s not the real story. You hid behind “plausible denial” and knew…at least before this conversation started last night, and probably earlier…that your own board mod was blocked and he did not know why.

    Puts everything in a different light.

    I know what X says. I am asking YOU, directly, what YOU knew.

    And you evaded it so I take it the answer is yes. Yes, you knew.

    Now if we’re done with this one thing we can move on. If not…that’s okay too.

    in reply to: Questions about the board and moving #1093
    zn
    Moderator

    New here and don’t want to get in the middle of anything. But there was a board called the Buzz – I’m guessing – and it got shut down while this board still existed and this site existed before the Buzz? And the moderators here were also moderators on the Buzz? Seems confusing. If this board existed before, why not just put your energy toward it? It sounds like this site was allowed to go dormant so that the other one could replace it? Am I the only one confused?

    I don’t think anyone here said the moderators at the old huddle were also the moderators at the buzz. In point of fact…a couple were. A couple weren’t.

    Either way, questions about boards and board policies and board histories, as I say in this thread, should go on a different board. (In fact as soon as I can move the posts that don’t belong, I will.)

    This thread http://theramshuddle.com/topic/ever-wandering-lost-tribe-of-ram-fans/ is just to welcome people here, or to say hello to the board, which beginning posters like to do. Yours is a board/s history question, and I would ask you to put in on hold just for a little bit or go to the Board Policies and Issues board and raise it there.

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1090
    zn
    Moderator

    LOL.. you want to talk evasion?

    You just accused a guy of reading mod PMs and when I called you out on it because you misread we are just to forget about it?

    Lets start from the top.

    You accused me of blocking you from some sites and you were proven wrong
    You accused X of reading Pms and shown to be wrong

    Are you just going to continue to throw shit until something sticks?

    Those kinds of moves don’t work, my friend.

    I said we will get to the PM issue and we will.

    Now. By evading my question several times…I take it that you

    1. knew I was blocked from the buzz…any time from before I emailed you to when this conversation started last night (you’re saying “you didn’t do it” does not answer “did you know it was done”; but I am taking the evasion as a “yes”).

    2. knew I was blocked just from ROD the previous time.

    So that’s a “yes” on your part. If that’s settled we can go on. If it’s not settled we can keep at it.

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1084
    zn
    Moderator

    There was ONE single reference to PM in that message..

    “The “inconvenience” that I caused you for all of one day was for all of your lectures via PM for the things I posted and the way I posted them”

    You are making some very serious accusations about a guy who simply said he was lectured by YOU to HIM via PM.

    First, you’re evading the question. We can get to X in the course of the conversation. I will be happy to do that.

    Am I just to take evasion as “yes”?

    You knew I was blocked from the buzz…either before I emailed you or after or at least before this conversation started in this thread.

    You knew I was blocked from ROD several weeks back.

    Another evasion and I will just assume a “yes.”

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1080
    zn
    Moderator

    Where do you come up with this shit? Now X was reading PMs?

    You ever answer questions or is every discussion always about you asking the questions and everyone is supposed to respond accordingly.

    And BTW..unlike you, I HAVE apologized to some members directly via PM.

    Reading PMs? He says so himself. Read his post.

    No your real frustration is that you can’t control this conversation. You can ask all the questions you want–you began with one. Will I apologize? Me saying I shouldn’t have done it apparently not counting for you. And then you added name-calling of your own to it, which I doubt you will apologize for.

    And I am asking a very important question. You have not answered it twice now. Just answer it so we can move on and both get some honest closure out of this. I used to trust you and we worked together well. I liked what we did. I don’t like this impasse. I would rather go back to the former relationship, where communication was not hard. If you can’t hear that, then you never knew me.

    But it’s a simple question. Did you know X blocked me from the buzz, or the previous time from ROD. That’s actually two questions, and they’re fair.

    in reply to: "If you could pencil in 9 wins" would you take it? #1077
    zn
    Moderator

    Honestly, it depends on how the team plays. If I think they shoulda won more and gave games away, that’s one thing…if the schedule and the division are as tough as they look and they give us pride with how they compete, then it’s a different thing.

    .

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1069
    zn
    Moderator

    I DIDNT BLOCK YOU FROM ANYTHING.

    Do I condone the actions by X? Your damn right I do.

    Yes I asked RM to ban him. He would not get off attack mode so I deleted a couple of posts. The thing is, there can be a one-time exception as people sort out what happened on the 28th–there are a lot of upset posters who suddenly with no warning found themselves without a board. But it has to stop sometime.

    Did you know I was blocked? You already say you condone it, which is half of the story. (See saying YOU personally didn’t do it is simply an evasion when the question is whether you knew about it. Assuming that’s even true and it actually happened the way X said.)

    For that matter, did you know about it the first time it happened, when I was just blocked from ROD (that was about the time when you bought ROD, the buzz went down with a virus soon after, and then came back up minus many features, including the Rieker donations, and when I asked about them, your response was to say you could just take the board down. I was blocked from ROD round about then.)

