Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 10,111 through 10,140 (of 11,188 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Professor of Nonviolent Activizm #15668
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Professor of Nonviolent Activizm #15664
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15663
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Here’s a question – since we are asking St. Louis fans what they think – here’s a question for everybody.
    Suppose SK moves the Rams to LA. And a new team moves to St. Louis. Supposing the NFL goes Cleveland on this deal, and the Rams logo and horns stay in St. Louis with the new team, and Donald, Bradford, Bailey, and Quinn all play for the Los Angeles Surf. Now what? Which team do you follow?

    I guess I’d follow both,
    but my interest in the Los Angeles Surf would
    probably fade after the old-ram-players retired or moved on.

    Los Angeles Surf. I like that.

    I’m still dizzy over all this — i was one of those
    who really didnt think the odds were good that
    the Rams would move.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Where's Mr Demoff ? #15644
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    This crossed my mind, as well.

    Usually, Demoff is out there talking to media after a report like this. The silence is deafening.

    I’m pretty sure that Demoff has not been closely involved in the L.A. development talks. I wonder if he learned something this week, too. Maybe not, but I wouldn’t put it past SK to play this extremely close to the vest, so that his mouthpiece doesn’t have to know all the dirty details until necessary.

    “Mr Demoff, what did you know,
    and when did you know it?”

    w
    v

    in reply to: Professor of Nonviolent Activizm #15642
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Gene Sharp was mentioned in the article:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Start_a_Revolution

    w
    v

    in reply to: Where's Mr Demoff ? #15632
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    No way to spin it. It is a shot across the bow of the barge churning upstream to get a stadium deal done in St. Louis.

    Yeah, exactly. I can hardly wait to see how Mr Smooth-PR handles it.
    It would be like the CEO of Exxon talking to Alaskans
    after the Oil Spill. I mean, what will he say?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15630
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>zn wrote:</div>
    Hey guys. We have a kind of loose rule here that says there is just 1 LA thread per page. I’ve enforced that before by merging threads, so it’s not fair to those guys in those former merged threads if I don’t maintain consistency with that.

    So…pretty soon, this gets merged in with the current big active LA discussion thread.

    This thread is about names, not venues or ownership groups. Plus it is not about LA. It is entirely about St. Louis.

    Yeah, its about name possibilities. Probably should move my Bernie article though. I wasnt sure where it would fit
    so i put it here 🙂

    There may very well be law suits galore before all this LA-St.Louis stuff is over.

    I like the Saint Louis Jazz,
    myself.
    They could have a mean sinister saxophone
    on their helmets. Or Charlie Parker.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15629
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rams’ Kroenke has made his LA play, but it’s not time for St. Louis to panic — yet

    Howard Balzer
    FOX Sports Midwest

    Not time for panic eh.
    Ok, but What about hysteria?
    Is it time for consternation?
    Foreboding?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15627
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Once a fan, always a fan is what i say. Don’t matter where they play.

    Yeah, thats how i am, but I’ve never
    had a pro team in my city,
    and I’ve never lived in a city, wedded to a pro team
    and then had the team run off
    for another city.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Bengals/Colts, Dallas/Lions #15621
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    wv wrote:
    Pats vs Ravens — dont like either team
    Broncos vs Colts — dont like either
    Seahawks vs Panthers — dont like either
    GB vs Cowboys — dont like the Cowboys.

    Guess that just leaves the Packers.
    I’m kinda “enh” on the Packers.

    Ah well.

    w
    v

    I like the Baltimore Browns. And, the Baltimore Colts. I think GB and Dallas will be a good game and don’t have nothin against either team. Though I agree with conventional wisdom and think that if either GB or Dallas beat Seattle, it would be a big upset.

    I am kind of hoping for an all Baltimore AFC final game. Ravens and Colts.

    Well, I think St. Louis and Los Angeles
    should compromise. They should build a stadium halfway
    between the two towns — Whats in between LA and St.Louis?
    Mexico? Let them play in Mexico.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15619
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    http://www.rams-news.com/bernie-i-dont-want-to-cover-this-team-next-year-audio/
    Bernie: “I dont want to cover this team next year…”

    in reply to: Bengals/Colts, Dallas/Lions #15616
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It was an awful decision to pick up the flag.

    But, Pettigrew also grabbed the defender’s face mask. Could have been offsetting penalties, but the offensive player’s part was never called by any official.

