Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,171 through 1,200 (of 2,078 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: watching this year's offense, week 1 v. week now #35479
    PA Ram
    Participant

    THAT’S who I should be doing my card tricks for. At least HE appreciated it.

    I practically have to tie my wife to a chair to watch it and when I’m done she will just nod and say–that it?

    Kinda like our lovemaking–ta-dum-dum!

    I’m here all week, folks. 🙂

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Martz on 920 AM … 12/8 #35477
    PA Ram
    Participant

    How the hell do you people remember all of this?

    I can’t remember what happened last week.

    I had to think for a few second who they played. It was the Cards, right?

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: should Detroit even bother to show up? #35476
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Battle of the 4-8 titans.

    But the Lions do have Jim Bob Cooter calling their plays.

    He has about a month experience over the inexperienced Rob Boras.

    Also–they have Stafford and we have–Case Keenum. They have Calvin Johnson and we have…(INSERT NAME HERE).

    But we do have Tavon and Gurley. We have no offensive line though.

    Our defense is hurt.

    We do have home field.(Even if it’s empty).

    The Rams have to show me that they can score or at least make some first downs before I’m picking them again the rest of the year.

    They CAN win this one–IF…..

    Otherwise:

    Lions: 23

    Rams: 7

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: The Holy Quran Experiment #35471
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I hope no one is offended by this but it’s just my opinion, of course.

    Religion is a crutch that most humans need or seem to believe they need. Humans want a God.

    The form that takes for individuals depends on many things but one of those things–by far the largest is where you are born. In other words–most of the time–your religion is handed to you by your parents or your country.

    In America–that form is Christianity.

    In Saudi Arabia–it’s Islam.

    No one in the world is born one or the other. You are fed it from a young age.

    So in terms of attraction–it’s a vehicle for you to get to God. You just happen to have the vehicle your parents gave you. How it runs, what’s under the hood–you’ll find out that stuff later–or you won’t really care. It runs–good enough.

    How many Christians have ever read the Bible? The video makes the point about people not really knowing what’s in there. And of course as you do gain knowledge you simply ignore the parts you don’t like, and highlight the ones you do.

    The Bible, for example–has a lot of weird crap in the OT. People don’t worry about clothes with mixed threads. They laugh at that old law. But that God is a warrior too, don’t forget–for HIS people. He kills or has people kill all in HIS name. Who can say that some future highly charismatic individual pulls that stuff out and creates a sect from it where Christians become radical? The text will never change. People will pick what they want and interpret things as they want to suit their particular needs.

    That’s religion.

    I often thought that if Jesus came down tomorrow and made a speech on all the networks, that five minutes later Fox news or MSNBC would be ripping him a new one. It would depend on if he said what they wanted to be said.

    I approach it more from trying to understand it on the flawed human level.

    If someone wants to find peace in the Koran–they will. If they want to find peace in the Bible, they will.

    It’s complicated and certainly the bigger problem may be the radical schools that exist in places like Saudi Arabia–where certain interpretations are pushed into someone’s brain from a young age.

    There is a push in this country to change history books–to teach religion in schools right next to science. What will that look like one hundred years from now? Is science shoved out the door in favor of the religious text? And what interpretation of the text gets pushed? What version? If America feels threatened it may be the warrior God type version and less the Jesus one.

    No one is immune to that.

    But maybe it’s a bigger question than just the text and attraction of it for a certain population. Religion is more complicated that that.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 1 month ago by PA Ram.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 1 month ago by PA Ram.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: what ails the offense? #35363
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I agree about the offense becoming predictable. It seems like the defense was always ready for that first play of the game when they would handoff to Gurley. They were waiting on it. I heard Farr often comment on how the defense saw this or that coming.

    But I feel it is a legitimate criticism of these receivers that they do not make the tough catches. I see receivers all over the league do it week after week. It feels like Sammy Watkins gets very little separation but he gets the ball anyway. Some guys hand fight very well and they just make sure they get the ball if it’s up there.

    If the Rams receivers are contested they usually drop the ball.

    Of course they would benefit from a QB who would get them the ball at better spots or when they are open but no QB does that on every throw either.

    This team does not have THE guy yet at the receiver position.

    And I am so tired of Brian Quick at this point. We get next to nothing out of him. I thought last year he was turning a corner. Not so much this year.

    Tavon is their best receiver because of what he can do–and at least they finally found ways of using him this year. That’s a bright spot. But the team would benefit from a true #1.

