Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 37,411 through 37,440 (of 47,810 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: (temporary game thread) CHAT ROOM BACK UP #57031
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    hey sims got a sack

    in reply to: (temporary game thread) CHAT ROOM BACK UP #57029
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    cunningham saved a fumble

    in reply to: (temporary game thread) CHAT ROOM BACK UP #57027
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    cooper but quick held

    in reply to: (temporary game thread) CHAT ROOM BACK UP #57016
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    good punt, 75 yds

    in reply to: (temporary game thread) CHAT ROOM BACK UP #57012
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    roll call!

    who’s here

    in reply to: (temporary game thread) CHAT ROOM BACK UP #57010
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    a trick play and they get a penalty

    in reply to: (temporary game thread) CHAT ROOM BACK UP #57007
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Gaines good PD

    run for 5

    3 n 5

    TD

    in reply to: I think it all comes down to Florida #56993
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Here you go, zn. I’m sure you have this down pat. Probably expanded upon it as well.

    How to hack the vote

    We know that voter fraud in the USA is so insignificant as to be completely inconsequential. The numbers are ridiculously low. We also know that courts keep overturning doctored up ways to disenfranchise voters, and that the fake concern over “voter fraud” is just an excuse to push disenfranchisement.

    That;s all pretty clearly established.

    I mean expect among rightie site blogiorialists. But then they’re just deeply partisan. The only people who buy their schtick are just as partisan.

    Which is fine. Yes I see you as a political partisan, in politics discussions. I know full well there’s more to you than that. Just as there’s more to me than partisan bashing.

    .

    in reply to: Rams inactive 11/6 #56992
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    QB Mannion, DB Gratz, OL Brown, OL Murphy, TE Hemingway, WR Spruce, DE Longacre

    So, Quinn, Brockers, Hayes, and Johnson…all active.

    Plus, basically they’re playing 2 right guards this year, Wichmann and Brown.

    in reply to: I think it all comes down to Florida #56977
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Here it is–Maine’s 2nd congressional district that may decide the election.

    And don’t worry, I have it covered. In fact I will be voting multiple times. I am extra motivated that way because if nothing else, the whole republican fake “voter fraud” campaign really pisses me off.

    Here’s where I live, on the coast.

    in reply to: election rigging #56974
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Now, I think he’s just kinda tweaking us for effect.

    I wouldn’t go too far into the motives thing. Violates the spirit.

    But it is fair to call someone on their sources.

    It’s the old problem. The lefties here range far and wide with their sources and do not just simply repeat partisan blogs. Mainstream, academic, commentary, and so on…it’s all mixed in.

    Far too often some reps of the right just repeat rightie blogs. In terms of knowledge of sources, it’s like bringing a pen knife to a laser fight.

    In saying that I am just commenting on a visible debate tendency and how evidence is used in posts.

    in reply to: Nothin would be fina than beatin Carolina … can they do it? #56965
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    there’s a chance i might be going to the game too, so it’d be nice to top that off with sweet victory!

    Hope you can make it to the game!

    That would be nice. If you do let us hear about it.

    in reply to: election rigging #56963
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    bnw, do you imagine anyone here takes some rightie blogger seriously?

    Meanwhile, this is the usual problem I see. People on the right who claim to be for rights and then just blow off the overwhelming evidence that the republicans have a voter disenfranchisement campaign going. Some republicans have even openly stated that’s what it is.

    It is impossible to take someone’s views on this issue seriously if all they are is partisan bs.

