Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 631 through 660 (of 1,028 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Steven Jackson Cut His Dreads #27359
    Herzog
    Participant

    All these ex-great running backs hang out together?

    in reply to: playing with Bailey's numbers #27224
    Herzog
    Participant

    This information does not seem to be correct. ESPN has Bailey at 435 yard for the entire 2014 season.

    in reply to: RIP my sister Carol #26903
    Herzog
    Participant

    I’m so sorry for your loss

    in reply to: If Fisher does not top 9-7 this year, does SK fire him? #26741
    Herzog
    Participant

    I’d probably give him another year, no matter what.
    I just haven’t seen any “Linehan level” bad coaching.

    I simply can…not…ignore the Bradford injuries. Two
    years in a row. How did Bruce Arians team look
    after Carson went down?

    I’m not sold on Fisher yet, but I’m not unsold
    on him either — if that makes any sense.

    If Fisher doesn’t have a winning team by year 9
    though, I’m gonna start lighting the torches.

    w
    v

    I’m with you on this. Well, not the year 9 thing, but everything else.

    in reply to: time for the "how did you become a Rams fan" thread #26707
    Herzog
    Participant

    My story is unremarkable and bland, but I’ll tell it anyway.

    I grew up in a small town in Missouri, which means we all followed the religion that was the St. Louis Cardinals….BASEBALL TEAM. Back then Whitey Herzog was taking them to the world series every other year, you can probably guess why it’s my name on here. I wanted that man to adopt me. I watched and/or listened to every game, even in school. Sometimes the teachers would notice, but they didn’t care, b/c they too loved the cardinals.

    The st. louis football team at the time was the Cardinals. I was in Junior high school when Neil Lomax was doing his thing, and I was a fan, but hardly cared about football.

    It wasn’t until they announced that they were leaving that the big void filled my heart. I couldn’t believe they left and I was just so sad about it. I have no idea why. I was just a kid so who knows.

    Years went by and I got older, started watching more football and realized I love the game. When rumors started to fly around that St. Louis might get an expansion team called the Stallions, I was very interested and primed to be a lifetime fan. It broke my heart when we didn’t them.

    Then it happened. The L.A. Rams were moving to St. Louis. I thought Rich Brooks was going to be the next great coach and I was simply in love. Chris Miller and Isaac Bruce…OH LORD it was fun to watch.

    I have to admit that I love this team more than my beloved Cardinals. Which is saying a lot. I will always be a Rams fan no matter where they go. Still, I will have a very heavy heart when they leave the Gateway City.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 5 months ago by Herzog.
    in reply to: correlation between penalties and winning? #26706
    Herzog
    Participant

    AlbaNY_Ram

    there doesn’t seem to be a correlation between reduced penalties and winning.

    Last year the 8 most penalized teams (with number of penalties and record) were:

    Seattle (151, 12-4)
    New England (138, 12-4)
    Indianapolis (127, 11-5)
    Detroit (126, 11-5)
    Buffalo (124, 9-7)
    St. Louis (123, 6-10)
    Denver (122, 12-4)
    Baltimore (120, 10-6)

    On the other end of the scale Jacksonville was the least penalized team with 73 and they finished 3-13.

    So sad that the Rams are the only Shiest team on that list. Sigh.

    in reply to: A quote I liked #26693
    Herzog
    Participant

    Yeah but the quote sorta implies that prior to this year he wasn’t as dedicated to mastering his craft as he is now. I think it takes some of the really special athletes time to figure out that athleticism by itself isn’t enough in the NFL.

    I just took it as (potentially) a Brian Quick situation, ie. he’s breaking through. Going from more green to more savvy. I don’t think it meant he didn’t work before.

    Yeah, I agree with you. Although I still don’t think he’ll be any good.

    Herzog
    Participant

    That explains the down years.

    in reply to: "Why the Rams can't build an offense around Todd Gurley" #26522
    Herzog
    Participant

    Well. OK, so I don’t think the Rams are planning on building a team around Gurley with bad quarterback play.

    Also, no mention of defense

    NO mention of Seattle winning the superbowl building a team around Lynch and a great defense.

    in reply to: Rams defense seeking fast start, consistency in 2015 #26494
    Herzog
    Participant

    To get there, the Rams will have to eliminate the big plays they had a knack for giving up in 2014. More often than not, those came as a result of a miscommunication or blown coverage on the back end. On pass attempts of 30 yards or longer, the Rams gave up just seven completions, which was tied for 12th in the NFL. But those plays often turned into bigger gains that went for touchdowns which is why the Rams gave up 29.71 yards per attempt on such passes, worst in the NFL. Five of those went for touchdowns.

    This could be a result of blitzing too much.

    Herzog
    Participant

    Good read…very interesting.

    Herzog
    Participant

    As a baseball Cardinal fan lifer, that just blew my mind.

    So she has a rep among Cards fans?

    Not at all, Just that her father, Mike Shannon has been doing Cardinal broadcasts for DECADES….just interesting, for no good reason.

    Herzog
    Participant

    Did I read that right? Greg Williams is Erin Shannon’s husband? As a baseball Cardinal fan lifer, that just blew my mind.

    in reply to: Rams interested in locking Foles up longterm #26370
    Herzog
    Participant

    As long as it is in form of a prorated bonus, they can give him a healthy check this year.

