Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
wvParticipant
wv wrote:
21Dog wrote:
It appears the Austin Davis Bandwagon to Canton has a couple of flat tires.I havent seen the game yet, but i saw the
low-lights, and it looked like the
pick-6 was a catchable ball. Britt
didnt catch it though.I think they still need a WR.
And a QB.w
vBritt could have helped Davis, but it was an off target pass thrown from a short distance.
Yeah, definitely another one of AustinD’s high-balls,
but i’d say 50 percent of it is on Britt. I’ve not
been all that impressed with Britt this year.Davis is obviously, not the answer at QB, btw,
to state the obvious. Granted he’s playing
tough teams, on the road, without Quick, etc.
Still, he’s just too limited.I’m readin Carson is probly done for the
year. ACL, maybe. Too bad. I like the Cards.w
vwvParticipantIt appears the Austin Davis Bandwagon to Canton has a couple of flat tires.
I havent seen the game yet, but i saw the
low-lights, and it looked like the
pick-6 was a catchable ball. Britt
didnt catch it though.I think they still need a WR.
And a QB.w
vNovember 9, 2014 at 8:21 pm in reply to: combined "today's game" & "arizona game lamentations" threads #11505wvParticipantThe cards just win.
They dont look good,
they just win.Its their year.
w
vwvParticipantI’ve been really frustrated with and critical of this D, but I think that you have to give them credit for that game. Gore was not a factor, the young secondary played as well as you could hope for, and the pass rush was ferocious. The final drive was upsetting. Folding when the game is on the line – even when they’ve been dominating to that point – does seem to haunt them repeatedly, and I it was excruciating to see it again Sunday. RFL’s right that when the game was on the line, only a SF mistake saved the game, but aside from that it looked like an entirely different unit.
Well, i think he’s right and wrong.
Cause what i see out of the Rams D
is a continuous display of good plays
(not just ‘ok’ plays, but ‘good’)
followed by bonehead-awful plays.And that is a different animal
than a defense that just constantly
gets outmuscled or outplayed
play after play.The D is not ‘just’ ‘bad’.
Its good ‘and’ bad.
Its weird.Unfortunately it amounts to the same
thing in the short term — losses.There’s hope for the longterm though.
I think.w
vwvParticipantI predict TA scores on a punt return and some great plays from the Rams special teams. On the passing game the Rams should go with the bigger guys Cook Britt Kendricks. The Cards secondary is very good and the only reason they are able to blitz so much.The Cards OL sucks I predict the wide awake giant (DL) leaves a cleat print on Palmers butt.
Well, i dunno. I dont foresee Palmer holding the ball
very long. I think the Cards will just
dink and dunk and wait for the Rams
to self-destruct.Sure would be inter-esting though,
if the Rams were in last place,
but beat the Seahawks, 49ers and Cards
all in a four game stretch.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years ago by wv.
wvParticipantWell, the Cards remind me of the old Patriots.
Teams lose and cant figure out how it happened.I’d guess the Rams will keep it close
and lose in the fourth quarter as Palmer
drives the length of the field against
the Rams D.w
vwvParticipantWell i guarantee you if it had been a
QB slammed, it woulda been a penalty and fine.
Are the rules different for RBs?w
vwvParticipant=============================================
(Ram43)
Rams at Cardinals: Full Preview of the Week 10 Matchup [www.insidestl.com]
Shane GreyOn Sunday, the St. Louis Rams will square off with the Arizona Cardinals at the University of Phoenix Stadium in a key NFC West matchup. St. Louis will arrive in Glendale with a 3-5 mark after winning two of their last three games. Arizona, meanwhile will enter the action with the NFL’s best record at 7-1.
How are the Cardinals Doing It?
When considering a myriad of statistical barometers, it would appear that the Cardinals are securing victories with smoke and mirrors. In breaking down the numbers, one would be hard-pressed to believe that Arizona is really sitting at 7-1.
Seriously, does the following look like the NFL’s best team to you?Offensively, the Cardinals rank thirty-first in passer percentage, thirtieth in yards per carry and twenty-eighth in rushing yards per game. Defensively, they rank thirtieth in sacks, worst in passing yards per game, No. 25 in passer rating allowed and thirty-first in forced fumbles. In addition, they check in at just a so-so fourteenth in both scoring offense and points allowed per game.
