Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 6,811 through 6,840 (of 7,307 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    <span class=”d4pbbc-font-color” style=”color: blue”>You guys do realize that that isn’t an official depth chart?</span>

    It claims to be official.

    But even if it IS official, it doesn’t mean much. Just a snapshot in time.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams mailbag … 5/14 #24721
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    We aren’t talking about how to get Benny Cunningham more involved in the offense. Austin is discussed this way because of our expectations of the guy.

    I think Wagoner is right about the owners’ meetings. Moving the File to Move date up seems very likely to me to be the next move in this game which – I agree – ends with the Rams in LA next year, and the Chargers a year or two after that.

    Interesting word choice: “macabre.”

    in reply to: Laram – State of the Rams #24709
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    It seems to me that going all in on the pass rush is a good idea, especially given the point LA makes later that the NFL has tilted everything towards passing, away from rushing anyway. And that doesn’t mean that the Rams are not trying to cover as well, in spite of the addition of Ayers (who – I will take his word for it – can’t cover). They invested heavily in secondary last year, both in the draft, and in UDFA, and a couple of those guys red-shirted. So the development of the secondary this year will be one aspect of the Rams that I will have an eye on. We have Gaines and Joyner up-and-coming, and this year we should see what Bryant and Roberson can do. I do think their LBs are limited, and probably the least imposing unit on the team. They are serviceable, but no wrecking crew.

    I think Gurley was a great decision at 10. I’ve yet to see anybody offer another name that was on the board at that point who could arguably have made as big a difference. His presence will make Foles and the passing game better both by making the defense worry about more things, and by his own value as a receiver. Want a better passing game? Get Gurley. Nobody else on the board would have helped the passing game more at that point. And while running the ball may very well mean more plays to score, Gurley doesn’t fumble. And running with Gurley is a lower risk than throwing to anybody. I just don’t agree that the Gurley addition will make a drive more likely to make a mistake. On the contrary. I think he immediately becomes the guy on the Rams that defenses have to gameplan for.

    in reply to: will Tavon step up in 2015? #24698
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    He’s a punt returner.

    I don’t agree.

    He does catch passes, and does do a combo of things in the passing game. IMO he is only a “failure” in that regard if someone expected him to be a pure receiver.

    He also can run the ball out of the backfield.

    And he can also return punts.

    He can do those things, yes. A few times a game.

    I see him as a poor man’s Amp Lee.

    in reply to: will Tavon step up in 2015? #24687
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    He’s a punt returner.

    in reply to: David Letterman #24632
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I liked him too, though I hardly have watched him. I’ve seen fewer than 100 shows, I would guess. But I saw enough to think more highly of him than any other late night host, including Carson, who was great.

    Letterman had a knack for pointing out that the mundane and facile could be entertaining if you just had enough sense of humor yourself. That combined with the acerbic wit you point out…he covered the gamut. He was amused, and he amused us.

    in reply to: Offensive Linemen Make Early Impression #24543
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Gurley Men.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The NFL has screwed up a lot of discipline.

    That’s true.

    And irrelevant.

    in reply to: USA Today power rankings #24501
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Holy crap.
    I would expect that kind of expectation only from a Rams fan. I doubt even most of the Rams beat writers would rate them that highly.
    I like them.
    I think they have a young corps that is now hitting its stride. I could really see this team taking off. I thought they were ready to step up last year until Bradford was lost, and the OL got wiped out. Again.

    But now there is hope that with stability in schemes, and with some experience, this young, young team could elevate itself this year.
    I like them better than the Cardinals and 9ers.

    Yeah, its an interesting ranking.
    I think they got it right, btw. Thats about
    right where I’d put them.
    They certainly have the talent to be right
    there in the 9 or 10 win range, fighting
    for a playoff spot.

    w
    v

    I agree with that. I think they are right, too. I am just very surprised anybody nationally thinks that. Given the usual level of ignorance we see nationally.

    in reply to: USA Today power rankings #24490
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Holy crap.

    I would expect that kind of expectation only from a Rams fan. I doubt even most of the Rams beat writers would rate them that highly.

    I like them.

    I think they have a young corps that is now hitting its stride. I could really see this team taking off. I thought they were ready to step up last year until Bradford was lost, and the OL got wiped out. Again.

    But now there is hope that with stability in schemes, and with some experience, this young, young team could elevate itself this year.

