Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
nittany ramModeratorMaybe sharks dont like all those Genetically modified foods in us. Ever think of THAT.
w
vWell then, yet another reason to support GMO foods. They protect us from sharks. Thanks, Monsanto!
If it was left up to Big Organic, we’d all be shark bait.
nittany ramModerator, North American Waters had 42% of all confirmed unprovoked attacks worldwide
What is a provoked shark attack? (?)
When the person inadvertently does something to provoke the shark. Grab its fins, try to touch it, etc.
-
This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by
nittany ram.
nittany ramModeratorThe word “attack” is usually a misnomer when it comes to sharks and people.
They are really just encounters. In most cases, the shark bites and lets go. And usually disappears. It is rare when they attempt another bite. The reason for this is the shark isn’t actually trying to eat the person. Usually it’s not even aggressive. It is investigating the person. Trying to figure out what the person is. Sharks investigate unusual objects by mouthing them. They get a sense of what an object is through taste. The shark tastes a person, the person doesn’t taste like food, so the shark moves on. Unfortunately, even a gentle shark bite can be catastrophic to a person but think about how the vast majority of people survive ‘attacks’.
If the shark really wanted to eat the person, the person would be eaten and there’s little the person could do to prevent it. The fact that so many people survive these encounters is proof in and of itself that sharks typically aren’t interested in eating them.
Calling these encounters “attacks” contributes to the false but widespread perception that sharks are simply savage killing machines. That perception is an obstacle in the race to protect them from extinction and they are being slaughtered at a rate of 75 – 100 million per year.
September 20, 2016 at 11:27 pm in reply to: The Los Angeles Rams fan experience doesn't seem to be too great #53470
nittany ramModeratorHas there ever been an NFL game where there weren’t fights in the stands?
Every game I’ve ever been to has had them.
September 20, 2016 at 1:08 pm in reply to: Trump used $258,000 from his charity to settle legal problems #53413
nittany ramModeratorNow, my guess is, as is the usual case, that his supporters will dismiss the mountains of facts and evidence, and just fall back on the narrative that’s he’s being persecuted and is the ultimate in perfection and can do no wrong.
We live in the ‘post truth’ era of American politics. Not that there was ever a time when politicians didn’t lie, but there’s never been a time when politicians could say such outrageously obvious lies and not be held accountable for it.
Until today.
Welcome to post truth America.
nittany ramModeratorThere’s no way to know the answers to those questions until they play the game.
The season started with the Rams losing to a team they theoretically should beat followed by a victory over a team they theoretically should lose to.
So thus far they’ve been the SOFAR (Same old Fisher Ass Rams).
I think if they lose to Tampa that’s a pretty good indication that another 7-9 BS season is afoot. If they win, well they could still end up 7-9 but it could be the start of something better.
This is a week to week proposition. I’ll begin to believe if they can win 3 in a row.
nittany ramModeratorWell, if the Rams lose this game they’re staring down the barrel of another 7-9 season.
Need to win this one.
nittany ramModeratorGurley.
He breaks out this week.
Yeah, I’ve been waiting for one of his patented breakaway open field runs. I was hoping he’d get one against Seattle. I bet he has at least two in Tampa.
nittany ramModeratorJared Cook is still making boneheaded plays.
Did you see him catch that 11 yard pass on 3rd down that would have been a first down if he hadn’t decided to loop back inside and lose yardage?
At least he held onto the ball.
nittany ramModeratorThose girls need some cheeseburgers.
Wouldn’t help.
In SoCal the cheeseburgers are made of tofu and kale, so…
nittany ramModeratorStill looks like some 7-9 bullshit to me.
Yeah, but 7-9 will feel so much better in southern Cal.
Because of the low humidity.
nittany ramModeratorAll these games against Seattle look the same. They’re always tough defensive battles. I think what tips the scale in Rams favor is at the LOS. Seattle’s weak oline is ultimately overpowered by the Rams d-line.
nittany ramModeratorsounds like there’s a lot of nervous nellies out there. ha!
As an Anxious Annie I take umbrage at that remark.
I was a Wentz guy too. He just seemed like he had more physical tools and upside than Goff. Plus as you said he played in a pro style offense. The only knock on him was that he wasn’t ready to play in the NFL – yet he’s starting and did well in his first outing.
That said, I’m not dissatisfied with Goff. His struggles in preseason haven’t soured me on him.
September 17, 2016 at 10:20 am in reply to: "if Fisher had his way Goff wouldn't play in 2016"… & other Fisher/Goff rumors #53136
nittany ramModeratorJeff Fisher DOES have his way. So whether Goff plays or not is 100% up to him, as far as we know.
What Silver actually said – since you have misquoted him in order to get hits and increase your revenue – is this:
Actually, the headline on the post is different than the one for the article. It’s different because I couldn’t remember the exact wording and I had already closed the site and I was too lazy to post the link, click on it, copy the headline, then edit and resubmit the post. (I just now noticed the headline is written in the link)
But I didn’t mean to imply that Fisher didn’t have control of Goff’s playing time. I only meant that if things went the way Fisher would want them to, Goff wouldn’t have to play this year. In other words, I meant the same thing Silver said, it’s just that my wording wasn’t as precise.
