Eagles trade up to #2

This topic has 4 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Agamemnon.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

Author

Posts
April 20, 2016 at 2:28 pm #42303

zn
Moderator

April 20, 2016 at 2:34 pm #42304

joemad
Participant

who got the better QB in the deal between Foles or Bradford… now it’s Goff or W?

better deals with Eagles / Rams
Charlie Young or Jaws? Harold Jackson or Roman G?

April 20, 2016 at 3:33 pm #42308

bnw
Blocked

I suppose now the choice of the Rams might have trade value if it differs from what the Eagles want.

The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

Sprinkles are for winners.

April 20, 2016 at 5:05 pm #42312

Isiah58
Participant

Does the Eagles’ move validate the Rams’ move to anyone? Unlikely, but the Eagles were not seemingly desperate for a QB but saw not one, but two QBs who they felt were worth moving all the way to Number 2 to get. Since they can suspect, but cannot know who the Rams are taking, they have to be confident with both Wentz and Goff.

“Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel.” - Homer Simpson

April 20, 2016 at 5:19 pm #42313

Agamemnon
Participant

joemad wrote:

who got the better QB in the deal between Foles or Bradford… now it’s Goff or W?

better deals with Eagles / Rams
Charlie Young or Jaws? Harold Jackson or Roman G?

According to my math on the actual trade they made to move up in the draft, the Rams and Eagles are close, maybe a slight edge to the Eagles.

We should have traded Bradford to Cleveland for their #1. 😉

I favor Wentz, but Demoff didn’t ask me before he made the trade. 😉

Agamemnon
Author

Posts