Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 271 through 300 (of 1,055 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams extend Gurley 4 years, $60 million… #88529
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I dont care about any of this. I dont even care if the Rams go 0-16.

    What i DO care about is seeing Aaron F’ing Donald and Neanterthal Suh PLAY next to each other. I WANT to SEE that. I want to see the dogs of war unleashed. I want to see Ruination. Carnage. Slaughter. Shock and Woe.

    Thats all i care about. I dont care about cooks, gurley, or russians.

    So wake me up when AD signs.

    w
    v

    I suspect Brockers play to be stellar and well worth watching but you go ahead and snooze lots of Sunday night games this season.

    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    The thing is the tag situation could get messy cause it could easily lead to this: AD just sits out and demands a trade, and if the Rams don’t trade him, they still have the tag amount counting against the cap and don’t have HIM and don’t get anything for him. So I see a trade in that situation as likely, if it even gets to that.

    He lost an accrued year with last seasons holdout loses another on if he’s not in camp by Aug 7 the Rams can keep him with the tag through 2022 so Donald has a lot to lose as well. I think he gets signed soon but just trying to imagine a trade it’s hard to conceptualize what that would look like

    in reply to: Rams Sign Brandin Cooks to 5-Year Extension #88199
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Well now we’re set at Wr for a while,.

    in reply to: tweets … 7/10 – 7/11 #88003
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Oh My God the comments for the Jeff Fisher article are just brutal. I feel bad for the guy… he has been the laughing stock of the NFL. I don’t think anyone deserves that.

    I think he’d be a great DC or scouting Defensive talent but he’s lost when it comes to offense with the exception of RBs he could pick them. Most of those comments are generous as the Rams never won eight games with him as coach.

    in reply to: Democrats should get "centered" #87875
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    A move to the center is a radical step Left. Bernie Sanders is Center/Left and Hillary rotten Clinton is very nearly as far right as Trump. Any leftward movement would be a good thing!

    in reply to: recent interview with Marc Bulger #87835
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    First time watching Bulger play and all the hype was on McNabb I couldn’t understand why they weren’t raving about Bulger instead. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uy9Bg5cOmvA

    in reply to: Brown suspended #87826
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Next time drink kava instead bula!

    in reply to: 2018 NFL coach rankings: Bill Belichick and then … #87707
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I think he’s got McVay way underrated as was Pederson who beat Belichick in the Superbowl with a backup QB. Zimmer is a dick and I think he is the next Fisher waiting to happen.

    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    This a good podcast. Worth listening to.

    That was good , better than most.

    in reply to: Benoit: 10 Thoughts on the 2018 Rams #87487
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    He makes decent points but question marks don’t have to be flaws and if the were they wouldn’t be question marks.

    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    a report from whiners mini camp starts about 3.07

    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    If health is guaranteed then how could they not improve from last year. Everything I’ve seen says there’s a noticeable difference with this year’s O. A full Ota and mini camp (on offense) they look sharp . I’ve watched some from other teams and they aren’t sharp like the Rams. I watched some from the Whiners and they were pretty laid back same with KC.The Rams have an intensity, or focus that I don’t see in other teams.

    in reply to: the never ending "Donald's really good" thread #87092
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Whatever leverage he has comes to an end on Aug. 8, the deadline to preserve unrestricted free agent status at the end of the 2018 season or be downgraded to restricted. It’s a position Donald put himself in by holding out during training camp last year and losing an accrued season as a result. If he holds out again, he’d lose all rights to UFA at the end of the season.

    And that means:

    The Rams would preserve the right to use the franchise tag on him for 2019.

    They’d also have the right of first refusal on any deal he agrees to with another team.

    Or, in the event of not matching any offer, recoup a first-round pick.

    And in a worst-case scenario for Donald, it would also mean potentially playing the 2019 season at roughly $7.4 million should he fail to secure a new deal with the Rams or another team and the Rams simply re-upped him at 110 percent of his 2018 salary.
    It only gets worse if he holds out of games before the drop-dead deadline to preserve at least RFA status – the 10th game of the season – as that means absorbing fines and losing weekly paychecks. He’d have to be extraordinarily confident he could convince the Rams to eventually meet his demands to go that route. But really, how realistic is that?

    So, as you can see, the little leverage Donald has right now is evaporating pretty quickly.

    It makes you wonder at what point he realizes he’s running out of cards to play. And how quickly $20 million and change in annual salary and $70 million or so in guarantees begin to look good enough.

    Ouch!!!!

    in reply to: Rams on the anthem issue #86787
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I hope that all the Ram players kneel and win every game.

    Do you think Trump would invite them if that happened? He is such a turd.

    He already killed one pro football league and that was before twitter.

    in reply to: Rams 2018 receiver corps #86759
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    SOME thought that was the buzz. It was bogus. There was some message board panic about that but the reality according to regular observers at the time was that he was fine.

