Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantBritt and Givens are two very different wrs. Givens was a straight up burner and Britt’s game is power/redzone contested catches. Givens was a 4th round record setting rookie . Britt’s is a underwhelming 1st round pick. Givens went down hill quick and Britt has teased of a rebirth since coming to the Rams. Britt is 6’3″ Givens was 5’11” in boots. Britt 223lbs Givens 195lbs. With all due respect Zn what in the hell are you talking about ?
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantOne of the knocks on Wentz coming out was the level of competition. I too preferred Wentz and I considered the level of competition argument meaningless. NDSU has put quite a few players in the NFL.I think Goff will be just fine but it will take a while.
September 15, 2016 at 5:42 am in reply to: Scientific American asks Stein, 2 bozos and a no show questions #52958Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantTrump’s answers were the best.
Yeah nothing would fix education like “market forces”. At least Clinton has a
brain disease, Trump is just fucking stupid.Eternal Ramnation
Participanti’m hoping cooper and spruce get healthy soon and make a real contribution to this offense.
At least stacking 9 or 10 in the box would stop , Spruce in the slot takes away your nickle from run D.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantWhere was this guy when Martz was run out of town ?
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantEternal Ramnation
Participantthat is not true ER. numbers mean nothing in themselves you have to interpret them. you and I interpret the reasons for the record differently
I interpret the 65 games coached by Fisher as 65 games coached by Fisher. You can argue your interpretation and I am pulling for you and your happiness on this but the number 65 is not open to interpretation.
Yes things have to be interpreted. For example you have already done that. You have interpreted the record as being a direct result of Fisher’s coaching. I don’t.
I interpret the 1st 2 years as a result of rebuilding plus losing a starting qb.
I interpret the next 2 years as being an example of what happens when a team does not have a starting qb AND has issues with the OL.
Given how I see that, 7-9 in 2015 was actually quite an achievement. That is, it doesn’t matter who the coach is if all you have for 2 years is BOTH no qb (only #2 types plus a starter who fell apart and melted down) AND big issues with the OL (injuries, and then inexperience PLUS injuries). I cannot think of any team that won under those dual conditions.
So numbers are not real…they are always the products of interpretation.
YOu look at the numbers and say see, bad coach.
I look at the numbers and say see, what do you expect when they have that kind of double problem.
You think (it seems) it’s natural and inevitable that the coach is the final cause and source of blame for that.
I think it;s natural and inevitable that any coach would have problems if they faced that kind of double problem for 2 years running.
.
I hear you Zn but it’s not my argument . I am fully aware of your ability to talk me down of ledge year after year and I admire that quality. The sample size is not 1 game. I don’t deny injuries play their part and Fisher is not at fault for everything in every game every season and there have been some great games for which I give Fisher his due but sometimes it does come down to coaching. Last night he said he didn’t expect that out of them, the same thing he said after the vikes crushed us at home on the opener in 14′. If he doesn’t expect it why do I ?The roster has changed dramatically since those days but the team that showed up last night was the same team that showed up in 2014 and I do interpret that to be the coach.
Eternal Ramnation
Participantthat is not true ER. numbers mean nothing in themselves you have to interpret them. you and I interpret the reasons for the record differently
I interpret the 65 games coached by Fisher as 65 games coached by Fisher. You can argue your interpretation and I am pulling for you and your happiness on this but the number 65 is not open to interpretation.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantIt’s not just one game it’s 65 games now.
I don’t look at it that way at all.
The “why not” is a longer response, and so will have to wait.