So, how have the Cardinals managed to reel off the league’s best won-loss percentage this season when considering the above? As is often the case, numbers don’t always tell the entire story. For example, Arizona’s aforementioned last place passing D is probably at least a little better than it appears on paper.
“They’re getting up and teams are just throwing it and going two-minute,” Rams Head Coach Jeff Fisher explained this week. “They’re giving up plays just to protect the end zone and things like that. It’s very, very misleading.”
St. Louis quarteback Austin Davis essentially reiterated Fisher’s thoughts on the Arizona air D.
“I think stats can be very misleading,” Davis suggested. “Obviously, their record’s great so teams are down and they’re throwing the ball more late in the game. They’re softening up and giving up yards. We don’t look a lot at the stats. They’re definitely really good at stopping the run and we’re going to have to throw and complete the ball and do some things in the passing game.”
According to Arizona Head Coach Bruce Arians, much of their success boils down to knowing how to close out games. While the Rams have struggled to finish several contests that they could have won, the Cardinals consistently find ways to perform successfully late in the action.
“I think that we’ve played hard for 60 minutes and kind of found ways to win games,” Arians said in a conference call this week. “I don’t think we’re anything special, but we’ve managed to win ball games in fourth quarters. That’s very hard to do. I think they’ve learned that’s when games are won and lost. Most teams, it’s very hard to teach a team how to win. You find ways to do that and then you start believing that it’s going to happen.”
Cardinals quartback Carson Palmer echoed similar thoughts to Arians in regard to finishing games off.
“What we’ve done a good job at is beating the teams we’re supposed to and then we close games out against good teams. The last two years, we’ve really been a fourth quarter team.”
Avoiding and Creating Interceptions
Two of the major keys to Arizona’s success to the midway point of the docket has been its ability to avoid throwing interceptions — the fewest in the NFL with just two — and its propensity for securing picks — the second most in the league at twelve. Overall, the Cardinals are plus twelve in turnover differential, the second best such number in the category league-wide.
Offensively, Palmer’s quick release has been a contributing factor in their low rate of interceptions.
“We don’t hold on to balls now to see a guy come open, we’re throwing them open,” Arians said. “So the interceptions are down. That, and you quit forcing the ball to one guy and start spreading it around to eight or nine. He (Palmer) has done a great job of that and just taking what a defense gives him.”Defensively, the Cardinals have corraled the NFL’s second most picks, something that certainly has not gone unnoticed by either the Rams head coach or the club’s quarterback.
“Well, they’re creating pressure and they’re making plays,” Fisher said. “They’re a good man-to-man cover team and everybody’s having opportunities to get their hands on the balls and they’re making the plays.”
“Yeah, I think a lot of their turnovers have come from pressure looks and guys just making bad decisions,” Davis suggested Wednesday. “I think we can do a good job of getting balls completed in those looks. There’s a lot of grass to run (after the catch). It’s kind of a high risk, high reward type of defense. So far this year there’s been a lot of reward.”
Davis, for his part, realizes he and his offense must do a steller job at protecting the pigskin.
“We’ve got do a great job of protecting the football,” Davis said, “and that starts with me making better decisions and the running backs holding onto to the rock and the receivers doing the same”
A week ago, a stingy St. Louis defense helped overcome Davis’ two turnovers in the week nine win. This week, however, the Rams likely will struggle to triumph if Davis again turns it over twice.
Will Davis Respond?
Speaking of Davis, how well will the Rams young signal caller bounce back from his worst start as a pro, one that culminated in just 105 passing yards, a paltry 44.6 rating and two picks?
At least according to St. Louis Offensive Coordinator Brian Schottenheimer, he should rebound just fine.“A couple weeks back when we were playing really, really well he was the same guy,” Schottenheimer asserted. “He’s the same guy now. He adjusts well. He sees things really, really well. On the interception last week, he said, ‘Hey I saw the guy, I thought I could get over him.’ The one (S Antoine) Bethea got, he just underthrew that one. Again, just very, very poised and he handles all the adjustments and things we do really, really well.”