    I watched almost all of that game. I didn’t feel like the Cowboys got calls all game long, but they did seem to benefit late in the game.

    Well i dont like either team, frankly,
    so I dont care which team cheated
    more effectively.

    The playoffs are awash with teams i dont like.

    Pats vs Ravens — dont like either team
    Broncos vs Colts — dont like either
    Seahawks vs Panthers — dont like either
    GB vs Cowboys — dont like the Cowboys.

    Guess that just leaves the Packers.
    I’m kinda “enh” on the Packers.

    Ah well.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15615
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    As for whether I’ll be a Rams fan if they leave St. Louis, time will tell. I’ll just see how I feel at the time. It’s not so black and white, the city vs. team thing. Right now, I can turn on talk radio and hear discussion about the Rams much of the year. I can talk with friends and family who follow the Rams. I can go to a game or camp, if I desire. That all goes away once they leave. And, if the NFL ever comes back, so does that experience.

    So, we’ll just see what happens.

    I was just gonna ask if any of the local St.Louis posters
    are gonna keep following the Rams if they move to La.
    I cant remember if Dak is the only local st louie regular
    on this little board or if there are others. Is Trench in St.louis?

    If i were an omnipotent Time Lord, I’d go back and fix it
    so Bidwell lost his team in a poker game, and the new owner
    kept the Cardinals in St.Louis,
    and I’d fix it soze Carroll Rosenbloom never drowned, and the
    LA Rams never fell into the hands of the Evil-Frontiere,
    and thus they’d still be in LA.
    I’d also make sure Modell never moved the Browns from Cleveland.
    Also, the Colts should be in Baltimore.
    Indy shouldnt even have a pro team. The Indy team should
    be in West Virginia. It could be the WV Fighting Frackers.

    Also, I’d bring back the Coastal Division.
    I believe it was the Rams, Colts, 49ers and Saints.
    Or Falcons. I forget.

    Alrighty then. I’m snowed in. Got lotsa
    time on my hands. I got tired of watchin
    cars slide down my steep street into car-piles,
    so now, I’m a-postin.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15607
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    One point of view
    w
    v

    ===================
    Roman18

    1st off I know that it means nothing….but here I go….

    A team can leave or a team can stay……It has no point on how a team plays. Business is just that. You either love a team or you love a city. If you are a city lover than really the team means nothing…..You could be a Cardinal fan or a Ram fan……or who else comes into the town next…..The team must show up….all I ask for is us to show up….and become a factor.

    IMO you just need to become a fan of the team…if they leave….follow them..be it who ever…….

    I have not been in an area where a team left me…IMO a team doesn’t leave me unless I let them go.

    The team IMO becomes the factor..not the city…..all I want is the horns to become a factor..not where they play…..I am a RAMS fan not a fan of where they play……

    Let them play in STL…..that’s cool if they move let them win there….all I want is them to win…..I am a RAMS fan and the place they play matters little to me
    =======================

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15606
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    fwiw
    ==========================
    The St. Louis Rams Would Be Worth $2.5-3.5 Billion The Moment They Moved To Los Angeles

    http://www.businessinsider.com

    The NFL is now closer to moving back to Los Angeles with news that St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke plans to build an 80,000-seat stadium in Inglewood, a move that would more than double the value of his franchise.

    In the latest valuations released by Forbes.com, the Rams were dead-last, with a value of $930 million. Meanwhile, teams in the top-5 TV markets (L.A. is no. 2) all rank among the eight most valuable teams with an average value of $2.11 billion and those numbers are almost certainly on the conservative side as the Cowboys are probably worth closer to $5 billion.

    The Buffalo Bills, valued just above the Rams at $940 million, recently sold for $1.4 billion. If teams in the top-5 TV markets are undervalued at the same rate, they would be worth $2.54-4.79 billion with an average of $3.16 billion and there is no reason to think an L.A. team wouldn’t be at the upper-end of that range.

    So, while a new stadium may cost Kroenke $1 billion to build, he will more than make up for it with the increase in the value of the Rams alone.

