Zooey wrote:

I think it’s important for me to be who I am. I think I’m sarcastic, and that’s okay. I’ve been getting away from that, from my core beliefs. I’ve been trying to do too much, I think. And I really believe that if I can just be the best me I can be, that’s what it’s all about. That just makes me a better poster. So I think it’s good that I’m starting over fresh at being me.

I like this.

I’m an extremely flawed human being with lots of battle scars. And no matter how often I try to be someone else, I always end up despising that guy. He sucks and he’s boring.

Yay for Sarcastic Zooey.

• This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by -- X --.

wv wrote:

Sure is easier to have good players
when yer QB is only making a couple million bucks.

w
v

All of our QBs are on a one year rental. I wouldn’t be all that surprised if they took another QB in the draft, relatively high, to weed out the weak link and give themselves a couple of options next year. All this talk about “strengthening units” had to eventually circle around to the QB position after all.

Herzog wrote:

I’m a bit confused. It’s all good though

PM me if you’d like.

Here’s his presser if it wasn’t already posted.

http://new.livestream.com/accounts/8109350/events/2963279

Correction. Houston, not Baylor (for Keenum) and Southern Miss for Davis, not Baylor.
I had Baylor on the mind for some reason.
Maybe we’ll acquire RGIII since he ran the spread at Harvard.

Some of the pieces are starting to come together here. Case Keenum came from an explosive spread offense at Baylor, Austin Davis was HIGHLY productive in the high-speed spread attack at Baylor, and they just plucked Foles off of that fast-paced spread attack in Philly.

Who is Cignetti though, and how does he fit in? He’s coached primarily pro-style offenses using both the WCO and the digit systems. The thing I’m reading that he likes to do, however, is give a bunch of different looks to make the defense try to guess what’s coming instead of saying, “here’s what we’re doing, try to stop it.”

I’m very interested to see how this offense is going to take shape. There isn’t a single QB on this roster who even resembles the prototypical pocket passer anymore. Does the key to beating teams like SF and SEA entail beating them at their own game?

• This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by -- X --. Reason: Typo

Winnbrad wrote:

– X – wrote:

Winnbrad wrote:
30 receivers, 23 o-lineman. That’s depressing. And that vid is from the 2013 season, right?

No. Week 7 of 2012.
Awesome set-up he had for that game. Steve Smith, Austin Pettis, Brandon Gibson and Chris Givens as his receivers. Only Givens remains, and probably not for long. The only lineman still on the team from that game is Barksdale; and again, probably not for long.

2012. That’s even more depressing. He’s probably had 40 WRs and 30 o-lineman by now.

I’m hesitant to depress you any further, but…

Craig Dahl was our starting strong safety for that game too.

• This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by -- X --.

Winnbrad wrote:

30 receivers, 23 o-lineman. That’s depressing. And that vid is from the 2013 season, right?

No. Week 7 of 2012.
Awesome set-up he had for that game. Steve Smith, Austin Pettis, Brandon Gibson and Chris Givens as his receivers. Only Givens remains, and probably not for long. The only lineman still on the team from that game is Barksdale; and again, probably not for long.

zn wrote:

– X – wrote:

Welcome aboard amigo.

Spanglish, eh? Now THAT’S a colloquialism.