    If you’re not against voter disenfranchisement, which in principle ought to violate everything you believe in, then you are just a pure partisan and therefore nothing you say on this issue could possibly be taken seriously. And I don’t care if you’re just this victim of the partisan bloggers you echo. You still ought to see through it.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    33-year-old journeyman quarterback explains why he’s envious that No. 1 pick Jared Goff hasn’t played a game in his rookie season

    Scott Davis
    Business Insider

    http://sports.yahoo.com/news/33-old-journeyman-quarterback-explains-165459660.html

    With the NFL season at its midway point, No. 1 draft pick Jared Goff has yet to play a single snap for the 3-4 Los Angeles Rams. And from the sounds of it, the Rams don’t have plans to throw him into NFL actions just yet.
    Rams coach Jeff Fisher explained to MMQB’s Emily Kaplan that, despite the number of rookie quarterbacks playing across the league, the Rams are content to let Goff watch from the sidelines and develop.
    While that may anger some Rams fans who want to see the quarterback for whom the team surrendered a bounty of future draft picks, some within the NFL believe the Rams’ strategy is smart.
    One such supporter is Brandon Weeden, a 33-year-old backup quarterback with the Texans, his third team since being drafted by the Browns in 2012. Weeden told Kaplan that coming out of college, he simply wasn’t prepared for professional defenses that are significantly more talented and complex than college.
    “I look at what the Rams are doing and I think it’s awesome. By having Case Keenum on the roster, Goff can have a year, a half a year, and redshirt to learn the NFL game. That’s huge. My rookie year, I had no idea what I was doing a lot of the time. I knew coverages, but they are just so much more complex, dissecting everything — it was impossible. I wish I had been in a situation like Goff’s where I wasn’t forced to be thrown into the fire.”
    According to Kaplan, the Rams are aware of the risk of throwing a young quarterback into the fire too soon, reportedly spooked by the struggles of Jaguars quarterback Blake Bortles.
    Much of this stems from the “Air Raid” offense that Goff, and many other quarterbacks, ran in college, which varies significantly from NFL offenses. The language, mechanics, and play-calling responsibilities are different in the NFL, and many quarterbacks coming from college offenses need time to learn it before going out on the field to execute.
    While it’s arguable that Goff can’t learn and adjust while holding a clipboard on the sideline, for now, it seems people within the Rams believe it’s in Goff’s best interest to continue sitting out. Fisher said he believes Goff could play in the NFL right now, but as Weeden suggested, “redshirting” for a year may be better for Goff in the long run.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    a loss to the Panthers essentially cuts the chord completely.

    Sometimes I wish I wasn’t an English teacher.

    It’s a clever musical reference.

    Though to be honest I am not entirely sure what it means.

    in reply to: reporters & analysts set up the PANTHERS game #56932
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams taking it one game at a time

    RICH HAMMOND

    http://www.ocregister.com/articles/bye-734494-rams-coming.html

    LOS ANGELES – It’s been slow for Rams players of late. Plenty of time to catch up on laundry, watch the World Series and perhaps move themselves out of the “undecided” category in advance of the election.

    A bye week is a time for rest and refreshment, but in the Rams’ case, it might also be a final chance for revival. They’ve had two weeks to ponder their place on the NFL food chain and build up a healthy appetite for today’s opponent, Carolina. A loss would be devastating on multiple levels.

    “Our season is still going,” linebacker Alec Ogletree said this week. “We’ve still got a chance to accomplish every goal that we want to accomplish. We’re going one game at a time.”

    So, start with this one. The Rams (3-4) are underdogs to the Panthers, the defending NFC champions who shockingly lost five or their first six games this season before a nice victory over Arizona last week.

    The Rams have lost three consecutive games but, if nothing else, the NFL’s bye-week trend is smiling upon them. Ten teams have already played a game after a bye week this season, and those teams have a combined record of 8-2, including 5-0 at home.

    The Rams have a 2-1-1 record under Coach Jeff Fisher coming off a bye. Both of the victories were at home (in St. Louis), including last season’s 24-6 triumph over the woeful Cleveland Browns.

    Success after a break isn’t necessarily a long-term trend, though. Last season, teams coming off a bye had a 13-13 record (three other games featured both teams coming off their bye weeks).

