- This topic has 46 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 8 months ago by
.
-
I don’t see how they could afford both Suh and Donald.
that’s the one thing i can’t get past. money.
but fit? i don’t know. here’s a link from the third article. scott seems to think suh could play any position on a dline in a 3-4 front.
Bart Scott: Ndamukong Suh in a 3-4 ‘Would Be Virtually Unstoppable’
“I’ve always wanted to see [Ndamukong] Suh play in a 3-4,” former NFL linebacker and current CBS analyst Bart Scott said on the Big O Show. “Because I think Suh in a 3-4 would be so dynamic, right? Because now you can’t double him, now you can move him around like people do with J.J Watt, Muhammad Wilkerson, all these types of guys. But when you put him there and they know exactly where he’s gonna line up, it’s easy to just take him away.
“So if you want to make Ndamukong Suh an end, you put him in a 3-4. So I think that’s something they should consider because I think Ndamukong Suh in a 3-4 would raise so much hell, it’d be illegal and then you just have to ask Cameron Wake to stand up and play a form of outside linebacker like Demarcus Ware was asked to do in Dallas but I’d love to see that happen because now you get the best of both worlds. Now people don’t know who’s coming. Now you have five on five, not five on four and people have to make a decision, who’s coming, who’s not coming. Sometimes you have to adjust your scheme to your personal and I always thought Ndamukong Suh in a 3-4 would be virtually unstoppable.”
I don’t see how they could afford both Suh and Donald.
And I don’t see him as a fit. In Wade’s D he would be a 3-tech, which is AD’s position.
Brockers wasn’t a fit at NT so I don’t see the advantage of putting Suh at DE.
This whole thing is just several differently shaped pegs for one round hole.
…
Suh just doesn’t excite me. Donald is better. I would rather have a NT.
Agamemnonregardless you have three guys who can play at multiple positions on the line and two who are elite level talents.
invader, you are in the minority on this. Which is fine except you know what being in the minority on an issue means. It means you have to expect terrible reprisals and all posts by you will be delayed for inspection to make sure they are not causing any trouble.
We are for diversity of opinions, sure, but, that doesn;t mean people can disagree with the majority. You start allowing THAT and it’s anarchy.
Johnny Caspar, from Miller’s Crossing: It’s gettin’ so a businessman can’t expect no return from a fixed fight. Now, if you can’t trust a fix, what can you trust? For a good return, you gotta go bettin’ on chance – and then you’re back with anarchy, right back in the jungle.
Short version: who knows, invader, you could be right.
On with @Midday180, @Schultz_Report say indications from @NdamukongSuh are he will choose between #Saints, #Titans, #Rams and #Seahawks. All about chance to win, not money which is why he didn't talk money in New Orleans or Nashville.
— Paul Kuharsky (@PaulKuharskyNFL) March 19, 2018
good discussions over at the herd.
i agree with the people who say the only way this works is if he plays defensive end. and i think brockers goes back to nose.
but who even knows if suh can play the 5 technique? i’d bet he can. he’s superior athletically. has enough length. and is a sharp dude.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