    I like them better than the Cardinals and 9ers.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    4. NBC broadcaster Bob Costas

    “I think [Brady] mishandled it with the league, and he also mishandled it in the court of public opinion,” Costas said on the Today show on Tuesday. “Think back, if he just said this: ‘Look, we all look for an edge. I like the football at the lowest possible end of what’s allowable. I communicated that to the equipment guys. If they went a bit overboard, I’m sorry, my bad,’ See you later.”

    I think that’s about right.

    At the time the story broke, everybody was saying that it didn’t affect the outcome. If Brady had said something like what Costas suggests, the punishment wouldn’t have been as severe, and he would have survived the court of public opinion. I would have still thought he was a liar because I don’t think those equipment guys would have done that without his blessing, but I think most people would have just let it go.

    I don’t feel sorry for him. And Kraft can go blow himself. It’s just too bad Belichek isn’t dragged into this more.

    But now they are busted TWICE for cheating. It taints their accomplishments. Boston fans can feel victimized all they want, but they will never hear the end of it.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Sacks/Stuffs doesnt seem to have much
    relationship to winning, if the top
    of that chart is any indication.

    w
    v

    One also needs to score points.

    in reply to: Deflategate c'est fini #24313
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Heatin’ up a bit

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/report-patriots-fear-lengthy-suspension-for-tom-brady/ar-BBjryg1?ocid=U142DHP

    Well, Brady got a fourth ring. I doubt
    if he even cares that much about missing
    some regular season games. He got his Ring,
    and he’ll still be around for the Pats usual
    playoff run. The money wont matter to him at this point.

    w
    v

    The reputation will.

    He could potentially become a Barry Bonds.

    Tom Brady Asterisk.

    in reply to: Bailey wows with trick catch #24304
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    661 yards and 1 TD in two seasons.

    I’d prefer a receiver who was kept less of a secret.

    in reply to: Todd Gurley #24264
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I am guessing he wont be in the lineup till
    mid-season or so. But what do i know.

    That means he’ll only get a thousand yards next year.

    w
    v

    Well, just so long as the Rams win the Super Bowl, I’m okay with that.

    in reply to: Collins signs with boys #24260
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Vikings dumped some OL today, I saw.

    in reply to: Todd Gurley #24257
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I hope for the best but I feel people are getting too far ahead with optimism considering he’s recovering from an ACL. If Mason ends up keeping the job what an expensive and waste of another first round pick.

    Yes, it is said it takes 2 years to recover 100%. Since he was hurt in November, he would have to be well ahead of schedule to be 100% at the beginning of the 2016 season.

    He doesn’t, however, have to be 100% to play or be effective. But you are right to remind us of caution. I don’t see how he can start the season, really.

    in reply to: The epic ballad saga of La'el Collins #24236
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The reports are saying Collins wants to play OT for a contender.

    Wow. Collins want to play for a good team.

    Bystanders are stunned.

    Most people thought he would go for the team with the prettiest colors, or the most loyal fan base.

    Collins wants to play for a contender?

    Wow.

    in reply to: Todd Gurley #24235
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Word around the campfire is that the Jets already had Gurley pegged @ #6. But when the Skins passed on L. Williams, they did a 180 and drafted the most talented player in the draft. Bowles just couldn’t help himself.

    Well, if the Jets wanted him, that can’t be good.

    in reply to: David Stewart = Tyson Clabo = Rob Havenstein #24193
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    And it appears that every OL the Rams drafted this year has that “mauler” mentality. They all just keep going, and keep hitting people.

    I tell you, that kind of mindset makes up for talent deficiencies. Obviously, you would like both in a player, but I think I’d rather sacrifice some size or length or technique for attitude, then get another Barron.

    And Greg Robinson was described the same way. In the 4th quarter, if you have an OL that just keeps on hitting, they are just going to wear guys down.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think the “identity” aspect of this is overblown a little bit. While it is easy to draw a “run it down their throats” theme to this draft, I don’t think that was really the intent. It looks that way. But if this had been a typical draft with an LB here, and an OL there, it wouldn’t have been so easily categorized even though it would have been building a Fisher team in equally the same way. Just not one aspect of it all at once.

    It fell out that way.

    The Rams entered the off season with two primary needs: OL and a QB of the future. There are other things they could have used, but that’s what they NEEDED.