    And my question to you was not if X is in on all of your sites, the question is whether you informed me, your partner, that he was not only an admin but was reading PMs and according to him blocking people. You think you should have been trusted implicitly…but did I really know how the buzz worked if an outside party was reading mod PMs, later to talk about them in public. Don’t be so defensive…this one is a minor issue.

    You keep raising the level of provocations, including trying to get in a dig at me when you apologized to all the posters whose site you blew up. So you didn’t really take responsibility for anything. It was sort of “I am sorry and it’s his fault.” smiley11 And then on to the name-calling we’re not supposed to do because it’s so wrong.

    ER’s post stands because X’s post stands. That’s my call. Unless the other mods want me to take down both. Or for that matter, a couple by you, too.

    .

    in reply to: Bailey Heading to Oklahoma for Workouts with Bradford #1066
    zn
    Moderator

    Huge Akmann

    Just read a tweet from Steadman Bailey saying he’s heading to OK in the morning for some workout sessions with Bradford. This is something Bradford hosts every summer with his receivers.

    ==

    STEDMAN BAILEY SR @iamSB3 · 2h

    Flight out to Oklahoma in the AM to link with Sammy B for some workout sessions! #Chemistry

    Actually all I see so far is Bailey doing it…don’t know if it’s others too.

    ..

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by zn.
    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1062
    zn
    Moderator

    Should I hold my breath waiting for an apology?

    I said several times throughout the thread I shouldn’t have name-called you. Go back and look. Not sure what else you want.

    But then in spite of your denial, I WAS blocked. So let’s begin one small step and see how it goes. X said I WAS blocked (like I knew I was). Did you know about that or not, and do you condone that or not now that it’s completely public?

    Either X did it like he said, without your knowledge…which means you were running a site where someone could do that (plus read mod PMs and talk about them in public). Or you knew X did it. Or he’s just covering for you.

    Did I ever know I was running a site where someone other than you was reading mod PMs and could block whoever he wanted? Did I know that was the deal I signed on to? How does that sit with you? We fell apart because of distrust. How does something like that contribute to distrust?

    You could give an honest answer, or you could do more zn bashing. But that rings hollow because I asked you to partner up on a site in the first place because you had already invited me to front one for you (that happened when you were impatient with RM because at that point the huddle kept going down). You had known me since the herd. You had known me on the huddle. When my solution to the huddle wars was to make a new site, that was fine with you…and you saw the huddle wars while they were happening. (To the point where you even told me on the buzz that Arsenic was Pancake). Your idea, as you kept telling me, was to have the biggest, most advanced Rams board, and you clearly thought you could do that with me–you even said so, and praised the board (until you bought ROD). That’s all completely understandable, but as I said all the subsequent zn bashing rings completely hollow now. smiley10

    Let’s see how this goes. Did you know I was blocked, and/or do you condone it now that it’s completely public?

    zn
    Moderator

    What the past regimes lacked, on the other hand, was the ability to coach up the lesser talents and get the most out of them. That’s one area where the current coaching staff separates itself from its predecessors.

    I would say that’s not true. The previous regime did get things out of Hall, Long, and Robbins. They had a huge leap in DL performance improvement from 2009-2010…Football Outsiders said it was the biggest leap they had ever seen since fist doing that kind of analysis.

    However, Waufle is superlative. Above and beyond. That doesn’t make what came before bad, it just means Waufle is THAT good.

    .

    in reply to: This is the kind of offense we've built #1012
    zn
    Moderator

    That was a great game and it’s a shame they ended in a tie.

    Bradford was 26 of 39 (in 5 quarters) for 275 yards (67.7%, 7.05 YPA) and 2 TDs, with passes of 14 to Jackson, 15 and 16 to Amendola, 17 and 19 to Kendricks, 14 and 24 to Gibson, and 36 to Quick (though I don’t know much of that was RAC yards). I like that kind of middle range passing attack, though, again, I don’t know without re-watching how much of that was RAC. He also had an 80 yarder to Amendola subtracted by a penalty.

    The Rams also ran 37 times for 159 yards (4.3 YPC).

    I don;t know how strictly indicative that game will be, but, it would be nice if things work like that.

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1007
    zn
    Moderator

    So X was the Dick. RM wouldn’t sell us out because well X is a dick . Most left the Huddle because of Thordaddy being a dick. X let Bob take the heat for him which is very high on the dickish scale. So the Huddle basically went out on it’s own got rid of the dicks (the goal when we left the herd) and now we are back home with out the dicks . Nice work Dick!

    Sigh. Sooner or later we have to get back to order and the Rams, ER. As a rule we shouldn’t be doing any of this stuff—naming posters, attacking old warriors. Just go forward. Thor, for example, is ill…I wish him the best, frankly. People can move on and change.

    But…under the circumstances…as long as it doesn’t leave this thread…it doesn’t feel right to delete it. Not if X’s post stands (and X’s post in this thread will stand.) And this isn’t a “warning.” Just a hope. Let’s go on and be better than this. Fair enough? smiley9

    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #1001
    zn
    Moderator

    X

    So now you know. I was able to block you from both sites, and I did. I blocked you from ROD because of your constant pilfering of my posts, and because of your incessant whining about being talked about by guys like Les and Thor and Albe and Boffo. So out of sight, out of mind, yeah? I blocked you from The Buzz because I felt like it. I’ve always had administrative access to both sites, even after I sold ROD. I knew when Bob was going to be away, and I’ve been planning on nuking you for a few years now. So I did. Not unlike Samir Suleiman, I’m a fucking throat slasher. And you deserved all of it.