    They can’t get everything this year so I doubt they go there in the draft but we’ll see how it falls. Maybe they find one.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: CoachO, some remarks on the OL #35362
    PA Ram
    Participant

    And New England isn’t “other teams” plural. All the Patz example (singular) shows us is that if your line becomes a problem, it’s better to have Brady. Other than that, we already know from Rams history alone that when an OL gets damaged past a certain point, it falls off in effectiveness. (See Bulger, 2007-9, which is basically 3 successive years of extensive OL injuries).

    Well, you probably will have a different example for any team I would name but the Packers(I know they have Aaaron Rodgers) have had a beat up line this year.

    http://espn.go.com/blog/green-bay-packers/post/_/id/25719/packers-get-most-of-offensive-line-back-only-corey-linsley-still-out

    I watch different games on GamePass and my ears perk up when I hear announcers talking about this or that team’s offensive line woes. Now is every line as bad as the Ram/s line? Nope.
    But everyone deals with it to one degree or another. The Rams are not the only victim to this sort of thing, this year, last year or any year.

    And New England, to my recollection won that first game of the season with those three rookies and they played pretty well. Even when the Rams were healthy it didn’t play particularly well.

    What I’m saying about the Rams are that it’s always one excuse or another. Bad line, bad QB, bad receivers. Bad OC. Maybe it’s all those things, maybe it is a combination but it is surely someone’s responsibility to get things fixed and it has not happened.

    Bad drafting, bad free agent signings? Sure–it plays a role. Saffold’s injury history is no mystery. When you have a round robin of three centers and take the best of the worst bunch, you don’t have anything great there–look how long they held Barrett Jones–why? the guy could never get on the field and when he did he wasn’t anything special. And because of your “elite” LT, drafted 2nd, you have to shuffle the line constantly so someone can babysit him. That’s a circumstance that they have to take responsibility for. They have failed at building a proper line and while we wait for “young guys to develop” or “guys to heal” The defense gets another year older and Gurley gets beat up in the backfield.

    I find it an interesting point that Coach O makes about Barnes. And I truly hope he is salvageable. But the Rams need to make some tough decisions on who is salvageable as they build for next year.

    At this point they have a lot of offense to build, from the line to the QB to a true #1 receiver. That’s no small feat.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: The Holy Quran Experiment #35353
    PA Ram
    Participant

    It means there is no mainstream news, no mainstream discourse, no mainstream talk out there to make it apparent that THAT is a very strange question.

    That’s going to happen when you are ignorant to a topic. There will be strange and sometimes nonsensical questions. But it’s okay to ask it because you’re curious enough to seek an answer to the question. Worse is not asking it at all and just assuming that it is a violent religion with no redeeming qualities. I wish more people sincerely asked these questions.

    I can’t tell you how many times I hear Buddha referred to as a god. “Buddha isn’t God.”

    Nope. He never said he was.

    Heck people are ignorant to their very own religion. Christians are, Muslims are, Buddhists are– all of them.

    Ultimately people will take what they like about it and leave the rest. It will all make sense to them and they will BELIEVE that THEIR way is the right way. They’ll KNOW.

    But you have to ask questions–strange or not.

    That’s how you gain understanding. And the world needs more of that.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: The Holy Quran Experiment #35344
    PA Ram
    Participant

    It’s a good question and unfortunately, I don’t have an answer for you.

    I personally am not a fan of organized religion. It’s more of a controlling tool for the powerful over the weak. This is not to say I am not spiritual but I think that’s a very personal individual thing. While I love much of the eastern philosophy of Taoism and Buddhism, that too can be warped into a cult with corrupt leaders. All organized religion can.

    This is not to say that all churches are corrupt. Many many of them do good charitable work. And in times of personal crises if someone finds solace in the church–good for them. But it should never mix with government or politics. That’s dangerous. Any religion that wants to establish a theocracy is out of line.

    I read the Koran once–or at least some of it. And I can’t remember much about it except it’s organized from the smallest passage to the largest, I believe. Jesus is in there but he’s not God. I remember it sounding very much like a text that tried to correct some things in the Bible.

    And yes–Muhammad was a warrior.

    At the time I was reading it I wasn’t looking for anything specific, I just was curious about it.

    I also read parts of the Bible and was shocked with some of the things in there because when I was younger and went to church they didn’t talk much about those things.

    I am probably more amazed by how a female could be attracted to organized religion because they don’t seem to take a high view of women.

    I do believe that all religions can be hijacked by maniacs. Islamic scholars make this claim in regard to ISIS. I heard one guy calling their interpretation of things “bizarre”. It is a death cult, an apocalyptic cult so maybe it’s unfair to judge all of Islam by that particular group. But clearly there are threads in the different schools that are disturbing.

    And yet–there are certainly peaceful Muslims.

