from PFF review of the GB game

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle from PFF review of the GB game

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4389
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from ReFo: Packers @ Rams, Preseason Week 2

    John Breitenbach | August 17, 2014

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2014/08/17/refo-packers-rams-preseason-week-2/

    Despite the positives this wasn’t a great day for Jeff Fisher’s defence. With the preseason caveat applied, their front seven looked particularly vulnerable to the run in significant contrast to last season. Extended action for Aaron Donald and Ray Ray Armstrong will have left Rams fans hoping for the rapid return of James Laurinaitis and Michael Brockers. The secondary didn’t look much better with rookie Lamarcus Joyner looking like he needs more time to transition. In contrast to the seven defensive starts ending up with red-graded games for the Rams, the Packers had just one in Sam Shields. The linebackers in particular had good games, combining for a combined grade of +5.2.

    St Louis – Three Performances of Note

    Better from Bradford

    Could this be the year Sam Bradford (+2.0) finally steps into that “top quarterback” group? He may well find it has to be, or he won’t be guaranteed the spot next year. The good news is he looked more aggressive downfield and had the accuracy to go with the intent. A beautiful throw to his receiver in stride on a post route (Q2, 12.36) was encouraging, as was the touchdown toss on the same series between two levels in a place only his teammate could get it (Q2, 8:07). He also seemed calmer under pressure, completing three of five rushed attempts for 50 yards. It was only 20 snaps but progress appears to have been made.

    Rookie Woe for Robinson

    Greg Robinson (-3.6) had something of a rude awakening in this one. Starting this game at left tackle he couldn’t handle Julius Peppers’ experience, giving up a hit to the former Bear (Q2, 11.18). Other than that he also gave up a hurry in his 18 pass- blocking snaps (-0.9). His issues in the run game were more significant, however, with a lowlight coming in the second quarter (9:06) where he showed poor technique to allow a tackle for loss. That play was subsequently followed by a holding call at the second level which detracted from his grade further and the former Auburn star will be disappointed he didn’t get into better position against the safety (Q2, 3:26). Overall, his struggles culminated in a -2.8 grade.

    Linebackers Still A Concern

    With Laurinaitis’ injury, Jeff Fisher has to be concerned about the state of his linebackers. Alec Ogletree (-1.2) still looks light weight against the run, struggling with guards at the second level in particular. JoLonn Dunbar (-0.5) doesn’t fill you with a huge amount of confidence, either, while Armstrong (-3.3) proved a disaster. The former hurricane actually improved on his Week 1 showing (-4.5) but was still pushed around easily in the run game and also graded negatively in coverage and as a pass rusher. The trio of backups don’t seem like they could step in if needed, with only Lawrence Wilson recording a positive grade.

    #4393
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, I agree Bradford looked good.

    I’m not the least bit worried
    about Dunbar or Greg Robinson
    or A.Donald or Joyner.

    The rookies — GR, AD, and Joyner look
    talented to me.

    RayRay, i dunno about.

    w
    v

    #4395
    Avatar photosnowman
    Participant

    I have no idea how people grade players. Is that done by the coaching staff and then made public to the sportswriters, or can anyone throw out a rating on a player like calculating a pitchers WHIP?

    Lately, I have asked too many questions in my posts and I haven’t included any pictures. I tend to over-punctuate, as well. I give my posting a -3.6.

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photosnowman.
    #4397
    Winnbrad
    Participant

    I have no idea how people grade players. Is that done by the coaching staff and then made public to the sportswriters, or can anyone throw out a rating on a player like calculating a pitchers WHIP?

    Lately, I have asked too many questions in my posts and I haven’t included any pictures. I tend to over-punctuate, as well. I give my posting a -3.6.

    I’ve wondered that, also. I’m assuming that like all things “human”, there’s a lot of personal bias, subjective judgement, and flat out errors in any rating system.

    I give your post a +1.2.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.