    Then Gurley was there. And it looks like a “run it down their throats” draft.

    in reply to: draft grades #24137
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Everyone they drafted is a system fit. I don’t have any problem with anything they did. It’s clear what the strategy was behind this draft, and it’s clear they nailed that strategy. Whether the players turn out or not, of course, we shall see. But they got what several people are calling one of the 2-3 best players in the draft (and one of those other players is Williams, a DE), and they got a free QB out of it all. If those OL turn out to be players, this looks to me like a more talented version of the Titans (except at QB). The OL, though. That’s what we are waiting for now. If they play out, I expect a wild card berth, or an excruciatingly close miss of the wild card.

    in reply to: TD passed away. #24129
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    RIP, Thordaddy.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Great post, Isiah58. That’s well said. Not only is that an accurate description of their philosophy, I endorse it fully. I agree that you always go BPA in the first. I did not understand the hand-wringing Thursday night/Friday morning about how they failed to address the line. I wanted a playmaker at #10, and while I didn’t have Gurley on my radar, it took me all of about a minute to get on board with it.

    And for those who didn’t like the Gurley pick, I ask…who? Peat? Nobody ever offered a preferred alternative. With the draft thick in OL, the strategy made perfect sense to me.

    We shall see. I like Dak’s assessment of the assessment. Gurley and Havenstein + one other starter = A draft. That’s the hope.

    in reply to: 101, 5/4 … Miklasz … 920, JT #24087
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    What the hell is a “perpetual rebuilding process?” Doesn’t every team participate in the draft every year? What do they want, Trung Canidate type picks?

    The Rams have to play rookies because they totally sucked when Fisher took over. They haven’t reached the point of the luxury of drafting for depth. They are drafting for starters still. And they are getting closer.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    i want to say that while i like the ol prospects, i really only expect one starter from that group in year 1. havenstein at right tackle. center will come from one of their three prospects – jones, rhaney, or barnes. the right guard spot will be barksdale or some other free agent they sign or possibly jones.

    the other rookies are developmental. no way they start them immediately unless they just absolutely knock he socks off the coaches, but that’s highly unlikely.

    and again. i think the gurley pick was brilliant. they needed that type of talent on offense. absolutely needed it. now he just needs to fulfill his potential… no pressure…

    I think they want Saffold at RG.

    in reply to: The epic ballad saga of La'el Collins #24049
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    What do you mean “based on the CBA”. What kind of limitations are we talking about here?

    The league sets a limit on how much teams can spend on undrafted FAs every year. I actually think it might be less that $100,000. That means that, in year one anyway, he will have to settle for next to nothing. Of course after this year he could end up getting a big-time FA contract.

    If that’s true, he may sit the year.

    He may have to anyway. He may be cleared this week, and he may be cleared after everybody has been in camp a while. And maybe he will be Aaron Hernandez’s roommate this time next year.

    But why work for a plumber’s salary this year, and risk an ACL?

    Presumably he would be eligible for FA next year in February when all the other FA hit the market.

    I just don’t think he plays this year.

    in reply to: Todd Gurley #24046
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, you know, even if his production drops by 10% in the pros, and he averages just 7 yards a carry, I will be alright with that.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    With so many teams set up to defend the pass, teams often struggle to deal with a beefy run game.

    Look at how teams struggle to defend Seattle’s O.

    Well, if we essentially look to do it better by having a better OL, a back with the potential to be better than Lynch and a better passing QB than Wilson with better weapons than Seattle has, then we have the potential to be ridiculously scary as a team. Just flat out horrific to other teams because we’re going to be a 4th quarter nightmare to defend.

    It’s not just Gurley, but also Foles.

    If Foles is Faulk, then Gurley is Holt.

    I just got a feeling that some alchemy is brewing this year… and having Mason with his ability to make people miss… man, we’re going to give teams fits.

    You must be feeling a lot better because I see your meds are really kicking in, Mack.

    I’m not sure the Rams’ OL is even adequate yet, Gurley may not play half the year, and expecting him to be better than Lynch when he does is optimistic, and Foles is a better QB than Wilson only in a few of the more remote alternate universes, and in none of them is he the impact player Faulk is.

    I must admit, though, that I am looking forward to the season a lot more now than I was two weeks ago.

    in reply to: LA Rams redirect page #24022
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    They took the initial profile down, but not the one you posted…

    har har har…

    I somehow thought it wouldn’t last.

Viewing 30 posts - 6,811 through 6,840 (of 7,307 total)