Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Russ Lande explains why cutting ties with Bradford is best option for Rams
- This topic has 39 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 10 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 29, 2014 at 6:06 am #14901GreatRamNTheSkyParticipant
Bradford is a liability with his health issues. It would be a gamble that if it fails and he is hurt again the Rams lose big time again. They are not going to pay him 16 million for the coming season so this whole bringing Bradford back issue may be up to Sam and his agent. Sam has done nothing to justify or earn the contract he was given or the money he’s been paid.
I doubt very, very much Sam would come close to such a contract with any other team. Only a moron would pay Bradford that kind of money again.
I don’t know what legit veteran starting QBs you could bring in. I would guess the Rams may have to trade for one. Secondly they’d probably have to give up their 1st round pick to get a veteran starter with any talent.
Bringing Shaun Hill back is a waste of time. He’s horrible! And he has proven his horrible over the last several games.
I think the only top grade College QB the Rams have a shot at is Brett Hundley and if I were the Rams I’d definitely take that shot. I think Hundley has the talent and the smarts and with good coaching could be a legit upper caliber starter in the NFL.
Then the other concern is the Rams need to continue to build their offensive line. What they have right now is not good enough.
Grits
December 29, 2014 at 10:36 am #14905TackleDummyParticipantI think the only top grade College QB the Rams have a shot at is Brett Hundley and if I were the Rams I’d definitely take that shot. I think Hundley has the talent and the smarts and with good coaching could be a legit upper caliber starter in the NFL.
That is probably right. But don’t count on him being any better than Hill or Davis in his first year.
December 29, 2014 at 11:20 am #14907joemadParticipantwhat QB out there is a better option that Bradford? Sorry, but Andrew Luck is not available.
Ryan, Kapernick, Brees, Rivers, Sanchez, Cutler, Smith, are not playing next week.
1) there are no playoff guarantees with high profile QBs.
BTW, all these guys, with exception of Kapernick, have a history of injury.
2) more often than not, QBs get hurt.
If you bail on Bradford, another QB is just as likely to get hurt.
December 29, 2014 at 1:03 pm #14934DakParticipantIf Bradford were a free agent this year, he’d be the top available QB on the market, imo.
December 29, 2014 at 1:42 pm #14937TackleDummyParticipantIf Bradford were a free agent this year, he’d be the top available QB on the market, imo.
If Bradford were not coming off of two ACL suguries you would be right for sure. On the free agent market right now the question becomes what qb teams would be willing to throw the dice and take a chance on Bradford and for what price? My guess there would be two or three who would give him an incentive ladened offer. I also think that the Rams will be one of those teams.
December 31, 2014 at 6:22 pm #15169znModeratorMy guess there would be two or three who would give him an incentive ladened offer. I also think that the Rams will be one of those teams.
I think that’s probably right.
January 1, 2015 at 10:09 am #15209wvParticipantOn Glennon
Ram43, reposting Jrry32
=======================================================
Here’s jrry32…I will preface this by saying that I’m assuming that Winston, Mariota, and Cutler are not realistic options.
After them, I think Mike Glennon is our best option as the QB to put BEHIND Bradford. This is a kid that just turned 25 and at the end of his second season, he has 29 TDs to 15 Ints in just over a season worth of games/attempts. Young QBs tend to get better. Especially ones that played under two different HCs and under two different systems in their two years. I don’t know why the Bucs started Josh McCown this year but it was a colossal mistake. They should have stuck with Glennon for the season and saw what he could do.
I went back and reviewed all of Glennon’s starts this year on NFL Rewind and I don’t understand what they were thinking. He’s not a perfect QB. I’m not saying that I think he has elite potential. And to be entirely honest, I wasn’t overly high on him as a prospect.
That all said, he showed more than enough this year and last year for me to believe that he has a future in the NFL. As it stands now, I think Glennon offers an extremely similar skill-set to that of Nick Foles. I think his floor in this league is carving out a year as a Kyle Orton type player…great backup/decent enough spot starter. But I do think he has the upside to be a starting caliber QB…a player similar to what Carson Palmer was this year in Arizona.
I’ll tell you this, Glennon is a QB who would have no issues finding Tavon over the middle of the field. At 6’7″ 230, he’s able to see over the OL/DL without any issue and would actually be taller than all of our starting OLs.
On top of his height, Glennon has functional mobility in the pocket with good instincts and effective movement. He helps out his OTs by either delivering the ball at the top of his drop or climbing in the pocket to allow them to push the rush past him. Because of his size, he’s confident climbing the ladder and moving within the pocket to create space and buy time. Glennon also shows the ability to anticipate routes and throw to spots rather than his WRs. His timing on passes is good for a young QB and he generally is a sound decision maker. He also has a quick release for such a tall passer and has a good understanding of touch.
The negatives for Glennon are that he doesn’t have an outstanding arm. It’s adequate but some of the more difficult throws get a bit more air on them than you’d like. Glennon also isn’t very mobile. He’s able to buy time in the pocket with his feet, instincts, and technical skills but he won’t win many foot races and is no threat to run…although he does have enough mobility to improvise outside the pocket. On top of all this, his deep ball is inconsistent from game to game, he locks onto WRs at times, and his footwork needs cleaning up. His drops are a tad sloppy and methodical. He also can get sloppy with his feet in the pocket.
Still, watching this kid play, it left with a lot of disappointment in Lovie Smith…a coach I respect. I’ve seen QBs that just can’t hang in the NFL. Mike Glennon is not one of those guys. I see NFL skills in his game and I see starter potential. He has some of the most important qualities for the position and I think that Tampa Bay did themselves a disservice not seeing what he could offer.
But Tampa Bay has the #1 pick and is likely going to draft a QB. If they do that, they have no reason to keep Glennon. I think Glennon would definitely be worth trading a 5th for. He’d give us valuable depth behind Bradford and he’d give us a guy who actually has potential if Bradford goes down. Most of all, he’s a good scheme fit for our offense and a kid who still has upside that, imo, was mistreated by a new regime because he wasn’t their guy. That’s what got us Joe Barksdale and I’m hoping it’ll be what gets us Glennon because he’s our best option behind Bradford for the 2015 season(assuming what I said in the first sentence is true).
There are some Tampa Bay Rams fans on here that might disagree with my observations. And you guys are absolutely entitled to that. But I promise you this, I did take the time to watch him very closely.
=========================January 1, 2015 at 11:25 am #15212AgamemnonParticipantSounds ok, jrry. I would do that for a 5th. He might be as good as anybody I would pick in the 3rd round, Mannion. I am not taking a QB earlier unless it is Cook and he isn’t coming out this year.
- This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by Agamemnon.
January 1, 2015 at 2:38 pm #15221AgamemnonParticipantJanuary 1, 2015 at 3:47 pm #15246znModeratorI moved the Cotton Bowl posts to its own thread.
This was done without harming any plants or animals.
I…think…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.