Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 3,871 through 3,900 (of 12,325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I submit to you that these are the results of living in a capitalist system that grinds people down and denies them housing, medical care, human dignity, and a say in their government. These are the results of white supremacy pushing people to the margins, excluding them, disrespecting them, and treating their bodies as disposable.

    yeah. but that’s the rub for me. it’s the system that’s corrupt. so if you have the same system in place, what will defunding the police really accomplish?

    =========

    Exactly. I think about that all the time, in different contexts. Its very interesting territory.

    Mostly though, the system is NOT going to let the police be ‘defunded’. Aint gonna happen, in most places. There will be a lot of talk, but in the end the reforms will be watered down to “more police sensitivity training” and “modifications on the rules of choke-holds” and maybe one or two less bazookas and one or two more Public Relations Officers hired.

    Just watch.

    And watch what BIDEN ends up proposing. He will spout so many ‘down the middle’ useless cliches it will be utterly meaningless.

    Looks like there might be a few places that might try some intriguing and radical changes though. Small pockets of radical-experimentation in the Corportocracy.
    Strange times.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I was a police officer for nearly ten years and I was a bastard. We all were.

    Highly recommended read.

    =============
    Well, it would be better if it wasn’t anonymous. How do we know its not fake?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Taibbi: has the left lost its mind #116654
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    WV,

    Have you read Robinson’s piece? Didn’t know he had responded to Taibbi until I saw your video. Thanks for posting.

    The Current Affairs piece is excellent. He calmly, effectively, surgically destroys Taibbi’s (IMO) ludicrously broad-brushed complaints, and Taibbi should have quit while he was behind. MT’s rebuttal to the rebuttal was a big ol’ bust. He wasn’t able to adequately address a single point made by Robinson — well, at least not without twisting it like a pretzel.

    Will quote a bit from the article tomorrow or later this week. Sad to see Taibbi choosing this hill — and The Hill — to plant his flag.

    Has The American Left Lost Its Mind? No. Once again critics of the left are misstating the facts and distracting us from consequential issues.

    ==================

    Well, my gut tells me, Matt is just kinda defending a friend of his. Which is fine with me, but I dont know that there is really much of an issue there.

    I dunno.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Taibbi: has the left lost its mind #116631
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Taibbi responds to the criticism of his article:

    in reply to: Police & protestors — conflicting images #116620
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    link:http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/55235.htm

    “….During the Obama administration, the Pentagon has been equipping US police departments across the country with a staggering amount of military weapons, combat vehicles, and other equipment, according to Pentagon data.

    According to a New York Times article published last week, at minimum, 93,763 machine guns, 180,718 magazine cartridges, hundreds of silencers and an unknown number of grenade launchers have been provided to state and local police departments since 2006. This is in addition to at least 533 planes and helicopters, and 432 MRAPs — 9-foot high, 30-ton Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected armored vehicles with gun turrets and more than 44,900 pieces of night vision equipment, regularly used in nighttime raids in Afghanistan and Iraq…

    Much of the lethal provisions have gone to small city and county police forces.{ } The recent militarization is part of a broader trend. According to Eastern Kentucky University professor Peter B. Kraska—who has studied this subject for two decades—as of the late 1990s, about 89 percent of police departments in the United States serving populations of 50,000 people or more had a PPU (Police Paramilitary Unit), almost double of what existed in the mid-1980s.

    Their growth in smaller jurisdictions (agencies serving between 25 and 50,000 people) was even more pronounced. Currently, about 80 percent of small town agencies have a PPU; in the mid-1980s only 20 percent had them. The domestic military ramp-up is far from being in proportion to any perceived threat to public safety….”

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Vivek Chibber on socialism, marxism #116578
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    left vs middle-class


    in reply to: Sports and the Protests #116576
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Shannon Sharpe on racism and owners.

    in reply to: Police Violence – The Class Argument #116562
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    A Morning Consult poll showed 58% of Americans either strongly or somewhat supported the idea of “calling in the U.S. military to supplement city police forces.”

