Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 38,881 through 38,910 (of 47,059 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: turns out Goff had a (treatable) enzyme deficiency #44460
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I see Goff in his Rams uniform and he looks very thin to me.

    Maybe a year or two in the league will change that.

    The key is that he was thinner at Cal. He played in college at 205. He’s now around 220. If you compare the Cal pictures and the Rams pictures you can see the difference between 205 and 220. He will probably be at 230 by 2017.

    See the whole point is that at Cal, an enzyme deficiency kept him from adding weight and muscle. They have since found out about that and have fixed it.

    in reply to: turns out Goff had a (treatable) enzyme deficiency #44456
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    More pics.

    Goff at Cal:

    Goff at Rams mini-camp:

    in reply to: turns out Goff had a (treatable) enzyme deficiency #44455
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    College pictures of Goff do not show him at his current weight and muscle build.

    Since college, because of a nutrition program (he had an enzyme deficiency, as detailed in this thread) and weight training, he is now 15 pounds heavier than in college (and gaining), is lifting more weight, and lost 3% body fat on top of it.

    They say by 2016 he ought to be playing at 230.

    Here is Goff at Cal:

    Here is Goff in Rams minicamp (and this is after only a couple of months)…he played at 205 in college and is already now at 220:

    in reply to: The long "Raiders to Vegas?" story, continuing #44454
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    NFL in Las Vegas is a lead-pipe lock, with or without Raiders

    Vinnie Iyer

    http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/news/nfl-las-vegas-raiders-relocation-mark-davis-david-beckham-robert-kraft/60bq2usocgmw1bsw4tvz8jrxq

    The NFL no longer can hide its cards — it’s ready to go all in on Las Vegas.

    The quickest draw to get there is relocating the Raiders from Oakland, and team owner Mark Davis has $500 million ready to make it happen.

    First, the possibility of that happening wasn’t ruled out by Roger Goodell. Then the commissioner expressed how the league is “evolving” in its stance in being more associated with legalized gambling.

    Then came the Vegas endorsement of the Cowboys’ Jerry Jones, arguably the league’s most powerful owner. It went to another level Friday when another NFL heavyweight billionaire, the Patriots’ Robert Kraft, gave his blessing to the Raiders, via USA Today.

    “I think it would be good for the NFL,” Kraft said. “I know Mark Davis has tried so hard in Oakland. If they won’t do it … I want to support him.”

    Vegas and its mayor, Carolyn Goodman, are waiting with open arms. It has taken a long time for the NFL power players to open their minds. As Goodell said in April and Jones earlier this month, Kraft echoed the sentiment that the so-called risks associated with Vegas no longer outweigh the entertainment reward.

    In NFL-owner speak, that means everyone who counts has realized that Vegas, like Los Angeles for the Rams, is bigger money in the bank. Now that weekly fantasy football has blurred the lines of gambling on NFL games, that’s no longer a hurdle in profiting from a team in Sin City.

    It means the pitch Davis made to the Southern Nevada Tourism Infrastructure Committee in late April, offering to spend half a billion to help build a $1.6 billion, 64,000-seat stadium on the Las Vegas Strip, has a lot more legs. It already had some when more photogenic soccer superstar David Beckham joined Davis in pitching that the stadium would also bring a Major League Soccer team to Las Vegas.

    “To bring a great organization like the Raiders is incredible, but it’s bigger than that,” said Beckham, who also has business ties to the stadium-backing Sands Corporation.

    The NFL is realizing how big it could be in its next stage of westward re-expansion. It’s no longer just a way for Davis to create better leverage against Oakland. Jones and Kraft wield great influence on the other owners, and along with Goodell, they can work to get 24 of the 32 needed to approve the Raiders’ move.

    While the Raiders are becoming a stronger bet for Vegas, it’s clear that the league has thought a lot more about expanding its reach there with any team. It’s the No. 40 television market and growing, ahead of current NFL cities Green Bay, Buffalo, New Orleans and Jacksonville. It’s not too far behind Cincinnati, Kansas City, Nashville and San Diego.

    Unlike all those cities, Las Vegas opens the NFL to new revenue streams. It’s the hub for two things hugely responsible for the league’s booming popularity: fantasy football and gambling. It’s a great place to give the Pro Bowl needed pizzazz and make the draft an even more marquee event. Imagine what Super Bowl week would be like, never having to leave The Strip. As MLS and the NHL also look to plant pro teams in Vegas, the NFL should be extra motivated to jump in and dominate another sports market.

    London and Mexico City still have their appeals, too, but they work better as satellite sites for NFL teams. Vegas, with L.A., would form a much better 1-2 punch than going overseas and south of the border. It keeps the NFL right in the heart of the action that’s made it so profitable.

    The NFL doesn’t need to pretend it’s a moral authority on anything anymore, least of which is its fans betting on its games. Whether it’s out of need or greed, Vegas will be part of the league soon.[

    in reply to: NFL owners poised to award Los Angeles a Super Bowl #44453
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    With the NFL back in Los Angeles, Super Bowl can’t be far behind—perhaps as soon as 2020

    By Sam Farmer

    http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-meetings-super-bowls-20160522-column.html

    It was early 1993, and Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones was in football heaven.

