Progressives need strategy built on values

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Progressives need strategy built on values

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #68524
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The formatting for this stinks. You would be better off going to the site: http://billmoyers.com/story/progressives-need-long-term-strategy-built-values/

    DEMOCRACY & GOVERNMENT
    Why Progressives Need a Long-Term Strategy, Built on Values
    It’s going to take a lot more than just resistance if progressives are to recapture the hearts and minds of America.

    BY JOHN ATCHESON | MAY 8, 2017

    Progressives must reclaim the Democratic Party from neoliberals, or continue to lose elections at all levels, as Democrats have been doing with increasing frequency since they abandoned the New Deal and adopted the raw deal. (Photo by DonkeyHotey/ flickr CC 2.0)

    This post originally appeared at Common Dreams.

    Ever since Trump got elected, there’s been a lot of talk about resistance. As the country marked Trump’s first 100 days, it reached a crescendo. Then Republicans in the House passed Trump care — one of the cruelest Bills in recent memory. The reason they can screw so many people with relative impunity, is that they’ve invested decades in creating a mega-narrative that insulates them from consequences.

    The alternative is to continue to lose elections at all levels, as Democrats have been doing with increasing frequency since they abandoned the New Deal and adopted the raw deal.
    Certainly, we must resist Trump’s destructive agenda in every way we can. But if progressives are to recapture the hearts and minds of America it will take far more than just resisting. It will require that progressives develop a long-term strategy that addresses the needs of people, not plutocrats, that is based on values, not tactics.

    And that has to start with reclaiming the Democratic Party from the neoliberals. The alternative is to continue to lose elections at all levels, as Democrats have been doing with increasing frequency since they abandoned the New Deal and adopted the raw deal. And if progressives cannot take over the Democratic Party we will have to start the long, slow slog toward building a third party and hope that there’s enough left of the country and the planet to salvage by the time we succeed.

    How Conservatives Took Over America

    We can learn a lot from conservatives, because they executed a successful silent coup, more than four decades in the making, funded by and conducted on behalf of the oligarchy. We’re not talking about some shadowy conspiracy featuring clandestine meetings, passwords, secret handshakes, James Bond supervillains, Freemasons or…gasp…even the Trilateral Commission. This coup was more like a flock of vultures moving in tandem only because they were pursuing a shared vision of their own self-interest — which was to relentlessly fleece us to feather their own foul nests. But if it wasn’t a coherent junta, it was fueled by money. Lots and lots of money. And it had a blueprint — The Powell Memo.

    The strategy focused on:

    creating a conservative infrastructure in the form of foundations, think tanks, endowed academic chairs and media-savvy spokespeople at all levels;
    deregulating the media, Wall Street, banks and industry in general (and purchasing the media outright once regulatory constraints were removed);
    discrediting government as the source of anything good or valuable;
    starving government of receipts with the purpose of shrinking it, assuring government couldn’t function;
    creating wedge issues to exploit hate, fear, greed, xenophobia and other aspects of the lizard brain; and
    creating the myth that markets would provide all good things by pure serendipity.
    The strategy has culminated in their spectacular success at all levels of government — they now control both branches of the legislature in 32 states and the governorship in 24 of those states, as well as both houses of Congress and the presidency at the federal level. But an even starker measure of their success is how corporations and the uber-rich have prospered at the expense of the rest of us. The top one-tenth of 1 percent of Americans now have as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent, democracy is all but dead in the Unites States, the press is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Oligarchy and both parties dance to its tune.

    Government — once the champion of the working man, the author of the New Deal and the architect of the longest sustained and broadly share period of prosperity in US history, has become the enemy. Meanwhile, the free market, which exploited workers, defiled the environment and operated outside of any moral framework, is now believed to be the font of all things good, delivered by pure serendipity. As a result, broad sections of society — including much of the press, the establishment wing the Democratic Party, much of academia and the public policy infrastructure and of course Republicans — believe taxes are bad, regulations are bad, small government is good, public programs are bad, and the markets (i.e. the oligarchy) will automatically provide great things if we just get government out of the way. This is the camouflage under which such nonsense as laissez-faire, trickle-down and supply-side economics keep getting resurrected, no matter how often it fails.

    Republicans Strategic Approach Will Make it difficult to Win the House until 2022

    For another example of the power of long-term strategic thinking over mere opposition or identity politics, consider project Redmap — a Karl Rove effort that all but assures that Republicans will control the House until at least 2022 — and that assumes Democrats stop navigating by their hood ornaments and get strategic. If they don’t, then Republicans will control the House for much longer.

