Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,141 through 1,170 (of 2,099 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: reactions to the Saints game #93366
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    One thing we didn’t do, is put as much pressure on the QB. Brees went untouched pretty much the whole game. Kamara and Ingram(despite his one fumble), had no issues at times running on us. We need to do a lot better up front, in generating pressure.

    in reply to: reactions to the Saints game #93346
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    The entire Rams defense looks a lot better on paper than they look on the field.

    Too much talent to be this inconsistent.

    What’s with all the presnap confusion?

    Peters is horrible.

    A lot of this has to be laid at Wade’s feet.

    Proud of the way the team battled back, though.

    The TD at the end, that put the Saints up 10, was on Blake Countess. I thought that Wade Philips, was this great Defensive mind and all, and we seem to be struggling.

    in reply to: Rams @ Saints #93301
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Besides score more points, what will it take to shock the world and beat the Saints in New Orleans? And more TD’s? The Superdome is normally a place that at times can be a “House of Horrors” for us. So what do we need to do to beat them on their turf, and take out their crowd?

    Is that VooDoo lady coming to put another hex on us again? I hope not. There are other teams that need hexing, like the New England Patriots, or the New York Yankees in baseball. Why not hex them? Why us? Is it our color scheme or something? Just wondering

    in reply to: Rams @ Saints #93140
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    We are underdogs in this game. I hear the Saints are 1.5 point favorites to win this game.

    in reply to: Possible Rams trade if available #93057
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Could it be Dante Fowler from Jacksonville? If available, I feel it would cost us at best a 5th round pick and maybe Sean Mannion.

    in reply to: Rams @ Saints #93053
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Sorry for my error. We have the Seahawks at home between the Saints and Chiefs. My eyes are going bad on me. Someone from another board explained it to me. I feel so stupid right.

    in reply to: reactions to the GB game #92982
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Cooks sure got held a lot, at least in the first quarter.

    in reply to: Packers @ Rams #92917
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I feel the Rams should win this game, pretty easily, but could we be looking ahead to the next two weeks? I say yes. I expect us to win this game though, Rams 38- Packers 28

    in reply to: Packers @ Rams #92916
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: reactions to the 1st SF game #92729
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: Packers @ Rams #92709
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Is Green Bay the biggest game so far?

    I’m thinking…probably not. They are about as capable of beating the Rams as the Vikings and Chargers were, and they are coming off a bye week. But I think the Vikes and Chargers – neither of whom have lost since the Rams beat them – are probably a notch better than Green Bay.

    The Rams should win. But they should win every game. I mean…they will be favored in every game the rest of the season in the betting line.

    A win sets up an 8-0 team going into New Orleans. That would be some kind of story.

    I am in favor of that scenario, so put me down as voting Yes on that.

    I don’t think Green Bay is very good. If they had a normal QB I think they would be in the bottom 1/3 of the league.

    But they do have Rogers so they’ll be dangerous.

    But I wouldn’t be surprised if the Rams won fairly easily.

    If somwehow we both win on Sunday, I would not be shocked if the Saints are favored, because the game is in New Orleans.

    in reply to: Rams @ 49ers #92653
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I’m getting this weird vibe, the game is going to be a Rams blowout. Anyone else getting that? Rams42-49ers 10

    I was a field goal short

    in reply to: Rams @ 49ers #92620
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I’m getting this weird vibe, the game is going to be a Rams blowout. Anyone else getting that? Rams42-49ers 10

    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Now…whether something else can be worked out or not, I don’t know. I haven’t really read about the politics in San Diego, but what other choice is there? I mean…one would think the Chargers would eventually catch on in LA, especially if they won.

    The other choices outside of San Diego, the Cargers have is Mexico City which I have talked about, and Mexico loves the NFL, another is over in England, where the NFL would love to put an NFL franchise, lets not forget, but probably won’t happen, still these names will be considered though, Anaheim, St. Louis, Portland(Oregon), and San Antonio.

    in reply to: Worries #92462
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: Tweets – 10/15 Rams sign WR Nick Williams, cut K Santos #92451
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I wonder if we should consider drafting another Kicker soon? Legatron seems like he can’t stay healthy. I’ll have to eventually look after the year is out at next years class of possible late round to undrafted kickers who may have a chance of making a team.

    in reply to: reactions, Denver game #92371
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    It pleases me that denver lost because their player taunted a ram player.