    He walked out of a tunnel at the Rose Bowl — site of the seventh and most recent Super Bowl in the Los Angeles area — and into the Southern California sunshine.

    “It was one of the greatest memories of my life and certainly of my career,” Jones recalled by phone this week, reminiscing about Super Bowl XXVII, a 52-17 victory by the Cowboys over Buffalo.

    “I rode in with the team, and had one of the guys get me a football. There might have been three or four thousand people already there. I walked down to the end zone and it just felt so great. I took that ball and I kind of hopped and skipped in the end zone and just said, ‘Touchdown!’

    “There’s a little bit of that feeling,” Jones said, “when I think about having the Super Bowl back in Los Angeles.”

    That hasn’t officially happened yet, of course, but it’s likely to come to fruition Tuesday when the league takes the unusual step of naming three Super Bowl host cities in a single day.

    “I’d be surprised if we came out of there without L.A. getting one of the three,” Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay said.

    The next two Super Bowl sites are set, with Houston playing host to the game capping this season, followed by Minneapolis hosting in its soon-to-open venue. At the NFL’s one-day May meetings in Charlotte, N.C., on Tuesday, owners will decide where their marquee game will be played after the 2018, 2019 and 2020 seasons.

    The five cities/regions competing for those games are Los Angeles, Atlanta, South Florida, Tampa and New Orleans.

    No one knows for sure until the 32 secret ballots are cast, but a likely outcome is Atlanta getting the first available slot for the Falcons’ new stadium (2018 season, Super Bowl in early 2019), South Florida getting the next one for the Dolphins’ renovated stadium, and L.A. claiming the third opening for the Rams’ Inglewood stadium. That would mean an L.A. Super Bowl in early 2021, giving the Rams two full seasons in their glistening, $2.6-billion home. Tampa and New Orleans are closer to longshots in this process, in part because those cities don’t have new or significantly renovated stadiums.

    With the Chargers backing a ballot initiative for a proposed stadium in downtown San Diego, there is also a possibility that the NFL would take the unusual step of guaranteeing a Super Bowl in that city if a new stadium were to be built. Such a guarantee would not name a specific year for a San Diego Super Bowl but could offer a time window for one.

    L.A. is also bidding for the game that will be played in early 2020 — it would need a special waiver to get around the NFL’s rule that a new stadium must be open for two seasons before it hosts a Super Bowl — but from the perspective of the franchise building the stadium and surrounding mixed-use development, the 2021 game would be preferable.

    “We believe hosting the 2021 Super Bowl, when the stadium has been open longer and the Inglewood campus is more developed, will provide a better experience for the fans and the NFL,” said Kevin Demoff, Rams chief operating officer.

    “In this process, though, where all the competing cities have not only put together strong bids but also have a history of hosting multiple Super Bowls, there is always a benefit to having more chances to host.”

    The Super Bowl proposals were due April 15, and four of the bidding cities/regions had since last summer to work on them. Because the Rams didn’t get the green light to move until mid-January, however, the NFL didn’t make a request for an L.A. proposal until early March. Therefore, the L.A. bid committee had less than six weeks to put together its pitch.

    That bid committee is composed of chairman Casey Wasserman, also spearheading the effort to bring the 2024 Olympic Games to Southern California; Kathy Schloessman and Bob Graziano of the Los Angeles Sports & Entertainment Commission, and Michelle Kerrick of Deloitte. That group, along with the Los Angeles Tourism and Convention Board, worked closely with the cities of L.A. and Inglewood to assemble the bid.

    “An NFL team coming back to L.A. was always about more than eight regular-season home games,” Wasserman said. “It was always about the promise of what L.A. and a world-class facility here could deliver in terms of the breadth and variety of events. Obviously at the top of that list is the opportunity to compete for, and hopefully host, a Super Bowl. Hopefully we’ll be able to attract a Super Bowl and it’s the first of many.”

    Hosting a Super Bowl is an expensive endeavor, and a city’s bid committee is required to privately raise about $35 million through sponsorships and donations. (Those “partnership packages” entail sponsoring the host committee, not the Super Bowl game, which the NFL owns.) That money pays for a wide range of expenses, including the hotels and practice sites for both participating teams, as well as Super Bowl transportation, security, promotion, accreditation centers and media events.

    To make a qualifying bid, a city must ensure at least 22,000 hotel rooms will be available during the peak nights of Super Bowl week. The L.A. bid committee estimates that the week leading up to and including the game would generate at least 100,000 hotel room nights (60,000 guaranteed), which would make the Super Bowl the largest event Los Angeles has hosted since the 1984 Olympics.

    Inglewood would be the centerpiece locale of an L.A. Super Bowl, but L.A. Live would be a significant focal point as well.

    “We’re spreading the wealth around,” Schloessman said. “We’re not putting all of the activities in one area. We tried to pick venues for these different events that will highlight Los Angeles as the entertainment capital of the world, and will also take advantage of our good weather.”

    Jed York, owner of the San Francisco 49ers, said he expects the Inglewood stadium to be “second to none” and an ideal site for the league’s biggest game.

    “I think there’s something to be said for city pride, regional pride,” said York, whose team was the host club for Super Bowl 50. “I think it would be really cool to announce that for Los Angeles, whenever they get to host one.”

    in reply to: Migraine headaches #44441
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I hope you guys find real relief fast. Is there promising research close to market?

