Why I think the Center is significantly better than the right.

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Why I think the Center is significantly better than the right.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #127033
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I know, I’m yet on another island here. But, I think there’s an important case to make for the radical difference between the lame-ass center and the all too violently disposed right.

    Boiled down, this is it:

    The Center does little to nothing to actually improve lives or save the environment, and all too often turns a blind eye to aggressive efforts on the right to do serious damage to both. This gives us abundant reason to be pissed off at centrists and moderates. But there is still an important difference between the two portions of the political spectrum. The most significant is in the way they seek to deflect from the absence of any viable program of aid or remedy.

    The Center tends to counter criticism with “We can’t move fast or go big on this, or we’ll lose political support.” The right counters their own empty agenda with endless lies to whip up their base into a frenzy of hate and fear. The assault on the Capitol, and the various smaller, targeted assassination attempts, is the result.

    As in, the Center relies on a sense that they’re basically helpless to do what needs to be done. This is of course a lie. But they virtually never seek to pit Americans against one another, or whip them up into an endless frenzy of fear and hatred. The right, OTOH, realizes they have no other method, whatsoever, to get through to their base. They offer them less than zero on economic or any other grounds, so they have to spin their base up into permanent frenzy. They can never let them spin down, calm down, or they’d lose them.

    To me, the danger in the two methods is rather obvious, and the effects are clearly quantitatively and qualitatively different. One stands in the way of progress, is all too lame, all too cowardly. But the other is an existential threat to all of us.

    Both demand strong leftist critique, but that critique, IMO, and the time spent on that critique, should be proportionally in accord with effects, dangers, etc. etc.

    Your thoughts are more than welcome.

    #127034
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Well I had a response based on body parts. One group is xxxxxxxx, the other group is xxxxxxx.

    But it wasn’t an appropriate response.

    But basically I think you’re right.

    #127035
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I’m a Mike Menet guy. Would love to see us draft him. Yes, he played Center, he played at Penn State.

    #127037
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I agree with you, Billy.

    #127047
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    It never ends for the right. This is a great example of what I’m talking about. Absolutely zero agenda to make lives better, so all they have is to whip up their base into a frenzy of fear and hate . . . and all too often on the tiniest sliver of nothingness as their supposed “proof.”

    Fox News pushes conspiracy theory about ‘reeducation camps’ on the eve of Biden’s inauguration

    Excerpt:

    Fox News ran several segments on Monday and Tuesday pushing a conspiracy theory on “reeducation camps” for Trump supporters.

    The ominous package on Tuesday relied on just two soundbites from liberal-leaning shows, including a Katie Couric appearance on HBO’s comedy program “Real Time with Bill Maher.”

    “Is the plan of Couric and others to cram everyone into a digital reeducation camp, or are they gonna set up a concentration camp like that for the Uighur Muslims in communist China to make sure everyone gets reeducated and deprogrammed?” co-host Dagen McDowell asked.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.