    I know this doesn’t answer your question. I hope someone can answer it because I’d love to read about that.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: CoachO, some remarks on the OL #35333
    PA Ram
    Participant

    New England.

    Started 3 rookies first game of the season. They have been shuffling since.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: The change in OC. What do you think it will do? #35321
    PA Ram
    Participant

    One thing that bothers me is that Boras was the tight ends guy and they have not looked too great this year–particularly, you-know-who. Cook’s blocking is abysmal. I just slowed down a play they ran against the Cards on what should have been Gurley running to the outside. Both tight ends don’t block anyone on the play.

    ANYONE!

    And they have to make the key blocks. Cook literally runs past them.

    Did he think he was going out for a pass?

    Boras did not straighten out that situation.

    This feels more like a “somebody has to fall on the sword” move than an actual attempt to upgrade the situation. I don’t think they can at this point. But…we’ll see.

    They’ve discarded Foles and Cignetti.

    We’ll see if that’s enough to get to average or at least–not horrible.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 1 month ago by PA Ram.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: CoachO, some remarks on the OL #35320
    PA Ram
    Participant

    That’s interesting about Barnes because he gets noticeably manhandled at times during the game.

    But I just don’t understand how other teams play two or three rookies, fight through various OL injuries–shuffle guys in and it isn’t this big of a disaster.

    I don’t doubt there’s an impact–but these guys look like they haven’t taken an NFL snap on some plays.

    I’m done with Robinson–I’ve already been over that a thousand times. I hope they try him at guard, I don’t know. But I see no evidence he will ever be a suitable LT.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Greg Robinson – Left Tackle, St. Louis Rams #35304
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I remember when they made this pick I wasn’t thrilled.

    I wanted Watkins but if they were going to go OT I was okay with Matthews. Yes–they raved about Robinson’s upside but at least with Matthews you knew what you were getting. While he struggled a bit his rookie season he has had an excellent second year. Robinson is still lost.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: The change in OC. What do you think it will do? #35302
    PA Ram
    Participant

    It’ll be interesting to see if this offense looks the same.

    I mean–what would that say?

    We should see something different, I guess–but what? And will it be any more effective?

    My guess–and it’s only a guess–is that we will see more running–even if it means 3 and outs.

    I don’t think Fisher likes Gurley getting 8 or 9 carries a game.

    But…we shall see.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Time to fire Fisher. #35243
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Okay–black knight wins.

    But I came very close to posting the dead parrot sketch as a metaphor for the Rams. Lol!

    Oh what hell:

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Time to fire Fisher. #35234
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Well most of the arguments made for keeping Fisher remind me of this:

    🙂

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Time to fire Fisher. #35231
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I look at Shottenheimer leaving and the difficulty getting a replacement and I wonder how much of that are OCs feeling boxed in with Fisher’s offensive philosophy

    It’s not like Fisher’s “philosophy” (which I think is frequently misunderstood anyway) is rare, uncommon, or strange.

    According to the logic you’re using there, no coordinator would want the Seattle job. Or the 49ers job in the Harbaugh years. And so on.

    Fact is, the league consists of different offensive approaches, and they all manage to find coordinators.

    I don’t buy this idea that what Fisher wants on offense (a balanced attack with play-action and which takes shots and aims at big plays) is all that unique, strange, different, dated, uncommon, or “wrong.”

    .

    Yeah–I’m throwing a lot of stuff out there, I get that. But why does Fisher fail, time and again–on that side of the football? I guess I’m wondering if he places his OCs in such a tight box that they’re afraid to do anything? When was the last time he had a great offense? I’m guessing the McNair/George era was pretty good for him but I can’t remember if they were top 10. But after that…what has he had on that side of the ball? I’d have to spend longer chasing stats then I feel like right now. But let’s say that his philosophy has nothing to do with it. What about coaching? The line coach? Boudreau? Yes–there are injuries–everyone has them. But this line is an epic fail. Certainly you can expect a dropoff with injuries but this is horrible–and it wasn’t great to begin with. And if it’s the injuries/youth excuse well–than there are questions about player selection–how it was built. It can’t be bad luck every year. It can’t be injuries every year. All teams go through that. I’m beyond that excuse. What is this team doing so wrong?

    If you get beyond the broad strokes of injuries, youth, poor QB play—what are the fundamental issues? And who takes responsibility for that? It’s okay for an offense to be average. This offense is so far below average it couldn’t see it with a telescope.

    It’s clear that mistakes were made in different areas and are still being made–but I have no confidence–even after another draft and free agency–that Fisher is the guy to fix it. He may be the most overrated coach in the history of the NFL. Who–with his track record–has coached this long?

