Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › "if Fisher had his way Goff wouldn't play in 2016"… & other Fisher/Goff rumors
- This topic has 24 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 1 month ago by Agamemnon.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 16, 2016 at 10:04 pm #53117nittany ramModeratorSeptember 16, 2016 at 10:17 pm #53118ZooeyModerator
Jeff Fisher DOES have his way. So whether Goff plays or not is 100% up to him, as far as we know.
What Silver actually said – since you have misquoted him in order to get hits and increase your revenue – is this:
“Well, I think ideally he might not play all year, if Jeff Fisher were doing what he philosophically believes is best.”
Which means that “ideally” he would have a red shirt year. But there are factors at play such as the play of Keenum, and the Rams’ record, and whatever. So he may reach the decision that he has to throw Goff in before he would like to “ideally.”
September 16, 2016 at 10:21 pm #53120znModeratorJeff Fisher DOES have his way. So whether Goff plays or not is 100% up to him, as far as we know.
What Silver actually said – since you have misquoted him in order to get hits and increase your revenue – is this:
“Well, I think ideally he might not play all year, if Jeff Fisher were doing what he philosophically believes is best.”
Which means that “ideally” he would have a red shirt year. But there are factors at play such as the play of Keenum, and the Rams’ record, and whatever. So he may reach the decision that he has to throw Goff in before he would like to “ideally.”
Agreed. It’s these silly blogger kids.
Here’s the actual discussion and you’re right the title of the article misrepresents what Silver says.
Silver: My source – in February, in March, in April, now – is the same source on this. The source is Jeff Fisher. Jeff Fisher really, really, really wanted to draft Jared Goff. That was his guy. So let’s put that one to rest first of all.
Secondly, I think the larger point is that there’s this hysteria going on because Jared Goff is not in uniform and did not play in the first game. I take issue with that whole premise as well.
We’re living in a time – beginning with ’08 and Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco – where things have changed dramatically from prior NFL history and now you are seeing a lot of top quarterback picks playing right away. Some, including the two I mentioned, have had surprising success, and others have not. And yet, we certainly have guys in the league – Aaron Rodgers, Philip Rivers, Carson Palmer – who sat and watched as top picks and it turned out to be a great pick for them.
So I reject the premise that if you draft a guy high, it’s the best thing long-term for that quarterback and for your franchise to play them right away.
I know Jeff Fisher and have known him for more than a quarter century, and I know what his philosophy is. He believes – and this is the philosophy founded on the experience with Steve McNair, who was brought along slowly and had an awesome career, and others – he believes it’s better to have these guys absorb it, take a look, get thrown in in practice a little bit and then eventually be worked into the lineup. He’s doing what he believes is best for Jared Goff and for the long-term interest of the franchise, even as it possibly quarrels with what would be best for Jeff Fisher right now – because he certainly is under pressure to produce in his first year in L.A.
…
Gottlieb: Alright, So when is Goff gonna play? Best guess.
Silver: Well, I think ideally he might not play all year, if Jeff Fisher were doing what he philosophically believes is best. Now we all saw that atrocity on Monday night. If it keeps looking like that for much longer, I don’t know that they’re going to have a choice.
September 16, 2016 at 11:41 pm #53125znModeratorhttps://www.profootballrumors.com/2016/09/latest-on-potential-jeff-fisher-extension
Thanks to the Rams’ season-opening debacle on Monday, head coach Jeff Fisher‘s future with the team looks less certain. Fisher and owner Stan Kroenke met after the Rams’ 28-0 loss to the 49ers, according to Bleacher Report’s Jason Cole, who adds that the contract extension Fisher was supposed to receive isn’t in play at the moment. video link: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2663705-insider-buzz-talk-of-jeff-fisher-extension-quiet-after-mnf-meltdown
One major problem for the Rams in Week 1 was the performance of quarterback Case Keenum, who completed 17 of 35 passes for 130 yards and two interceptions against a San Francisco club that went 5-11 a year ago. Fisher will go forth with Keenum for the time being, but other coaches on the Rams’ staff feel first overall pick Jared Goff gives them a better chance to win, per Cole. video link: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2663411-insider-buzz-rams-staff-feels-offense-would-be-better-with-jared-goff?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=web-des-art-top-16
September 17, 2016 at 12:46 am #53127znModeratorFisher already feeling the heat in LA
Jim Thomas
Jeff Fisher’s performance in St. Louis was a mere sidebar over much of the Rams’ last two seasons in the Midwest. The overwhelming storyline here was whether the team would move to Los Angeles or not.
We all know how that one turned out.
Fisher and the Rams left the humidity of St. Louis summers for the balmy breezes of the Pacific Ocean. But after a colossal dud of a season opener against San Francisco, Fisher is feeling the heat.