    A lesson for the entire NFL.

    w
    v

    They were taunting us on the Rams Huddle board. They feel we are illegal aliens. Not from another country, but from another planet. I live in Reading(PA), my area may seem like that, but still.

    in reply to: reactions, Denver game #92367
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I saw one highlight, one was where we got called for a pass interference against us in the end zone, which later Denver scored one to make it 23-20. There was no way in H.E, Double Hockey sticks that was pass interference. Even one of the people on NFL Network, said even if if you were to push him, for the pass, that ball was way over Sutton’s head. No chance to catch it.

    in reply to: Can the Rams beat the Broncos? #92326
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I saw we won 3 straight against Denver and 4 of our last 5. Interesting.

    in reply to: Maher on climate change #92314
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    A couple of older videos

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 4 months ago by JackPMiller.
    in reply to: The problem of the Senate #92254
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Jamil Smith: Watch the Georgia Minority Vote Disappear Before Your Eyes

    Jamil Smith: Watch the Georgia Minority Vote Disappear Before Your Eyes
    Brian Kemp, the Republican running against Democrat Stacey Abrams, is blocking more than 53,000 people from the polls over a technicality, continuing his history of voter suppression
    By Jamil Smith

    My younger sister lives in the Atlanta area, and, like any annoying brother, I’ve been hounding her about something. I texted her this week to make sure that she is registered to vote. Not because I’m worried that she’ll be one of these Millennials Who Doesn’t Vote, but because she is black and living in Georgia, and could fall victim to Brian Kemp’s voter suppression tactics.

    Kemp is Georgia Secretary of State, the state’s top elections official. He has decreased the overall number of voters in Georgia since 2012 by more than 1 million — all while purging the rolls in a way that has predominantly affected black residents. Kemp is also the Republican nominee for governor. Democrat Stacey Abrams, the first African American woman nominated by a major party for that job anywhere in the country, is competing against a rival who is also the referee.

    Most candidates don’t want to be seen as cheaters. But for Republicans like Kemp, necessity outweighs propriety. Republicans have nothing else to sell, really. The tax cut is a bust, and I’m not sure how the Brett Kavanaugh fight helps Kemp as he runs against arguably the best-known female challenger on a ballot this November.

    This past Tuesday, the deadline for Georgia residents to register to vote, the AP reported that at Kemp’s insistence, more than 53,000 voter applications have been suspended indefinitely. More than two-thirds of those applications were filed by black people. As the AP report makes clear, a lot of people in Georgia don’t even know that this has happened to them. One woman, while trying to demonstrate to her college students how Georgians can verify their registration, discovered that she had been removed from the rolls, herself. She and tens of thousands may have to submit a provisional ballot if their issues are not rectified in the next three weeks and change.

    Abrams is within half a percentage point of Kemp in the RealClear Politics average as of this week. Already implicated in a failed effort to close seven of nine polling places in a sparsely populated but majority-black county, it is clear that Kemp and his allies understand how close this race will be. Those 53,000 voters could make all the difference in this race, which he surely realizes. Even if this was a blowout, his move would be suspect.

    Kemp’s campaign didn’t respond to Rolling Stone’s request for comment. Spokesman Ryan Mahoney told the AP in a statement that, “Kemp is fighting to protect the integrity of our elections and ensure that only legal citizens cast a ballot.” The aforementioned registrations were held up by the state’s controversial “exact match” verification policy. If a word is misspelled, an address not updated, or even a hyphen is out of place, a Georgia voter could end up in Kemp’s limbo. “Exact match” is a process that civil rights groups have sued to end, and that Kemp had been told was discriminatory eight years ago, before he implemented it. Yet his campaign would have us believe Kemp as an avenger, supposedly protecting democracy even as he mutilates it.