    But I get that he will be back next year–and I give him full credit for building a great defense. But we can’t have half a coach.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Time to fire Fisher. #35228
    PA Ram
    Participant

    While I think that you can make the case to fire Fisher, I really don’t think they’ve quit on him.

    There is a certain ineptness in some of the things that happen but I don’t think it’s quitting. I think it’s a combination of certain types of players(Cook, Robinson–just don’t have their heads in the game)injuries(which ALWAYS seems to be a thing)lack of quarterback(Fisher just flat out missed on Foles)and actually questionable handling of the building of this offense and perhaps even its offensive philosophy.

    The next part is pure speculative nonsense on my part but I’m going to say it anyway because I can always deny it later. I look at Shottenheimer leaving and the difficulty getting a replacement and I wonder how much of that are OCs feeling boxed in with Fisher’s offensive philosophy–the things he won’t do or allow them to do. Maybe it’s not a desirable job.
    How much impact does he have on the offense? Didn’t Shaw want Vermeil to bring in Martz? And didn’t Vermeil have the good sense to let Martz do his thing only occasionally interfering? Maybe Fisher is more of a control freak about that.

    I don’t know that any of that is true but it’s just one of those thoughts that cross my mind in the early hours of the morning after a night of bad dreams.

    In any case–yes–it’s perfectly reasonable to fire Fisher.

    But not because the team has quit on him.

    Having said that–he’s not going anywhere.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Cards beat down Rams postgame thread of doom #35182
    PA Ram
    Participant

    This sums up how it has gone this year:

    Jim Thomas ‏@jthom1 5m5 minutes ago
    Fisher said he literally was asking for place-kicking volunteers when Zuerlein replacement Zach Hocker strained his quad during pregame.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Cards beat down Rams postgame thread of doom #35178
    PA Ram
    Participant

    They won’t win another game. They would have to win by the defense scoring and still managing to hold up after being out there all day to stop the other team. This offense can’t do anything. 4-12. Who predicted that?

    Congrats–you’re the winner.

    This has to be a historically bad offense. I don’t think I’ve ever watched a team where I gave their offense next to no chance of scoring. Or if the other team goes up by 10 it’s over.

    I expected more with Gurley but you have to have SOME kind of passing game–something–or defenses will take away your star.

    I had high hopes for Foles but that’s gone.

    Maybe next year.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Trey Wingo tweets about the Rams 3rd down offense #35152
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Maybe they should not be punting on 4th down. Maybe they should be going for it. Maybe that’s the key. At least that would stop the 3 and out stuff–break the pattern. They’d be on 4 and out and that might give the defense the rest it needs.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Florio: Owners in wait-and-see mode on L.A #35151
    PA Ram
    Participant

    It’s clear he doesn’t want to be in St. Louis.

    I don;’t think that’s a factor at all. There’s no evidence of “St. Louis is not an option.” It just looks like he wants to be this big owner with the fabulous LA property. That doesn’t mean he would not accept St. Louis at all if things didn’t play out for LA.

    That could be true–but why would he, if that’s the case, seem so cold to the reporters and fans of the city? Wouldn’t you want to NOT quite burn that bridge if there was a chance you could be back, or if you were seriously committed to the city? I think the fans of St. Louis would love to hear from him–not just Demoff, but from HIM.

    And St. Louis is making an effort.

    He doesn’t seem to be encouraging that.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: why is Quinn out #35150
    PA Ram
    Participant

    So I live with it and can mostly function fine but once in awhile it acts up.

    Which is why we have to think about your replacement in the next poster draft.

    You are not as useful to us if your arm goes numb and you can’t type.

    I mean sure yeah, great posting career and everything PA, but, posting is a “what have you typed for me lately” business.

    Just the cold hard merciless truth.

    Well, as you know, posting is a young man’s game. Sure–someday I will retire and become a posting analyst, using some sort of speech-to-text system to make comments on things like Nittany’s use of certain adjectives to describe the QB situation of the Rams, or how Zooey historically gets off to a slow start, but finishes pretty well, or how wv_ram’s career has been pretty much on the same track as those French films he likes, or how you will sometimes process birthday notices a little late and it’ll all be good.

    And I haven’t completely ruled out getting that nerve burned yet. Pennsylvania posters are like quarterbacks—hard to replace. i like to think of myself as the Nick Foles of the board.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Florio: Owners in wait-and-see mode on L.A #35143
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 39m39 minutes ago
    News on Carson Project: A 200-acre plot some thought would be available for parking/development— Links at Victoria Park — now not available.

