Breitbart vs the Normies

Zooey wrote:

http://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/

Zooey, that gets a red light from my browser’s WOT app. Says “not safe.”

Hmm. I went through it and survived. There’s no malware. It’s a white supremacist website that outlines the plan for ridding this nation of inferior races, especially Jews who, as you know, caused all this mess by encouraging mass immigration and the homosexual agenda. And so on.

The warning may be based on its being a hate group’s website. Not sure. I didn’t stick around long enough to find out.

Just thought I’d mention the red flag, etc.

The alt-right and its “friends.” There are few ideologies in this world that disgust me more, or make me despair to such a degree. The obscene ugliness of their thinking. Its twisted nature. Its venom and road-kill stench.

And the people most likely to join such movements — white Christian males — generally have, relatively speaking, the least to complain about in this country and in much of the rest of the world. As in, their sense of being under threat from the government and from the Other is, more often than not, the opposite of reality.

sdram wrote:

speaking of hate – whigs, Lincoln, immigrants, secret society’s – good stuff.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/trump-nativist-speech-follows-dark-us-pattern-755626563851

————-
Maddow acts like a ‘two party system’ is a good thing. Why?

Why is ‘two’ a magic number?
(not that the Replicants and Duplicats are
that much different, but for the sake of argument…)

…btw, in wv-world there would be several parties. And they would ALL
be leftwing-progressive parties. No rightwing parties needed. Just the Progressicans. And the Progressocrats. And the leftwingicans. And the Leftwingicrats. And the Holy-shit-Infinitely-Left-party.

w
v

w
v

Would be pretty cool if the Green Party were the “far right” for us.

:>)

But, pushing things a bit further, rather than having a bunch of leftist parties — which would be ginormously better than our current situation — why not zero parties?

No political parties allowed. Because they are, of course, concentrated organizations, with their own hierarchies, and concentrated organizations tend to represent their own interests, rather than the broader public’s. At least over time. Concentrated power tends to make gaining more power the goal.

Instead, let’s go back to basics, and “organize” as communities, with everyone automatically granted full and equal membership in their particular (fully democratic) community, federated with every other community. The economy would be fully democratized, and cooperative, not competitive. The communities themselves would be co-ops.

We’d have regions, not states. And regions would consist of all the co-ops in their area, and the regions would cooperate with each other too . . . and the communities and the regions would form the nation, under a new Constitution and a new economic mode. No permanent power centers, anywhere. The flattest possible pyramids, with “leadership” being temporary, rotational, at the local, regional and national levels. Lotteries. Not elections.

No parties needed. All political power rests in each of us, as individuals, with equal voices and equal shares in our commonly held economy and democratic union. Our organizing principles are the earth, democracy, equality, social justice for all.