    Yeah that make sense I do remember that aspect now that you mention it. Still like what I’m hearing now a lot better.

    in reply to: Rams 2018 receiver corps #86734
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Wasn’t the buzz on Goff last season’s OTA’s that he was struggling throwing pics not looking sharp?Everything I’ve read about this seasons OTAs says he’s sharp even read somewhere he’s “on fire”.

    in reply to: why don't the national media guys see Goff coming? #86676
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    He’s shown more than Jimmy G has in 4 years but they’ve sure bought into his HOF destiny . Maybe they already wrote the story that Goff’s a bust and they’re just trying to hold out until it’s true. Goff and McVay are a great team. He’s shown growth that’s hard to miss . Remember after the Skins game the knock was he couldn’t read defenses and would lock on to Kupp fast foward to the Hags game when Earl Thomas said in his post game that Goff was getting better and actually moved ET off with his eyes. The ball was there in that game Kupp dropped it Kupp fumbled what would have been a 14-0 lead on the vikes. He killed it in the PA game granted having Gurley makes that a lot easier but imo he sells it better than most. 27 tds to 7 ints there are several QBs rated higher than Goff that weren’t even close in that dept. I think you underestimate Goff at your own peril this year. I don’t remember him throwing perfect 60 yard bombs in last years OTAs.

    in reply to: Obo breaks his foot, already had the surgery #86386
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Didn’t Brockers start out his first season with a foot injury?

    in reply to: tweets … 3/7 #85004
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Zn I think you mean 4/7

    in reply to: Rams trade for Brandin Cooks #84907
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    La ram on the cooks trade

    “IF you just want a player than can garner attention on deep routes you don’t have to give up a 1st rd pick and $8M per year for it.

    Go watch the Jacksonville playoff game where they knocked Cooks out of the game.

    Get physical with this smurf and you can take him outta his game.

    He’ll hit some deep routes on occasion and that will be it!!

    I don’t like this deal at all!!!

    Why have TWO passing teams given up on him already?

    He’s only 24 and on his third team already, why?

    I liked Cooks coming out, but after seeing how you defend him in the NFL he lost value for ME.

    With NE as well, because I’m pretty sure I know why they traded him.

    Limited tree and ….Soft!

    Cooks had a fantastic game against the Jags in the AFC title game. He had 6 catches for 100 yards and then had an additional 2 pi penalties for about 30 yards each.

    All together he was targeted 10 times and 8 of those targets resulted in positive results. Including the pi penalties, Cooks accounted for 160 yards in the title game. And that’s against what is supposed to be a talented secondary.

    Yeah actually Cooks got knocked out (concussion) in the Superbowl and N.E. doesn’t make it there without him. Cooks is definitely not soft, he’s not a big physical guy like Sammy but he is faster and runs better routes. If you watch him in N.O. he lines up all over the place his tree is extensive, honestly I don’t know what LA is talking about. My guess on why N.E. traded is they lost their LOT, Amendola and traded Jimmy G. A 40 something QB with no LOT, no backup they need to move up in the draft.

    in reply to: Rams trade for Brandin Cooks #84888
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I love it! Cooks a 4.3 burner that runs great routes and has great hands as well. I don’t think your getting anywhere close the that level a player at 23 in the draft. Sure it’s only a year but they’re already trying to extend him and with 100 million cap space next year if they like him they probably get it done. If Wade thinks Ebukam and Littleton can do it I trust him.

    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    They have a point on both inside and outside LBs but Donald , Brockers and Suh would supplant any of the other teams’ mentioned starters at their positions

    in reply to: OBJ trade talk? #84672
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Given OBJ’s most recent problem L.A. would not be a good place for him. The strategy of trading draft picks for proven players discounted for attitude or behavioral problems seemed to work last year but if your turning half your roster over every year the culture your trying to build with all talk of ” family” becomes a soulless corpofamily like the cheatriots. OBJ is an amazing player but he has also been amazingly selfish to the detriment of his team and instead of maturing it seems like he’s regressing with this latest demand of wanting a new contract coming of a season where he barely played.

    in reply to: did the rams overvalue joyner? #84449
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I believe Joyner was gone without the tag he is thought of very highly around the league. Last season it was night and day when he was in the game . He got hurt in the 9ers game and I think he came back in the London game. So many plays. Of course I like Watkin’s potential as well but I don’t think the Rams could afford him at the tag level. Might just be me but I didn’t like some of the low effort plays, quitting on routes etc.

    in reply to: Suh to visit Rams? #84301
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Donald ,Brockers and Suh would be insane!With the Rams secondary. Well it would be long boring games full of false starts sweeps and stretch runs and punts, lots of punting. Westbrook did great at nose and Brockers really came alive when they slid him to end. I trust Wade to come up with a winner.

    in reply to: Are the rams gonna win the super bowl? #84251
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Of fucking course they are.

    in reply to: Watkins signs with KC #83958
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Wonder if it means they keep Tavon?

    in reply to: Watkins signs with KC #83951
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Too much for the Rams. At least he didn’t go to the niners!

    in reply to: sammy watkins to stay? … ie. sammy, Rams, market, drama #83933
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Sammy’s a different cat and he likes his current team

    in reply to: League Adjusting to McVay? #83839
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    My issue is redzone offense.

    Here’s a stat. NFL Team Red Zone Scoring Percentage (TD only) https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/red-zone-scoring-pct

    Rams were 17th.

    Interestingly, look at who the top 5 were:

    Jacksonville
    Philadelphia
    New England
    Green Bay
    New Orleans

    I agree zn that was frustrating. I don’t think it’s as bad as the stats make it look because they had a relatively large number of scoring plays outside the redzone but still it was a noticeable problem in some games.

Viewing 30 posts - 271 through 300 (of 1,055 total)