    For different reasons, Mack and I each just have inherent conditions. I think that’s true of a lot of migraine people. Sometimes you have an isolated trigger and can avoid it.

    But I haven’t let one get out of control for years and years now, so, I’m comparatively okay.

    I don’t think medical science has much of a handle on them.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams GM explains what Michael Vick’s rise and fall taught the NFL

    Andrew Lynch

    http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/atlanta-falcons-michael-vick-los-angeles-rams-les-snead-stephen-curry-lebron-james-052016

    Before his arrival, the NFL had never really seen anyone like Michael Vick — for better and for worse. And it’s unlikely we’ll ever see another Vick, given everything that transpired during his career.

    Current Los Angeles GM Les Snead knows all about Vick’s impact on Atlanta and the league at large. Snead was the director of player personnel for the Falcons during Vick’s time with the Falcons, and he joined FOX Sports’ Peter Schrager this week for a wide-ranging conversation that touched on Vick’s on-field prowess; his off-field transgressions; Rams rookie QB Jared Goff; the Sam Bradford trade from last year; and more.

    Of course, Vick’s career exploded in controversy when he was sentenced to nearly two years in prison for his involvement in a dog-fighting ring. Aside from the reprehensible nature of the crime, Snead explained how Vick’s transgressions taught the NFL a much-needed lesson:

    “During those situations, you always try to learn something from it and apply it in the future. And I think the best thing that probably happened from all that is you quickly realize that a lot of these young kids are under extreme pressure. And I think with Michael’s sake, he would want to escape and get back to his old friends, just to get away from some of the stresses of being the face of the franchise — the face of the city.

    “I think what probably all teams and especially us and myself have carried on is that, number one, you realize these are not just young — you’re not just developing football players. You’re developing young men to men. Not just for their time that they’re with you and your franchise. Because you can play a long time, right? And it’s 10 years, and all of a sudden, a 21-year-old is now 31. … So I think those moments, what you learn from it, “Hey, let’s try to do everything we can to continue playing the college role,” per se. It’s not just a job, it’s not just, “You’re a professional.” Even though you are, and the standards and all of that increase, as they should be, the bar is higher.

    “You put in programs or whatever, to develop, if you want to call it, boys to men, and not just football players. That’s what I’ve tried to do and I think a lot of NFL teams from that moment have tried to do.”

    Looking back, Snead says that the spectacle surrounding Vick was comparable to what we see in today’s NBA — which likely played into the “pressure” Snead believes Vick faced in Atlanta:

    “In Atlanta, during our Super Bowl year, I don’t think we sold out a game, even though we went 14-2. … so that just kind of lets you know where the Falcons were on the meter in Atlanta. But I think what Vick did was made you relevant immediately. He was just one of those players at the time, because he was one of the first running QBs that was electric and can pass the ball. Just one of those — people wanted to come see him play.

    “So you had people coming to see him play like you almost would, “Let’s go watch LeBron [James] tonight,” or, “Let’s go watch Steph Curry tonight.” A little bit like the NBA, I think that’s what Vick brought to Atlanta. You had to be there and live it to really get the full, full scope or picture of what Vick meant to that city.”

    It’s a fascinating comparison, since football is the ultimate team game, consisting of 11 guys on either side of the ball working in unison. A basketball team, on the other hand, only has five players on the court at any one time, so the stars stand out and drive the NBA. That’s not really the case in the NFL, where we root for our favorite teams first and our favorite players second.

    Michael Vick is supporting legislation that will help keep pets safe.

    When Vick was drafted by the Falcons in 2001, he immediately made Atlanta relevant as a football city and helped raise the city’s reputation as an entertainment and cultural epicenter. Yes, the Falcons had gone to the Super Bowl in 1998; even that on-field success couldn’t touch the excitement in the early ’00s, however.

    As for the present day, Snead revealed just how cool and confident Rams No. 1 pick Jared Goff is with a story from Goff’s pro day before the draft. Check out the podcast for that and more discussion about some of the Rams’ recent personnel moves.

    in reply to: 40 most hated NFL players of all time #44409
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Three Rams…2 players & a coach

    25-Cortland Finnegan

    Finnegan has been called everything from “dirty” to “crazy,” but the cornerback’s physical style has bothered opponents and fans since 2006. He’s best-remembered for a 2010 fight with Andre Johnson that resulted in helmets flying off and $25,000 fines for both players.

    24-Chuck Cecil

    Cecil continues the run of hard-hitting defensive backs that had a reputation in the NFL. Cecil was known for launching himself into players — he earned the nickname “Scud” — and was fined multiple times in his career for helmet-to-helmet hits. Cecil’s style of play was widely-criticized. Just check out this hit and judge for yourself.

    17-Richie Incognito

    Incognito already was a highly-penalized offensive lineman and widely-regarded as a dirty player before a scandal broke in 2013. Incognito played a role in harassing teammate Jonathan Martin and allegedly sent messages with racial slurs. Incognito did not play in 2014 before signing with the Bills the following season.