    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 38m38 minutes ago
    The #Chargers/#Raiders plan in Carson may now be a bit smaller than some imagined, though the golf course wasn’t in their “core” plan.

    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 37m37 minutes ago
    Carmen Policy, Carson’s advocate, told me: “We have our core piece of land, we don’t need anything else.” To look elsewhere for development

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: why is Quinn out #35142
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I have a pinched nerve in my neck and it affects my arm from time to time. I’ve had a shot in my neck and that helped but every now and then I still have some weakness or numbness or some pain. It sucks. At one point they suggested they could burn the nerve which didn’t sound like something I’d want to do.

    So I live with it and can mostly function fine but once in awhile it acts up.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Florio: Owners in wait-and-see mode on L.A #35141
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I have to believe that this will swing one way or another. Someone will break and one of the plans will win the day.

    So let’s say it’s the Rams. How pissed off will Spanos and Davis be? Will they try to go to court? Can they go to court? Will they both go rogue and move giving L.A. three teams?

    Or if it happens that they win what will Stan do? It’s clear he doesn’t want to be in St. Louis. London? Can you imagine cheering for the London Rams? Or would they even be called the Rams anymore? Maybe they’d be the London Queens–er, or the London Rippers, er…or well–I don’t know what they’d be called but that’s my worst nightmare, really. I fear one day that the Rams could go the way of the Oilers. New place–if it’s other than L.A. or St. Louis and especially if it’s London.

    These are things that keep me awake at night pondering life’s big thoughts.

    Anyway–the bottom line is that the Raiders are screwing this up. If they back away quietly into the shadows than the Rams and Chargers can both have L.A. and everyone will be happy—except St. Louis unless they get the Raiders and then they might be happy with the trade.

    There are only two chairs. When will the music stop?

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Does Arizona stand a chance against the Rams? #35116
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Not with Nick Foles in the driver’s seat. He’s already beaten them once. I’d be surprised if they show up for this beatdown.

    I tell you though–in all seriousness–if the Rams win only one more game this year I hope it’s this one. I don’t think I could stand Arian’s smug attitude if they beat the Rams. Sweep that loudmouth.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Cloud Atlas #35115
    PA Ram
    Participant

    What was that Leo DiCaprio movie that had people in a dream, within a dream? That was hard to follow. Inception?

    I think this was way better than Inception. Just
    my opinion of course.

    w
    v

    Whoa, whoa, whoa!

    “Inception” is one of the ten best films of all time according to PA Ram’s 10 Best Films list.

    That well respected list is of course recognized all over the world as one man’s opinion.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Cloud Atlas #35031
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I tried reading the book but it was a mess.

    I hated it. Considering the way the characters in the book move around and watching what they did with the characters in the film with actors portraying different roles I just scratched my head and dismissed it. Never saw the film.

    I don’t mind reading difficult books within reason–but this book went too far for me.

    I also skipped “The Martian”. While the book was okay–it was more a technical manual. I am sure the film took a lot of that out and focused on the action but I just wasn’t up for it.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Peter King on the Bengals game and other Rams stuff #34982
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I don’t think Havenstein or Brown are there yet–but they show some promise at least. I think they could develop into quality NFL players. Of course the injury curse hasn’t helped them this year. But Saffold has lingering questions about his health and Robinson has lingering questions about his ability to become a solid LT in this league. So the line will continue to be a “work-in-progress”.

    I’d really like them to settle down the LT spot next year by investing in solid vet or if that’s too expensive and they’re in position for a good young player–take him. I know they’ve failed at both of those strategies(Long, Robinson)but they HAVE to solve that problem somehow in order to fix this offense, IMO. So as frustrating as it is, I think they are back to square one there and like it or not, they have to address it. Hopefully they get value with Robinson at guard.

    But this is another reason I want to see Mannion– to see what they have. Obviously they have to solve the QB problem over and above anything else–but if they assume that Mannion is that guy without really testing him–we won’t know until he fails spectacularly and then it’s another lost season.

    I’m starting to feel at peace that this is another lost season.

    I’m accepting that.

    So maybe it’s time for Fisher to loosen up. Give Mannion some time–loosen the offense up a bit and make this team throw more–even if they fail. Find some way to develop a passing game and use your weapons. Commit to it. You’re failing anyway.

    Maybe that sort of investment now will help next year.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: interesting, Browns game #34979
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Austin Davis looked like….Austin Davis by the way.

    Makes an incredible play followed by complete lack of awareness and ineptitude.

    Watching the hapless Browns makes me think: “It could be worse–I could be a Browns fan.”

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

Viewing 30 posts - 1,171 through 1,200 (of 2,078 total)