Okay, well, it’s manly of you to come here and apologize. That’s the right thing to do. But now I’m going to have to ask you to leave the board for a few minutes, so we can talk about how we are going to handle this situation. You’ve been a good poster over the years, and it goes without saying that we personally like you, but there are bylaws around here, and to some extent our hands are tied. I’m sorry.
I understand. I am not fit to post here. I’m sorry that I let you all down.

-
This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by
nittany ram.
September 17, 2016 at 9:00 am in reply to: "if Fisher had his way Goff wouldn't play in 2016"… & other Fisher/Goff rumors #53132
nittany ramModeratorAgreed. It’s these silly blogger kids.
I like TurfshowTimes but I don’t post everything they write. I try to find the more newsy articles – those in which players, coaches and reporters are quoted instead of the emotional rants.
Here’s the actual discussion and you’re right the title of the article misrepresents what Silver says.
As I explained to zooey above, I inadvertently misquoted the headline.
September 17, 2016 at 8:50 am in reply to: "if Fisher had his way Goff wouldn't play in 2016"… & other Fisher/Goff rumors #53131
nittany ramModeratorJeff Fisher DOES have his way. So whether Goff plays or not is 100% up to him, as far as we know.
What Silver actually said – since you have misquoted him in order to get hits and increase your revenue – is this:
Actually, the headline on the post is different than the one for the article. It’s different because I couldn’t remember the exact wording and I had already closed the site and I was too lazy to post the link, click on it, copy the headline, then edit and resubmit the post. (I just now noticed the headline is written in the link)
But I didn’t mean to imply that Fisher didn’t have control of Goff’s playing time. I only meant that if things went the way Fisher would want them to, Goff wouldn’t have to play this year. In other words, I meant the same thing Silver said, it’s just that my wording wasn’t as precise.
nittany ramModeratorThat would be cause for concern if they had lost to the best team in the league, and they lost to one of the worst.
This is the assumption I question.
The media said they were one of the worst but they had no good reason for it.
Kelly has gotten things out of qbs before people were dismissing. (Eg. Sanchez’s best games were all with Kelly).
And that defense was far better than its record under Tomsula/Mangini
That defense did not play like one of the worst ones in the league.
I often see this, where people are dismayed the Rams lost to a team so bad, and then turns out they were just wrong about that team being that bad.
Now that’s not to say the Rams should have lost and should have looked that bad doing it, but in this case, like many cases in previous year, I question the extra added lamenting that comes from assuming a team was “one of the worst” when in fact there’s good reason to doubt that it was.
..
Fair enough. But like I said, losing to anyone 28-0 is cause for concern. Of course there’s the odd outlier here and there but for the most part playoff caliber teams don’t lose to anybody by 28 points. They don’t get shutout. And that’s the crux of it, because we were expecting the Rams to be a playoff level team. Why did we believe that? Well, speaking for myself I believed it because Fisher believed it and said as much.
Now, could the Rams still be a playoff team? Sure. But the way they played the first game doesn’t bode well for that. Maybe the 9ers are a decent team but that doesn’t really take the sting out of this loss because of what that loss most likes says about the Rams.
nittany ramModeratorI dont like to talk about fans (posters) much, but lets just say
many of them often rush to judgment about all kinds of things.1/16th of the season is gone. 15/16ths to go.
w
vTrue but the Rams lost 28 – 0. That would be cause for concern if they had lost to the best team in the league, and they lost to one of the worst. So I get its only one game but on the other hand I can understand why people are upset. In this circumstance I don’t think the rush to judgement is necessarily unwarranted.
September 16, 2016 at 6:37 am in reply to: Rams in 99 yellow/blue throwbacks for Seattle game #53064
nittany ramModeratorSo is Ryan Seacrest affiliated with the Rams now?
By the way, this is how you announce that the Rams will be wearing throw-back uniforms in the Coliseum…

nittany ramModeratorPeople are not getting what he meant IMO. He was saying that he thought the SF defense was doing certain things it wasn’t.
What? You mean you think Keenum really didn’t mean he was seeing actual ghosts? Based on what? We have his direct quote.
To you sir I say balderdash and poppycock.
nittany ramModeratorAs usual perception has nothing to do with reality.
Ain’t that the truth. Wanna hear something funny? Well, maybe not funny – but it’s kinda ironic. I drive a white Mazda CX7 with black-out tint on all windows and a light tint on the entire windshield. I also have 22″ chrome & brushed aluminum rims and a killer sound system – with which I bump the bass quite a bit. Would you like to know how many times I’ve been pulled over in that car for either no apparent reason, or very very minor traffic offenses? In the past year, 7 times. Know how many tickets I’ve gotten? One. Apparently I was in a subdivision that had a noise ordinance.
I’m glad you’re hanging out here, X. I hope you stick around.