You can bet on anything these days, and the oddsmakers at BookMaker Sportsbook and 5Dimes Sportsbook — to name a couple — now say Fisher is the “favorite” to be the first NFL coach fired in 2016.
Which makes sense. Most NFL coaches don’t survive three consecutive losing seasons. Fisher has survived four. And season No. 5 with the Rams didn’t get off to a roaring start. The 28-0 loss to the 49ers sparked widespread speculation about Fisher’s job security.
But this is the Rams we’re talking about, an alternate universe in terms of logic. According to multiple reports, the Rams are close to a contract extension for Fisher, who has a 27-37-1 record with the team. The extension reports have been around for a while — dating all the way back to the 2015 season in St. Louis.
But there has been no official announcement by the team. And to do so after a 28-0 loss — well, as the saying goes, that wouldn’t be a good look.
“I never talk about my personal stuff or my extensions, or non-extensions or anything,” Fisher told Los Angeles media Thursday. “That’s between me and the organization.”
The team’s performance, on the other hand, is out there for everyone to see. On the HBO “Hard Knocks” series chronicling Rams training camp, Fisher chastised his team on one episode, saying he was tired of “7-9 bull-(bleep).”
Alas, the Rams’ play against a less-than-stellar 49ers team was so bad it looked more like 3-13 or 4-12 “bull-(bleep)” than the 7-9 variety.
For the most part, the Rams were off the radar during their final few seasons in St. Louis. On a national scale, nobody really noticed the team. Nobody really cared. But now the team is in Los Angeles, and this was Monday Night Football on opening weekend. A big stage.
After the game, Fisher told reporters the team wouldn’t use the relocation as an excuse, a note he has struck repeatedly during the offseason and preseason. But then in the same breath, he did just that.
“We’ve moved four times in the last seven months, OK?” Fisher said.
Again, not a good look. Despite his laid-back demeanor, it makes you wonder if Fisher is feeling the heat.
And as the Los Angeles Daily News pointed out, it’s actually only three moves: St. Louis to Oxnard (for OTAs), to Irvine (training camp), to Thousand Oaks (regular-season facility).
Adding to the craziness, former NFL wide receiver Keyshawn Johnson said on “The Stephen A. Smith Show” this week that Fisher was forced to take quarterback Jared Goff in the draft. He cited as sources “outside people and the inside people I know with the Rams.”
The NFL Network’s Mike Silver, a long-time Fisher supporter, countered by pointing out that Fisher told him long before the draft that he wanted Goff.
Goff, the No. 1 overall pick in the draft last spring, was the Rams’ No. 3 quarterback against San Francisco, and as such was on their pregame inactive list. As of Thursday, Fisher was noncommittal on whether Goff would be inactive in the Rams’ home opener against Seattle.
September 17, 2016 at 8:50 am #53131nittany ramModeratorJeff Fisher DOES have his way. So whether Goff plays or not is 100% up to him, as far as we know.
What Silver actually said – since you have misquoted him in order to get hits and increase your revenue – is this:
Actually, the headline on the post is different than the one for the article. It’s different because I couldn’t remember the exact wording and I had already closed the site and I was too lazy to post the link, click on it, copy the headline, then edit and resubmit the post. (I just now noticed the headline is written in the link)
But I didn’t mean to imply that Fisher didn’t have control of Goff’s playing time. I only meant that if things went the way Fisher would want them to, Goff wouldn’t have to play this year. In other words, I meant the same thing Silver said, it’s just that my wording wasn’t as precise.
September 17, 2016 at 9:00 am #53132nittany ramModeratorAgreed. It’s these silly blogger kids.
I like TurfshowTimes but I don’t post everything they write. I try to find the more newsy articles – those in which players, coaches and reporters are quoted instead of the emotional rants.
Here’s the actual discussion and you’re right the title of the article misrepresents what Silver says.
As I explained to zooey above, I inadvertently misquoted the headline.
September 17, 2016 at 9:54 am #53133ZooeyModeratorJeff Fisher DOES have his way. So whether Goff plays or not is 100% up to him, as far as we know.
What Silver actually said – since you have misquoted him in order to get hits and increase your revenue – is this:
Actually, the headline on the post is different than the one for the article. It’s different because I couldn’t remember the exact wording and I had already closed the site and I was too lazy to post the link, click on it, copy the headline, then edit and resubmit the post. (I just now noticed the headline is written in the link)
But I didn’t mean to imply that Fisher didn’t have control of Goff’s playing time. I only meant that if things went the way Fisher would want them to, Goff wouldn’t have to play this year. In other words, I meant the same thing Silver said, it’s just that my wording wasn’t as precise.
