Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 2,881 through 2,910 (of 12,320 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: comics, jokes, one-shot memes, funny tweets, etc. #128084
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: political tweets #128082
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: political tweets #128080
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: what’s your favorite flavor of jam or jelly? #128065
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The only time i would eat jelly/jam is on
    toast.

    And the only thing i ever put on toast
    is cinnamon.

    With that out of the way,
    the answer is:
    Peach

    w
    v

    in reply to: the rift between Russell Wilson and Seahawks #128059
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think Pete Carroll has proven his system works.
    But I get the fact Wilson is sick of the OLine problems.

    I still remember that great Seattle Legion of Boom,
    with that great DLine, and Marshawn Lynch
    relentlessly pounding the ball.
    And that 12th Man Crowd they had.
    One of the greatest NFC West teams i can remember.

    Not sure how many QBs are gonna wanna
    play in that Carroll offense.

    Interesting situation.

    w
    v

    in reply to: what do we huddlers expect from Stafford? #128040
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Man, Stafford can fling it.
    I’m tellin ya guys, he’s better than
    Case Keenum.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k1F1JF7o_M&t=7s

    in reply to: Science tweets #128028
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: animal bits #127957
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    WV–are those really “animal bits”?

    ==

    Nah, i messed up the link, somehow. It was sposed to be the yellow penguin,
    which is awesome.

    in reply to: Was Wentz better than Goff? #127956
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Wentz is a mystery to me.
    He showed MVP talent for a while. Surely, in the right situation
    with the right coach, surrounded by the right players,
    he could regain his form.

    Wouldnt surprise me if Wentz had a great
    second act.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Kromer gone #127952
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well…McV is good at finding and hiring
    Good assistant coaches. Other teams want them.

    The Kromer thing is odd, though.

    I didnt think McV would be able to find a
    better DC than Wade. And he did.

    So, maybe he finds another good Offensive Line
    coach. We’ll see. They need one, for sure.

    This team is still very close to being
    a Ring-Contender. A few more pieces.

    w
    v

    in reply to: political tweets #127951
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: political tweets #127930
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 2/15 thru 2/18 #127916
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: political tweets #127913
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Not a tweet, but Justin Jackson

    in reply to: texas winter & privatization #127898
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: what do we huddlers expect from Stafford? #127866
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    33 is the new 28 for a QB in the NFL.

    The QB-friendly rules-changes make it a lot
    safer to be a QB.

    Its not gonna be a big deal anymore
    to see 40 year-old QBs.

    Possession-WR’s might last a bit longer
    too, i would think.

    w
    v

    in reply to: the trial and its effects #127824
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The Republican candidate for president has won the popular vote once out of the past 8 elections.

    Only 25% of the country identifies as Republican, and a quarter of them are 65+, and more than half are 50+.

    To the extent that they have been successful, it has been largely due to gerrymandering and a wide variety of voter suppression tactics.

    What I’m saying is… they can’t afford to alienate any Republicans. .

    =============

    Which is why, to state the obvious, the elites HAVE to control
    the Duplicat-Party. They HAVE to derail any progressive leanings
    in the Dem Party.

    I also think another reason no witnesses were called is because
    the Dems were afraid of something. They were afraid of what
    the REP Witnesses would say about Dems.

    w
    v

    in reply to: the trial and its effects #127811
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    If anybody comes across a plausible explanation for why the Democrats stopped short of calling witnesses, I’d like to see it.

    Had to be a political-calculation. Nation was
    getting sick of the hearing. The Nation wants them to work on more
    important things.

    The Dems knew no matter how many witnesses showed up
    they were not going to get a conviction.
    And they knew no matter how many witnesses came they were not going to
    score any more points than they’d already scored, because the vast majority of Americans are not pol-wonks and dont watch this stuff.

    The Dems got what they could get, and now they want out.
    w
    v

    in reply to: around the league tweets… starting 2/9 #127792
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dont always agree with Lavar Arrington,
    but i always enjoy listening to his smooth, articulate perspective.

    About half-way thru this vid, he is asked about JJ Watt,
    but he talks about Aaron Donald:

    in reply to: the trial and its effects #127788
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Going back to… Trump’s call to the Georgia Secretary of State was an excellent example. He knew exactly what Trump wanted him to do, which is why he leaked the audio to protect himself from his own legal liabilities.