    ==

    4 Fisher Titans

    25-Cortland Finnegan

    24-Chuck Cecil

    13-Albert Haynesworth

    Haynesworth should be remembered for his tremendous ability as a dominating defensive tackle, but that’s just not the case. He instead is best known for stomping on Dallas center Andre Gurode during a game in 2006, which led to a five-game suspension. He also signed a seven-year, $100 million deal with the Redskins, but spent most of those two seasons antagonizing the coaching staff.

    9-Adam “Pacman” Jones

    Jones was involved in numerous off-field incidents early in his career, and he was suspended for the 2007 season as a result. Jones re-invented his career in Dallas and Cincinnati, but he still finds his way into the headlines. He drew a $35,000 fine for slamming Amari Cooper’s head into the turf last season and had a costly personal foul (and an even bigger reaction on Instagram) after the Bengals’ wild-card loss against Pittsburgh.

    ==

    5 Patriots, mostly FA signings

    38-Rob Gronkowski

    Gronk is the ultimate frat boy. He drinks. He dances. He directs his own party-boy cruises. He gets away with all of it because, well, “Who doesn’t love Gronk?”

    Give credit to Gronkowski. He doesn’t apologize for any of it, and he doesn’t care what anybody thinks. For the haters, it’s just another reason to loathe the Patriots.

    37-Rodney Harrison

    Harrison developed a reputation as a dirty player while playing safety for the Chargers and Patriots, and that led to multiple fines that totaled more than $200,000. He was suspended for one game in 2002 for a helmet-to-helmet hit on Jerry Rice, and again in 2007 for violating the league’s substance abuse policy. He still finds ways to stir it up as an analyst on “Sunday Night Football.”

    29-Bryan Cox

    Cox played 12 seasons as a linebacker, but he was best known forthe back-and-forth with the Buffalo Bills, in which he was ejected from one game for a fight with Carwell Gardner. He spit at the fans. He gave the fans a double-bird salute. Cox was a nasty player, but he finally got a Super Bowl ring late in his career when playing for the Patriots. He resurfaced on HBO’s “Hard Knocks” as Atlanta’s defensive line coach and didn’t disappoint there, either

    .

    18-Randy Moss

    Moss is the greatest vertical-threat receiver in NFL history, but it came with side effects. Like the time he bumped a Minneapolis traffic cop with his vehicle, which spawned the catch-phrase, “Straight cash, homey.”

    Moss left the field early, squirted a ref with a water bottle and faux-mooned Packers fans. He knew how to pee pee people off — fans, teammates, coaches, anybody. Still, hell of a player that’s who is pretty good as an analyst on Sundays.

    5-Tom Brady

    Brady could be on a list of most loved players, too, but there are more haters given the controversy surrounding the four-time Super Bowl winner. The “Tuck Rule,” SpyGate and Deflategate have all been part of his career, and he’s facing a four-game suspension for the second straight year heading into the 2016 season.

    A lot of the Brady hate comes as a result of all those wins, too, but even more comes from the controversies.

    in reply to: Michael Thomas #44389
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    SOUTHERN MISS’ MICHAEL THOMAS CAN DEVELOP INTO A TOP NFL WR

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/draft-southern-miss-michael-thomas-can-develop-into-a-top-nfl-wr/

    This is a strange wide receiver class. The headline grabbers in Baylor’s Corey Coleman, TCU’s Josh Doctson and Ole Miss’ Laquon Treadwell all have their flaws, but if you dig a little deeper into the class, there are good No. 2-type receivers who are likely to be available on Day 2 of the draft and beyond. That’s not to say some of these sleepers can’t develop into top receivers in the NFL, however, which brings us to Southern Miss’ Michael Thomas.

    We’ve heard a lot about Ohio State’s Michael Thomas as a potential late first-round draft pick, but the buzz for the Southern Miss playmaker of the same name is much less vocal, though it does exist. Owning the 11th-highest receiving grade of all receivers in this draft class, there’s a lot to like about him.

    Let’s be clear though, Thomas isn’t the perfect draft prospect, and as frighteningly good as some of his traits are, there are things that would make me nervous about drafting him high in the second round if I were an NFL general manager. He dropped seven passes from 79 catchable targets this year, giving him a drop rate of 8.97 that ranked 19th-worst of the 45 receivers in this class to see at least 58 catchable passes thrown their way. Drops can be misleading — let’s not forget that Amari Cooper came out of Alabama with a safe set of hands last year and went on to lead the NFL in drops in 2015 — but in addition to a high frequency, Thomas had some really poor drops as well.

    When it comes to production his 1,392 yards are impressive, but a lot of his yardage came on moments where he flashed, rather than times where he took games over. He racked up over 100 yards as a receiver on eight occasions in 2015, and in all eight of those games at least 25 percent of his yardage came on one reception. That’s not necessarily a bad thing — and it’s good that he creates big plays — but teams would prefer to see him as a bigger threat consistently, rather than once or twice per game.

    While there are reservations about Thomas, it’s time to pivot to his ceiling, which is one of the highest of any receiver in this draft class. There are things he can do that hint to the possibility that he can develop into the best receiver to enter the NFL this year. He’s raw and needs work to get there, but what he does well, he does very well.

