Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 2,011 through 2,040 (of 12,314 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams tweets … 10/10 -10/13 #141120
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “The Rams’ 84 pressures given up through five weeks is their most in the PFF-era. Closest was the 2007 Rams that allowed 72.”

     

    I mean, what can ya say.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Dallas game #141119
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Oline.   I got nuthin other than the obvious.  Oline.

     

    w

    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Looks like another ugly loss to me.   I cant pick the Rams to win against any team with a top 15 D-Line.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: injuries going into game 5 #141025
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Jeezus.   Stafford is gonna get killed.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #141010
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: our reactions to the 9ers game #141008
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Missed the game, and i dont wanna watch the low-lites.

     

    Looks like the season depends on whether McV can patch together

    a decent OLine.

     

    I hate to see a great vet-QB battered all year.   Not a good plan.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: around the league, week 3 games & aftermath #140909
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    skip to the bayless segment (cant believe i just typed that) and listen to him give

    the percentages of black coaches and the positions they coach.  Its like, 80 percent of RB coaches are black but 90 percent of QB coaches are white, etc.

     

    in reply to: around the league, week 3 games & aftermath #140896
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I picked the Lions to win their division.  Just watched the hi-lites of their loss against the Vikings.   Detroit had that game and totally blew it.

    They are an exciting team.   Only weakness Sunday was their run-defense.

    Goff looked good.   Still there is something about Goff’s pocket-presence that is not a match for Stafford.   I cant quite even describe what i am talking about.

     

    w

     

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #140892
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: us on the Arizona game #140831
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Only watched the highlights, but looked like the Rams were in control

    the entire game.

    A road win like that, against a division team — very nice.

     

    A lot of good teams looked rather ordinary today.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: around the league, week 2 & aftermath #140757
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “the corporate ladder works all the time.”

    ==

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/19 – 9/21 #140732
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    You just know Kupp was more proud of that block than any pass he caught

    in reply to: around the league, week 2 & aftermath #140714
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Most surprising thing to me so far is the Bengals OLine.    Its terrible so far.

    They new it was their only weakness and they totally replaced the old OLine.

    And it still sux.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Atlanta game #140678
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rams are still a ‘dangerous’ team.  Thats what I’d call them at this point.

    A danger to themselves and a danger to others.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: around the league after week 1 #140582
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Gotta say, its strange that you go out and get Russell Wilson, and there he is with a Fourth and Five, and…you kick a 64 yard FG.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: media & twitter on the Buffalo game #140547
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: media & twitter on the Buffalo game #140543
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 9/10 – 9/14 #140541
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Orlovsky’s take was certainly interesting in that vid.

    If the Rams were not ready to play….why not?

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Buffalo loss #140540
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dunno about ‘rusty.’  Maybe.  Just looked like the Oline was overpowered to me.

    The two prior games Buffalo whipped the Rams defense, so that was nothing new.

    Buffalo’s offense is just gonna do that, they are that good.

     

    I think we all tend to wait about 3 or 4 games before we draw conclusions.  Atlanta will be inter esting.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: the new political tweets thread (4/4 2022) #140524
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: our reactions to the Buffalo loss #140523
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Only saw the hi-lites.   Just looked like the Bills OLine was

    better than the Rams OLine.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: comics, jokes, one-shot memes, funny tweets, etc. #140484
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Thu 9/8 8:20PM ET – Buffalo Bills … the build up #140471
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Bills lead series 8-5

    Bills have won 4 of last 5.

    Defense has been torched the last two games, it looks like.    I would think with all of OJ’s problems they could slow him down this year.  I dunno.

     

    https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask?q=rams+vs+bills+all-time+record

    in reply to: Rams tweets…9/1 – 9/5 #140395
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    i wonder how that compares to other nfl teams’ rosters.

    ==

    Exactly.   I’d be curious how it compares.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: the 53 #140381
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It takes a series of miracles to repeat as champions, but ya know, the rams are definitely in the mix.

    But I cant picture them having enough general-scariness to win it ALL without OBJ.

    Thats the ‘kind’ of addition that tilts things just enough.  Its a large piece of the puzzle, i would think.   Late in the year, if they can add a healthy OBJ they would be a different team than they were in, say, the previous 12 games or whatever.  He turbo charges them.

    So, i keep thinking about that there situation.

    I did not know he was as good as he turned out to be.   I never followed him.   But that guy just changes things.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: the 53 #140380
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rams initial roster set: 10 takeaways from 53-man cutdowns and beyond By Jourdan Rodrigue

    The Rams’ initial 53-man roster is set, …. This isn’t a surprise to anybody who has been following along here over the past two seasons — whether you agree or disagree with the Rams’ process. The Rams, for now, are keeping Matthew Stafford,…

     

    Another surprise.

     

    w

    v

     

    in reply to: the 53 #140362
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So Aaron Donald made the 53?   Anybody else surprised?

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: Rams tweets … 8/26 – 8/31 #140354
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So the rams cut Jacob Harris the WR, their 4th round pick.

    Guess that means they like Mccutcheon.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: around the league (starting 8/11) #140351
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The 9ers mishandled this from the beginning, but restructuring his contract was making the best of a bad situation, imo. They tried every tactic in the book to try to trade him, and there just wasn’t a market for him. It may be easier to trade him now that his contract is rewritten, but he has now missed all of the preseason (including the 9ers’ preseason in which he not only did not practice, he did not even get this year’s playbook from the team). One radio blabber ventured to guess that G restructured his contract because the 9ers would have cut him otherwise which would have hit his reputation and future value. They will lose him after this season, but they probably figure having him as a backup is worth more to them than whatever little draft capital they could get for him at this point. Maybe someone loses their starter, and trades for him later, but that becomes less likely by the day. He is probably headed towards a phase in his career where his is the best backup QB in the league for 2-3 years.

    ==

    Well, not sure if you noticed but the new deal has a no-trade clause, so I dont think they can trade him if some other team loses a starter, etc.    Course, i guess if he requests it they could do it.

     

    w

    v

    in reply to: issues in the Epstein investigation #140349
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dont think ive ever mentioned the Epstein case on here or anywhere, but I’ll say this.  I ignored it for a long time because i put it in that ‘celebrity sex scandal’ category or ‘conspiracy nut’ category.   I just ignored it.

    But every now and then I’ll read a few paragraphs about it, and…it may be the most breathtakingly sinister example of everything thats wrong with capitalism in US history.

    If there was ever a case to make the average American doubt US institutions

    its this one.

     

    Sadly, as per usual, the average American tends to see it as an indictment of ‘the Clintons’ or ‘Trump’ etc.

     

    w

    v

Viewing 30 posts - 2,011 through 2,040 (of 12,314 total)