    Trump said everything but “steal the votes for me, or else.” He walked right up to that line, almost crossed it several times, and did threaten him. But he may well have couched his rhetoric in enough double-speak to get away with it. I have no idea, but I do know he shouldn’t be able to.
    .

    ==============

    Exactly. I listened to that call carefully, three times,
    and its typical Trump. Brilliant-Crafty-Evil Trump.
    He went right up to the line. And didnt cross it.
    He does that ALL the TIME.

    If you are a Dem it seems ‘obvious’ that he crossed the line.
    But if you are anything but a Dem, it aint so obvious
    and there’s just a bit of ‘reasonable doubt.’

    So, Dems will always vote to convict,
    but not many Reps, and some Indies wont either.

    Think about Malcolm X, the Black Panthers,
    some of the Radical 60’s folks — they said a lot
    of stuff that went right up..to…the…line.

    w
    v

    in reply to: what do we huddlers expect from Stafford? #127787
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I am guessing we may see Quarterbacking like we haven’t seen since John Hadl.
    I dunno how many people remember the big John Hadl/Harold Jackson year
    but it was a LOT of fun to watch. The ball was flying all over the place.

    I expect to see the deep ball again, which should
    help McVay’s short-game. The little screens and such, should be
    better now that the entire field is threatened all the time.

    But. I still think we are looking at a 10-win-team
    if the OLine isnt upgraded just a bit.

    Brady got all the pub as per usual, and the Bucs D
    got a ton of pub, but what impressed me most about the Bucs
    championship run was OLine. Seemed to me everytime Brady
    wanted to go deep to Evans or whoever, he had an amazingly
    clean pocket. I was startled at just how much time they
    gave him. And then there’s Russell Wilson, Aaron Rogers, etc.

    Can the Rams build a championship Oline?
    We’ll see.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Science tweets #127772
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: the trial and its effects #127771
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, I havent followed any of this theater very closely,
    so that being said, I thought from the beginning that
    Trump stopped short of ‘inciting’ that crowd
    in a way that could be proven ‘criminal.’
    He never said any of the magic words necessary
    for a criminal conviction, in my view.

    He didnt expressly tell them to gouge out cops eyes
    or bash in windows or bring pipe bombs, etc, etc.

    He just didnt.

    Did he secretly want them to bring down the government
    and make him King of the World? Sure, no doubt.
    But he has always been craftier than people
    give him credit for. His words are open to interpretation.
    They just are. Lots of Reps did NOT force their way
    into the Capital Bldng. Why didnt they?
    Because they didnt interpret his words in a way
    that would lead them toward violence.

    You could not get 12 people on a jury to agree on
    any of this. Trust me. A prosecutor would be
    lucky to get 8 out of 12.

    Now maybe there’s ‘other’ evidence I’m not aware of
    but if we are just going by trumps weasel words?
    Nah, its not enough. He went right up to the line — and
    didnt cross it. Which is typical for Trump.
    He’s a master at it.

    Just my opinion.

    w
    v

    in reply to: the trial and its effects #127763
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I assume the Dems know they cant get a conviction. I mean, they cant.
    It wont even be close. So its not about a conviction and never was.

    So what are they doing?

    Well its ‘politics.’ They want to hurt
    the Republicans as much as they can, discredit as many Reps
    as they can. Its theater, and hard-ball-partisan-politics.

    I listened to some of a Trump-Lawyer’s argument while
    i was in my car today. It was an excellent argument i thought.
    He played an audio of a gazillion Dems saying inflammatory,
    pro-violence rhetoric, and then he argued it all should be
    protected by the 1st Amendment, and that it was unfortunate
    that the rhetoric on both sides has reached this point.

    I dont have an opinion on whether trump should be convicted,
    because my brain just wont go there anymore — the entire
    corrupt, murderous capitalist system should be convicted.

    I just can down-shift my brain to consider whether
    Trump is guilty, or one part of the system is ‘guilty,’
    when the entire system has
    reached a dystopian-imperialist-kill-the-poor state.

    I mean, to me, its like if in 1941, if Mengele
    put Goebbels on trial. Sure, Goebbels is guilty,
    but…WTF? The entire system was genocidal.

    I’ve just gone over the edge.
    No coming back.

    w
    v

    in reply to: tweets (Rams) … 2/8 thru 2/14 #127704
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Chiefs still heavy favorites.
    Not at all surprising.

    w
    v

    in reply to: superbowl–reactions, discussions, etc. #127703
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    If the Chiefs Oline was healthy,
    I’d still pick the chiefs everytime.

