Forum Replies Created

Viewing 27 posts - 391 through 417 (of 417 total)
1 2 3 … 12 13 14
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 19, 2015 at 10:07 am in reply to: Garrett Reynolds signs with Rams #21002
    — X —
    Participant
    wv wrote:

    Nice depth.

    Still need a coupla Solid, Massive, Starters.

    w
    v

    You appear to be unfamiliar with our pun approach to building O-lines.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 19, 2015 at 1:41 am in reply to: Jed York: 49ers got away from “core strengths” under Harbaugh #20984
    — X —
    Participant

    Zooey wrote:

    I think it’s important for me to be who I am. I think I’m sarcastic, and that’s okay. I’ve been getting away from that, from my core beliefs. I’ve been trying to do too much, I think. And I really believe that if I can just be the best me I can be, that’s what it’s all about. That just makes me a better poster. So I think it’s good that I’m starting over fresh at being me.

    I like this.

    I’m an extremely flawed human being with lots of battle scars. And no matter how often I try to be someone else, I always end up despising that guy. He sucks and he’s boring.

    Yay for Sarcastic Zooey.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by -- X --.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 19, 2015 at 1:28 am in reply to: Board stuff: using "quote" – FIXED. Thanks RM. #20983
    — X —
    Participant
    zn wrote:

    div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-titleAnonymous wrote:

    div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”RamsMaineiac wrote:
    I just updated the bbpress plugin… did it fix the issue you were trying to address here?

    Yes. Looks like it.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 19, 2015 at 1:24 am in reply to: The Longest Joke in the World #20982
    — X —
    Participant

    Someone turned me onto it too, and I did the scroll thing to see how much time I was gonna have to dedicate to it. Being that it was in such narrow margins, it looked like an insurmountable task. lol. It kept me intrigued once I started though, so I hung in there til the “end.”

    You suck, wv. Attention span of a moth.
    The shame you must feel…

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 14, 2015 at 6:36 pm in reply to: Wagoner: Rams mailbag #20534
    — X —
    Participant

    When did they start calling him the Rams Mailbag?
    Seems uncalled for, despite his leaving for greener pastures.

    That aside…

    @nwagoner: I’m not sold that the Rams are content at quarterback now, nor should they be. So I think just about anything is in play when it comes to quarterbacks. I wouldn’t rule out a trade up, a trade down, anything. Remember, this is a group that was “devoted” to Sam Bradford as recently as a couple of weeks ago. This is the time of year when deception rules so can we really rule out anything at this point?

    I agree with this.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 14, 2015 at 6:33 pm in reply to: Foles has one year left…future at qb? #20533
    — X —
    Participant
    wv wrote:

    Sure is easier to have good players
    when yer QB is only making a couple million bucks.

    w
    v

    All of our QBs are on a one year rental. I wouldn’t be all that surprised if they took another QB in the draft, relatively high, to weed out the weak link and give themselves a couple of options next year. All this talk about “strengthening units” had to eventually circle around to the QB position after all.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 13, 2015 at 1:03 am in reply to: should the Rams still draft a qb? #20324
    — X —
    Participant

    I certainly would. The greatest currency you can own in this league is a promising backup QB.
    Plus, why wouldn’t they want fierce competition for the starting QB spot? Just hand it over to Foles?
    No thank you. Someone has to be looking over their shoulder here for once.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 13, 2015 at 1:00 am in reply to: Welcome back -X- #20321
    — X —
    Participant
    Herzog wrote:

    I’m a bit confused. It’s all good though

    PM me if you’d like.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 13, 2015 at 12:10 am in reply to: Welcome back -X- #20312
    — X —
    Participant

    Thanks, I appreciate it.
    I know I got stupid before, but zn and I discussed it and not all is as it seemed.

    Again, sorry if I offended anyone.

    Jerks.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 11, 2015 at 3:43 pm in reply to: Chip Kelly ( Was offered 1st rounder for Bradford this morning) #20075
    — X —
    Participant

    Here’s his presser if it wasn’t already posted.

    http://new.livestream.com/accounts/8109350/events/2963279

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 11, 2015 at 1:18 am in reply to: Bradford to Eagles, Foles to Rams #19939
    — X —
    Participant
    Zooey wrote:

    I wanna puke.

    I am not going to buy season tickets this year. I am not even going to get NFL Ticket. That’s that.

    Palm Face

    lol. “Palm Face.”

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 9:07 pm in reply to: Bradford to Eagles, Foles to Rams #19907
    — X —
    Participant
    Agamemnon wrote:

    laram
    It’s the J-E-T-S!!!!….
    March 10, 2015 06:55PM Registered: 5 years ago
    Posts: 14,113
    Status: HOF Inductee Donator:
    All of my friends/sources in Philly are saying that the Eagles have a deal with the Jets who covet Sam Bradford.

    If this is true, maybe it was a three team trade?

    Wouldn’t the Jets have reached out to the Rams and offered something also?
    And if so, was it not good enough?