    Republicans are just two states shy of being able to convene a constitutional convention and the Koch Brothers — funders of the coup — are pumping money into an effort to put them over the top.
    As recounted in David Daley’s Ratf**ked, Republicans targeted key races in the state legislatures with an eye toward gerrymandering the hell out of the House elections. The results have been dramatic. In 2012, the first year the full effect of redistricting could be seen, Democrats got 1.7 million more votes than Republicans, but Republicans won 33 more congressional seats. And for all the talk — and the need — to take back Congress in 2018, it will be extraordinarily difficult for Democrats to do in the face of such a stacked deck.

    Here’s the timeline for leveling the playing field. Democrats would have to launch an effective attack on Republican legislators at the state level in 2018 and 2020, then wait for the census results and draw reasonable districts that actually represent the people. As a result, the first time Democrats could face Republicans without their gerrymandered advantage will be 2022, again, assuming Democrats get their act together.

    If this frightens you, it should. Even more frightening is the fact that Republicans are just two states shy of being able to convene a constitutional convention and the Koch Brothers — funders of the coup — are pumping money into an effort to put them over the top.

    How Democrats Lost America – and Why They’ll Continue to if They Don’t Change Course

    While conservatives are playing political chess and thinking several moves ahead, Democrats are playing political checkers and focusing on short-term excuses for losing the election — like the Russian email hacks — which as Norman Soloman pointed out, gives them a pretext to continue to blame their defeat on the Russians, rather than the fact that they ran candidates who put Wall Street over Main Street.

    It is precisely this embrace of neoliberalism that has caused the Democratic Party’s long, slow slide into irrelevance. Back in the 1960s, half the registered voters claimed to be Democrats; today, 29 percent do. Republicans have been hovering somewhere near 25 percent during the same period, while winning elections.

    The reason Republicans win as a minority party is because Democrats have embraced neoliberalism and rejected true progressivism and the New Deal. As a result, turnouts at election time are typically low, and it’s the Democrats and disaffected independents who don’t turn out. The difference between the “trickle-down, supply-side” con of the Republican Party and the Democrats’ embrace of the free market, deregulation, lower taxes, markets-know-best agenda that Bill Clinton brought to the party with the Democratic Leadership Council is simply too small to excite the people.

    If Democrats want to win again, they will need to embrace real progressive values, restore a measure of diversity to the press and media by restoring regulations that allowed the FCC to bust monopolies, and invest in the needed infrastructure — foundations, think tanks, academic chairs, etc., to carry a populist message and to reveal the treachery of the Republicans’ economic con game.

    As you read this, there’s a fight on for control of the Democratic Party. Incredibly, the old-guard neoliberal establishment is doing all they can to hold onto the status quo that enabled a dangerous know-nothing like Trump to assume the presidency.

    Scary stuff.

    #68527
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “…The reason they (the Right) can screw so many people with relative impunity, is that they’ve invested decades in creating a mega-narrative that insulates them from consequences…”

    “…The reason Republicans win as a minority party is because Democrats have embraced neoliberalism and rejected true progressivism…”

    Well, we (board-leftists) have been saying those two things for well over a decade now. Meanwhile the biosphere continues to to be destroyed by the Obama-Hillary-Dems and the Trump-Reps.

    I see zero reason to think the Dems are going to change. Just read Waterfield’s posts. They will turn to another ‘qualified’ candidate like Hillary/Obama.
    We will lurch from Trump-nationalism-neoliberalism to Obama/hillary-neoliberalism.

    For all the reason’s we’ve discussed for over a decade — ‘they’ outnumber ‘us’.
    There simply are not that many ‘progressives’ in this country. There’s just not. If there were, the Senate would not look like it does.

    The Neolibs (Rep-version and Dem-version) were better at selling their meta-narratives than the progressives/socialists.

    We lost. They won. Have a nice day 🙂

    w
    v

    #68531
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yep.

    All through the 80s and 90s, I could at least believe that the Left could triumph somewhere down the road. That the arc of history is long, and we could ultimately gain the upper hand.

    But, you know, that whistle just signaled the two-minute warning on the biosphere, and it’s over. I suppose we could score in the next 12 seconds, then recover a fumble on the kickoff, score on the next play, then get an onsides kick to set up a chance…but somehow…that doesn’t ever seem to happen.

    The game is over.

    And I have kids that are going to be alive when the shit hits the fan.

    You think the Trump fascists and gun nuts are out of control now? Just wait…

    Where’s Mackeyser? We can usually count on him to enter a thread right about now, and make everything even worse.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.