    “You have a tendency at times to start a little slower,” Fisher said of teams coming off a bye, “but I don’t anticipate that with our guys. They’ve played hard. They know how to practice, so it’s kind of exciting to get back on the field.”

    The Panthers have been on both sides of this. Last month, Carolina traveled to New Orleans to face the Saints, who were coming off their bye. New Orleans took a 14-0 first-quarter lead and won 41-38.

    Carolina, reeling, had its bye two weeks ago, then hosted Arizona last week. The Panthers jumped to a 14-0 first-quarter lead and put together their most complete effort of the season in a 30-20 victory.

    Things seem to be coming around for the Panthers, who have an excellent front seven and renewed balance on offense with the return of running back Jonathan Stewart to health, paired with the scary running ability of 245-pound quarterback Cam Newton.

    “They’ve got a funky scheme,” Rams defensive end William Hayes said of Carolina’s offense. “It’s just about preparing and getting your film work in and believing in what you’re seeing and doing it. With their offense, you can’t just go out there and freelance. You’ve got to go out and play your keys and play fast. That’s the thing. We’ve got to do a lot of rallying, because they can do a lot of things that are scary.”

    Even after their three-game losing streak, the Rams remain only 11/2 games out of first place in the NFC West.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams approach fork in the road on when Jared Goff should step in at quarterback

    VINCENT BONSIGNORE

    http://www.ocregister.com/articles/goff-734496-rams-keenum.html

    On the final practice before the Rams broke for their bye week, rookie quarterback Jared Goff took the majority of snaps with the first-team offense.

    Without the benefit of actual game action to assess Goff’s progress, his extended work against the Rams front-line defense last Wednesday opened a window into just how far he’s come since the end of training camp.

    Coupled with the Rams’ plunge in the standings – should it continue against the Carolina Panthers – the progress Goff showed may have created a new timeline from which they finally decide to get him on the field.

    What we have, essentially, is a franchise rapidly approaching a crossroads in which present and future objectives will meet.

    And Case Keenum, the incumbent starter, appears more aware than ever of the looming fork in the road.

    Keenum spoke recently about being the starter “this week” and how he’s taking things “a week at a time.”

    It’s the first time all season Keenum has referred to his hold on the starting job in such tenuous terms. That it comes during a three-game losing streak – and immediately after he threw four interceptions in a frustrating loss to the New York Giants – is striking.

    Almost as if instincts are telling him a fourth straight loss could be the catalyst for change.

    Which means he might be facing a must-win situation when the Rams host the Panthers Sunday at the Coliseum.

    Win, and keep the job. Lose, and give way to Goff.

    It would be the right thing to do.

    For the moment, the Rams remain on the fringe of the NFC West race. That’s more a product of what the rest of the division hasn’t done than what the Rams have, but as long as the division title is legitimately within reach, Keenum should stay the starter with Goff developing in the background.

    That’s been the plan almost from the moment the Rams selected Goff, at which point they hoisted themselves onto two separate train tracks.

    On one, they hoped to finally turn the corner from the 7-9 teams they’ve been under Jeff Fisher to a legitimate playoff contender. Keenum was the quarterback they counted on to navigate them across that route.

    On the other, they’d quietly and prudently develop Goff, the undisputed future face of the franchise. As some close to Fisher explain it, he would follow a similar blueprint he used 21 years ago with Steve McNair as coach of the Houston Oilers.

    McNair arrived in Houston a talented but raw prospect from tiny Alcorn State, then spent two years learning and developing behind the scenes. From that quiet place, an eventual Super Bowl quarterback emerged.

    “He hasn’t wavered from his plan,” one source said. “He kept Steve McNair off the field and played Chris Chandler for a year and he liked the results.”

    Ideally, the Rams hope the two train tracks run parallel to each other this year, but the three-game losing streak they’ve stumbled into has reduced their best regular-season start in years to an all-too-familiar 3-4 mark near the midpoint.

    And it’s created the very intersection they hoped to avoid.

    The justification for deliberately bringing along Goff in the classroom and on the practice field only holds up if the Rams remain in the playoff race.

    As long as they are, Keenum deserves the chance to keep playing.

    But they are barely hanging on at this point, and a loss to the Panthers essentially cuts the chord completely.

    Keenum isn’t solely to blame, although his 10 interceptions through seven games is alarmingly high and the three pick-six touchdown interceptions he’s thrown have played big in two losses.

    Still, he’s merely part of a larger Rams’ problem.

    Of bigger concern is rolling with him out of foolish hope the playoffs are within reach, and in the process squandering the chance to develop Goff over the remaining eight games.

    If the Rams lose Sunday to the Panthers, all remaining rational to stick with Keenum is lost.

    Which brings us back to Goff, and his work with the first-team offense last week.

    The progress was apparent in how decisive he looked, his command at the line of scrimmage and quickly the ball was coming out of his hand. On two occasions, he unleashed passes that drew oohs and ahhs from teammates watching on the sideline.

    It was only practice, but for anyone who has watched Goff since OTAs the leap forward was obvious.

    And for Rams coaches, it was a turning point. Goff has impressed them with his progress in the classroom the last few weeks by asking more advanced questions and delving beyond just the initial layer of play concepts and defensive looks to more nuanced details.

    Now they were seeing it in real time.

    “I thought it came to fruition on the practice field,” offensive coordinator Rob Boras said. “That practice Wednesday, I thought it was great. To me, and you guys that are watching practice, how fast he’s getting in and out of the huddle. You could just see the confidence with what was going on. The wheels weren’t turning when he got up to the line of scrimmage, and he was real accurate, and decisive with what he was doing.

    “I’ve kept talking about how well he’s been doing in the classroom; it was time to see it out here with all those reps that he got. I think we were all really pleased to see what was able to do in those couple of practices.”

    Point being, Goff is closing in on being ready to take the field.

    As long as the Rams remain in legitimate playoff contention, there is justification to keep Goff on the sideline and let him develop in the background.

    But the intersection between what they’d prefer to do and what they should is looming close and closer.

    And you get the sense that everyone from the coaching staff to Keenum can see it up ahead.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    he’s still voting for clinton though it should be noted.

    this is a tough on for sure. who stinks more? clinton or trump? that’s tough.

    Sorry but that one’s easy for me.

    I don’t like Clinton all that much BUT Trump is several orders of magnitude worse.

    To me, that’s like asking, would you rather be stuck driving the same crappy car, or chained up behind a tank and dragged through a few hundred yards of broken glass.

    in reply to: Edvard Munch action figures #56917
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This is purty awesome:

    link:http://io9.gizmodo.com/edvard-munchs-the-scream-is-infinitely-more-horrific-as-1788584730

    Available starting in May of next year for around $52, The Scream will include a colorful backdrop allowing you to recreate Munch’s original masterpiece, or you can pose any anguished figure in your collection in front of it. It might not be authentic, but who wants to spends tens of millions of dollars on a piece of art you can’t actually touch?

    Is there one signalling “TD”?

    And hopefully as a Rams fan, not a Seattle fan.

    in reply to: best of Keenum, 1st 7 games #56916
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I would very much like to have Keenum back next year as a back up.

    I wish he were better in late in the game comeback situations.

    They were in that situation 5 times and they won 2.

    But then I suppose if he were better in those situations he would actually be a starting caliber qb.

    And…I agree with you. Nice back-up. I think the best actual #2 caliber back-up the Rams have had since I can remember (not counting starting caliber qbs who just happened to be #2 on the depth chart at first, like Ferragamo, Everett, Green, Warner, Bulger, and for that matter Goff.)

    in reply to: Important Issues We SHOULD Be Discussing… #56872
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    zn: From what I gather he’s basically a libertarian. Which is probably why we never get anything from him (that I know of) about corporate wrongdoings.