Okay, well, it’s manly of you to come here and apologize. That’s the right thing to do. But now I’m going to have to ask you to leave the board for a few minutes, so we can talk about how we are going to handle this situation. You’ve been a good poster over the years, and it goes without saying that we personally like you, but there are bylaws around here, and to some extent our hands are tied. I’m sorry.
September 17, 2016 at 10:18 am #53135znModeratorAgreed. It’s these silly blogger kids.
I like TurfshowTimes but I don’t post everything they write. I try to find the more newsy articles – those in which players, coaches and reporters are quoted instead of the emotional rants.
Here’s the actual discussion and you’re right the title of the article misrepresents what Silver says.
As I explained to zooey above, I inadvertently misquoted the headline.
Well I was too lazy to look at the title of the original and just assumed. So I perpetuated this sordid little misunderstanding. I too am responsible for any collateral damage and/or body count that results.
Thanks for posting stuff NR, it’s always appreciated.
September 17, 2016 at 10:20 am #53136nittany ramModeratorJeff Fisher DOES have his way. So whether Goff plays or not is 100% up to him, as far as we know.
What Silver actually said – since you have misquoted him in order to get hits and increase your revenue – is this:
Actually, the headline on the post is different than the one for the article. It’s different because I couldn’t remember the exact wording and I had already closed the site and I was too lazy to post the link, click on it, copy the headline, then edit and resubmit the post. (I just now noticed the headline is written in the link)
But I didn’t mean to imply that Fisher didn’t have control of Goff’s playing time. I only meant that if things went the way Fisher would want them to, Goff wouldn’t have to play this year. In other words, I meant the same thing Silver said, it’s just that my wording wasn’t as precise.
Okay, well, it’s manly of you to come here and apologize. That’s the right thing to do. But now I’m going to have to ask you to leave the board for a few minutes, so we can talk about how we are going to handle this situation. You’ve been a good poster over the years, and it goes without saying that we personally like you, but there are bylaws around here, and to some extent our hands are tied. I’m sorry.
I understand. I am not fit to post here. I’m sorry that I let you all down.
- This reply was modified 8 years, 2 months ago by nittany ram.
September 17, 2016 at 2:24 pm #53159— X —ParticipantAgreed. It’s these silly blogger kids.
Hey. I write for TST on occasion.
You watch yourself, mister.You have to be odd, to be number one.
-- Dr SeussSeptember 17, 2016 at 2:36 pm #53161znModeratorAgreed. It’s these silly blogger kids.
Hey. I write for TST on occasion.
You watch yourself, mister.Well you’re not silly and you’re not a kid.
But you read this stuff around on the net. How much of it measures up?
And I would say certainly some does, but then, you have to be selective.
September 17, 2016 at 3:05 pm #53162— X —ParticipantBut you read this stuff around on the net. How much of it measures up?
And I would say certainly some does, but then, you have to be selective.
Not much of it is any good. And, honestly, some of the guys who write for TST are totally jaded to the point that they have lost almost all objectivity. The ‘realist’ attitude has permeated most of the independent internet ‘news’ sites, and I don’t pay much attention to any of them anymore. There are a good amount of fans on message boards who do a lot more studying of the games via NFL Rewind, and some of them have past experiences as players or even coaches. Others do a diligent job of keeping track of quotes and timelines as well. Those are the guys I pay attention to. You being one of them. I only write for them when I wanna turn an obscure quote by a reporter or coach into an allegory of sorts.
You have to be odd, to be number one.
-- Dr SeussSeptember 19, 2016 at 10:02 pm #53375znModeratorI just saw this, basically. Good response and thank you for the compliment.
I just saw your post at ROD where you compare the long passes by Keenum in 2013 to Rodgers.
Where does this Keenum can’t/doesn’t throw long stuff come from?
He does it right in front of every Rams fan who watches games, but then 6 seconds later some forget it happened.
September 19, 2016 at 10:51 pm #53379InvaderRamModeratorI just saw this, basically. Good response and thank you for the compliment.
I just saw your post at ROD where you compare the long passes by Keenum in 2013 to Rodgers.
Where does this Keenum can’t/doesn’t throw long stuff come from?
He does it right in front of every Rams fan who watches games, but then 6 seconds later some forget it happened.
yeah but i suspect those passes are only possible because defenses do not respect him at all.
the rams ultimately need a qb who defenses actually have to respect.
of course i could be completely wrong and have not enough knowledge of football to back this up with actual evidence… haha!
September 19, 2016 at 11:19 pm #53383znModeratorI just saw this, basically. Good response and thank you for the compliment.
I just saw your post at ROD where you compare the long passes by Keenum in 2013 to Rodgers.
