physics in Ant-man (spoilers)

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House physics in Ant-man (spoilers)

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #27385
    zn
    Moderator

    I have a standing thing with one of my daughters—we see all the Marvel movies together. This started with Iron Man.

    Anyway, Ant-Man is pleasantly done, and fun, and interesting.

    But its physics is gawdawful bad.

    Though, to me, that doesn’t detract from the movie…the physics of most sci-fi is just preposterous. So it’s not really a complaint. I can both enjoy a movie and pick on its plot holes and incomprehensible physics and stuff like that.

    Anyway, in this one, the way “shrinking” works is that the inventor, Pym, has discovered a particle that reduces the space between atoms.

    BUT then you have to regulate it, or you just keep shrinking down to the quantum level. We see this happen.

    2 problems with that.

    1. If the particle works by reducing the space between atoms, you can’t then get smaller than an atom.

    2. We see the quantum realm. Which makes no sense. We see because photons hit our eyes and get interpreted by our senses and brain as a field of vision. If you shrink to smaller than sub-atomic particles, how then are you SEEING? If photons are bigger than you are, then your senses and nerves can’t absorb them to form a field of vision.

    There’s also an unstated problem with weight. If you shrink and retain your atomic density, why don’t you retain your weight/mass? Where does THAT go? This is emphasized when one of the characters enlarges a tank he carries on his key chain, which turns out to be a real tank. That means until he enlarged it, he was carrying around a shrunken real tank in his pocket. Where did its weight go?

    The acting btw was good– a lot of fun.

    It’s not the best Marvel movie but it’s not the worst either.

    #27389
    PA Ram
    Participant

    You were thinking a lot deeper about the physics than I was, but it’s interesting.

    My question was why didn’t he just give Ant-Man’s suit wings? Why make the poor guy have to play rodeo on the back of other insects?

    Anyway–the film was, okay.

    I just don’t see this guy carrying his own film. I’d like him better in The Avengers in a supporting role.

    He’s no Iron Man, that’s for sure.

    Also–the villain is…meh.

    Like I said, it was okay. Not great.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #27390
    zn
    Moderator

    You were thinking a lot deeper about the physics than I was, but it’s interesting.

    Well I have a very high but very amateur interest in particle physics. I read around on it constantly. It got so I wanted to test my understanding, so I would try to see if I could explain some of it. (For example, here’s a mind bender–a great deal of the mass of atoms comes from elemental particles like quarks and electrons acquiring mass by interacting with the Higgs field, which of course is produced by the recently discovered Higgs boson. BUT not all the mass or protons and neutrons comes from that. So where does the rest come from? The answer is mind-blowing.)

    So in any event, I went into the movie knowing that stuff, and therefore when there were discrepancies and contradictions I noticed immediately. It would be as if we both saw a fictional film about the NFL and a player talked about playing in a traditional 5-4 defense just like the old Chicago Vikings did in the 1920s. We would both immediately go “hunh?”

    This isn’t me bragging. A real physicist would get bored of the amateur level “feeling my way” nature of my “knowledge” within seconds.

    But, I think it’s interesting. So I keep up.

    .

    #27391
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Yes, I get all that.

    But why didn’t the suit have wings?

    I find physics interesting as well—but I don’t get it at all. Every once in awhile I get just a tiny little piece that clicks in and I sort of “get it” for a moment or so–but then I read more and lose it. I get some of it without really “getting it” if that makes sense–which it doesn’t. That’s a quantum expression. I mean it’s a wave and particle and well–you know.

    So anyway this stuff picks up mass going through the Higgs field or some such thing? I read about that awhile ago. Can’t really remember much.

    These are things I’ve come to accept I’m just not smart enough to REALLY understand. It’s like explaining algebra to a chicken–or to me. Never really gonna happen.

    Still, I love to read the physics forum on Reddit and read smart people arguing back and forth. 🙂

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #27392
    zn
    Moderator

    Yes, I get all that.

    But why didn’t the suit have wings?

    I find physics interesting as well—but I don’t get it at all. Every once in awhile I get just a tiny little piece that clicks in and I sort of “get it” for a moment or so–but then I read more and lose it. I get some of it without really “getting it” if that makes sense–which it doesn’t. That’s a quantum expression. I mean it’s a wave and particle and well–you know.

    So anyway this stuff picks up mass going through the Higgs field or some such thing? I read about that awhile ago. Can’t really remember much.

    These are things I’ve come to accept I’m just not smart enough to REALLY understand. It’s like explaining algebra to a chicken–or to me. Never really gonna happen.

    Still, I love to read the physics forum on Reddit and read smart people arguing back and forth. :)

    On the wings? I just gather that was a later development, which leads to the wasp (another Marvel character).

    b

    The thing about the Higgs field is that it can’t account for a lot of the mass of an atom. Something freakier accounts for the rest.

    A couple of minor movie notes.

    1. In the comics, it’s Hank Pym who invents Ultron, not Stark. Pym is also a founding member of the Avengers.

    2. In the comics, shrinking a lot takes a toll on your sanity. They briefly allude to that in the film but not enough to make it a grounded part of the story.

    3. On the old classic Saturday Night Live, there’s a sketch where superman is married to lois lane, and they have a party for other superheroes. Garrett Morris plays Ant-man. The other superheroes make fun of him for having such limited powers, which he doesn’t take very well (“I don’t see what’s so funny….”). In honor of that sketch, the film director had Morris cameo in the movie as a cab driver.

    .
    .

    .

    #27394
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I had to have my son tell me about first after credit scene. Who was she? Was she good or bad? Didn’t know any of it.

    Anyway–the answer lies in the Pym Field.

    There may not really be a Pym Field but Marvel can do whatever it wants. 😉

    http://boingboing.net/2015/07/13/ant-man-the-physics-of-shrink.html

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #27395
    Mackeyser
    Moderator

    I may be a complete pig, but damn. I know comic artists have caricatured the human body, both male and female for decades, but golly gee willickers, that’s a tight suit. Frankly, I’m confused about the physics of how she gets it on. It’s not like it has any zippers, snaps, buttons or velcro…

    Anyway, I also enjoy the physics (or lack thereof) in comics and comic movies.

    It’s why I refer to them as popcorn movies. If I tried to take them seriously, I’d get all mad. If I judge them by how fast I’m shoveling the popcorn into my face, then I find that THAT is actually a pretty good metric of how much I’m enjoying the movie on a visceral level without thinking too much.

    In other words, they’ve done enough to allow me to continue to suspend my disbelief. It helps that I’m a willing co-dependent in this relationship…

    Although, now that I’ve lost 60lbs (down to 221 from my high of 282) and don’t eat popcorn at the movies, I’ll have to figure something else out.

    I’ve been to the movies a couple of times since I stopped eating popcorn and dammit, it’s hard. I LOVES me that big bucket!!!

    Sports is the crucible of human virtue. The distillate remains are human vice.

    #27396
    PA Ram
    Participant

    r

    You know–my big thing is not eating popcorn because then I drink a lot–then I gotta go to the restroom during the good parts or hold my bladder til it bursts.

    I’m best off just watching the film with a cough drop or two.
    r

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #27400
    Mackeyser
    Moderator

    Man!!! That having to pee thing is a THING now!!!

    I swear I used to be able to down a massive drink and watch a 2:30 action flick and not even use the head before going home. Now, I’m lucky if I can make it through a 2 hour movie and not have kidney damage from holding it from just having a 24 oz water…

    I swear, I’m not drinking ANYTHING when that Warcraft movie comes out because I’m not going to miss a second of it!!!

    Sports is the crucible of human virtue. The distillate remains are human vice.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.