    Five years after the neutering of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. Holder, we have gotten used to Republican voter suppression being a part of every election cycle. Along with police violence and mass incarceration, it is Jim Crow’s longest living descendant. Just in the past week, North Dakota’s voter-ID law got the Supreme Court’s sign-off, likely disenfranchising many tribal Native American residents who either don’t have an address on their identification or don’t have an ID at all. Missouri’s voter-ID measure was blocked by a state circuit judge, but Arkansas’ Supreme Court ruled in favor of its state’s law — which looks a lot like the one that the same court blocked four years ago. For Republicans looking to jimmy open new pathways to power, consistency is an afterthought, especially when few of these stories garner the kind of press that Shelby case did. Where there is no attention, there is no accountability.

    Kemp’s actions reflect the worst instincts of Republicanism by placating those who believe President Trump’s lie about millions of illegal votes being cast against him. Kemp no doubt excites Americans who think that voter ID laws, discriminatory purges and other suppressive measures are here to save us from those who would thwart our electoral system. People in this camp obscure the con this way, further mutilating democracy even as they claim to be covering its wounds.

    The Abrams campaign sees through it. Calling upon Kemp do away with “exact match” and to resign his position as Secretary of State, Abrams spokeswoman Abigail Collazo tells Rolling Stone that Kemp’s move to “silence” thousands of eligible voters “isn’t incompetence; it’s malpractice.”

    Kemp tried to smooth things over on Wednesday by boasting about how Georgia broke its record for registered voters: more than 6,915,000 are eligible to vote this November. In announcing the registration record, Kemp was defensive and outright conspiratorial. “While outside agitators disparage this office and falsely attack us,” his office said in a Wednesday statement, “we have kept our head down and remained focused on ensuring secure, accessible, and fair elections for all voters.” Naturally, he expected applause for this, as if this was his accomplishment. But it was Abrams and her New Georgia Project that, for about five years now, has been working consistently to not only get 800,000 people on the rolls, but particularly to encourage those from marginalized groups to vote.

    In return for the help in doing his job, Kemp blamed the victims. His office told the AP’s Ben Nadler that Abrams and the New Georgia Project were directly responsible for their need to interrupt those 53,000 voter applications. Kemp “accuses [her] organization of being sloppy in registering voters, and says they submitted inadequate forms for a batch of applicants that was predominantly black,” wrote Nadler, offering no proof to substantiate his claim. But how else is he to legitimize his discrimination against black Georgians — only 32 percent of the state’s population and yet nearly 70 percent of Kemp’s suspended voters? Too many of them were registered by Stacey Abrams, it’s her fault.

    Republicans have been proud of their suppressive measures in the past, even if they try to cloak them in this false crusade against voter fraud. But Kemp has added a new twist. Outside of über-suppressor Kris Kobach’s run in Kansas, no other governor’s race has a candidate not just working the referee, but being the referee. In the Trump era, Kemp must know that there is no need to be coy about just what Republicanism is now, and how it is exercised.

    After I texted with my sister about the Kemp news, she told me she will check her registration again. That seems wise. Georgians should do the same today. Then perhaps next week, too. Brian Kemp is trying to shape his own electorate in a tight race against a black woman already making history. He has about 25 days left. Unless the courts stop him, who knows what he’ll do next?

    in reply to: The problem of the Senate #92250
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    https://www.salon.com/2018/10/10/north-dakota-ruling-shows-how-supreme-court-could-hurt-democrats-chances-to-retake-senate/

    North Dakota ruling shows how Supreme Court could hurt Democrats’ chances to retake the Senate
    Supreme Court effectively upholds strict voter ID law, jeopardizing Democratic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp’s re-election

    On Wednesday the Supreme Court refused to halt a voter ID law in North Dakota that will effectively disenfranchise thousands of Native Americans, a key constituency of the most vulnerable red-state Democratic senator.

    In April a federal district court order required state officials to accept ballots even if voters’ ID included only a mailing address rather than a specifically residential address. As The Wall Street Journal reports, this effectively thwarted the state’s voter ID law, which by requiring a home address from potential voters disproportionately targeted Native Americans, who are more likely to be homeless. Last month, however, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the previous court order, putting the Voter ID law back into effect. To counter this, a group of Native Americans petitioned the Supreme Court to toss out the appeals court order.

