Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Darnell Docket?
- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 8 months ago by wv.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 4, 2015 at 10:18 am #19423PA RamParticipant
Jim Thomas @jthom1 15m15 minutes ago
Rams have had conversations w/agent for former Arizona DT Darnell Dockett."Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
March 4, 2015 at 10:29 am #19424PA RamParticipantPro Football Spot @pfspot 55m55 minutes ago
ESPN’s Adam Schefter reports the 49ers, Cardinals, Seahawks, and Rams are all interested in free agent DT Darnell Dockett."Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
March 4, 2015 at 10:32 am #19425PA RamParticipantAdam Schefter @AdamSchefter 2h2 hours ago
Former Cardinals DT Darnell Dockett expected to decide today between 49ers and Cardinals, though Rams and Seahawks also interested."Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
March 4, 2015 at 11:35 am #19427rflParticipantHmmmmm.
We’ve been told that the Rams have very limited funds for and interest in FAs.
I know this is just a minor rumor. But IF Snead is working with a limited FA budget, then acquiring any position other than QB or OL, in my view, is a problem. Sure, it would be nice to have another fine, vet DT. But we desperately need OL.
WV keeps saying he expects the FO to move heaven and earth to improve the OL. He speculates that based on his sense that the regime’s future utterly depends on building a functional OL, and that they are smart guys.
I dunno. Sure, this rumor does not constitute counter-evidence. An FO should always be kicking tires. But I am not at all sure that WV’s reasoning is sound. I am not sure these guys don’t figure they can toss some youngsters and retreads at Boudreau and come out smelling like roses.
I think WV’s assessment of team need is correct. His confidence in the FO, in my opinion, is not.
We’ll see, won’t we?
By virtue of the absurd ...
March 4, 2015 at 11:47 am #19429znModeratorWe’ve been told that the Rams have very limited funds for and interest in FAs.
Actually, it’s not really the case that they have limited resources for FAs. They aren’t set up for massive FA spending, but they can do a fair amount. They do have the ability to create cap space, in fact easily. The Rams cap is deceptive, since they are slow to cut people and they frontload aggressively. But they can instantly produce space any time they want to sign someone.
Dockett is a cut. That means he can be signed immediately. If they are interested, it would be a kind of “opportunity hire.” Showing interest in him looks to me like it has to do with seeing an unexpected possibility and being pragmatic enough to follow it.
Free agency hasn’t even started yet. If a cut like Dockett interests you, you have to jump on it.
But none of that is related to what they can do come time for free agency. As I said, these guys can create space at will. They’re set up to do that. Their cap policies allow for it–in fact their policies deliberately set things up that way.
So to me jumping at a chance for Dockett is just not going to impair their ability to sign a FA when it is time to sign FAs, if in fact they’re interested in FAs.
March 4, 2015 at 12:03 pm #19430znModeratorRams show interest in Darnell Dockett
By Nick Wagoner
http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/16731/rams-show-interest-in-darnell-dockett
EARTH CITY, Mo. — There’s a battle brewing for the services of defensive lineman Darnell Dockett in the NFC West division.
According to ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter, all four teams, including the St. Louis Rams have showed interest in the recently released Arizona Cardinal.
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter
Former Cardinals DT Darnell Dockett expected to decide today between 49ers and Cardinals, though Rams and Seahawks also interested.Schefter’s report makes clear that Dockett is going to decide soon and all signs point to that decision coming down to a return to Arizona or a move to San Francisco to play for the 49ers. The Seattle Seahawks and the Rams have apparently “shown interest” in Dockett but that interest hasn’t manifested into any sort of visits.
Dockett paid a visit to San Francisco on Monday night with the Niners’ interest coming in part because of the uncertain future of defensive lineman Justin Smith. Arizona released Dockett in order to save $6.8 million in salary-cap space but did so with hopes of bringing him back at a reduced cost.
In 158 games with the Cardinals, the 6-foot-4, 293-pound Dockett had 459 tackles, 40.5 sacks and four interceptions. The 33-year old Dockett missed all of last season with an ACL injury but had been extremely durable before that, missing only two games in the previous 10 years.
Even though it sounds unlikely that the Rams will be major players in the Dockett sweepstakes, that they have some interest in Dockett should be telling for what they are looking for on their defensive line.
The Rams released defensive tackle Kendall Langford last week in a cost-cutting move and though they left the door open for Langford’s return, he has begun taking free-agent visits in search of a starting job. Langford wrapped up a visit to Detroit and is scheduled to head to New York to meet with the Jets before a stop in New Orleans.
Sans Langford, the Rams are down to just two defensive tackles — Aaron Donald and Michael Brockers — under contract for 2015. Much like last year, it means the Rams will again be scouring the free-agent market for depth. In 2014, that resulted in the addition of Alex Carrington, who didn’t offer much in his one season with the team.
An older veteran like Dockett would make sense for what the Rams need because whoever they bring in will probably only be needed for 25 or so snaps a game. Although it appears the Rams aren’t going to be Dockett’s destination, the Rams’ potential interest should be instructive in the types of defensive tackles the team will be vetting as free agency begins.
March 4, 2015 at 3:12 pm #19439wvParticipantI am not at all sure that WV’s reasoning is sound….
We’ll see, won’t we?
They will put together a monster OLine.
They will throw everything at that problem.
It just makes sense in so many ways.
They need to protect Bradford, and they need
to be able to run and use play-action. They
need to withstand the defenses in the NFC West.
They will spin their wheels another year,
if they fail to fix that one unit.
They must know that.I will weep,
if they piddle around
on other positions,
and fail to build a
topnotch OLine.w
v
“Come away, O human child!
To the waters and the wild
With a faery, hand in hand,
For the world’s more full of weeping than you can understand.”
― W.B. Yeats, The Collected Poems -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.