    Thomas ranks near the top of multiple signature stat categories, highlighting his overall skill set amongst the other receivers in this class. WR rating tracks the NFL QB rating on passes where each receiver was targeted. With 71 catches for 1,392 yards and 14 touchdowns from 112 targets, ranking sixth in the class. Obviously the play of the quarterback comes into the equation here too, but it does give a solid basic look at his production.

    Thomas was also a solid deep threat, with his 509 yards on passes traveling 20 yards or more in the air ranking seventh amongst draft eligible receivers. He was actually only targeted 30 times on deep passes, with 10 receivers seeing more looks downfield, but was one of the best in the nation when the ball was thrown his way.

    Yards per route run tracks the number of yards each receiver produced with regards to the number of routes they ran. Thomas ran 467 routes in his final year at Southern Miss and racked up 2.98 yards per route run — the fifth-highest mark in this class. On a per-route basis, Thomas was more productive than both Notre Dame’s Will Fuller and Ole Miss’ Laquon Treadwell, both who will potentially be drafted in the first round of the NFL draft.

    Thomas can make plenty happen after the catch too, forcing nine missed tackles from 71 receptions and averaging 7.1 yards after the catch per reception. Yards after the catch are often impacted by the type of coverage a receiver faces, along with defensive backs taking bad angles. While that is true, you can see from this play against Washington in Southern Miss’ bowl game that Thomas also displays a good burst to create big plays after the catch.

    Thomas has the ability to go up and bring the ball down, with numerous circus catches throughout 2015. Not all receivers can make these type of catches so routinely, with only a few receivers in the NFL being able to do so. Being able to increase his catch radius gives an added layer to what Thomas is able to do, as well as adding some wow factor to his film.

    While Thomas is raw and not without his flaws, it’s madness to expect a receiver to come into the NFL polished given how open college offenses are these days. When a player like Amari Cooper comes into NFL looking like a complete prospect and has to adjust, that much should be obvious. But if a team can get past the rawness of Thomas, there’s a very good receiver who could prove to be the jewel of this draft class if he develops correctly.

    in reply to: Rams sign Easley #44388
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams Sign DL Dominique Easley To A One-Year, $600K Deal

    link: http://nfltraderumors.co/rams-sign-dl-dominique-easley-one-year-deal/

    Adam Schefter reports that the Rams are signing former Patriots DL Dominique Easley to a one-year deal.

    According to Ben Volin, the Rams signed Easley to a one-year, minimum salary deal worth $600,000 with no guaranteed money, incentives or bonuses.
    Volin adds that the Patriots had offset language included in Easley’s contract, which means they still owe him $483,959, but will get a $600,000 salary cap credit in 2017.

    Easley’s contract also includes a split salary of $363,000 if he gets hurt and spends the season on the injured reserve list, per Volin.

    They brought Easley in for a workout earlier in the day, so it appears as though he was impressive enough for them to extend him an offer following the session.

    Easley previous found interest from the Bengals, but wound up leaving Cincinnati without an agreement.

    It seems like the Rams could ask Easley will play a similar role to what Nick Fairley did for them last year.

    Easley, 23, was taken with the No. 29 overall pick during the 2014 NFL Draft. He was in the third of his four-year, $7.303 million rookie contract when he was cut loose by the Patriots close to a month ago.

    Easley’s career has largely been marred by injury, as he appeared in just 22 games over the course of his two years in the NFL with both seasons ending with him on injured reserve. In college, Easley tore both of his ACLs while playing for Florida, so there were obvious concerns about injuries hampering his NFL career.

    In 2015, Easley appeared in 11 games for the Patriots and recorded 15 tackles and two sacks. Pro Football Focus gave him a solid rating overall last year, despite playing 275 snaps for the Patriots.

    We had him featured in our Best Available Free Agents list.

    in reply to: power in LA, stan has #44387
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The arrival of the NFL significantly altered the list of the 50 Most Powerful in Southern California Sports

    My first thought reading all this was…SFW.

    My last thought, though, was…SFW.

    .

    in reply to: NFL owners poised to award Los Angeles a Super Bowl #44383
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    LA Will ‘Absolutely’ Host an Upcoming Super Bowl

    An NFL official predicts the new Rams stadium will be chosen next week to host the game in 2020 or 2021

    http://la.curbed.com/2016/5/19/11711128/super-bowl-los-angeles

    Rumors that the NFL stadium rising in Inglewood will host a Super Bowl in the near future began swirling almost as soon as the league allowed the Rams to return to Los Angeles in January. Now, with team owners meeting Tuesday to vote on host cities for Super Bowls LIII, LIV, and LV, it looks increasingly certain that those rumors will become reality. A high-ranking NFL official tells the LA Daily News that Los Angeles will “absolutely” be chosen to host a Super Bowl as soon as 2020.

    The Rams stadium, expected to be complete by 2019, is competing against stadiums in Atlanta, South Florida, and Tampa Bay for hosting responsibilities for Super Bowls LIV and LV, to be held in 2020 and 2021. The fact that Los Angeles is in the running to host the 2020 event at all is an extremely encouraging sign. The NFL appears to have changed a longstanding rule that requires stadiums to operate for two years before hosting a Super Bowl, with LA’s bid specifically in mind.