No explanation necessary Zn but the number is a fact and not a perception.You look at it differently because you can and it works for you.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantWill Brinson
@WillBrinson
Final updated Rams drive chart. This is not a joke nor a drill:PUNT
PUNT
PUNT
INT
PUNT
PUNT
PUNT
PUNT
PUNT
PUNT
INT
PUNT
TURNOVER ON DOWNS
10:19 PM – 12 Sep 2016That’s not accurate , they ended the game kneeling in victory formation….losing 28 to 0
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantIt’s not just one game it’s 65 games now. I sure don’t need to see another game like that one
in my life time.The fact that they have rebounded after poor performance time after time makes it worse.This team is an undisciplined inconsistent mess. The only constant has been losses like this and coach Jeff Fisher. If you want to go to the home opener there are still seats available from $175.00 to $225.00.Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantWell if it doesn’t endanger their water supply why did they reroute it from going under Bismark’s water supply to going under Standing Rock’s water supply? Hmmm, seems your search for hypocrisy has taken a turn.
Eternal Ramnation
Participant10-4 good buddy. I went back and listened to the post game from the opener vs. viking from 2014 and I really wished I hadn’t .
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantThere was a flicker of hope there during the 3rd . I thought Mo played well but I gotta put this on the coach. I think even the really good players on Defense have seen this one too many times. That death kneel at the end (which we have seen before ) was just too much. We’ve seen this through 3 or 4 OC’s sooner or later Fisher needs to answer for it.
-
This reply was modified 8 years, 5 months ago by
Eternal Ramnation.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantI predict the Rams are shut out 28 to 0
September 12, 2016 at 12:59 pm in reply to: Wentz looks pretty good & other gameday observations #52702Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantWell the Patz beat Arizona.
I didn’t see that much of the game.
Did anyone else? How did Arizona look?
The AZ defense looked good but not great. Palmer is declining. Fitzgerald was a monster! There were zero rbs resembling Marshall Faulk.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantHis philosophy of keeping it close and somebody making a play to win it is a recipe for disaster . That and evaluating WRs .
September 3, 2016 at 9:12 am in reply to: informal poll: Goff not starting, being #3 – disaster? not concerned? #52108Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantCam had about the same preseason performance as Goff. I’m not concerned , how long did Aaron Rodgers sit ? I do think coaching plays a part. He got one series with the ones, hardly enough time to develop. Putting him in with 2’s and 3’s against the opponent’s ones exposed him to more punishment and injury and was pretty stupid imo.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantI read the media’s versions first and then watched. Defense looked pretty damn good and is it just me or did Williams bring a little extra after Zimmer called him dirty last year on Joyner’s hit on Bridgewater ? Zimmer looked like he was crying on the sidelines after both his QB’s took that beating. Morgan Fox who I had never heard of looked unblockable. I didn’t think Goff was terrible. The int looked like a fluke to me and they didn’t give him too much to work with. That throw to Britt was freakish. Thomas might have just cut Quick who looked terrible again. Two muffed punts and KR TD special teams not looking well.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantGood for Sam ! As a person he’s top notch, something that gets lost when your team struggles.Had to be tough watching his team move up and pick Wentz but he’s still younger than Warner was in AZ so , still time to leave his mark.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantThey let us take deer we hit here most of the time anyway. You hit a moose though and you’re lucky if you’re not seriously injured yourself.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantTree looks to have made up some ground and the front seven looked to me like they
were playing as a unit. TruJo was less than spectacular and Joyner was awful. Hard to compare because the Rams were subbing in 2’s and 3’s in the 1st and Denver still had starters in during the 3rd. Why can’t the Rams get wrs that can catch? The new TEs were dropping stuff as well.Magee ripped off a nice 73yrd run .Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantI actually watched their preseason games and they look horrible. That of course means squat but Palmer looked much worse than his back up did and the OL was not good at all.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantAugust 23, 2016 at 4:55 am in reply to: youtube party…post a song you like which you think is not that widely known #51437Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantEternal Ramnation
Participantwell keenum has maybe the best oline the rams have had in several years. a very good running back in gurley. he’s starting to get some receivers around him. keenum might have it better than any rams qb in the fisher era. i would think. i think he’s set up for success. or at least compared to every other rams qbs in the fisher era.