As for what Arizona expects from Davis, if it is indicative of what their head coach conveyed, they are anticipating solid play from the Rams QB.
“I’m really impressed with Austin Davis,” Arians said. “I know a lot about Southern Mississippi, and when you break Brett’s (Favre) records you’ve done something special. I really think this kid has a great future. He can make every throw. He’s mobile, but he’s not looking to run, he’s looking to throw.”
Can the Rams Maintain Balance Vs. Arizona’s Run D?
More often than not, NFL offenses are at their best when they are relatively balanced. It makes them generally less predictable, helps keep defenses honest and aids in setting up the play action pass.
It came as no surprise, then, when Schottenheimer suggested that his St. Louis offense was most effective when it had a somewhat equal ratio of runs to passes: “We’re at our best when we’re balanced and when we can get the running game going,” Schotteneimer said.
Of course, maintaining a balanced approach may be easier said than done against the Cardinals run defense, a unit that is ranked second-best in regard to rushing yards allowed per game and third-best in terms of yards per carry relinquished.
One of the major challenges in putting together a productive ground game against Arizona is their frequency of putting extra players in the box.
“Number one, it’s an eight-man front,” Schottenheimer said.”They’ve got safeties down all around the line of scrimmage. They jam the front. The linebackers play as fast downhill across the line of scrimmage as probably anybody I’ve seen. It’s just an aggressive scheme. They move, they penetrate, they knock people back… which makes it hard to find running lanes.”
If the Rams are to get their run game going, it more than likely will again come via a diversified, back-by-committee approach, as Fisher has not named a starter there and spoke of utilizing any number of runners against the Cardinals.
Eying Ellington
Staying on the running back theme, Arizona’s Andre Ellington is a highly productive, do-it-all performer from the Cardinals backfield.
The second year Clemson alum is not only on pace to chew up over 1,000 yards on the ground this fall, but is also on track to reel in over 60 receptions.While not in the same caliber of a Jamal Charles or Marshall Faulk, Ellington is highly versatile and cut from a similar cloth.
“They’re using him out of the backfield,” Fisher stated. “He free releases a lot. They create match-ups on linebackers and defensive backs. He’s got great quickness. Then they use him in the running game. He’ll bounce outside or cutback. (He’s) a lot like (Chiefs Rcool smiley Jamaal Charles.”
On Sunday, the St. Louis defense will have to account for Ellington on all downs and in all situations. Arizona will use him in any number of ways, and the Rams will have to be ready for the multifaceted back at all times.
Brown Is Ballin’
When the Cardinals drafted wide receiver John Brown in the third round of the 2014 NFL Draft, they surely couldn’t have hoped for much more than they have received in year one from the Division II Pittsburgh State product.
Through eight games, the 5’10” Brown has turned in four touchdowns, 24 catches and a 14.6 yard per catch average.
Brown, with 4.3 speed, already has a 100 yard game and a 75 yard TD on his brand-new professional resume.
To this stage, his play has certainly pleased his head coach.
“John is an explosive player,” Arians said. “He can take a short pass and take it to the house or he can just take the top off the coverage. But he’s fearless. I was shocked he dropped a ball over the middle for the first time last Sunday. It was like ‘Whoa. Maybe he is human for a rookie,’ you know? Because he has a very mature attitude, just like a five year vet when it comes to preparation already.”
His quarterback, Palmer, is just as impressed.
“John Brown, the young rookie, he’s just done a phenomenal job,” Palmer asserted. “He’s extremely smart. He’s come in and learned the offense really fast and it’s not a very simple offense, especially for a receiver that plays multiple situations. He’s come in and really just picked up everything quickly and asked the right questions and done the right things to warrant play time.”
Certainly, it hasn’t hurt Brown’s cause that he has been mentored and led by the example that is future Hall of Fame receiver Larry Fitzgerald.
“Larry’s just a true pro,” Palmer said of his veteran wideout. “He comes in and he works his butt off every day. He leads by example and shows the young guys what it takes to work and what it takes to be great.”
Fitzgerald, 31, is still highly productive and remains the go-to guy in the Arizona offense. To date, Fitzgerald has racked up 35 receptions, 14.7 yards per catch and two scores.
