Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › I hate Goodell
- This topic has 6 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 9 months ago by InvaderRam.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 25, 2015 at 4:22 pm #21458HerzogParticipant
PHOENIX • As the NFL wrapped up its annual owners meetings Wednesday, commissioner Roger Goodell said he was happy with the progress made on the St. Louis stadium plan.
But that progress may have to come at an accelerated pace because the league is considering moving up the relocation schedule, potentially with an eye on having at least one team in Los Angeles by 2016.
As for St. Louis, Goodell said: “I’ve spoken to the governor (Jay Nixon). Our staff has been there with Dave Peacock. They’ve done a really good job of formulating a plan.
“They have a great site. They have a site that I think is important for St. Louis to redevelop. I think it’s a perfect stadium site, as the governor told me. And I think they’re working towards making it a reality.
“And that’s a positive. The efforts that are going on there are very positive.”
The question remains, will progress on the St. Louis riverfront stadium project on the north edge of downtown come quickly enough before Rams owner Stan Kroenke bolts for Los Angeles?
Along those lines, Goodell said Wednesday that the league has had discussions on the committee level about moving up the timetable for relocation following the 2015 season.
“We’ve had some discussions within our (Los Angeles opportunity) committee,” Goodell said. “Whether that time frame — if there was a relocation — whether that’s the appropriate time frame to do so. There’s a lot to do when you relocate a franchise.”
Currently, the next window for the Rams — and for that matter, the Oakland Raiders and San Diego Chargers — to file for relocation is Jan. 1 through Feb. 15 of 2016. The league is considering moving up that window to the fall of 2015.
Proceeding earlier, Goodell said, would give relocating teams a better opportunity to properly transition to a new marketplace.
“Which is the goal if there is a relocation,” Goodell said. “So that’s been discussed. We certainly have not come to any conclusion on that.”
But an earlier relocation window would make it more difficult for the three markets trying to keep their teams — St. Louis, Oakland, and San Diego — to have their stadium plans finalized.
March 25, 2015 at 4:25 pm #21459HerzogParticipantProceeding earlier, Goodell said, would give relocating teams a better opportunity to properly transition to a new marketplace.
“Which is the goal if there is a relocation,”
This is such horseshit. It only screws the cities trying to keep their teams. There’s no other advantage to rushing it.
March 25, 2015 at 6:12 pm #21470ZooeyModeratorUnbelievable.
And totally Evil Genius.
They just moved the goalposts. They have just inoculated themselves against their own by-laws. Perfect.
That doesn’t mean that the Rams ARE moving. It just means that if they do, the NFL can make an excuse.
March 25, 2015 at 6:30 pm #21495InvaderRamModeratorwell if we’ve learned anything it’s that the nfl has no integrity.
i mean i wouldn’t mind seeing the rams in los angeles but this is all very unfortunate. lots of st louis rams fans here and it would suck to see them go.
anyway i think the league has seen kroenke’s plans. i think this is what they’ve been waiting for and they are going to do everything they can to make it happen. the rams already have a fan base there. it’s the plan that has the greatest chance to succeed. and that stadium is going to be an absolute spectacle.
i still think st louis gets a team. maybe not immediately but somehow they will.
- This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by InvaderRam.
March 25, 2015 at 7:21 pm #21497wvParticipantwell if we’ve learned anything it’s that the nfl has no integrity.
Well, i am not sure there is such a thing
as a mega-corporation with ‘integrity’ — but
i shall spare us all
my speech on that…A lot of fans have already figured out
you haf ta kinda follow the ‘players/team’
and not the ‘Corporate-NFL/Owners’
Its tricky but it can be done.A lot of California ram fans managed
to do that when Georgia moved the team.
A lot of Missouri fans may learn to do
that if the Rams move back.We need to start passing out ‘Nomad”
t-shirts or somethin.w
vMarch 25, 2015 at 7:42 pm #21499bnwBlockedI loathe Goodell and Tagliabue and Roselle before him. Each one has bent over the St. Louis fan.
- This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by bnw.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
March 25, 2015 at 8:55 pm #21509InvaderRamModeratorwell if we’ve learned anything it’s that the nfl has no integrity.
Well, i am not sure there is such a thing
as a mega-corporation with ‘integrity’ — but
i shall spare us all
my speech on that…A lot of fans have already figured out
you haf ta kinda follow the ‘players/team’
and not the ‘Corporate-NFL/Owners’
Its tricky but it can be done.A lot of California ram fans managed
to do that when Georgia moved the team.
A lot of Missouri fans may learn to do
that if the Rams move back.We need to start passing out ‘Nomad”
t-shirts or somethin.w
vor some fans have that feeling of pride in their city. and not necessarily the players or the owners.
for me it’s the horns on the helmet.
with the cardinals. it’s the birds on the bat.
now if the rams get rid of those horns. that will crush me.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.