    I’ve noticed the lack of corporations (and capitalism more generally) too. His leaks have only been directed at — as far as I know — the public sector. And, as already mentioned, with few exceptions when it comes to America, just the Dems.

    My editorial: personally? I don’t suspend that criteria. Wikileaks is libertarian and serves a libertarian agenda. There’s no scrutiny of business interests. I don’t suspend my criteria for him–he either recognizes the private sector needs major exposure, or he serves their interests. I don’t care beyond that. I have that criteria for everyone I discuss politically. There is just absolutely no way I make him an exception.

    in reply to: Important Issues We SHOULD Be Discussing… #56868
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This is worth watching whether u agree or disagree with it.
    At the 3 minute mark Assange sez its false that “17 agencies” have verified that the leaks came from russia

    I think he’s a complete asshole.

    And he does things like publish the medical histories and personal histories of rape victims. Why?

    All I get out of the stuff he’s doing now is that he has a personal vendetta against Clinton. That’s it.

    From what I gather he’s basically a libertarian. Which is probably why we never get anything from him (that I know of) about corporate wrongdoings.

    in reply to: PA Ram… have you seen/will you see Dr. Strange? #56866
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I didn’t have it on my list but I may check it out. I really don’t know anything about the character. I never read the comic. I was turned off a bit by the city turning upside down. I thought it felt like an “Inception” rip-off.

    But I do like Cumberbatch. I may check it out.

    I saw “Inferno” last week. Better than the reviews but all Dan Brown novels are pretty much the same. But I enjoy the little historical notes and locations.

    Visually Dr Strange is better than Inception. The visuals are much more complex. But it’s not overdone. It’s just cool to watch.

    I saw Inferno and liked it as well. I like the ‘historical puzzle’ aspect of it.

    Also saw The Accountant recently and enjoyed it. The premise was interesting for an action film – Much better than Jack Reacher. But the best film I’ve seen recently is Girl on a Train. Very dark and suspenseful with a twist.

    Yeah PA I agree with Nittany. it’s not an Inception rip-off. It’s more like filmed live-action Escher.

    Definitely check out Dr. Strange. You don’t need to know the character from the comics. It’s very stand-alone. Many reviewers rank it among the best Marvel movies.

    BTW there’s both a mid-credits scene and an end-credits scene.

    in reply to: hindsight time…McLeod #56850
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I like the first Alien movie with Sigourney Weaver over the first Predator movie which starred Arnold Schwarzenegger.

    And you’re saying that could help the running game?

    .

    in reply to: reporters & analysts set up the PANTHERS game #56849
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams’ top pass rusher only has 3 sacks, but pressure he produces impresses Panthers

    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article112580183.html#storylink=cpy

    According to Pro Football Focus, Donald leads the NFL in quarterback pressures with 38 and averages 5.4 per game – though he didn’t have a sack until October and still has only three.

    Panthers head coach Ron Rivera is well-aware of Donald’s skill.

    “He plays with great leverage. I know he’s not 6-foot-4, 6-foot-5, but he knows where his strengths are and he plays to them,” said Rivera before the team departed for Los Angeles on Friday. “He’s very powerful, has a great first step in getting into the crease. There’s one thing he does, and it’s that he gets vertical.”

    Like Pro Football Focus, Rivera cited Donald’s skill with his hands against offensive linemen.

    “A lot of guys spend a lot of time dancing at the line of scrimmage, getting their hands up, people being slowed down. He goes,” he said. “That’s one of the really neat things about him. And he’s a smart football player. He understands the game.”

    Carolina gave up just one sack and four tackles-for-loss to Arizona last week, but is still without starting left tackle Michael Oher as he continues through the concussion protocol.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    People are apprehensive about this game.

    It’s a cylinders game.

    Rams hit on all 3 cylinders–pass, run, defense–they win. They can hit on just 2 and still win but then it’s closer.