    The Supreme Court refused to do so, although Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a dissent from that decision that was joined by Justice Elena Kagan. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, whose first day on the bench was Tuesday, did not participate in the decision:

    The risk of voter confusion appears severe here because the injunction against requiring residential-address identification was in force during the primary election and because the Secretary of State’s website announced for months the ID requirements as they existed under that injunction. Reasonable voters may well assume that the IDs allowing them to vote in the primary election would remain valid in the general election. If the Eighth Circuit’s stay is not vacated, the risk of disfranchisement is large. The Eighth Circuit observed that voters have a month to “adapt” to the new regime. But that observation overlooks specific fact findings by the District Court:

    (1) 70,000 North Dakota residents — almost 20% of the turnout in a regular quadrennial election — lack a qualifying ID; and (2) approximately 18,000 North Dakota residents also lack supplemental documentation sufficient to permit them to vote without a qualifying ID.

    Because North Dakota is so sparsely populated, “it could be that a couple of hundred votes matter,” Robert Wood, a political-science professor at the University of North Dakota, told The Wall Street Journal. The key election going on in that state is for the United States Senate, with Democratic incumbent Sen. Heidi Heitkamp fending off a challenge from Republican Rep. Kevin Cramer. Although Heitkamp has been one of Trump’s stronger supporters among Democrats in the Senate, she is nevertheless considered vulnerable due to the fact that North Dakota voted heavily for Trump in the general election. Recent polls have found her between 10 points and 12 points behind Cramer.

    Heitkamp recently made news for her willingness to oppose Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court even though another conservative Democrat, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, ultimately supported him. As she explained to CNN in an interview, she made this decision in part by deciding to rewatch Kavanaugh’s testimony with the sound turned off on her television.

    “It’s something I do. We communicate not only with words, but with our body language and demeanor,” Heitkamp explained. “I saw somebody who was very angry, who was very nervous, and I saw rage that a lot of people said, ‘well of course you’re going to see rage he’s being falsely accused,’ but it is at all times you’re to acquit yourself with a demeanor that’s becoming of the court.”

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 5 months ago by JackPMiller.
    in reply to: reactions to the Seattle game #92037
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    i know Peters struggled all day, even though the one TD, the WR was out of bounds and was not called, but he has to play better as well. Plus, I hope that Cooks and Kupp will be ready against Denver next week, because the way our defense has been playing, we need our offense to outscore the Broncos.

    in reply to: Kavanaugh #91890
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: Kavanaugh #91875
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    To me- the only hope is in the voter booths. If we can take congress then Trump will be severely limited. Any hope that congress as its constituted now can change what we’ve seen happening these last two years is foolhardy. Partisanship on steroids has created too much of a divide. So how do we get out the vote? Republicans have been at my door and on my phone daily. They do a great job. But democrats? Do they remember how to win elections?

    You may have been listed in the system somehow as a republican. It comes up that way. I have worked in those. The system works in that republicans call republicans and democrats call democrats. It is in there system, same as to knocking on the doors. It is a computer thing that happens, they have a list and you were on their list.

    in reply to: i get wanting to protect qbs #91782
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    even tweaking rules making it harder for offensive linemen to block defensive linemen.

    protect the qb so they can stay healthy. but make it easier for defensive backs to cover and defensive linemen to sack qbs LEGALLY.

    to me at least. it would be a more exciting game.

    Football is not football the way it used to be. Frustrating. I can see making it a little safer, but seeing these roughing the passer penalties, is just sad, and I agree with you on illegal contact calls. Five yards down the field. My @$$. Tired of this defenseless WR crap as well. Granted, I don’t want anyone to get hurt, but it is football, and it is a violent game, and the players knew what they signed up for.

    I would have a hard time seeing guys like Ray Nitchke, Dick Butkis, “NightTrain” Lane, Bill Curtis, Lawrence Taylor, and others, having to try and play with thesse rules. In the words of Vince Lombardi,

    in reply to: Kavanaugh #91761
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    Kavanaugh

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 5 months ago by JackPMiller.
    in reply to: do the Rams have a prayer against Seattle in Seattle? #91753
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    With no Earl Thomas there for the Seahawks. Rams 38 – Seahawks 9

    in reply to: Kavanaugh #91745
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    in reply to: Kavanaugh #91724
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 5 months ago by JackPMiller.
Viewing 30 posts - 1,141 through 1,170 (of 2,099 total)