Where does this Keenum can’t/doesn’t throw long stuff come from?
He does it right in front of every Rams fan who watches games, but then 6 seconds later some forget it happened.
yeah but i suspect those passes are only possible because defenses do not respect him at all.
the rams ultimately need a qb who defenses actually have to respect.
of course i could be completely wrong and have not enough knowledge of football to back this up with actual evidence… haha!
No, IR…they have film on him doing it by now. Any defense that doesn’t expect it is just not doing their work.
And if you watch the plays he does a good job.
I don’t know why you say the Rams need a better qb…we all know that. Keenum is a placeholder. My thing is, he’s a good one (a good placeholder.) Obviously he’s not the future.
Have you ever watched the 2015 Keenum highlights vid? Watch it. This has nothing to do with defenses not respecting him.
Watch the vid, that and the links to the big plays he made Monday.
September 19, 2016 at 11:36 pm #53385InvaderRamModeratori’ve seen the highlights. i’ve also read articles saying that defenses are daring him to throw.
what that tells me is defenses are willing to give that up if it means they can contain the running game. cuz they figure keenum can’t hurt them.
and so far the rams offense is being contained.
now there could be many reasons for this. one being the receivers. another being pass protection. and another being keenum.
i don’t see the problem in saying that. if defenses are daring him to throw it and he’s doing minimal damage then the defense is doing its job.
again. there could be many reasons for that but one significant reason i’m guessing is keenum.
and i like keenum. he’s a battle, but saying he’s limited. there’s nothing wrong with that.
- This reply was modified 8 years, 1 month ago by InvaderRam.
September 20, 2016 at 12:21 am #53387znModeratorwhat that tells me is defenses are willing to give that up if it means they can contain the running game. cuz they figure keenum can’t hurt them.
IF that’s happening, so far he HAS hurt them, including Seattle twice. That sounds more like something an article would say (by a sportswriter not an analyst) and not something a coach would say to his team. I figure the coach would know better than that.
September 20, 2016 at 12:41 am #53388InvaderRamModeratorwell in the larger sense he hasn’t hurt them. cuz they have 3 fgs in 2 games.
now i also realize this is only 2 games so far. and against at least one very good defense in seattle. and with not the strongest wr corps.
so we’ll have to keep watching and see how things unfold. case had a very efficient game against what is probably a top 5 defense. he did catch the defense a couple times deep. and if not for at least one miscue could have even hado a td.
but again. i am just speculating, but if defenses figure they can contain the running game and mid range passing game while giving up an occasional deep pass i’m not sure what that says. and again. that may not even be all case’s fault.
September 20, 2016 at 1:32 pm #53414OzonerangerParticipantGiven that Keenum has the accuracy of a drunk doing his business in the local dive bar, I’d keep Goff in the class room but start Mannion. Really, he would add the element of the unknown to opposing DCs, which might just spring Gurley.
September 20, 2016 at 1:34 pm #53417OzonerangerParticipant“he did catch the defense a couple times deep. and if not for at least one miscue could have even hado a td.”
Yes! He could have had one of those TD thingys! It would have been remarkable!
September 20, 2016 at 2:09 pm #53418wvParticipanti’ve seen the highlights. i’ve also read articles saying that defenses are daring him to throw.
————
Yeah, if the hi-lites are meant to show he can throw long, I dunno.
Only two of those passes were what “I” would call long bombs.
The rest were short passes and medium-long passes.I wont quibble about labels to describe his arm, but i would say
his arm is indeed a liability. He ‘can’ set himself if he has time
and with a lot of effort launch one, but in general, his arm is one of the weakest arms of the 32 starting QBs in the NFL. I mean, go down the list. Where does he rank?His arm is one of the reasons he’s a ‘placeholder’ imho.
Given his moxy, experience and other abilities, He’s the best they have today, though.
Sure wish he had more help in the receiving corps. A Larry Fitzgerald would help.
w
vSeptember 20, 2016 at 5:05 pm #53432AgamemnonParticipantSeptember 20, 2016 at 7:49 pm #53452znModeratorYeah, if the hi-lites are meant to show he can throw long, I dunno.
Only two of those passes were what “I” would call long bombs.
The rest were short passes and medium-long passes.I count as long anything 31 yards or over.
If you look at the numbers on passes 41 yards and over, they are so rare as to be in low double digits for the entire league.
I find that when you look at the numbers, you get a very different view of what a long pass is. We have it in our heads that they are fairly common. They really aren’t.
So for example, name any 6 or 7 qbs who played all last year–guys you think would throw long effectively. I will look up the total number of 41 yarders for all 6-7 qbs combined.
.
September 20, 2016 at 8:05 pm #53456AgamemnonParticipant -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.