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15586
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    http://www.rams-news.com/jim-thomas-rams-report-audio-2/
    JT on the issues of the Day (JT starts at 30 min mark)

    “pretty sad whats going on, for St.Louis…”

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    • This reply was modified 10 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15583
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Dunno if this has been posted:
    http://www.insidestl.com/insideSTLcom/STLSports/STLRams/tabid/137/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/15922/Peacock-Blitz-to-Present-St-Louis-Stadium-Plan-to-Nixon-on-Friday.aspx
    Former Anheuser-Busch executive Dave Peacock and Clayton attorney Bob Blitz, heads of the St. Louis stadium task force, have released a statement in response to news Rams owner Stan Kroenke plans to build a new stadium Inglewood, Calif….see link
    =======================

    Bernie on the LA issue:
    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bernie-miklasz/bernie-is-st-louis-in-or-out-as-an-nfl/article_11eae05a-e972-5864-84bc-94101f4277ae.html

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15580
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dunno what to make of any of this. This guy says he has ‘sources’
    that say Kroenke told the LA Mayor he was moving the team to LA
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2320097-insider-buzz-kroenke-says-rams-are-moving-to-la-with-or-without-nfls-approval

    in reply to: Rams currently scheduled to pick 10th in NFL draft #15573
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/nfl-draft-scout/24936785/nfl-draft-huskies-lbrb-shaq-thompson-headed-to-the-nfl

    2015 NFL Draft: Huskies LB/RB Shaq Thompson headed to the NFL
    By Dane Brugler | NFLDraftScout.com Senior Analyst
    January 5, 2015 12:34 pm ET

    Shaq Thompson scored four defensive touchdowns in 2014. (Getty Images)Shaq Thompson scored four defensive touchdowns in 2014. (Getty Images)

    Washington linebacker Shaq Thompson announced Monday morning that he will skip his senior season and enter the 2015 NFL Draft. The junior also played offense for the Huskies, but his NFL future is expected to be on defense.

    Thompson is currently ranked as the No. 10 overall prospect by NFLDraftScout.com and the top-ranked linebacker in the upcoming class. He is a projected top-15 pick with the versatility to fit any defensive scheme.

    “I feel that I have accomplished a lot here in these past three years, and I’m so thankful to everyone for helping me achieve my goals,” said Thompson in a statement. “Now I’m looking forward to achieving a new set of goals, facing new challenges that come with being in the NFL. I’m excited to start the draft process, the next chapter in my life, but will forever and always be a Husky!”

    Thompson was a two-way player for the Huskies in 2014, starring at linebacker on defense and running back on offense. He finished his junior year with 81 total tackles, three forced fumbles and four fumble recoveries, adding 463 rushing yards on offense and six total touchdowns (four on defense, two on offense). Thompson earned First Team All-Pac 12 and All-American honors and won the Paul Hornung Award as college football’s most versatile performer.

    “Shaq Thompson has been a wonderful representative of the University of Washington and the Husky football team, and he has our full support as he takes this important step,” said Coach Chris Petersen said. “I look forward to what’s to come for him and to watching him embark on what will be a long, successful NFL career.”

    Breaking him down as a NFL prospect, Thompson is an above average athlete with the pursuit speed to chase down ballcarriers and the closing burst and veracity to be a fierce finisher. He trusts what he sees and plays with excellent ball instincts, tearing through blocks to show up at the ball. Thompson does a nice job with his strike zone to wrap and finish as a tackler, using proper technique by distributing power through his hips. He does need to improve his take-on strength to better stack and shed blockers, but Thompson understands field leverage and aggressively attacks at the point of attack, making it tough to contain him.

    Is it possible Fisher could take a
    defensive player with the first pick?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15564
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Good post WV. I disagree with Farmer in that I think this is a done deal.

    1. Kroenke is not stupid. He would not just make this move without acknowledgement from the league.
    2. Could be Kroenke has agreed to be the heavy in this scenario so the league doesn’t take a beating PR wise.

    People in STL need to stop rationalizing this and accept what is happening.

    Grits

    Well, i got no idea what’s goin on, LoL.

    I’m just gonna sit here in West, by god, Virginia
    and eat popcorn, and wait and see.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams currently scheduled to pick 10th in NFL draft #15559
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rob Rang Mock


    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/nfl-draft-scout/24935958/nfl-mock-draft-eagles-soar-with-brett-hundley

    10. St. Louis Rams – La’el Collins, OL, LSU: The Rams boast one of the league’s fastest defenses, but one-dimensional teams won’t be successful in the highly competitive NFC West. With a steep drop-off at quarterback following Mariota and Winston, the Rams might be best served again rolling the dice with Sam Bradford and Shaun Hill in 2015. Massive LT Greg Robinson showed flashes of why the Rams invested the No. 2 overall selection in him in 2014 and the Rams will have veteran Jake Long returning from injury in 2015. The interior, however, was a mess for St. Louis. Collins starred at left tackle for LSU but projects best to guard. His brute strength and tenacity make him one of the draft’s elite run blockers.

