Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › well at this point, 11 days away
- This topic has 7 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 7 months ago by Isiah58.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 18, 2016 at 10:01 pm #42246znModerator
I’ve done a bit of reading and viewing, and I have come to a decision about the #1 pick.
I think they can’t go wrong no matter who it is.
I just think they get a somewhat different style of qb in each case. But it’s not as different as, say, choosing between Cam Newton and Tom Brady.
I have seen no convincing argument stating that either Goff or Wentz would be a BAD choice.
There’s also some things I don’t buy. I don’t buy for example that there’s a “Fisher style qb.” Nor is there such a thing as a qb who “better fits his offense.” To me a Fisher style qb is just a good qb. In terms of fitting his offense, either one can do it…they would just fit it differently. The offense will evolve to take best advantage of either qb going forward. It just will evolve somewhat differently depending on which one they pick. IMO it will work no matter which way it evolves.
If I am right and they are both worthy picks, what if one becomes more elite than the other, but they take the one that’s just good? Fine, no regrets on my part. I think when it comes to that both have qualities that might foreshadow being elite, but you don’t need elite. Just good. I base that on last year…they went 7-9 with a melted down qb and if they just got consistently decent qb play they would have won more. I think if you put either qb on last year’s team they would have been a playoff team.
To me a franchise qb is just a consistently good starter you’re not looking to replace, and I think either guy will fill the bill.
Which one do I prefer?
Right now I think…both.
…
April 18, 2016 at 10:21 pm #42248bnwBlockedOK then I’ll expect an additional something. I expect durability.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
April 18, 2016 at 11:17 pm #42253InvaderRamModeratorwell i do think there is such a thing as system fit. but that’s not to say that the rams couldn’t tweak the offense a little bit or that goff couldn’t adapt his game.
i’m really torn right now as to who the rams should pick. just want this over with, so i can stop reading about the other one. right now i’m actually thinking goff should be the pick, but i’m probably going to go back and forth several times before the draft.
April 18, 2016 at 11:52 pm #42255ZooeyModeratorGoff fumbles by year:
12 games, 10 fumbles
12 games, 9 fumbles
13 games, 4 fumblesWentz had 6 fumbles, and 3 fumbles.
I’m not seeing an important difference there.
April 19, 2016 at 12:21 am #42256PA RamParticipantI just hope it works out–whoever the pick is. It HAS to. They can’t screw this up–and maybe both are legitimate future stars in which case it’s just a question of flavor. I think most Rams fans will be excited with either guy.
If they shock the world and announce Hackenberg I’ll put my foot through the television.
I’m going to be glad to stop hearing the “Rams have no quarterback” comments.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
April 19, 2016 at 2:36 pm #42263Isiah58ParticipantI’ve done a bit of reading and viewing, and I have come to a decision about the #1 pick.
I think they can’t go wrong no matter who it is.
I just think they get a somewhat different style of qb in each case. But it’s not as different as, say, choosing between Cam Newton and Tom Brady.
I have seen no convincing argument stating that either Goff or Wentz would be a BAD choice.
There’s also some things I don’t buy. I don’t buy for example that there’s a “Fisher style qb.” Nor is there such a thing as a qb who “better fits his offense.” To me a Fisher style qb is just a good qb. In terms of fitting his offense, either one can do it…they would just fit it differently. The offense will evolve to take best advantage of either qb going forward. It just will evolve somewhat differently depending on which one they pick. IMO it will work no matter which way it evolves.
If I am right and they are both worthy picks, what if one becomes more elite than the other, but they take the one that’s just good? Fine, no regrets on my part. I think when it comes to that both have qualities that might foreshadow being elite, but you don’t need elite. Just good. I base that on last year…they went 7-9 with a melted down qb and if they just got consistently decent qb play they would have won more. I think if you put either qb on last year’s team they would have been a playoff team.
To me a franchise qb is just a consistently good starter you’re not looking to replace, and I think either guy will fill the bill.