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 8:40 pm in reply to: Bradford to Eagles, Foles to Rams #19901
    — X —
    Participant

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 7:56 pm in reply to: Rams trade 7th round draft pick for Casey Keenum #19888
    — X —
    Participant

    Correction. Houston, not Baylor (for Keenum) and Southern Miss for Davis, not Baylor.
    I had Baylor on the mind for some reason.
    Maybe we’ll acquire RGIII since he ran the spread at Harvard.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 7:04 pm in reply to: Bradford to Eagles, Foles to Rams #19865
    — X —
    Participant
    Winnbrad wrote:

    The latest from Jim:

    Jim Thomas ‏@jthom1 9m9 minutes ago

    Eagles get Bradford, a 5th-round pick from St. L this year, in exchange for Foles, a 4th-rounder this year, & 2nd-ronder in 16.

    So we get Foles, a 4th rounder this year, and a 2nd in 2016.

    We gave up Bradford and a 5th rounder this year?

    If that’s correct, and I’m still not sure, then I’m quite pleased.

    I’m hearing those compensations are conditional. Like if Bradford doesn’t play X amount of games, the compensation gets higher for the Eagles. And if Bradford emerges as the full-time starter, the compensation increases for the Rams.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 6:45 pm in reply to: Rams trade 7th round draft pick for Casey Keenum #19856
    — X —
    Participant

    Some of the pieces are starting to come together here. Case Keenum came from an explosive spread offense at Baylor, Austin Davis was HIGHLY productive in the high-speed spread attack at Baylor, and they just plucked Foles off of that fast-paced spread attack in Philly.

    Who is Cignetti though, and how does he fit in? He’s coached primarily pro-style offenses using both the WCO and the digit systems. The thing I’m reading that he likes to do, however, is give a bunch of different looks to make the defense try to guess what’s coming instead of saying, “here’s what we’re doing, try to stop it.”

    I’m very interested to see how this offense is going to take shape. There isn’t a single QB on this roster who even resembles the prototypical pocket passer anymore. Does the key to beating teams like SF and SEA entail beating them at their own game?

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by -- X --. Reason: Typo

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 6:19 pm in reply to: Bradford to Eagles, Foles to Rams #19847
    — X —
    Participant
    wv wrote:

    Mike Sando, ESPN.com ‏@SandoESPN
    #Eagles OC Pat Shurmur had same job with #Rams when team drafted Sam Bradford in 2010, so familiarity there.

    He copied that tweet.

    Captain Obvious, SS NoKidding @Captain Obvious
    #Eagles OC Pat Shurmur had same job with #Rams when team drafted Sam Bradford in 2010, so familiarity there.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 4:55 pm in reply to: Bradford to Eagles, Foles to Rams #19808
    — X —
    Participant

    That’s a lot of wide open receivers and/or picking on the Raiders in that highlight video, eh wv?

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 4:31 pm in reply to: Bradford to Eagles, Foles to Rams #19789
    — X —
    Participant

    Right now there are multiple rumors being circulated. First we were giving up a 2nd rounder. Now we’re getting a 2nd rounder. Then there’s another that the Eagles are looking to use Bradford as draft-trade capital.

    Which, you know, is par for the course this time of year.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 4:25 pm in reply to: Bradford to Eagles, Foles to Rams #19786
    — X —
    Participant
    Dak wrote:

    Is this for real?

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000477790/article/rams-trading-sam-bradford-to-eagles-for-nick-foles

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 2:44 pm in reply to: So … yeah #19780
    — X —
    Participant

    It’s gluten free.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 11:31 am in reply to: How many linemen has Bradford worked with? #19763
    — X —
    Participant
    Winnbrad wrote:

    – X – wrote:

    Winnbrad wrote:
    30 receivers, 23 o-lineman. That’s depressing. And that vid is from the 2013 season, right?

    No. Week 7 of 2012.
    Awesome set-up he had for that game. Steve Smith, Austin Pettis, Brandon Gibson and Chris Givens as his receivers. Only Givens remains, and probably not for long. The only lineman still on the team from that game is Barksdale; and again, probably not for long.

    2012. That’s even more depressing. He’s probably had 40 WRs and 30 o-lineman by now.

    I’m hesitant to depress you any further, but…

    Craig Dahl was our starting strong safety for that game too.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by -- X --.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 11:25 am in reply to: So … yeah #19762
    — X —
    Participant

    I don’t mind a little ribbing.
    Do your worst.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 11:17 am in reply to: How many linemen has Bradford worked with? #19759
    — X —
    Participant
    Winnbrad wrote:

    30 receivers, 23 o-lineman. That’s depressing. And that vid is from the 2013 season, right?

    No. Week 7 of 2012.
    Awesome set-up he had for that game. Steve Smith, Austin Pettis, Brandon Gibson and Chris Givens as his receivers. Only Givens remains, and probably not for long. The only lineman still on the team from that game is Barksdale; and again, probably not for long.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 10, 2015 at 10:22 am in reply to: How many linemen has Bradford worked with? #19756
    — X —
    Participant

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 8, 2015 at 4:43 pm in reply to: the value of hurries #19661
    — X —
    Participant
    zn wrote:

    – X – wrote:

    Welcome aboard amigo.

    Spanglish, eh? Now THAT’S a colloquialism.

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

    March 8, 2015 at 3:59 pm in reply to: the value of hurries #19654
    — X —
    Participant



    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 27 posts - 391 through 417 (of 417 total)
1 2 3 … 12 13 14