    11. Minnesota Vikings – Ronnie Stanley, OT, Notre Dame: Current LT Matt Kalil struggled in 2014 and the Vikings may elect to draft someone to push him. Stanley is just a redshirt sophomore in his first season at left tackle, but the 6-6, 315-pounder boasts an exciting combination of agility, balance and power. Improving at left guard would make sense, as well, especially given the deep drops and power running game offensive coordinator Norv Turner prefers.

    12. Cleveland Browns — Andrus Peat, OT, Stanford: As the only team with two first-round picks, the Browns have a lot of flexibility, including potentially making a good offensive line one of the league’s elite. A star left tackle for the Cardinal, Peat is blessed with remarkable balance and agility for a man of his 6-7, 315-pound dimensions. He would provide an upgrade over Mitchell Schwartz at right tackle and could be groomed to eventually take over for perennial Pro Bowler Joe Thomas.

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #15558
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    =============================
    The NFL is getting closer to returning to Los Angeles.

    Major news in the NFL-returns-to-L.A. saga early Monday morning. The Los Angeles Times reports that Rams owner Stan Kroenke is planning to build an NFL stadium in Inglewood. Kroenke is teaming up with Stockbridge Capital Group, which owns the 238-acre Hollywood Park site, to build an 80,000-seat stadium and a 6,000-seat performance venue as part of a major retail-office-residential development, which is being dubbed the City of Champions Revitalization Project.

    News of the development will put pressure on the city of St. Louis, which owns the outdated Edward Jones Dome. The Rams can convert their lease there to year-to-year next month and leave as early as the end of the 2015 season.

    This doesn’t necessarily mean the Rams are moving to Los Angeles—yet. Shortly after the story broke this morning, I spoke with veteran Times NFL reporter Sam Farmer, who has covered the story of the NFL’s flirtations with Los Angeles since 2000.

    The MMQB: How is this different from all the other proposals for returning a team to Los Angeles over the last 20 years?

    Farmer: This is appreciably different than all the other concepts that have come and gone—the two dozen or so viable proposals. This is different, because it’s an existing owner with a site that can accommodate a stadium and all the parking and retail and a 6,000-seat theater. It’s a game-changer, because there hasn’t been a current owner who can identify a site and make it happen. If this were a game of Clue, we’d already have two of the answers—the who and the where. This is not a done deal. But this is the first major step toward returning the NFL to Los Angeles, and it could trigger a land rush between the Rams, Chargers and Raiders to all try to get to the market first.

    How likely is it that St. Louis has lost the Rams?

    Farmer: It would certainly be pins and needles time for the city of St. Louis. The city has to come back by the end of the month [of January] with a serious proposal to keep the Rams. That’s when the Rams can roll over the lease to a year-to-year deal. This move ratchets up the pressure on the city of St. Louis and will smoke out the city’s best deal. This is a dramatic, bold and aggressive move toward the nation’s second-largest market, and a market that had the Rams for decades. And it’s the second-richest owner in the league, with deep ties to Los Angeles, who has a history of making bold and aggressive moves like this one. So St. Louis certainly should be concerned.

    When is the earliest the Rams could play in L.A.?

    Farmer: 2016. They could conceivably play in the new stadium by 2018—but they won’t put shovels in the ground for the stadium until they get the Environmental Impact Report done, which is all the legal, environmental and political clearances to build the stadium. The earliest that could happen would probably be early in 2016.

    Where would the Rams play until 2018, if they move?

    Farmer: I think it’s most likely the [Los Angeles] Coliseum. But I wouldn’t rule out the Rose Bowl.

    More possible in Los Angeles: one NFL team or two?

    Farmer: The concept of dropping two teams into the city simultaneously is very difficult. Two teams at once might be overwhelming. The first team would be so much better off in Los Angeles. Would the second team basically want to be the Jets playing in Giants Stadium? The first team is much more enticing. My expectation is you wouldn’t see two teams for a while.

    mmqb.si.com
    ==========================

    in reply to: Bengals/Colts, Dallas/Lions #15513
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well Earl Morrall is out for the Colts
    so I dont think they are going anywhere
    with this Luck kid.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams Roster by draft class #15510
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Carrol tore up his team and started over.
    Harbaugh just plain inherited a good team…vets…
    Fisher intended to build around a core of inherited players. They were young.