Which one do I prefer?
Right now I think…both.
…
I am generally in agreement with every point you made.
I love both of these guys. I think that many of the assumptions of the national pundits and many fans too are a little off. For example, many believe that Wentz’ small school background will require a longer learning curve versus Goff’s Pac 12 background. I think this is less a factor when talking about a QB than other positions, but I also think that the pro-style offense that NDSU ran will more than make up for the jump in competition.
Also, while I marvel at some of the throws Goff made at Cal, and truly appreciate his timing and ability to throw guys open, I also wonder if those 50/50 balls he throws will work in the NFL. That said, I think he has shown toughness and a true skill at throwing the football, even if it is in a four wide, open passing attack.
I also agree with you that there is no “Fisher QB.” That is people trying hard to label Jeff Fisher. I think either fits with the type of offense that the Rams want to run, and both can be successful.
I think the Rams are due for a little QB luck. Yeah, there was Warner, but it has been a pretty dry period since. I think that with Gurley and a young but improving O-Line, our new QB is set up for success early if they can find another target for him in the draft.
Whoever they pick, you can be sure of one thing. No one on earth, including the Mel Kipers, the Daniel Jerimias, the Todd McShays, or any other entity will have invested more time and resources into this decision than the Rams. We are talking thousands of man-hours on this decision alone. This does not in any way guaranty that they make the right choice, but anyone who immediately claims that they blew it should at least concede that their opinion is based on far less information than the Rams had when they made the choice, including running both through the same workouts, asking them both the same questions in the meeting rooms, watching and dissecting every throw both of them have ever made in competition, and determining not which guy is the best passer or the best athlete, but which QB in the Rams’s system gives the Rams the best chance for a championship in the future.
Isiah 58
“Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel.” - Homer Simpson
April 20, 2016 at 12:53 am #42291znModeratorWhoever they pick, you can be sure of one thing. No one on earth, including the Mel Kipers, the Daniel Jerimias, the Todd McShays, or any other entity will have invested more time and resources into this decision than the Rams. We are talking thousands of man-hours on this decision alone. This does not in any way guaranty that they make the right choice, but anyone who immediately claims that they blew it should at least concede that their opinion is based on far less information than the Rams had when they made the choice, including running both through the same workouts, asking them both the same questions in the meeting rooms, watching and dissecting every throw both of them have ever made in competition, and determining not which guy is the best passer or the best athlete, but which QB in the Rams’s system gives the Rams the best chance for a championship in the future.
Isiah 58
I think that’s a very important point.
But then I also think it’s an important point because (like you) I don’t think they’re choosing between success and failure…I think they have a choice between 2 good qbs.
The nuances and analysis just gets down to which one they prefer to be a Ram for the next 10-15 years.
There’s a good chance they will go 1-2 in the draft, and I think that both are going to make it as regular starting NFL qbs.
The decision the Rams have to make is, sure, yeah, okay, both are going to be good, but…which one is the most best for us?
April 20, 2016 at 1:02 pm #42299Isiah58ParticipantEven “most best” is a relative term, right?
I mean, Sean Payton may have Goff as the “most best” QB because what Goff does best is better suited to Payton’s offensive philosophy. Whereas Wentz could be “most best” in a Bruce Arians type offense, similar to Palmer and Big Ben.
To me, the question you have to ask if you are the Rams, and be honest with your evaluations, is this: “What were we not getting with Foles and Keenum that, if we had that trait or skill, would have led to more victories?” That question, more than which one of these guys is technically the more proficient passer of the football, is critical to the Rams’ future success. But I submit to you that most of the fans/columnists/pundits/draft experts, etc., are not asking that question. They are watching YouTube highlights and trying to determine who is the best thrower, and ergo the proper choice for the Rams. Throwing is very important, but not sole determining factor that should determine this pick.
Isiah 58“Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel.” - Homer Simpson
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.