    You get different answers about that one, depending on the poll. For example there’s this:

    Americans 49% to 34% reject use of military for crowd control amid George Floyd protests, poll finds
    https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/polling/americans-49-34-reject-use-military-crowd-control-wake-floyd-protests-poll

    ==================

    Well, i think you’d get different numbers on all the other ones too, if you change a word here or there, or offer another option, etc. Like i say, i dont trust these kinds of polls. I wish i could.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Politics of individual righteousness has no stakes #116568
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    ..Just dismissing important trends with some bogus arguments like this one source is frustrating to me.

    ============

    But you agree that the Fox-Version/Rightwing-Version of B on B crime, is cherry-picking/shallow/spin, right?

    I think its a layered, complicated subject, that ‘could’ be discussed in a useful way, but that topic would inevitably lead away from race and right to Class/Poor-People. But that kind of discussion would require class-consciousness, and study, and time, and facts, and that aint gonna happen much if at all, on corporate-TV.

    w
    v
    “hurt people, hurt people”

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Oh my goodness. Stick with it for the 18-19 minute mark. Excellent stuff.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    At 6:15 mark of the Rogan vid. Check out what Wood says about stop-and-frisk Stats.
    “The stats are junk”

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Of course, Rogan had him on:

    in reply to: Police Violence – The Class Argument #116541
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    … Because of BLM as of right now the majority of the country believes that the police help uphold an underlying systemic racism that is everywhere. That has never happened before, that I know of, in USA history.

    ==============

    Well, I’ve seen those polls, and i wish i could believe them. But i don’t.
    They remind me of the universal health care polls.
    I think the country is much more evenly divided on this law-and-order stuff.

    w
    v

    There’s no reason to disbelieve the polls. The issue is translation into action. A majority does support universal health insurance, when asked. But in that case it did not translate into a fair and open fight between Dem primary candidates.

    So it remains to be seen what actions come out of the new mindset where, unlike previously, a majority of whites see and “get” systemic racism in policing.

    ….

    ==================
    Well, i dunno. I do question the poll numbers. Part of the reason i question them, is because i think we live in a corporotacracy-idiocracy. I dont think half the people in this country even know what ‘systemic racism’ IS. I think people answer black-and-white questions on poll questions in ways that dont necessarily reflect what they really think. Heck oftentimes idiot-propagandized-humans believe things that are completely at odds with one another.

    No, i dont trust ‘any’ of the numbers on these complex issues. But, i dunno.

    w
    v

    Taibbi:”…As Cotton points out in the piece, he was advancing a view arguably held by a majority of the country. A Morning Consult poll showed 58% of Americans either strongly or somewhat supported the idea of “calling in the U.S. military to supplement city police forces.” That survey included 40% of self-described “liberals” and 37% of African-Americans. To declare a point of view held by that many people not only not worthy of discussion, but so toxic that publication of it without even necessarily agreeing requires dismissal, is a dramatic reversal for a newspaper that long cast itself as the national paper of record.

    Incidentally, that same poll cited by Cotton showed that 73% of Americans described protecting property as “very important,” while an additional 16% considered it “somewhat important.” This means the Philadelphia Inquirer editor was fired for running a headline – “Buildings matter, too” – that the poll said expressed a view held by 89% of the population, including 64% of African-Americans.

    (Would I have run the Inquirer headline? No. In the context…”

    in reply to: The Seattle protest #116540
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Seattle. An enigma wrapped in a conundrum.
    The chief of police says they dont know who to negotiate with because no-one is in charge…

    ============================

    in reply to: Police Violence – The Class Argument #116536
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    … Because of BLM as of right now the majority of the country believes that the police help uphold an underlying systemic racism that is everywhere. That has never happened before, that I know of, in USA history.

    ==============

    Well, I’ve seen those polls, and i wish i could believe them. But i don’t.
    They remind me of the universal health care polls.
    I think the country is much more evenly divided on this law-and-order stuff.

    w
    v

    in reply to: The Seattle protest #116510
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Nikkita Oliver:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/06/nikkita-oliver-on-seattles-extraordinary-protests
    “Building People Power”: Nikkita Oliver on Seattle’s Extraordinary Protests and What Comes Next

    The activist and former mayoral candidate has been an integral part of protests that led to the creation of a seven-block, police-free “autonomous zone” in a central Seattle neighborhood—whether Trump likes it or not.

    By Jacob Uitti
    June 11, 2020

    In Seattle, as in nearly every major city in America, protesters clashed with police for over a week in early June, demanding justice for George Floyd and other victims of racial violence and police brutality. But what happened next, and is still happening, was completely different. On Monday the police effectively abandoned the area surrounding the East Precinct police station, allowing protesters to establish a seven-block area they are calling the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ).

    Within that space protests are ongoing, but so are history lectures, art exhibits, movie nights (Ava DuVernay’s 13th screened Tuesday), concerts, town hall meetings, and street art. There is no formal leadership of the Seattle protests, but among the most prominent figures is Nikkita Oliver, who ran for mayor in 2017 and was the first candidate of the independent Seattle Peoples Party. Also the codirector of the Creative Justice Northwest program, Oliver has been busy organizing protests, facilitating communication among the various groups, and getting down to the autonomous zone when she can—which sometimes means at 3 a.m.

    The CHAZ has drawn the attention of none other than Donald Trump, who tweeted threats late Wednesday to “take back” Seattle, and was swiftly rebuked by Washington governor Jay Inslee as well as Mayor Jenny Durkan, who has faced calls to resign after the police used flash bangs and tear gas against protesters.

    Not long after the president’s tweet, Oliver got on the phone to talk about not only Trump’s attempt to “incite violence,” but also the historical precedent for movements like this one, the beauty of a movement without a figurehead at the front of it, and how the protests have even bolstered the reputation of another controversial Seattle group: cyclists….

    ….
    …In Seattle there is the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, local residents providing heavy security, medical stations on call. Given those, how is change playing out differently compared to other areas in the country?

    You know, I’ll be transparent. I don’t know how it’s playing out differently compared to other areas, but what I can say is what I am in awe of. You know, protesters maintained a sort of occupation at the East Precinct. So essentially, the police left. The people have now actively started building an autonomous safe zone that has art, has music, has food, has community care, and all of that started during the barricade when medics were bringing supplies and community members were dropping off support, when people were donating money and building bail funds, when lawyers were volunteering their time, when people started to develop tactics like umbrellas and bringing gas masks, just a sense of mutual aid and care for each other.

    When I look at the rallies happening across the city, there is also this incredible bike brigade that’s started. I think generally people think of cyclists in our city as irritating [laughs], unless you are a cyclist. And to see this bike brigade come up, I think for some folks, has really transformed the way we even think about cycling. They helped marshal the march; they’ve kept people safe. Honestly, today a car tried to run into a group of high school students protesting. And one of the bike brigade folks literally threw their bike under the car to slow it up. There is a real sense of care and support and love for people.

    There is a medic squad that rotates and is around at every protest, every march in the autonomous safe zone. There are people providing food. There are stores in places in the autonomous safe zone that are letting people come in and use the restroom, wash their hands, and store things. It really is incredible to see the care and compassion people have for each other, even in the face of this very oppressive force. Governor Inslee sent the National Guard here. There are some very terrifying things happening here, and yet there is a lot of care and compassion for each other, which I think is going to be the marker of how we do or don’t come out of this well.

    Why do you think people are angry now and poised to protest?

    It is not just Black and indigenous and people of color experiencing the oppression of the system. I think you have middle-class and poor white people who are realizing that they were never safe under capitalism either. It’s creating this convergence, and in the midst of that, people saw the—all of the murders are horrific, but you saw the murder of George Floyd happen, where a police officer knew he was being filmed, could hear the man crying out for his mom, saying he could not breathe. Which then brings us back to Eric Garner, and we’re seeing these things come up over and over again. Tony McDade, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and you’re seeing all these things repeat themselves. I think people are awakening to the fact that the system has actually been set up to work for almost none of us.

    Seattle’s peaceful protesters fought for eight days before the city police surrendered the East Precinct. The next night they took City Hall. Are you involved in how these movements are being mobilized and, if so, what might be next?

    Yeah, there’s a lot of coordination. I wouldn’t say I’m, like, exclusively involved. I mean, the beauty of what is happening is people are just wanting to be involved. So they’re starting to organize their own actions. I think it’s significant and important because if you look at what has happened in similar movements, we’ve ended up with figureheads—and when the figurehead is gone, the movement dies. The beauty of what’s happening now is that it’s becoming diffuse and harder to tell who the figurehead is because there are so many leaders all over the city doing their own thing but aligning to the common values and goals, which is incredibly powerful.

    Last night there was an impromptu showing of the Ava DuVernay documentary 13th in the middle of what used to be one of the city’s busiest intersections. And the East Precinct police station’s sign now says: “Seattle People Department.” When you see these symbols of change, what do you think?

    Honestly, I start to immediately think about what’s the vision for this space? And how can it actually be a people’s station, and what are the things that the people need, and how can we organize to make that happen? It’s one thing to take a space, it’s another thing to turn a space into something functional that actually serves the community. You know, Seattle is the second city to have a Black Panther Party, and one of the hallmarks of the Black Panther Party was that they met the needs of the community. That’s why people responded to them: their breakfast program, in some places they had an extermination program, the Black Panther newspaper—all of these things met needs in the community.

    So if you want to continue to galvanize people, at some point you have to start feeding the people, caring for the people, building with the people. That’s what builds people power; that’s what sustains people power; that’s what sustains commitment to a movement. So honestly, I see it and it’s incredible the way that the area is being turned into a safe zone. Then I immediately go into, Alright, what can we do in this space to take care of the people?

    Protests are happening all over the world. But what would prevent the work from coming to fruition locally and nationally moving forward?

    One thing would be if we give up. How many times have we seen uprisings start and then people get tired? One of the things that’s going to happen is people are going to go back to work at some point as things calm with COVID—though it also may eventually get worse again. People will go back to work. And the toll that capitalism takes on our ability to organize will once again be present. Right now people are at home. Maybe they work in the morning and work a little bit at night but are able to be out and have a presence at rallies.

    I think another thing is just the overall government structure. The structure of the system we live in is inherently white supremacist. It’s inherently built on white supremacy. Policing is inherently racist. Those structures were not made to be transformed from the inside out. They have to be transformed by the pressure that we’re creating. In some ways we’re going to see the government get in the way, whether it’s our local government, where we have leaders that lack the political will to do what needs to be done, or it’s the president, who literally just tweeted today that our city has been taken over by domestic terrorists.

    in reply to: The Seattle protest #116509
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Wow.
    ———-
    “… William Boeing, saw to it that his personal racism would have a lasting impact on the city’s widening economic inequality by authoring bylaws that restricted the sale of real estate in his neighborhood to anyone who wasn’t white. The legacy of racially-restrictive housing covenants in Seattle is a staggering wealth gap: In 2019, the median net worth of a white household in the region was $456,000. For Black households, it was $23,000….”
    ————-

    in reply to: Police Violence – The Class Argument #116494
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The socialist adolph, is swimming upstream on this one.
    At about the five minute mark (if anyone can make it that far) he talks about the race/neoliberalism thing.

    in reply to: Police Violence – The Class Argument #116491
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    antiracist politics is in fact the left wing of neoliberalism in that its sole metric of social justice is opposition to disparity in the distribution of goods and bads in the society,

    That’s not its “sole argument.” Nor do I think it’s the “left wing of neoliberalism.” Actually I think saying that is the right wing of leftism purism. Anti-racism appeals to deepset ideas of justice, human rights, and freedom from direct oppression. Is that enough? Of course not. Is saying it is not enough an important criticism? Yes.

    At the same time, to me “intersectionality” really means something.

    ==============

    “Moreover, although it often comes with a garnish of disparaging but empty references to neoliberalism as a generic sign of bad things,
    antiracist politics is in fact the left wing of neoliberalism in that its sole metric of social justice is opposition to disparity in the distribution of goods and bads in the society, an ideal that naturalizes the outcomes of capitalist market forces so long as they are equitable along racial (and other identitarian) lines…”
    ——

    Well, ‘I’ interpret that as Adolph just complaining about ‘Class’ getting minimized or jettisoned or ignored by a NON-intersectional kind of anti-racist program.

    Basically, i think he’s just talking about Clinton-Obama-DNC type politics. Race, Gender, and No-Class. In other words, NeoLiberalism. In my words Corporotacracy.

    Thats my interpretation of his thots, anyway.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Police Violence – The Class Argument #116479
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Before I read that Reed article I tried having a conversation with my wife, who is kind of a mainstream Dem, about my frustration and reluctance to accept BLM as a meaningful and important reaction to America’s racial problems.