    The very first Super Bowl (which then went by the less auspicious title of the AFL-NFL Championship Game) was held at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum in 1967. Six more Super Bowls were held in Los Angeles after that, but the city has not had the opportunity to host a game since the Rams left town in 1994. The push to bring the event to Inglewood has been led by Rams owner Stan Kroenke, along with LA Olympic bid mastermind Casey Wasserman and Los Angeles Sports & Entertainment Commission president Kathryn S. Schloessman. Mayor Eric Garcetti has also spoken about the significance of bringing America’s unofficial holiday back to the city after all these years.

    As the Daily News points out, the financial impact of hosting a Super Bowl could potentially be enormous. Other cities have raked in billions of dollars when hosting, and Los Angeles businesses are eager to see some of that super money after a drought of more than 20 years.

    The signs are all pointing very strongly toward LA hosting one of the two Super Bowls it’s a contender for. Of course, the NFL owners are a fickle bunch, and if the decision process is anything like the soap opera that brought the Rams back to Los Angeles in the first place, it’s anyone’s guess as to what could happen.

    in reply to: "The Trouble With Diversity" #44378
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    There are a lot of myths about AA.

    A lot of people don’t know, for example, that the prime beneficiaries of AA were white women.

    A lot of people mythologize AA in to this minority quota system for the unqualified. Like you can’t find qualified people to hire. Right.

    It’s not a quota system, and it was not about minorities per se….and anyone who doesn’t know that, including the writer we’re linked to in this thread, has no idea what the real issues are.

    Affirmative Action Is Great For White Women. If the Supreme Court rules against the program, its most vocal opponents could get a rude surprise.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/affirmative-action-white-women_us_56a0ef6ae4b0d8cc1098d3a5

    As the GOP primary rages on, candidates aim to strengthen their electoral chances by stirring up racial resentment, capitalizing on seven years of Obama-induced anger and a sense among white conservatives that “their” country is slipping away from them.

    There’s nothing new about using white fear to get voters to the polls, of course, but this year, it’s happening against the backdrop of a Supreme Court case that threatens to dismantle one of the more controversial policy achievements of the Civil Rights movement: affirmative action. The face of Fisher v Texas, Abigail Fisher, is young, educated and white, and believes the system limits her chances because of her race.

    But if the court were to dismantle affirmative action across the nation, Fisher, and many other white women like her, may not like what they see. The fact is that white women are disproportionately likely to benefit from affirmative action policies. You’d never know that from listening to Fisher — or her demographic.

    Data from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study — an annual large-scale academic survey that aims to track political attitudes — show that 66 percent of young white people between 17 and 34 describe themselves as “somewhat opposed” or “strongly opposed” to affirmative action policies in employment and admissions. Among young white women, 67 percent are against affirmative action. Among young women of color — the study polls black, Hispanic and Asian American women — only 29 percent oppose it either strongly or somewhat.

    Affirmative action, when it was introduced by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, originally required entities that receive federal funding to take tangible steps “to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.” In 1967, Lyndon Johnson added sex to that list.

    And yet, just as most people think of Title IX as being about athletics funding (there’s a lot more to it than that), the general perception of affirmative action is that it’s “just” about race.

    But affirmative action has been quite beneficial to women, and disproportionately beneficial to white women. Women are now more likely to graduate with bachelor’s degrees and attend graduate school than men are and outnumber men on many college campuses. In 1970, just 7.6 percent of physicians in America were women; in 2002, that number had risen to 25.2 percent. But — and this is a big but — those benefits are more likely to accrue to white women than they are to women of color, and that imbalance has very real effects on employment and earnings later in life. In other words: affirmative action works, and it works way better for white women than it does for all the other women in America.

    But white women have made a practice of publicly objecting to affirmative action policies. As researcher Jessie McDaniel notes, since the landmark 1978 Supreme Court case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, in which the court ruled that race may be factored into university admissions, “the people suing universities for discrimination in the academic admissions process have been white women: Abigail Fisher; Barbara Grutter (Grutter v. Bollinger); Jennifer Gratz (Gratz v. Bollinger) and Cheryl Hopwood (Hopwood v. Texas).” Those landmark cases challenged university affirmative action programs in Michigan and Texas, respectively.

    And those women are far from alone in believing that a system that’s designed to help them and has helped lots of women like them has actually robbed them of something that’s rightfully theirs — and should be dismantled as a consequence. In fact, they’re more likely than white men in their age group to object.

    It’s likely most of them don’t understand how affirmative action helps them, said Jesse Rhodes, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst who recently analyzed some of the CCES data for Al Jazeera.

    “For most polling,” Rhodes said, “understanding of policies is pretty limited. Citizens have a hard time connecting their experience to policies unless they’re regularly receiving pretty clear signaling from government about the benefits of those policies.” Younger citizens tend to be the least knowledgeable, Rhodes noted, simply by virtue of having less experience and less time to collect information. Guided only by the popular perception of affirmative action that it only (or mostly) benefits people of color, it’s possible that young white women see no benefit from the diversity it brings to classrooms and workplaces and view it as an obstacle to their own chances of gaining access to those spaces.

    But even if young white women are aware of how affirmative action could likely benefit them — and how likely it is that they, in fact, have already benefitted from it — it’s possible these millennials view efforts to remedy the effects of racism as unnecessary, just as they view efforts to remedy the effects of sexism.