What kind of music were you playing on that killer sound system? I’m thinking the reason you were pulled over is that the cops didn’t appreciate you blasting One Direction at 10,000 decibels…
-
This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by
nittany ram.
nittany ramModeratorzooey said:
They get pulled over by police more often, searched more often, arrested more often, and prosecuted more often. And their sentences are harsher than what whites receive for comparable crimes.
Northeastern University just did a study on racial profiling by the Vermont State Police. As you would expect, they found that black motorists were indeed stopped and searched more often than whites. Five times more often, in fact.
However, white motorists that were stopped and searched were more likely to have contraband compared to non-white motorists that were stopped and searched.
As usual perception has nothing to do with reality.
Racial profiling will become an effective tool for crime prevention as soon as law enforcement starts targeting white people.
September 15, 2016 at 1:34 pm in reply to: Informal poll… will the Rams rebound against Seattle? #53004
nittany ramModeratorIt’s late in the 4th quarter. Rams are down by 4 pts. Keenum has been harried and abused by the Seattle defense the entire game. The crowd is silent as his teammates with heads down watch the trainers lift Keenum to his feet. Unable to continue he is helped from the field. Que Jared Goff, the bright-eyed rookie who had just been named QB2 prior to the game. What Goff lacks in know-how is more than compensated for with moxie and hutzbah. He hoists the comatose offense onto his back and with the grit of a thousand Duke Waynes wills his team the length of the field and into the endzone for the victory.
A Hollywood story befitting a Hollywood team.
nittany ramModeratorIt has been predicted from the earliest days of antibiotics. Now what?
Dunno. Most pharmaceutical companies don’t do much research into new antibiotics because there’s no money in them. This is because a given person rarely needs antibiotics and any new antibiotic will be obsolete in 20 years or so due to bacterial resistance. The carbepenems are our last line of defense and some bacteria are starting to show resistance to them.
nittany ramModeratorI got no opinion on anything
till i see a couple more games.That goes for all issues, btw. Race, gender, politics, Game of Thrones,
The Kardashians, Global Warming, Scientology, Monsanto, Zooey’s dummer Brother, Wood Stoves, Vaccinations, False Flags, Jesus, Concussions,
Electric Football, Raisin Toast, Terrorism, tapirs…..doesnt matter. I have no opinion until i see a couple more games.w
vYou’re being hyperskeptical. We’ve seen enough games to know that Scientology is true.
nittany ramModeratorI think Fisher is middle of the pack. So, keep him, fire him, it isn’t a big deal to me.
I was in favor of extending him prior to the SF disaster. Now not so much. I know one game shouldn’t carry so much weight but the Rams looked SO bad…I dunno. I’m no longer deeply embedded in the Fisher camp.
I like continuity and once Goff get’s his shit together the offense will improve. But this team has a lot of talent. I think there’s a lot of coaches that could do well with the Rams.
So, yeah – extend him, fire him, whatever.
September 14, 2016 at 2:07 pm in reply to: 49ers could tell by alignment exactly what the Rams route tree was #52873
nittany ramModeratorSo…..the 9ers defense figured out the Rams offense before Jared Goff?
Line of the year. You win the Internet.
September 14, 2016 at 1:22 pm in reply to: 49ers could tell by alignment exactly what the Rams route tree was #52869
nittany ramModeratorWell that makes more sense explaining the crapfest but telegraphing plays is pathetic for a pro team.
Is that “telegraphing”?
Or the 9ers doing a great job of studying the Rams offensive tendencies?
The Rams defense has dismantled some top offenses in the past, and part of it is using film to read tendencies.
Well, the 9’ers player said they could tell the route tree by the Rams’ ‘alignment’. It does seem problematic if the defense can tell what route you’re gonna run just by where you line up.
-
This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by
nittany ram.
nittany ramModeratorThey gotta get the running game going which means an o-line that couldn’t block the 9’ers’ front seven must somehow figure out a way to block the Seahawks’ front seven.
Which they’ve done. Blocked the Seattle front 7. Pretty much the same OL, except Reynolds in for Saffold, and Wichmann/Brown rotating instead of just Wichmann. That was just 3 regular season games ago.
Yeah I know. Which is why their inability to block the 9’ers was as astonishing as it was disappointing.
But there’s an old coaching adage that says you’re not as good as you look when you win and not as bad as you look when you lose. Who knows, maybe the o-line’s futility against the 9’ers could have been corrected with a few adjustments that the coaches are now aware of after looking at film and will put in place against Seattle.
Or maybe the o-line will continue to implode in on itself like a dying star.
We shall see…
nittany ramModerator“We have to go out and fix the problem and do us, be us,” said Keenum.
the problem is they are who are they are. i want them to be something else…
Yeah, my fear is Keenum can’t fix the problem because he is the problem. Hopefully that isn’t the Case (see what I did there).
One thing is certain, Keenum can’t carry this team on his back. They gotta get the running game going which means an o-line that couldn’t block the 9’ers’ front seven must somehow figure out a way to block the Seahawks’ front seven.
-
This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