“Larry’s still very, very good,” Fisher said. “He has just a big catch radius that makes him so hard (to cover).”
Is Sack City Back for Good?
A week ago, the Rams more than doubled their previous season-long sack total of six by exploding with eight of them against the 49ers.
One cannot help but wonder if the suddenly resurgent St. Louis pass rush will continue to resemble their preseason #sackcity touting, or will they look more like the unit that was last in the league in sacks for much of the campaign?Even though the Cardinals’ Palmer is not one of the more fleet-of-foot QBs the Rams will face, he is good at avoiding pressure and he’s been sacked the eighth least to this point of 2014.
“He’s really good in the pocket, he steps up and he’ll step up in either gap if you get the outside rush,” Fisher said. “He has a good feel for moving in the pocket. What he’s done for years is he keeps his eyes down field. The eyes don’t come off on the rush. His eyes are down field all the time. He’s got a natural, instinctive movement and flow in the pocket and that’s what makes him affective.
That’s why he’s not getting sacked very often.”Palmer certainly isn’t an easy guy to successfully pressure, but St. louis needs to at least make him unfomfortable in the pocket on Sunday to disrupt the Arizona air game and possibly add an interception or two to the Cardinals league low total of just two picks.
November 7, 2014 at 5:16 pm in reply to: Is Bruce Arians an "offensive genius" ? + Arians wired v. Washington #11387wvParticipant
Darren Urban on CardsNovember 7, 2014 at 9:38 am in reply to: Is Bruce Arians an "offensive genius" ? + Arians wired v. Washington #11374wvParticipanthttp://espn.go.com/blog/arizona-cardinals/post/_/id/10381/10381
(on Austin Davis)
“I think he’s a guy that can extend plays,” safety Tyrann Mathieu said. “I think the blitz gets to him. He’ll just throw the ball up. We’ll have a chance to make a play. I think at the end of the day, though, teams are going to try to come and run the football on us, so I think that’s what the Rams are going to do.“I don’t think they’re going to put the game in Austin Davis’ hands.”
===================- This reply was modified 10 years ago by wv.
November 6, 2014 at 9:42 pm in reply to: Bill Polian Explains Faulk Deal, & Drafting James Over Ricky Williams #11362wvParticipantSo, I read what I wrote earlier – it made no sense to me either. So, I’m still norminal right?
Peyton Manning playing his second season was part of the turn around I would think.
Well i understood the first post,
but not this one.Anyway, only abnorminal posters
post here.w
vNovember 6, 2014 at 6:26 pm in reply to: Bill Polian Explains Faulk Deal, & Drafting James Over Ricky Williams #11344wvParticipantRicky Williams was an inter esting character.
w
v
S.I. Vaulthttp://www.si.com/vault/2000/03/20/276809/lone-star-ricky-williams-was-hailed-as-a-savior-when-he-arrived-in-new-orleans-but-his-hearts-still-in-texas-and-his-heads-someplace-else-far-away-in-a-world-of-his-own
……
….Williams, who says only winning will improve his attitude, also
would prefer to “take all the guys from UT and put them on the
Saints. It’s not just the quality of the players, it’s the
quality of the people they were and the way they played for each
other. There was a deep sense of pride [at Texas]. Like my
linemen–they were so proud. When they missed a block and I got
hit in the backfield, they would be right there and say, ‘I’m
sorry, Ricky.’ You could see in their eyes that it really hurt
them. In New Orleans when I got hit in the backfield, they’d
pick me up but I never once heard anyone say, ‘I’ll get them
next time,’ or anything at all. I don’t know what the problem
was. I think they were too worried about themselves.”
…
…What hurt most, he says, was not that he’d negotiated a bad
deal, but that he felt as if his teammates had lost respect for
him and didn’t think he was smart for signing such a contract.
“Hopefully the Saints will come to me and address [the
contract],” he says. “But I don’t think they will. Last season
it bothered me to the point where I thought I would feel better
playing if I had a better deal. Because we had a tough season,
it made the contract even worse. I think if I was healthy, I’d
have hit those numbers. I thought I had a chance until I hurt my
toe [in mid-November].” Williams shakes his head. “I got zero
help,” he says, referring to his teammates.