    Rhodes and his co-author at Al Jazeera, Sean McElwee, write that the data suggest young white Americans, “rather than seeing racism as a persistent problem still in need of remedy… are inclined to believe America is a colorblind society and that little remains to be done to remedy past racial injustices.”

    Similarly, the success of affirmative action for white women might have contributed to their sense that they, and people like them, no longer need formalized programs to ensure that they’re fairly considered for admission and employment. Sure, affirmative action helps fix sex discrimination, but that’s not really a Thing anymore, right?

    All this depends, however, on young white women knowing that affirmative action benefits them, and disproportionately so. Rhodes noted that the question used to collect the data is one that primes race over sex: “Affirmative action programs give preference to racial minorities in employment and admissions in order to correct for past discrimination. Do you support or oppose affirmative action?” Had the question mentioned sex instead of race, responses from young white women might have been different.

    Faced with the data we have, however, we’re left to assume that their answers are informed, at best, by a mistaken belief that racism is over and policies against it are a relic of a bygone era and, at worst, by racial prejudice.

    These findings contradict the conventional wisdom that young people are considerably more racially progressive than their parents and grandparents, Rhodes and McElwee note. And, Rhodes suggested, the lack of movement in white attitudes about affirmative action is likely connected to the increasing necessity of a college degree in the contemporary workforce and the growing competitiveness of the workforce “that make the chances of having a stable middle class more precarious than it used to be.”

    “I do think that shapes how they understand the admissions process,” Rhodes said.

    But so, too, does persistent racism, it seems, as well as a lack of understanding about what affirmative action policies actually do.

    White women benefit enormously from affirmative action. By opposing it, they’re advocating for making life harder not only for racial and ethnic minorities — but also for themselves.

    in reply to: "The Trouble With Diversity" #44376
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Writing this without watching the Youtube I would say that AA exists for politicians to receive political gain from the AA employee.

    There are a lot of myths about AA.

    A lot of people don’t know, for example, that the prime beneficiaries of AA were white women.

    A lot of people mythologize AA in to this minority quota system for the unqualified. Like you can’t find qualified people to hire. Right.

    It’s not a quota system, and it was not about minorities per se….and anyone who doesn’t know that, including the writer we’re linked to in this thread, has no idea what the real issues are.

    ….

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    it will always be a passing league, but i do like the idea of countering all that speed on defense with some power. if it actually works. i guess we’ll find out.

    Some things about this.

    First, yes you have to pass well in the league when you pass…but you don’t always have to pass.

    If you look at the 12 teams with the highest passing percentage last year, 1 was a playoff team (New England).

    If you look at the 12 teams with the highest RUSHING percentage, 7 were playoff teams in 2015 (Carolina, Minn, Seattle, KC, Cinn, Arz, Houston).

    Then look at the Rams, because there’s another aspect to this. Last year was the first with Fisher where they crossed over into being “run heavy.” I count pass heavy as throwing 60% of the time or more, I count balanced as anywhere from 56+% to 59+%, and I count run heavy as running 44% of the time or more. In 2012 the Rams passed 59% of the time, and in 2015 they ran 46.6% of the time.

    But they STILL set up long passes and took shots.

    Even with Foles and Keenum (combined numbers) they threw 31+ yarders 5.4% of the time (which is top third in the league though not top 6th) and hit on 28% of them (which is edging toward good though not there…30% or more is good).

    Anything at 5% or more on long passes is the top 1/3rd of the league. In fact that was better than a lot of teams–last year, for example, Flacco was 4.3%, Wilson was 4.1%, Luck was 4%, Rodgers was 4%, Brees was 3.8%, Rivers was 3.6%, Brady was 3.4%, Tannenhill was 2.6%, Stafford was 2%, Ryan was 1.9%, and Eli was 1.9%

    That’s the worst rated passing game in the league, with a melted down starter and problems to fix at WR. And the long shot was STILL part of their game.

    So I imagine how good it will be when the qb is starting-caliber and they have more at TE and WR

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    What if his mind is slowly being taken over
    by some evil mysterious force.

    I’m not even talkin about some Lizard type force.

    Could be amphibians, for all we know.

    Don’t be so quick to go against facts that way.

    An amphibian would never have drafted Gurley.

    /

    in reply to: "The Trouble With Diversity" #44359
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    [Feminism is] a socialist, anti-family, political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians. ~Pat Robertson

    That just sounds like a normal american teenager’s high school years.

    .

    in reply to: Migraine headaches #44358
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Friend of mine has a fifteen year old daughter
    who keeps missing school cause of Migraines.

    I’ve googled around and it dont look like
    docs know much about how to stop’em.

    Anybody got any advice?

    w
    v

    I’ve had migraines for years. It depends on the trigger. It can be different things for different people. Mine are set up by sinus issues and are related to allergies. There are certain triggers I have to avoid–dairy, nuts. Finding out about those helps. But it will be different for different people. Get a doctor to help find the triggers AND to see if Relpax works (prescription needed). It works for me. I take it when they first come on…it’s really bad if you let them go. I have no side effects with it, but they are expensive…helps if you have a prescription plan with health insurance.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    What is this “guess what” thing,
    Snead has fallen into.

    w
    v

    It’s the evolved, more adult version of what players always say–“you know.”