Yes , yes and yes also it’s not like Goff is lost he learns very quickly you could see him improving play by play. The D on the other hand has me worried, we need Gaines to be who he was two years ago and Trujoe has looked less than stellar so far. The lbs are missing JL’s knowledge and leadership and saftey is a mess. The younger guys have made some plays but still
watching KC and Dallas just roll over the starters was not good.Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantI don’t see anyone stopping this run game. The D doesn’t look right just yet. I watched live on Game Pass and had to listen to K.C announcers just awful . It was like they wouldn’t even mention a Rams player’s name and holding interviews during the game completely ignoring the Rams play.Worse than the infamous preseason Browns game a few years back.
Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantAs usual I was out on the ledge watching our pitiful D give up 2 TD’s to a rookie qb
taken after Goff. Hate the home whites uni decision . That first quarter was brutal. But I do
this every preseason . Seems like 17 years since the Rams looked well prepared.August 9, 2016 at 1:03 pm in reply to: Reich vs. Hedges debate as to who should Bernie voters support now, + Chomsky #50451Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantThe problem for me is if I were to ever vote the lesser of two evils I would have to vote Trump. It’s really not even close . Trump has a record of failing at whatever he does. Hillary has done terrible things , Iraq, Libya , Syria ,Honduras , Haiti, the Ukraine and lot’s more. Trump talks about using nukes/ Hillary referring to nukes says nothing is off the table. Trump denies Climate Change , Hillary has promoted fracking all over the world and a tar sands oil pipeline
right here at home. You know the US has killed 1.3 million Muslims over a 5 year span with Hillary’s support , meanwhile Trump screwed some would be con men out of money at Trump U. Also a Trump presidency would last maybe 4 years, Clinton and the DNC blatantly cheated in the primary and got off scot-free, if she is not stopped now we’re looking at 8 years of this shit.That’s an interesting take and I can’t say I disagree with your premise that Hillary has done worse things over her political career than Trump has as a slimy business tycoon. However, her position and power gave her the ability to do greater evil. I think if Trump had that power he’d do even worse things. I guess that’s what this election is about – choosing between a known evil and a potentially greater evil.
What about the Supreme Court? If Trump is elected we could have a conservative SC for the next 30 years.
Honestly all the Supreme Court means to me is whether I prefer an AK/AR or an abortion. I do not believe we have 30 years to worry about if the status quo is maintained for 8 more years.
Margaret Davidson, NOAA’s senior advisor for coastal inundation and resilience science and services, and Michael Angelina, executive director of the Academy of Risk Management and Insurance, offered their take on climate change data in a conference session titled “Environmental Intelligence: Quantifying the Risks of Climate Change.”
RIMS16_conference logoDavidson said recent data that has been collected but has yet to be made official indicates sea levels could rise by roughly 3 meters or 9 feet by 2050-2060, far higher and quicker than current projections. Until now most projections have warned of seal level rise of up to 4 feet by 2100.
These new findings will likely be released in the latest sets of reports on climate change due out in the next few years.
“The latest field data out of West Antarctic is kind of an OMG thing,” she said.
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2016/04/12/405089.htm
August 9, 2016 at 3:49 am in reply to: Reich vs. Hedges debate as to who should Bernie voters support now, + Chomsky #50435Eternal Ramnation
ParticipantThe problem for me is if I were to ever vote the lesser of two evils I would have to vote Trump. It’s really not even close . Trump has a record of failing at whatever he does. Hillary has done terrible things , Iraq, Libya , Syria ,Honduras , Haiti, the Ukraine and lot’s more. Trump talks about using nukes/ Hillary referring to nukes says nothing is off the table. Trump denies Climate Change , Hillary has promoted fracking all over the world and a tar sands oil pipeline
right here at home. You know the US has killed 1.3 million Muslims over a 5 year span with Hillary’s support , meanwhile Trump screwed some would be con men out of money at Trump U. Also a Trump presidency would last maybe 4 years, Clinton and the DNC blatantly cheated in the primary and got off scot-free, if she is not stopped now we’re looking at 8 years of this shit. -
This reply was modified 8 years, 5 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts