Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 126 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams Practice Squad #52349
    znhater
    Blocked

    I see they re-signed Cam Thomas but does anyone know who they cut to free up a roster spot?

    in reply to: Should Rams pursue Robbie Gould #52348
    znhater
    Blocked

    Yes that’s the first thing i thought when i seen he got cut. A big upgrade imo

    in reply to: Barnes the starter, and other JT tweets #30192
    znhater
    Blocked

    The rams are in big trouble with Barnes as the starter. I really wish they had done more in the free agency period when it comes to center.

    in reply to: Teams don't trust the Pats #30169
    znhater
    Blocked

    What was the picture? The link was dead.

    in reply to: Teams don't trust the Pats #30090
    znhater
    Blocked

    fuck u wv – we only lost because they cheated whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Seriously, if u read Martz’s comments he acknowledges what u say – 3 turnovers I think it was – that was the difference.

    Sad thing – that 2001 Ram team was better than the ’99 team. We win that game 9 out of 10 times.

    I will never believe the “better team won” that day – how do we know Law was not tipped off on the route via signal theft? How do we know they didn’t abduct Proehl the night before, place a Ceti eel larvae in his ear thus rendering him susceptible to the suggestion that he fumble away a big play at a critical moment? Huh? How do we KNOW? They obviously are big fat cheaters – I wouldn’t put anything past them. Cool thing is everybody knows it now – asterisk firmly in place. Laff.

    Also, I strongly suggest you remove that fuckin’ utube link in your post – fucking disgusting – nobody wants to see that.

    Oh, and fuck the Patriots again.

    Couldn’t have said it better myself.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 2 months ago by znhater.
    in reply to: Teams don't trust the Pats #30087
    znhater
    Blocked

    WV, You mean the play were Vrabel hit Warner in the head and it wasn’t called? I firmly believe the league was in on this as well, at least early on. What team better to win the Super Bowl after 9/11 than the “Patriots”.

    Oh yeah and fuck the patriots.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 2 months ago by znhater.
    in reply to: Rookie numbers #24069
    znhater
    Blocked

    I screwed up. Wichmann is 69.

    I will change it via edit, thanks for the alert.

    Thx you’re a good man.

    in reply to: Rookie numbers #24063
    znhater
    Blocked

    I screwed up. Wichmann is 69.

    in reply to: Wagoner: What Rams' starters look like today #21324
    znhater
    Blocked

    Yeah, “praying for Barksdale to return” doesn’t really sound like the battle cry of a super bowl worthy offensive line. Man I didn’t think we’d be in this situation. I thought Fish would have it down by year 4.

    Yeah I’m with u. I have a real problem with the lack of urgency to fix the oline. And although zn posted that the line has been worse, that was towards the end of season and those guys were backups. Not in March.

    in reply to: JT chat….3/18 #21009
    znhater
    Blocked

    Wow it’s September all ready? Lol just kidding.

    Thanks for spotting the typo. I fixed it. And also added this post. Cause otherwise…you would look purrtee crazy. s

    Lol thanks.

    in reply to: JT chat….3/18 #20936
    znhater
    Blocked

    Wow it’s September all ready? Lol just kidding.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams mailbag #20563
    znhater
    Blocked

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Rams4life wrote:</div>
    Just passing along the info.

    Sorry bro, I meant no disrespect. Zooey’s right, I was just aiming my smartassery at JT, not you.

    It’s all good man.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams mailbag #20554
    znhater
    Blocked

    as if JT knows.

    Just passing along the info.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams mailbag #20549
    znhater
    Blocked

    According to JT rams still interested in Wiz and Blalock.

    Jim Thomas
    @jthom1
    1h
    @prollz23 Wisniewski and Blalock still in play. And Barksdale for that matter.

    in reply to: Britt signs #20468
    znhater
    Blocked

    You did fine. I just went an extra step and brought the entire text over to the post.

    Ok thanks.

    in reply to: Britt signs #20462
    znhater
    Blocked

    Deal is only 2 yr 9 mil and change.

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000478316/article/rams-bringing-back-kenny-britt-on-twoyear-deal

    NFL

    Find this article at:

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000478316/article/rams-bringing-back-kenny-britt-on-twoyear-deal

    Rams bringing back Kenny Britt on two-year deal

    By Kevin Patra
    Around the NFL writer
    Published: March 13, 2015 at 09:51 p.m.
    Updated: March 13, 2015 at 11:01 p.m.

    The St. Louis Rams will hang on to free-agent receiver Kenny Britt.

    NFL Media Insider Ian Rapoport reported Friday that the receiver is staying with the Rams on a two-year, $9.125 million deal worth up to $14 million, per a source informed of the situation. Britt receives $4.3 million guaranteed.