…
…Williams traveled to New
Orleans to check on his house and to meet Jim Haslett, the
former Pittsburgh Steelers defensive coordinator who was hired
to replace Ditka. “He doesn’t say, ‘How’s your elbow?'” says
Williams. “He says, ‘Have you been working out?'” (The answer to
that question is no. Williams, still nursing his injuries,
hasn’t worked out at all since the season ended.)
“His questions bothered me,” Williams says. “And the way, if you
ever meet a football coach, they always look you up and down
before they say anything to you. It’s their job, I guess, but it
didn’t make me feel like a person.”“I was in there and Coach Haslett says, ‘Ricky, I’ve heard so
many things about you, it’s hard not to prejudge you before I
meet you,'” says Williams. “He said, ‘I don’t want to do it, but
I’ve heard from people upstairs and the p.r. staff that you come
whenever you want and do whatever you want, and Coach [Ditka]
never did anything about it, never punished you or anything.’ He
said, ‘Ricky, with me that’s going to have to change.’ I looked
at him and said, ‘It’s not that bad, Coach.'” …. see link..wvParticipantShotty is doing the game planning wv, Fisher has said himself that he will occasionally make in game suggestions, but its on the OC.
So the OC reigned Davis in.
Davis is making awful decisions, and even though he has played better defenses lately, there were many. many plays that he left on the field. The OC has down a tremendous job of drawing up plays and Davis is pissing them away. I’m talking routine plays he’s missing, not anything extraordinary that you would expect from an elite qb.
It makes me ill because I’m ready to win games, past ready.
IF Fisher was in “win now” mode he would go back to Hill.
Unfortunately he painted himself into a corner and probably won’t!Always good to see you on the board, La.
Yeah, i’ve been disappointed in Austin lately.
I was excited about him after the first few games,
but i thiink i over-valued his escape-from-the-pocket-trick.Ah well.
Do you think Chris Long will make any difference
on the D, when he comes back?w
vwvParticipantwv wrote:
I glanced at that and thot it said ‘
“hey sarcasm”.
And i thot, do we have a
sarcasm-ram now?w
vYeah, that’s REAL likely.
Yeah, but do
Ineffable-ram now.w
vwvParticipantI glanced at that and thot it said ‘
“hey sarcasm”.
And i thot, do we have a
sarcasm-ram now?w
vwvParticipantCrazylegs wrote:
Protect Davis and give him time and it’s a different Rams offense.I actually think it’s the other way around. Davis doesn’t yet know how to counter the blitz. A qb is supposed to see that stuff pre-snap and adjust accordingly. Audible if there’s time, throw to a hot read and so on. If that weren’t true, then, blitzes would always work and no offense would ever burn the blitz and all qbs would be under duress every play. But actually offenses can make defenses stop blitzing by making the blitz costly. (There have certainly been several games this year where opposing offenses ate up the Rams defense when it blitzed.) All that depends on the qb however, and Davis does not have that yet, it seems. He also fails to see players downfield when he abandons the pocket, or mis-times his throws sometimes when he abandons the pocket. So I don’t think the issue is the line as much as the qb. In fact I think Davis himself is well aware of this. He talked about it after the Vikes game, that the sacks were on him not the OL, because he wasn’t getting into a rhythm and timing throws from the pocket. You see games where he is aware of that, and you see games where he forgets that.
Well i think its both the PassBlockers
‘and’ AustinD. There have been times
Jake and Wells and others have just
stunk.I kinda like the new line with GR
at LT. He’ll make mistakes
but he’ll get better every game
and be a force out there, i would think.w
vwvParticipantTackleDummy wrote:
Without playing in any regular season NFL game before this season, Austin Davis this year in 8 games is 163 completions out of 254 passing attempts (64.2%) for 1785 yards (7.0 average). He has 11 TDs and 7 INTs. His passer rating is 87.8.
Doubling everything he would end the season with 326 completions out of 508 attempts (64.2%) for 3570 yards (7.0 average). He would have 22 TDs and 14 INTs. His passer rating would still be 87.8.For comparisons, Sam Bradford in his rookie year, 2010 was 354 completions out of 590 passing attempts (60.0%) for 3512 yards (6.0 average). He had 18 TDs and 15 INTs. with a 70.5 passer rating.