    I mean what kind of blueprint did Tampa
    show us:
    1) First, get the Chiefs OLine all decimated with injuries.
    2) Dominate the Line of Scrimmage.

    w
    v

    in reply to: superbowl–reactions, discussions, etc. #127685
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Next Man Up:https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/super-bowl-2021-chiefs-offensive-line-coach-not-fazed-by-injuries-despite-not-having-both-starting-tackles/

    Super Bowl LV is headlined by the matchup between quarterbacks Patrick Mahomes and Tom Brady, but arguably the most important facet of this game has to do with how well the Kansas City Chiefs offensive line can handle the Tampa Bay Buccaneers pass rush. Unfortunately, the Chiefs have had to deal with numerous injuries along the offensive line in 2020, and those misfortunes continued into the postseason. In the AFC Championship game against the Buffalo Bills, starting left tackle Eric Fisher went down with a torn Achilles, and with Mitchell Schwartz already on injured reserve due to a back injury, the Chiefs will not have either of their starting tackles for Super Bowl LV.

    While Kansas City’s starting lineup is being reshuffled yet again right before the biggest game of the year, Chiefs offensive line coach Andy Heck told reporters on Tuesday that his position group is deep, and that they all have the “next man up” mentality.

    “To me, it feels like something that’s a constant in this league,” Heck said when asked about adjusting his lineup again. “You always have seasons where you’ve gotta … ‘Hey, next man up.’ You’ve gotta move a guy here to there and so in that regard, this is not unusual. I think the way you get them ready for that is you just approach it with a mentality that it doesn’t matter if you’re playing left guard or right tackle. There’s only a certain amount of blocks you gotta make.”

    “I feel like they play as one no matter where they’re at. They have that continuity, they’ve been put through that situation at some point or another.”

    Heck is correct in saying that his linemen have been put through every situation. On Monday, Chiefs head coach Andy Reid pointed out something that was very interesting in that regard. According to ESPN’s Dianna Russini, at practice, the Chiefs’ entire offensive line will play every single position on the line. So no one is set in one spot and everyone is somewhat prepared to play in any position anytime it is needed.

    Heck says he hasn’t officially made a decision on his starters for Sunday, but we have an educated guess of what it could look like:

    Chiefs potential starting OL:

    LT Mike Remmers Replaced Schwartz at RT in Week 7

    LG Nick Allegretti Drafted in 7th round in 2019

    C Austin Reiter Drafted in 7th round in 2015

    RG Stefen Wisniewski Waived by Steelers in November

    RT Andrew Wylie RG this season (UDFA in 2017)

    When Fisher exited the game two weeks ago with his Achilles injury, Remmers moved from right tackle to left, and Wylie moved to right tackle. Reiter is obviously still the starting center, Allegretti is at left guard and then Wisniewski fills in for Wylie at right guard. Heck said he’s comfortable in Remmers’ experience on the outside, and that Wylie is athletic enough to play tackle instead of guard.

    Whoever starts on Sunday is going to have their work cut out for them, however, as the Buccaneers’ defensive front has been dominant as of late. Shaquil Barrett sacked Aaron Rodgers three times in the NFC Championship game, Jason Pierre-Paul got to him twice and then the Buccaneers also return Vita Vea from injury for the second game in a row — he provides a big interior push from the nose tackle position. With how versatile Mahomes is in the pocket coupled with the Chiefs’ speedy weapons who know how to get open in a hurry, maybe this patchwork offensive line won’t be a big problem. Either way, Heck says his guys are up for the challenge, and that he’s quite comfortable with his players in whatever positions they are playing.

    “The guys that are in my room, it doesn’t matter who they are, where they’re from — man, we roll,” said Heck. “Let’s get to work. And this particular group we have this year, I absolutely love. These guys come to work every day, they’re a lot of fun to be around and they love to compete.”

    in reply to: will Torry make the HOF … update: no #127662
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    As long as they continue to snub Massey,
    I will continue to boycott all
    Hall of Fames.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Donald is the DPOY #127661
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Maybe you guys will start listening to me now. I’ve said from the beginning that Aaron Donald is good. What’s it going to take to convince the rest of you?

    ==

    If you Hate Merlin so much, maybe
    you should just start wearing
    Joe Kapp jerseys.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Donald is the DPOY #127643
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    When did JJ Watt start fading a bit?

    AD will be going into his 8th year.

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 2,881 through 2,910 (of 12,320 total)