    We don’t want the cap hit to be too big next year. We have a bunch of FAs we might want to sign. I think we could handle 20 million, maybe a bit more. 15 million would be better. imo

    A lot of own players to resign next year too.

    in reply to: Brockers taking his game to a new level #26319
    Herzog
    Participant

    He could improve by leaps and bounds, but it may not show up in the stat line due to the position he plays. I hope he shines, he’s always been on of my favorite Rams.

    in reply to: Boudreau #26318
    Herzog
    Participant

    There might be a step backward to go forward but I think we’ll be OK in the long run,

    Looks like another 8-8 season.

    in reply to: Fisher pleased with Nick Fairley's conditioning #26195
    Herzog
    Participant

    Five pounds of muscle a week?

    I dunno. Is that possible?

    w
    v

    No Way No HOW. He’ll gain mostly fat.

    in reply to: Evan Mathis anyone? #26163
    Herzog
    Participant

    pay the man! we got the cap room don’t we?

    in reply to: Killer, back-breaking, TD-returns #26114
    Herzog
    Participant

    I am totally ok with starting a couple
    young, healthy, big, heavy, maulers
    on the OLine.

    Just keep it simple,
    and play the Lombardi way
    and execute.

    w
    v

    I am much more “have to seem em first before I can say.”

    Though in principle, I have nothing against young, healthy, big, heavy maulers on the OL.

    Not so much for dentists.

    .

    You know I’m a dentist right? Everyone hates us

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams lack a dominant offensive trio #26084
    Herzog
    Participant

    Qualitative and speculative. Meh.

    dido

    in reply to: OTAs week 2 … et c'est fini #26081
    Herzog
    Participant

    This is where I really miss Tony Softli. Uncle Tony was good for some relevant scouting info and for calling Steven Jackson a “war daddy.” Come back, Uncle Tony.

    I thought Brockers was the “War daddy”.

    in reply to: reviews of Mad Max: Fury Road are over the top #26044
    Herzog
    Participant

    Cool, I can talk about movies here. I saw it and it was a great film, however I took my pregnant wife and that might have been a mistake.

    Yeah, that’s not a who’s who of take the pregnant wife movies.

    Did I mention to you all that I’m having a kid? It’s my first! We’ve been trying forever….three more months …KNOCK ON WOOD

    in reply to: Foles & play action, 2013 & 2014 #26043
    Herzog
    Participant

    I don’t think that point can be driven home hard enough.

    If our OL RUN blocks well, which should be about 50% of the play calls, then you have the Play Action passes which I presume is 33% of the remaining 50%, thus 17% rounding up, then optimistically, the amount of Run or Run Affected blocking is in effect 67% of the time.

    That leaves only 33% of snaps where an opposing D can expect to be able to purely get off and rush. Combine that with the uncertainty of down, distance and situational football and it makes it hard for a defense to really pin their ears back.

    THIS PLAN CAN BE DEVASTATING. As the Eagles proved in 2013.

    The KEY is the RUN BLOCKING of the OL. If the OL blocks well and the D has to focus on the run essentially 67% of the time knowing that a run play typically gains near 5 ypa and they have to play COMMITTED run D because big gains are a very real possibility (hence the NEED for a RB like Gurley), then the OL will face a DL that won’t have the same “get off” that DLs do when facing pass happy teams. That will allow rookies and less than all-pros to play effectively within the confines of a relatively simple system because the focus will be on execution.

    Again, we saw that in how they drafted. They chose guys who showed that they knew how to execute, especially Havenstein who led the way on most of Gordon’s big runs at Wisconsin AND was extremely effective in pass pro only having one holding penalty all year and giving up zero sacks.

    I like it. This whole plan hinges on a very effective running game.

    Yeah I like it.

    in reply to: OL speculations after OTAs week 1 #26015
    Herzog
    Participant

    That’s a lot better than I thought. If Havenstein is the only Rookie starting, than I would feel so much more comfortable. Dare I say even optimistic.

    Herzog
    Participant

    Fisher has to reign Williams in the way Vermeil did with Martz.

    Jenkins has to stop being Jenkins.

    THAN I think we might have something.

    in reply to: Simmons: Offensive Line Beginning to Take Shape #25953
    Herzog
    Participant

    Hmmmm…. Now I’m starting to get excited

    in reply to: Tweets and stuff – 6/4 OTAs #25863
    Herzog
    Participant

    That offensive line would probably get us the number one overall pick next year

    in reply to: more on Gurley #25834
    Herzog
    Participant

    I wish they’d stop mentioning Adrian Peterson. Remember when Ricky Williams was the next Earl Campbell? I’m hoping this doesn’t Jinx him

    in reply to: reviews of Mad Max: Fury Road are over the top #25831
    Herzog
    Participant

    Cool, I can talk about movies here. I saw it and it was a great film, however I took my pregnant wife and that might have been a mistake.

    in reply to: Rams plan to release WR Bud Sasser #25830
    Herzog
    Participant

    I wonder what kind of heart condition he could have. Sucks.

Viewing 30 posts - 631 through 660 (of 1,028 total)