board reactions, JETS game

[zn]

9-6

AO INT seals it

Gurley sloooooowly starting to get going

[nittany ram]

Back in the playoff hunt – kinda, sorta.

So, does Keenum start next week?

[Agamemnon]

Agamemnon

[Agamemnon]

nittany ram wrote:

Back in the playoff hunt – kinda, sorta.

So, does Keenum start next week?

Not my QB. LOL

Agamemnon

[PA Ram]

Agamemnon wrote:

nittany ram wrote:

Back in the playoff hunt – kinda, sorta.

So, does Keenum start next week?

Not my QB. LOL

Okay–that’s actually pretty good.

• This reply was modified 8 years, 1 month ago by PA Ram.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

[PA Ram]

I had to go pick up my wife so I missed the thrilling ending but I see the Rams played perfect Fisherball and got the win. I’ll take it. A win is a win is a win. Did the team really improve? Not really. They are still who they are.

Technically yes–they are still in the playoff hunt so I expect Fisher to stay the coarse.

I don’t think it’s a playoff coarse but…well, hopefully it works.

The question is do they prepare for next year(Goff) or do they try to get to the playoffs?

I don’t see a playoff team.

But I think Fisher does.

I hope Fisher is right.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

[Eternal Ramnation]

That is our 22 starters until Barnes and TA missed plays but damn compared to the rest of the NFL they’re super healthy. Britt looked good Gurley got going somewhat . Defense played well after the 99 yrd drive. TA has bad hands. They seem lost Keenum is inconsistent , he’s gutsy a fighter but he just isn’t that good, Hecker is !The D locked it down in the 2nd half.Cooper ran the route to the sticks!

[InvaderRam]

Agamemnon wrote:

nittany ram wrote:

Back in the playoff hunt – kinda, sorta.

So, does Keenum start next week?

Not my QB. LOL

……….

bwahahaha!

awesome.

• This reply was modified 8 years, 1 month ago by InvaderRam.

[wv]

I’ll be interested in where the Defense ranks
after that game.

I’ll also be interested to see where they rank
after the Saint and Patriot games 🙂

w
v

[NERam]

Another nailbiter. Who woulda thunk it???

[JackPMiller]

Not sure why, I know we won, but it does not feel like it. Anyone else have that feeling.

[wv]

NERam wrote:

Another nailbiter. Who woulda thunk it???

————-

I guess thats two games where Ogletree sealed the win
with a late Turnover.

Still not many sacks for this D or turnovers.

w
v

[NERam]

wv wrote:

I’ll be interested in where the Defense ranks
after that game.

I’ll also be interested to see where they rank
after the Saint and Patriot games

w
v

The offense will be rank, you can be sure of that.

[zn]

JackPMiller wrote:

Not sure why, I know we won, but it does not feel like it. Anyone else have that feeling.

Me personally? No. I don’t feel that way.

I don’t believe in moral defeats.

[Winnbrad]

The Rams beat a bad team that started a below average quarterback. We beat the AFC version of the Rams.

A win next week (at home!) has to happen. If it doesn’t, the 7-9 BS train is pulling into the station.

[sanbagger]

I missed the game, was in a golf tourny today, and the Jets are sanbaggerettes team soooooo….kinda glad they pulled off a W even if it was a field goal victory cause that…Whatever, I received from her was pretty sweet.

Gotta catch up on what happened but right now I’m wallowing in the W

• This reply was modified 8 years, 1 month ago by sanbagger.

[wv]

Winnbrad wrote:

The Rams beat a bad team that started a below average quarterback. We beat the AFC version of the Rams.

A win next week (at home!) has to happen. If it doesn’t, the 7-9 BS train is pulling into the station.

————-
Well even if they win, they may be on the 7-9-BS train. They are now 4-5.
Let us look at the schedule…

To get to that lofty, unimaginable EIGHT win summit, they need to scrounge and claw four more hideously-ugly wins out of the next seven games:

Miami
At Saints
At Pats
Atlanta
At Seattle
SF
Ariz

Maybe that last game will be the game that decides whether its 7-9-Bullshit, OR,
Eight-and-Eight-Mediocrity.

w
v

[Agamemnon]

JackPMiller wrote:

Not sure why, I know we won, but it does not feel like it. Anyone else have that feeling.

Yeah, sort of. The Jets just feel like a really bad team.

Agamemnon

[canadaram]

wv wrote:

————-

I guess thats two games where Ogletree sealed the win
with a late Turnover.

Still not many sacks for this D or turnovers.

w
v

The Rams are 2-0 when scoring no TDs and Ogletree gets a late game turnover.

[Winnbrad]

wv wrote:

Winnbrad wrote:

The Rams beat a bad team that started a below average quarterback. We beat the AFC version of the Rams.

A win next week (at home!) has to happen. If it doesn’t, the 7-9 BS train is pulling into the station.

————-
Well even if they win, they may be on the 7-9-BS train. They are now 4-5.
Let us look at the schedule…

To get to that lofty, unimaginable EIGHT win summit, they need to scrounge and claw four more hideously-ugly wins out of the next seven games:

Miami
At Saints
At Pats
Atlanta
At Seattle
SF
Ariz

Maybe that last game will be the game that decides whether its 7-9-Bullshit, OR,
Eight-and-Eight-Mediocrity.

w
v

Ugh. I think I was optimistic with 7-9. Maybe I can catch that 6-10 train?

[NERam]

canadaram wrote:

wv wrote:

————-

I guess thats two games where Ogletree sealed the win
with a late Turnover.

Still not many sacks for this D or turnovers.

w
v

The Rams are 2-0 when scoring no TDs and Ogletree gets a late game turnover.

Theres the argument for leaving Goff on the bench until he fully develops, huh? Quite a success formula.

[sanbagger]

JackPMiller wrote:

Not sure why, I know we won, but it does not feel like it. Anyone else have that feeling.

Yep…I was happy with the win last night…feeling a little empty today.

[joemad]

JackPMiller wrote:

Not sure why, I know we won, but it does not feel like it. Anyone else have that feeling.

it’s not easy for West Coast teams to travel back east and win.

URL = https://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/is-there-still-a-disadvantage-for-nfl-west-coast-teams-traveling-east/

“”””Since the start of the 2003 season, West Coast teams have gone just 61-111 (35.5%) against East Coast teams.””””

[Eternal Ramnation]

joemad wrote:

JackPMiller wrote:

Not sure why, I know we won, but it does not feel like it. Anyone else have that feeling.

it’s not easy for West Coast teams to travel back east and win.

URL = https://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/is-there-still-a-disadvantage-for-nfl-west-coast-teams-traveling-east/

“”””Since the start of the 2003 season, West Coast teams have gone just 61-111 (35.5%) against East Coast teams.””””

Unfortunately the Rams are 76 and 131 over that same period so they will find a way to lose regardless.

[bnw]

Another game with no TDs. Two wins like that too. 1st and goal at the Jets one yard line gets us a FG. Pathetic.

• This reply was modified 8 years, 1 month ago by bnw.

The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

Sprinkles are for winners.

[zn]

joemad wrote:

Since the start of the 2003 season, West Coast teams have gone just 61-111 (35.5%) against East Coast teams

Wonder what the other way around is.

Of course, WC teams travelling to the EC are starting 3 hours earlier. Wonder if that makes a difference between WC teams going east and EC teams going west.

.

[— X —]

zn wrote:

Me personally? No. I don’t feel that way.

I don’t believe in moral defeats.

Haha. Nice.

You have to be odd, to be number one.
-- Dr Seuss

[Author]

Posts