So it would seem to me that Austin Davis is on track for a slightly better year than Bradford had as a rookie.
And yet there are people who think Austin Davis has reached his ceiling. That he cannot improve. That he might not be able to “come back” after what they consider a sub-par game. This is the same Austin Davis who went from being cut a year ago to becoming the starting QB this year and producing numbers like our former NFL offensive rookie of the year. Really? He has shown he has the ability to improve his game greatly. He has shown a great work ethic in doing so. And people are already ready to write him off after only a half of season.
SORRY, I JUST DON’T GET THE LOGIC (OR LACK THEREOF).
I don ‘t know where Davis’s ceiling is. But I am pretty sure he has not reached it. Nor will he reach it this year and probably not next year. He will keep improving for a while yet.
Apples and oranges. There is a huge difference in the quality of players (and coaches) that Bradford had around him his rookie year compared to what Davis has now.
I thought the Seattle game was pretty revealing,
and interesting. I mean, AustinD completed, like
18 of 21 or somethin like that, but they were
almost all dinks and dunks. Fisher reigned him
in. Didnt trust him to throw it downfield.Now maybe they can win with that formula,
sometimes, or even often, but i dont think
thats how the gameplan would have looked
if Bradford had been in there.I’m concerned that the Rams cant count
on Bradford or AustinD to be ‘the guy’
in the coming years.I guess we’ll see.
w
vNovember 5, 2014 at 9:06 pm in reply to: Robert Quinn Talks Final Play Against 49ers on NFL AM #11297wvParticipantOn NFL AM, Robert Quinn breaks down the final play against the 49ers and also previews Sunday’s game against the Cardinals. (4:04)
http://www.rams-news.com/robert-quinn-talks-final-play-against-49ers-video/Centaurs?
Sigh.
I guess i’m an old curmudgeon now.
Give me Greg Cosell.w
vwvParticipantMan he is playing a LOT of top 5 defenses lately, without Quick now. If he can cut down on the int’s, than he’s my guy…. But he has to cut down on them
Yes, he’s played tough defenses,
without Quick. And no-one can tell the future, so, sure,
maybe he will end up improving and being a
good starter.But my eyeballs have made me skeptical.
Sure looks to me like teams have figured out
what he does best and they’ve taken it away.
I no longer think he will turn out to be
a quality starter.
But who knows.
I hope he turns out to be the next
Kenny Anderson.At any rate, if the rams can
rush the passer and run the ball
they can win with a decent
“game manager-QB”w
v- This reply was modified 10 years ago by wv.
wvParticipanti don’t know. fisher made it pretty clear davis was the starter going forward. i don’t think that means he’s not trying to win, but i do believe he needs to determine what exactly they have in davis.
or maybe davis sucks again next week, and they determine he’s not starting qb material…
Well, when Fisher made that statement AustinD was
looking purty good, i think. He aint looked
good in a while, and it dont look like he’s
improving to me. Looks like he’s got limitations.I no longer think he can be “the guy.”
He’s certainly not a ‘bum’ though. He’s
fiesty, and hangs in there, and can
spin around and extend plays and make some
throws. But when he has to stay in the pocket
he’s startin to remind me of Pat Haden,
who was also fiesty and a gamer, but not
“the guy” cause he had limitations.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years ago by wv.
wvParticipantInvaderRam wrote:
i think he’s got the physical skills. i think at this point it’s just learning the position. if he can continue to grow into the position he’ll be fine. if not then rams are looking for a new qb.I try to be as objective as I can in my first post in this thread.
BUt this is a complicated issue and I have mixed feelings.
Personally, I don’t like the idea of this season becoming the “see if Davis can play project.”
I am very “win now.” They have the future in which to figure out the future. Or to put that more narrowly, they have the off-season to figure out the next season.
If it were me and he falters again, I would just start Hill. I wouldn;t even hesitate.
From what I saw of Hill in this offense, he can play, and his strengths as a qb are pretty much the opposite of Davis’s weaknesses.
It is fair and realistic, I think, to ask if AD can rebound.
But. My “win now” attitude also has me wary of that. So he doesn’t have too long to prove he can, in my book.