    But the trick with cylinders is gettin em all to show up at the same time.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Fisher, Wms, Gurley … 11/4 … transcripts

    (On CB Trumaine Johnson’s status)

    “Trumaine was limited today in practice, and he’s listed as questionable, as is (DE) William (Hayes) and (DT Michael Brockers) ‘Brock’ and (RG) Jamon (Brown). I think the only we’ve listed as out is (WR) Nelson (Spruce). Everybody else is limited and questionable.”

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Why cant pro teams use the simple, qb-friendly Air Raid offense? Why wouldnt it work in the pros?

    w
    v

    From what I know about it? Too simple. It wouldn’t work against pro defenses.

    Think…every team in the league had a chance over the last few years to draft an Air Raid qb and switch to an Air Raid offense. No one did it that way. IN each case the qb has to undergo a learning process.

    .

    in reply to: hindsight time…McLeod #56801
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    His play if correct could move our company pick to a 3rd round pick. Part of it, means getting into the Pro Bowl.

    I don’t think that’s based on how he plays though…it’s based on the contract. As it stands the Rams already estimate a 4th round pick.

    They could get a 6th for Farley, too.

    .

    in reply to: RT vid on Hillary #56790
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Throw in the natural “conservative” tilt of the media, due to the people who own it, and I really don’t see any consistent pro-Clinton bias.

    90% of those who work in “the media” vote Democratic.

    Of those 2 ways of seeing it I side with BT. Given my perspective on things and my kind of political vision, the mainstream mass media is so hopeless and clueless I don’t even pay attention to it. I haven’t watched tv news in probably over a decade, and when I read a newspaper—usually over lunch in a diner—it’s local, and for local news. In general, I find the conservative mantra that the news is “liberal” to be just another conservative delusion. I don’t mean to offend anyone–it’s honestly the way I see it.

    Article…and it’s not definitive. If you read the way I do there is never “one” article, you always have to see the range. It’s never “one.” Having said that, here’s one of a possible many:

    ====

    FOURTH ESTATE
    What Reporters Really Think of 2016
    An exclusive survey of the campaign press corps.

    By POLITICO MAGAZINE May/June 2016

    http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/2016-campaign-opinion-journalists-press-corps-reporters-survey-213844

    In the 2016 election, the media have become part of the story as never before—blamed for “creating” Donald Trump, while enduring repeated insults from him and his staff, criticized for being too soft (or was it too tough?) on Hillary Clinton, while barely getting a chance to question the candidate up-close.

    So how do the journalists themselves feel about it? In March, we conducted an exclusive survey of more than 80 campaign reporters, asking them to rate how well the press is covering 2016 and tell us what it’s really like on the campaign trail. Their responses are aggregated below, and you can read their on-the-record thoughts about the campaign here. Which candidate treats reports most harshly? Overwhelmingly, they said it’s Trump—78 percent of respondents think his campaign is the most hostile to the press, and 94 percent think Trump manipulates the media to his advantage. When asked which candidate they think is least-liked by his or her own staff, however, they named Clinton first.

    When we asked the reporters to assess how well they’ve covered the 2016 campaign, they gave themselves an average rating of 5.7 on a scale from 1 (hopelessly) to 10 (perfectly), and most said they think the impulse for ratings and clips has contributed some to Trump’s success in the race so far. Thirty-nine percent said they think the media’s coverage of Trump has been biased in his favor, while 23 percent think it’s been biased against him and 38 percent think it’s not been biased at all.

    When it comes to actually voting, 61 percent of our respondents said they think reporters should vote in elections they cover, but just under half said they’re not registered with a party. Asked whom they’ll vote for, the largest group said they either don’t know or don’t plan to vote. Who they think will win was another matter: 86 percent went with Clinton.

Viewing 30 posts - 37,411 through 37,440 (of 47,810 total)