I wonder if Archie Manning was ever a sperm donor?

Was JT in town when Bidwill flew the coop to AZ?

His email address is phonetically apropos. @FlemESPN

Fisher wants to win now. So a late first round draft pick for Bradford wouldn’t do and no team is insane enough to trade two first round picks for Bradford. This trade gets him a proven QB and draft picks. It also frees up a lot of cap space. Can’t fault anything with this trade unless you dislike Foles and he was the best that was offered. Fisher and Snead were not willing to risk another season and another $13 million on Bradford so this trade is the best option to improve now and build for the future. Bradford’s role in this trade should not be overlooked. He was unwilling to take a pay cut and still is doubtful to start the season. Fisher and Snead were forced into this trade.

• This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by bnw.
• This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by zn.
• This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by zn.

Must draft a QB.

Dak wrote:

Testes 1, 2, 3.

Bragging?

• This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by bnw.

zn wrote:

But the software has a couple of quirks.

testing

NFL.com screen scroll states if Bradford doesn’t play due to injury Eagles get a 3rd round pick. If Bradford does not play in 8 games Eagles get a 4th round pick.

Is it a done deal?

— X — wrote:

I don’t mind a little ribbing.
Do your worst.

What, no filling?

I’m still not sold on his deep ball.

Strains credulity.

zn wrote:

When a team like the Rams contain him, though, they can make it a long and miserable game for him.

I think the Rams match up well with them…it’s just that the last 4 times they played, the Rams had 3 different qbs.

.

Oh I agree! I think the lack of a QB is all that stands between the Rams and the playoffs if not winning the division.

Only in America can a woman get a compliment about her good looks and turn it into racism.

nittany ram wrote:

bnw wrote:
Weird thing is Russel Wilson probably does better when he is hurried.

Not according to PFF…

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2014/12/27/seahawks-russell-under-pressure/

I disagree with PFF. They are looking at numbers not outcome. I agree with the comments of this poster,

SeattleGuy • 2 months ago
When the pocket disappears and RW starts to improvise, he is much more dangerous than your simple analysis would indicate. First, let’s be honest. He often gets flushed out of the pocket and simply throws the ball away. Other times he gets sacked as when the Cards sacked him 7 times at the Clink and pressured him often in the desert. But when they missed, he threw long passes against them or ran for big yardage.

In fact if you combine your numbers with Brian Billick’s Toxic Differential, another “relationship” emerges. When you pressure Russell Wilson, you’d better damn well get to him or he’s going to kill you with big plays. Seattle leads the NFL in big play differential by a wide margin. Anyone paying attention can see that RW more than makes up for this fall off in QBR when he scrambles. He often breaks off big runs or throws long passes to wide open receivers or Marshawn Lynch. These are the plays that break a defense down and determine the outcome of a game. I can attest to that firsthand as a former Ram’s fan when Dryer and Youngblood would end up exhausted and totally frustrated chasing Fran Tarkenton for what seemed like a minute at a time.

So, don’t make the mistake of thinking Seattle is better off with quick passes. That a red herring as the team’s Toxic Differential proves. As one fan posted a few weeks ago, sure the Hawks O-line is crap and yes the receivers are garbage but Seattle leads the league in big plays? His recommendation? Throw away the play book. Who cares if your opponent sacks you for a 10 yard loss 5 times a game, if you offset that with a few 50-yard throws and runs? No DB can cover a pro receiver no matter how bad they are for 5 to10 seconds.