    NFL Media columnist Michael Silver first reported Wednesday that the team was expected to re-sign the 26-year-old pass-catcher.

    Keeping Britt adds some semblance of consistency after a bevy of offseason changes on the offensive side of the ball. The Rams added a new offensive coordinator in Frank Cignetti before the team swapped Sam Bradford for Nick Foles on Tuesday.

    The enigmatic Britt set a career high with 48 catches to go along with 748 yards and three touchdown snags in 2014 — the second-best statistical year of his career. However, he topped 70 yards in just two contests.

    The Rams will take another spin with the one-two combination of Tavon Austin and the 6-foot-3 Britt — No. 51 on Around The NFL’s top 101 free agents list — for at least another year. Jeff Fisher could be in the market to add another wideout in a deep draft.

    The Rams also announced they re-signed free agent tight end Lance Kendricks.

    The latest Around The NFL Podcast breaks down every trade and free-agent signing and discusses the impact of Darrelle Revis’ return to the Jets. Find more Around The NFL content on NFL NOW.
    <span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>Good find.</span>

    Did i not post that right?

    in reply to: Britt signs #20459
    znhater
    Blocked
    in reply to: Britt signs #20458
    znhater
    Blocked

    13 mil and change after the Britt signing. According to Wagoner

    in reply to: Welcome back -X- #20270
    znhater
    Blocked

    I’ll plead the 5th.

    in reply to: Rams trade 7th round draft pick for Casey Keenum #19918
    znhater
    Blocked

    Correction. Houston, not Baylor (for Keenum) and Southern Miss for Davis, not Baylor.
    I had Baylor on the mind for some reason.
    Maybe we’ll acquire RGIII since he ran the spread at Harvard.

    Great.

    in reply to: How many linemen has Bradford worked with? #19749
    znhater
    Blocked

    Yeah, no offense to u zn but I’m about tired of the excuses. He either proves he can stay healthy and put up big numbers this season or he will be a backup the rest of his career. How ever long that may be.

    znhater
    Blocked

    Don’t see the big fuss over Gore. He’s to old and about to hit the wall.

    znhater
    Blocked

    Imagine us without …

    Hill

    Barksdale

    Davis

    This FO has some moves it needs to make rather desperately.

    If’n it’s me, I’d never let Barksdale hit FAcy.

    I would like to personally thank the Vikings. But Davis is a restricted free agent that they tendered. He should return.

    in reply to: Suh best FA since Reggie White #19604
    znhater
    Blocked

    Debatable.

    in reply to: JT chat … 3/4 #19477
    znhater
    Blocked

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Rams4life wrote:</div>
    Why on earth would the rams want to bring back hill? I thought they wanted to upgrade the position when Bradford gets hurt again. If hill comes back, it would almost certainly be as the backup. Then same scenario as the last 2 seasons. This coaching staff has me up in arms.

    But…as opposed to what? Who is the great leap forward from Hill? Not a lot of options. And even if they did that (and I am not saying they will) they will draft someone too…so it’s not really the same scenario.

    It is to me because the rookie they draft will take some time to develop, thus meaning Hill would still be the backup. There are some intriguing players that will be on the block come draft time. I’m just praying the rams make a move for one of them.

    in reply to: JT chat … 3/4 #19474
    znhater
    Blocked

    Why on earth would the rams want to bring back hill? I thought they wanted to upgrade the position when Bradford gets hurt again. If hill comes back, it would almost certainly be as the backup. Then same scenario as the last 2 seasons. This coaching staff has me up in arms.

    in reply to: Weinke high on Bradford #19334
    znhater
    Blocked

    I like the part about not re-inventing the wheel. Smart. I am feeling pretty good about Weinke as our QB coach.

    If we could just feel pretty good about our QB we would be all set.

    in reply to: Brandon Gibson cut #19332
    znhater
    Blocked

    Id take Hartline over Gibson at this point.

    in reply to: Vincent Bonsignore, LA Sports columnist #19274
    znhater
    Blocked

    Just someone else’s opinion. And when was the last time they hosted a super bowl in a rams stadium? Oh yeah, never. Kroenke is building the stadium. It remains to be seen if the st. Louis proposal even gets off the ground. I just can’t see him letting another team play there whem he settles for a stadium he won’t own. Plus San Diego and Oakland don’t have any money. It’s all just a ploy to get a better deal where they are now.

    Just my opinion like everyone else’s but none of the other makes sense to me. Build on toxic land lol. I just don’t see it happening.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by znhater.
    in reply to: The QB's Record thing #19273
    znhater
    Blocked

    Well, if Bradford had been putting up 30 tds and 4000 yards per season, no one would be saying he’s a bad QB. Comparing him to Quinn is a bit out there, since Quinn is a pro bowler and Bradford is average at best.

    They always say, the QB takes to much credit for a win and to much blame for a loss.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 126 total)