Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › NFC West Q&A: Carson Palmer
- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 4 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 6, 2015 at 9:59 am #26990znModerator
NFC West Q&A: Does Cardinals QB Carson Palmer scare division opponents?
Josh Weinfuss
Today’s question: In what ways does Cardinals quarterback Carson Palmer, coming off another ACL injury, scare other NFC West teams?
Nick Wagoner, St. Louis Rams: I’m not sure at this stage Palmer does anything that really “scares” teams, at least not him personally. But what’s more notable is what his presence means for the Cardinals as a whole. It’s pretty clear that Arizona is good enough defensively and has enough pieces on offense to be a legitimate contender when it has a quarterback capable of getting the ball down the field. Palmer brings a veteran presence who isn’t prone to big mistakes and can connect on the deep ball. He shredded the Rams in 2013, averaging nearly 300 yards per game in two matchups and might have reached that number again last year had he not suffered a torn ACL in the first meeting between the teams. The Rams still lost to Arizona twice last season but both games were close in the fourth quarter. When Palmer was fully healthy late in 2013, he led the Cardinals to an easy 30-10 win.
Paul Gutierrez, San Francisco 49ers: The 49ers never saw Palmer last season, losing to Drew Stanton in Week 3 at Arizona and beating Ryan Lindley in the regular-season finale in Santa Clara. You’d have to go back two years to the last time the Niners saw him. They beat Palmer twice even though he threw for 705 yards on 53-of-90 passing with four touchdowns and three interceptions. Alas, two years ago is a lifetime for this Niners defense, which returns just four starters from that first meeting — nose tackle Glenn Dorsey, outside linebacker Ahmad Brooks, inside linebacker NaVorro Bowman and free safety Eric Reid. Plus, the 49ers are breaking in a new defensive coordinator in Eric Mangini, whose personnel dictates the Niners confuse and confound opponents, as opposed to simply dominating. As such, Palmer represents a different challenge as a heady veteran who might be able to pick apart a rebuilding, er, reloading defense on the fly. Palmer the game manager against the Niners might be more dangerous than Palmer the mad bomber.
Terry Blount, Seattle Seahawks: I don’t know that it scares them, but everyone in the division knows the Cardinals are going to be much better with Palmer back. Who knows what this team could have accomplished last season if Palmer had been on the field all year. The Seahawks were fortunate they didn’t have to face him in either game last season, a definite factor in the Cardinals scoring a total of nine points in those games. A quick look at a couple of stats shows a dramatic difference. Palmer threw 11 TD passes and only three interceptions in six games. The team had only 10 TD passes and nine interceptions in the last 10 regular-season games. Arizona was 5-1 with Palmer; 6-5 without him, including the playoff game loss at Carolina. So the rest of the division knows Palmer makes the Cardinals a much tougher opponent.[
July 6, 2015 at 10:57 am #26992wvParticipantHe’s a gamer. A wily, veteran, starting-caliber QB.
Probly wont last 16 games though — so, the key for the Cards is:
Will they have him for the playoffs.w
vJuly 6, 2015 at 12:26 pm #26993znModeratorHe’s a gamer. A wily, veteran, starting-caliber QB.
Probly wont last 16 games though — so, the key for the Cards is:
Will they have him for the playoffs.w
vI dunno. They did okay with Stanton, too.
July 6, 2015 at 12:33 pm #26994bnwBlockedStanton exposed the Rams weakness but he didn’t last.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
July 6, 2015 at 12:49 pm #26995znModeratorStanton exposed the Rams weakness but he didn’t last.
Stanton went out, though, because he got injured.
With Stanton at qb, Arz could maintain its momentum. They were 5-3 with him starting, including a loss to Denver and a loss to Seattle. The fact that he wasn’t that great is interesting—he completed 55% of his passes, had only a 2.9% TD percentage, and an avg. qb rating of 78.7.
So 5/3 with that is not too shabby.
…
July 6, 2015 at 1:08 pm #26997bnwBlockedStanton exposed the Rams weakness but he didn’t last.
Stanton went out, though, because he got injured.
With Stanton at qb, Arz could maintain its momentum.
…Not when they play the Rams twice a season.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
July 6, 2015 at 1:24 pm #26998znModeratorStanton exposed the Rams weakness but he didn’t last.
Stanton went out, though, because he got injured.
With Stanton at qb, Arz could maintain its momentum.
…Not when they play the Rams twice a season.
There you go.
That’s the spirit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.