    The fact that you petulantly demanded satisfaction without knowing the full story is just typical of your past, present, and future behavior. Bob hooked you up BIG TIME, and you repay him by calling him a dick? Who the hell do you think you are? The “inconvenience” that I caused you for all of one day was for all of your lectures via PM for the things I posted and the way I posted them. That was for turning every good poster into a shitty poster because you lack even a rudimentary understanding of how to speak to people without condescension. Les, Thor, Albe, Boffo … those are all genuinely good and interesting people that you turned into assholes because you can never, ever, ever, humble yourself and see another person’s point of view OR take even the slightest bit of criticism and gain a little introspection from it. But mostly, it was because you decided to turn on me one day before I even knew who the fuck you were. And I forget nothing. I’ve been stringing you along for years now. Pretending to be your friend, taking shots at you, apologizing to get you on the hook again, taking shots at you, apologizing, dogging you, apologizing, and so on and so on and so on. You. Are. My. Puppet. My greatest revenge comes this day, “Rick.”

    So here’s my advice to you going forward. Shut the fuck up and listen once in a while. Don’t challenge people’s intellect because you think yours is superior. Don’t make the mistake of thinking everyone is forgiving, and stop leeching off of other people to get what you want. But most of all, take a goddamn look in the mirror. You’ve been ostracized from every board not named the PD, and for good reason. Dozens upon Dozens of people registered and left The Huddle because of you. You alone. A jury of your peers booted you off of ROD, and The Herd still mocks you to this day. You want a place to call home so that you can stop being the leader of the martyred flock of the internet? Buy one. Register the name, “ZNsWorld.tv” and pony up $8.95 a month to host your own site. Push a goddamn button to install a board, and lord over it like the creepy pie eating internet fascist you are.

    For the rest of you who thought I was a decent guy, and was trying to help? Nah. I tried to buy The Huddle from RM, but he never responded to any of my emails. I was going to make that board great and ban the one guy responsible for destroying it. Some of you would have followed him through the gates of Hell I’m sure, but many of you would have noticed that the guys who were “ALLEGEDLY” responsible for its demise are actually the ones who have the personality to make a board click. And without them, that board died. I realize most of you are happy with a small community revolving around ZN and the face he shows you in public. I get that. But if you were ever exposed to the other face? The one that puffs out his chest behind the scenes because he can’t STAND being anything other than the center of attention and the sole voice of authority? Well, you’d know you were being duped.

    Ban me now. I have no desire to respond to the inevitable victim speech that’s sure to follow.

    My work is done.

    Rules violating posts by you in the future will get torched. This post will stand though. It’s really a testimony to a lot of things. Including your own essentially vindictive spirit. Even if it’s one big game for you.

    I will call you on a couple of your misconceptions and bs. And this will not lead to an argument. That WILL get nuked. No responses–you just posted the most petty attack post this community has seen since the old huddle war days, and you don’t get to continue with it. I never incessantly said anything about any poster at ROD (meaning, the ex-huddlers who still post there)…I double-checked on it with Bob to ask if he had zapped out the names posters were trying to bash. I asked if he had done that, and he said yes, and I basically said good job (because we had the same policy at the buzz, basically…no old wars. At the time I thought Bob and I were friends when I asked that…and for you to know it means you were reading buzz board PMs). I never “stole” anything from you and all boards copy posts, including ROD. But I did ask people to not copy mine, and if this is your way of doing the same, so be it. I didn’t petulently demand anything… I knew I was blocked and thought Bob was doing it for a reason. I wanted to know the reason, so we could have honest communication. What does one do when one is blocked and they know it, recite hindu prayers? Turns out, either you were his proxy or you’re covering for him or you just used him in a set up. If anything you said is even true. It doesn’t matter much if it is or not. Either way, he crashed a whole board community because of it.

    The one thing I do want to stress is that describing my FRIENDS as “followers” is just a piece of projection on your part.

    We have a board, X. That’s all that matters. You haven’t “gotten” anybody. But think so if you want. Shrug.

    .

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by zn.
    in reply to: What happened to the Rams Buzz board ? #998
    zn
    Moderator

    But then I don’t know why I was blocked and if you can’t see it’s natural to assume you’re the one who did it…then I don’t know what to tell you. Who else could have blocked me from both sites?

    Plus I was blocked from ROD before…weeks ago. I have no idea why I was blocked then and no idea why I was subsequently unblocked…but I let it go. I just thought it was you and you had some issue but I wasn’t going to ask (being blocked from ROD was not high on my list of problems).

    Well, I could have blocked you from both sites, because I have administrative access to the server.

    Well obviously I didn’t know that. Did you? If so, why? If not, what is a good explanation for me being blocked?

Viewing 30 posts - 40,951 through 40,980 (of 41,079 total)