    So to me that’s 3 different situations
    combined with 3 different approaches.

    So Harbaugh “Loaded Up.”
    Carrol “Rebuilt”
    Fisher “Built around a young core”

    A reasonable view, imho.
    Some posters obviously label the Fisher
    approach/situation differently. Mostly
    its semantics, probly. I can certainly see
    how some posters would call what Fisher did
    a ‘rebuild.’ I can also see how it could
    be viewed as a “build-around-young-core” when
    compared to what Carrol did.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Rams Roster by draft class #15508
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So do you think this means that Fisher and Harbaugh took over already rising teams and that Carroll came in when the team was at rock bottom?
    Or do you think Carroll is an egomaniac and just blew it up to reform it in his own image?
    Or, is the real question how many of those 8 pre-Fisher Rams will still be on the roster in two years?

    Well to me it just means Carroll has done
    a great job of building a great team.
    And he didnt have the RG3 windfall either.

    Still we dont know the future. Maybe
    these young rams will win multiple Rings.
    Who knows.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams-related notes: Wild-card round By Nick Wagoner #15504
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Who knows what they would have done and where they would have gone
    if Spags had stayed…either way I had no problem with SK putting his own guy in. Might as well.

    You know one small thing Spags and Fisher had in common? Spag’s great Giants superbowl defense was built around the DL, and his DL coach was Mike Waufle. Waufle then comes to the Rams when Fisher gets hired. Interesting, hunh.

    Didnt know that about Waufle.

    …Fans (me included) have a very hard time
    accounting for injuries and key-injuries. We all know
    examples of teams (Pats – Belichick playing WRs in the secondary)
    overcoming injuries, so we tend to think every team
    “ought” to be able to “overcome injuries.”
    Fans love to rail about “the injury excuse!”
    Fans of teams that have losing seasons year after
    year after year after year after year after year —
    ESPECIALLY dont want to hear about injuries.

    But one only has to look at the Bruce Arians team
    to see the effect of one or two key injuries.

    I got no ‘final conclusions’ about the topic
    of ‘injuries’. Its a difficult subject.
    It kilt Spags, though.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Rams-related notes: Wild-card round By Nick Wagoner #15499
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    wv wrote:
    Apparently Spags did a great job with that group. I didnt know
    he had that job. I wonder if he’ll ever be a head coach again.

    Do you like Fisher better as a coach or Spags ?

    Spags did a great job–they fixed the entire secondary while playing week to week. Stewart even played well enough to start. Baltimore, I think, has a history of fixing things on the move. So for example, their superbowl year, they shifted the OL around just before the playoffs, and it paid off. I don’t think I have seen anyone do that before.

    Of the 2, JF and SS, I like Fisher better. In comparison, Spags made too many “first time head coach” mistakes.

    I think for sure Spags will be a coordinator again, and yes sooner or later a head coach. As you know, I think most anti-Spags stuff comes from just overlooking the incredible, dire effect the 2011 injuries had on everything. Plus it followed doing well in 2010. If there’s one thing that riles fans up, it’s raising their expectations and then stumbling. It brings out the “you are dead to me” mode in a lot of fans.

    I agree with all that.

    The ram players played hard for Spags.
    Thats something that gets overlooked sometimes.

    Sometimes Owners just want to recharge
    the fanbase. Bringing in a new Head Coach
    can do that, to state the obvious.

    w
    v

    in reply to: In Loving Memory of Stuart Scott #15498
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Thats a nice video. Nice speech
    by Scott at the end of the vid.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams-related notes: Wild-card round By Nick Wagoner #15494
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Except for the secondary they weren’t key players. Though they also have depth I think.

    Apparently Spags did a great job with that group. I didnt know
    he had that job. I wonder if he’ll ever be a head coach again.

    Do you like Fisher better as a coach or Spags ?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Benny the Returner #15489
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Benny was decisive. He cuts quickly without hesitation. He breaks arm tackles. I really liked the way he developed. The bad part, though, is that he’s always a risk to fumble, imo.

    I like his ‘power’ as a returner.
    Reminiscent of Cullen Bryant.
    (An old LA player –before your time, Dak 🙂 )

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 10,111 through 10,140 (of 11,188 total)