Yeah, i agree with that.
I dont think Fisher is playing Davis just to
“see if he can play.” Fisher is always in
win-now mode it seems to me.If AustinD sucks again next week,
i think Fisher will switch.
Though, i’m not sure its a good thing
to be the QB that gets to start against Denver.w
vwvParticipantIf the Rams can run the ball — he’ll rebound.
If not, he wont 🙂w
vwvParticipantI think this gets down to confidence again.
Davis made a couple of huge mistakes in the SF game, but the Rams didn’t fold this time like they did with huge mistakes by other players against other teams. That’s IMO because the team believes it’s always “in it” with a West opponent.
When i watch the Cardinal defense,
the players just look like they are always
in a good position to make the tackle.
When i compare it to the Rams, it seems like
the Ram players are always lunging and
over-running or almost-over-running things.
There’s just a sense that the cards Defenders
are not running around as much. I dunno.w
vwvParticipantI watched some of the Cardinals vs Dallas
on replay — They look Sooooo different
from the Rams. They look smooth, efficient,
intelligent, poised, well-coached.Carson Palmer throws fast-accurate-darts in the
ten to fifteen yard range. Just Zings
them into tight windows.
He spreads the ball around.I cant see the Rams beating this team.
I can see the Rams giving up some
big plays to this team.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years ago by wv.
November 5, 2014 at 3:11 pm in reply to: Rams lead NFC West in Sacks & other interesting stat things #11258wvParticipantLegatron is 27th in FG percentage. 10 for 13.
Arizona’s kicker is 16 for 16.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/kicking/sort/fieldGoalPctw
vNovember 5, 2014 at 3:02 pm in reply to: Rams lead NFC West in Sacks & other interesting stat things #11256wvParticipanthttp://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/givetake
Arizona is second in the NFL in turnover differential
1 Patriots +12
2 Cardinals +10Rams are tied for 23rd at minus 2
Somebody needs to tell AustinD
to just manage the game and
be safe with the Ball.w
v- This reply was modified 10 years ago by wv.
wvParticipantI have no idea. The Rams, seemingly, are 10 different teams rolled into one.
If these Rams were a movie, they’d be “Sybil”.
So I don’t know what the hell is gonna happen anymore.I would think Carson Palmer is going to try to
dink and dunk all the way down the field.
He’s not gonna hold the ball and let Quinn
and Donald kill him.So, somehow, someway, Greg Williams has to
find a way to stop the short passing game
to Fitzgerald and company.Rams are seven point underdogs again.
http://www.footballlocks.com/nfl_odds.shtmlSaints favored by 4.5 over the 49ers.
w
vNovember 5, 2014 at 2:36 pm in reply to: 101, 11/3 & 11/4 – Wagoner, Patrick Willis, Steve Wyche, Jim Fassel #11250wvParticipantSimeon Rice joins “The Fast Lane” to talk about his new film and Rams defensive end Robert Quinn.
http://www.rams-news.com/simeon-rick-on-whats-so-special-about-robert-quinn-radio-interview/
Simeon Rice is a trip.
He’d never even heard of Robert Quinn.w
vwvParticipantI assume, on the Field Goal ‘return’
Tavon was dilly-dallying so the SF coverage
team would think he was not bringing it out.I dont really mind his slow, halting
first steps on that play. I think
he was just trying to be deceptive.Its the bonehead move at the edge
of the endzone-line that was
dum.Tavon has an odd return style.
Remember the big return against the Colts —
it was “no, no, dont, dont…yes, yes!”Thats what you get with Tavon.
Sometimes it’ll look ugly and sometimes
he’ll break them.w
vwvParticipant“Yes, he is. I had a coach in the film room show me a couple of weeks back how Laurinaitis got the defense out of a bad look for the play that was called and into a different front that stopped the play. I think he does a lot of that.”
by jthomas 4:00 PM
=========================A lot of us wonder about JL. He’s not a hard-hitter, he doesn’t
make big plays that often, sometimes he seems outclassed
on the field — but there’s always been this meme floating around
out there that he has a great gameday-football-IQ. JT touches on it here.I dunno.
w
v -
AuthorPosts