    He used to be a college player, but, the brain changes as you grow older. You know?

    in reply to: Patriots best drafting team ? #44336
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’ve watched Belichick do wonders with that Patriot Defense even when he was starting WRs at DB.

    They could do that because they had a solid defense around that. And that was only one guy, Troy Brown.

    They are pretty consistently solid on defense, and that’s because they do have a lot of good (not great) draft picks and key FA pick-ups.

    On offense, really, as I see it, it’s Brady and Gronkowsi. The rest are interchangeable parts.

    They’re just not The Best drafting team. They’re fine. They do well. But The Best? Not really. Not from what I see.

    in reply to: Patriots best drafting team ? #44322
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Well, they keep winning and winning and winning, so
    I am gonna assume they are putting good players on the field
    year after year after year

    Arguably…I don’t think that’s an accurate assessment. They do have a pretty decent drafting track record (but then when was the last time the Rams dumped 2 first-round picks?) So they are okay. Pretty good. But….IMO they win year after year because they have a seasoned Brady in a system he has played in his whole career. Plus they have a couple of key players. There is coaching too but then…that still depends on Brady.

    But when the Denver got to Brady last year, or when the Giants got to him in that first superbowl, New England was not as gifted and dominant, suddenly.

    That leads me to a hypothetical. Put Brady on last year’s Rams and they are certainly better than 7-9. Put the 2015 Foles and the 2015 Keenum on last year’s Patz and they might be better than 7-9 but not by much.

    in reply to: Goff game & highlight vids (get to know yer new qb) #44318
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Goff game & highlight vids (get to know yer new qb) #44317
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Patriots best drafting team ? #44309
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    They just cut one first round pick and traded away another.

    And both ended up in the NFC West (Chandler and Easley).

    in reply to: Rams sign Easley #44302
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams sign another first-round defensive lineman

    The Los Angeles Rams have signed another former first-round defensive linemen, Dominique Easley from the New England Patriots. CBS Sports NFL Insider Jason La Canfora joins Nick Kostos to talk about the expectations for the Rams and Pats this season.

    vid link: http://www.cbssports.com/video/player/nfl/688194115838/0/rams-sign-another-first-round-defensive-lineman

    in reply to: Rams sign Easley #44300
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Bradford asked to be traded, wasn't, then… #44285
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jordan Matthews, Eagles WRs stick up for Sam Bradford

    http://www.theredzone.org/BlogDescription/tabid/61/EntryId/56554/Jordan-Matthews–Eagles-WRs-stick-up-for-Sam-Bradford/Default.aspx

    Eagles quarterback Sam Bradford has taken criticism from all angles after requesting a trade when the team moved up to draft Carson Wentz.

    When no deal was made Bradford returned to the NovaCare Complex where he was welcomed back by a group of teammates that not only understood his predicament but also defended his actions, Matt Lombardo of NJ Advance Media reports.

    “My thing is,” Eagles wide receiver Jordan Matthews said following Tuesday’s practice at the NovaCare Complex. “Yeah, all that stuff was happening, but when he came back he got right back into it and got right back to work. That’s what we need to do and that’s what he has to focus on.

    “All the other stuff gets nullified if we go out there and win. Once the pads go on, Sam’s not going to be sitting back thinking ‘what if.’ No, he’s going to be out there ready to go win a freakin’ football game. Let’s be completely honest. He’s not the first or only player in the NFL looking for a situation where he can make more money or better their situation. He’s just a quarterback, so I know it’s looked at a little differently.

    “But, if he’s in here … I know Sam. Sam’s going to want to go out there and win. He doesn’t have social media, but he knows what people say. He wants to prove them wrong. We want him out there.”

    Matthews along with teammate Zach Ertz flew to Bradford’s home in Oklahoma to work out with the quarterback earlier this offseason. Even with Wentz now in the fold, the wide receiver says that what happens from here forward is all that matters for Bradford, not the business drama over the past several weeks.

    “We can’t worry about next season,” Matthews said. “I don’t even want to talk about that. We have to worry about right now … It’s all that matters. It’s all we’re focused on. Whatever happens in the future, we’ll roll with it. But right now, Sam’s here. He’s the starting quarterback. We have to be ready to compete for him and we want him out there.”

    “I think people saying Sam doesn’t want to compete are the farthest thing from the truth,” Chris Givens said. “He’s a competitor. He’s a guy that wants to win. He’s a guy that comes to work every day looking for ways to get better. He’s a guy that people look to to lead.”

    in reply to: Rams sign Easley #44279
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    zn, don’t you think it’s time to change the log in page so it says “Los Angeles” rather than “St. Louis?”

    That’s a good point!

    in reply to: Trump's Sup Ct nominees-more Scalias' #44274
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    That I agree with.

    in reply to: Rams sign Easley #44272
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Could Dominique Easley be a steal for the Rams?

    ESPN NFL Insider Jarrett Bell details why landing Dominique Easley could be a steal for the Rams. (2:06)

    link: http://www.rams-news.com/dominique-easley-steal-rams-video/

Viewing 30 posts - 38,881 through 38,910 (of 47,059 total)