    Reed comes pretty close to voicing my own frustration:

    “And the shrill insistence that we begin and end with the claim that blacks are victimized worst of all and give ritual obeisance to the liturgy of empty slogans is in substance a demand that we not pay attention to the deeper roots of the pattern of police violence in enforcement of the neoliberal regime of sharply regressive upward redistribution and its social entailments.”

    My conversation went no where and my wife and I probably din’t move beyond the basic idea that America has serious racial problems and at least the 8:46, George Floyd, BLM protests draw attention to this.

    ==============

    I just wish ole Adolph was a better…’communicator.’ Heck i agree with him, and i still get lost in the labyrinth of his paragraphs. I’ve never finished one of his articles in my life.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Imperialism – or black lives dont matter #116471
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    pop.resist:https://popularresistance.org/black-lives-matter-everywhere-its-time-to-defund-the-us-military/

    “…While the U.S. war on the black population at home is now exposed for all of America–and the world–to see, the victims of U.S. wars abroad continue to be hidden. Trump has escalated the horrific wars he inherited from Obama, dropping more bombs and missiles in 3 years than either Bush II or Obama did in their first terms.

    But Americans don’t see the terrifying fireballs of the bombs. They don’t see the dead and maimed bodies and rubble the bombs leave in their wake. American public discourse about war has revolved almost entirely around the experiences and sacrifices of U.S. troops, who are, after all, our family members and neighbors. Like the double standard between white and black lives in the U.S., there is a similar double standard between the lives of U.S. troops and the millions of casualties and ruined lives on the other side of the conflicts the U.S. armed forces and U.S. weapons unleash on other countries….”

    in reply to: Police Violence – The Class Argument #116469
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    counterpunch:https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/06/12/the-capitalist-limits-of-police-reform/
    June 12, 2020
    The Capitalist Limits of Police Reform
    by Shamus Cooke

    “….Demanding reforms is critical to any social movement, and many police reforms can save lives and reduce harm, but they are often fleeting, as Alex Vitale explains in his book “The End of Policing”. The especially complicated dynamics of police reform have deep roots twisted together with the base of class society, where capitalist fueled austerity creates the social disruptions that police are called to “manage”.

    Vitale’s book discusses the complex web of legal, social, and institutional barriers to reform that ebb and flow over the decades but ultimately remain in place, because the police are themselves the byproduct of historic economic relationships that have evolved over the years— police power grows as inequality grows, which widens as pro-market politicians shrink social services.

    Banning specific weapons or tactics will be replaced by other forms of violence, because as Vitale explains, police are ‘violence workers’, experts in force that view all problems as nails to be hammered….

    …..Vitale notes that the nature of the police “since its earliest origins, is to be a tool for managing inequality and maintaining the status-quo. Police reforms that fail to directly address this reality are doomed to reproduce it.” And ultimately “as long as the basic mission of police remains unchanged, none of these reforms will be achievable”

    The “mission” of the police is tightly wound up with deeply-entrenched economic relationships…
    …..
    ….The demands to “defund the police” are moving energy in the right direction since such demands will quickly expose the undemocratic nature of city budgeting. The budget is not transparent because its purpose, largely speaking, is to promote and protect the interests of those who run the government— the wealthy. Participatory budgeting has long been a demand of the Left, but the budget is so highly protected that little gains have been won.

    Divesting from police and investing in working people is the way forward, but there are gigantic class barriers that need to be recognized so that the power needed to overcome them can be amassed.

    Defunding the police involves moving the money into public services, housing, etc. But this is a much more complicated demand than it appears because it directly challenges the direction that the wealthy are taking the economy. Similar ideas emerged after the nationwide riots that erupted after the Rodney King verdict in ’92. The outcome was more austerity and mass incarceration….see link…”

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Is that a Ram jersey the victim has on? I believe it is.
    I hadnt seen this one before. The Cop just keeps beating him.

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The Seattle thing is fascinating. It seems like a lot of White Occupy-Wallstreet-types have hijacked the BLM campaign, and turned it into something…else.
    Though, i really dont know shit about it.

    In the months to come, I will be interested in the Seattle situation.

    in reply to: Krystal, Saagar, Rogan #116448
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    At the 50:40 mark or so:
    Krystal: “No-one trusts anyone. And for good reason…you know youre getting spun”

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 3,871 through 3,900 (of 12,325 total)