Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 5,041 through 5,070 (of 8,230 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bernie M is back #95425
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Here is a handkerchief, Bernie.

    You might want to wipe your chin. You’ve got a little venom dripping off it.

    It’s not real noticeable, or anything, but….

    in reply to: reactions to the Eagles game #95424
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I blame Pharoh Cooper.

    The guy was always a cancer on this team, and now that he is gone, the Rams have lost their last game of the season.

    in reply to: Whats wrong with the offense? #95383
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Also against Chicago, they did not adjust to how defenses are playing them now. Defenses are subtracting the intermediate “chunk” passes they thrived on earlier, and then also both (1) attacking the OL and (2) gameplanning Donald out of the picture which means fewer dramatic defensive plays limiting the score.

    One answer to the defensive strategy of taking away the 11-25 yard chunk plays is to develop a patient short passing game. They WERE doing that against the Eagles but then getting behind meant they had to junk that approach.

    And when they junked the short passing game in desperation late in the game, they nearly came back.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 9 months ago by Avatar photoZooey.
    in reply to: Gurley knee inflammation #95341
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Knee inflammation.

    Usually inflammations have root causes.

    Knees don’t…you know…just inflame.

    in reply to: reactions to the Eagles game #95296
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    BTW…I didn’t see it…I read it in the play-by-play…did the Rams really go for it on 4th down from their own 30?

    in reply to: reactions to the Eagles game #95295
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    In the twitter feed on CBS, someone said Gurley hurt his knee. I can’t really listen to Collinsworth. He makes my skin crawl.

    Anyway. Something about a knee.

    in reply to: reactions to the Eagles game #95285
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I did not see all of it, but what I saw was discouraging.

    The Rams started off the season with some dominating performances. When they played a tough team in the Chargers, they came through. Since the game where Talib and Peters got hurt, though, this team has been in decline.

    The offense still rolled, and McVay made great halftime adjustments right up through the KC game while the defense struggled. Well…now the offense is struggling, too. I will admit that the defense has improved since Talib returned in terms of points allowed…but they still can’t stop the run. I am pretty damn tired of seeing 7 and 8 yard runs against this defense again and again. And when the Rams can’t get to the QB…they lose.

    I didn’t see the D step up and make plays tonight. Sacks, stuffs, TOs, busted plays…you just don’t see the Rams’ defense assert itself and take control. Like…ever. Talib’s interception tonight saved the Rams from being blown out, but you never get the sense the Rams defense is the master of the game. And this is a defense of all-stars. On paper, it looked absolutely fabulous except for the LBs.

    Now I don’t know if it is personnel, or scheme, but it looks like scheme to me. The players they have on D have proven themselves to be red and blue chip players with the exception of Ebukam.

    And now the offense can’t get going. Losing Kupp matters, but his loss alone does not account for the sudden mediocrity of the offense. Since the KC game, this team has gone from moving the ball at will to struggling to put together a drive. And the big strikes are a thing of the past. Goff’s accuracy is off, the receivers seem to be covered, the OL can’t keep the pressure off, and Gurley gets nailed for losses and short gains frequently.

    This looks like a team on the decline at the time of year everyone needs to get hot. They look just so-so. They have lost to the Bears, the Saints, and now the Eagles while barely surviving the Chargers, Packers, and Chiefs.

    This does not look like a team of destiny. At all.

    in reply to: Good Foles v. Bad Foles #95258
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I agree the Rams win either way.

    If Bad Foles shows up today, the starters should be resting in the 4th quarter.

    in reply to: signs, comics, memes, & other visual aids #95253
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams 2019 schedule (home/away only, no dates yet) #95235
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    16-0, baby!

    What ever happened to Old Hacker, btw?

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    In spite of the rickety show we saw in Chicago last week, my confidence in the Rams beating the Bears pretty easily in Los Angeles remains pretty high. I don’t have any Xs and Os to back that up, and can’t really say where that belief comes from. But the Bears don’t scare me. Now, I hope the Rams get the winner of the Saints/Bears game in the championship because…that would be easier, but I think the Rams have to get the #1 seed for that to happen.

    I think the Rams are going to win out. The Eagles have, like, more than a dozen guys on IR. They are done. They may give the Rams some trouble, but they aren’t going to win. And if they do, it is officially panic time in Los Angeles. But I don’t see it. I’m expecting a double digit victory.

    This week would be a good time for the Panthers to put together their best game of the season.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Sunday night AGAIN!?

    I can’t believe it. The ONLY two Sunday nights of the damn season when I have a Sunday night commitment, and that’s the two nights the Rams play. Dammit all to hell.

    Well…I will be able to watch most of it on a laptop like last week, but sitting in the middle of my sofa in front of the TV would be better. I’m just going to be surrounded by comings and goings, and people wondering why I would waste time watching football. I assumed it was gonna be a 1:25 PST game.

    Okay. Back to the question (which wasn’t about me), I will turn on the TV a couple of times during the the late games, and see what’s happening in the Seahawks/Niners and Pats/Steelers. Probably won’t even sit down at any time for either of those games unless there is drama with 5 minutes left. That’s what I get here. The morning game is Raiders/Bengals, and that is a hard “No, Thank You.”

    in reply to: 12-14-18 #95218
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, I thought of you, too.

    And that is a sick thing to do.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I think the Rams’s issues of late have been a worn down OL and the loss of Kupp, mostly. I think losing Kupp was a pretty big deal, and the OL is clearly not keeping Goff upright as reliably as it did early in the season. Those are problems.

    I’ve noticed – fwiw – that the Rams aren’t running jet sweeps as much. They’ve run a WR 3 times total in the past 3 games: 0 vs. Bears, 2 vs. Lions, 1 vs. KC.

    in reply to: Crazy Final Minute Chargers Vs Chiefs #95210
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Chiefs, Chargers…<Yawn>

    The Rams beat both of those teams.

    So Saints vs the Bears is what you want to see?

    Me, too.

    in reply to: Tom Tomorrow #95208
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    in reply to: Crazy Final Minute Chargers Vs Chiefs #95203
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, that 4th and 7 pass was stunning. I was thinking, “What’s wrong with you? Why are you making that dumbass throw?” Then it was…”Oh.”

    But I’ve seen the replay several times, and I still can’t believe he caught that. He was wearing that defender like a cape, and then just a tiny step outside, then in, and Bam! The ball was right there. That play was ridiculous.

    in reply to: Crazy Final Minute Chargers Vs Chiefs #95200
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t have any interest in either team, particularly, but I tuned in to the game late, and watched the comeback.

    I have to admit, it’s always nice to see a team get knocked off the perch like that.

    I thought it was smart to go for the 2-point conversion. They had the momentum on their side, and you really don’t want to hand the ball back over to Mahomes. It was their best chance to win the game, and there wasn’t much downside. If they lose the game, they lose the division, but no real ground in the wild card race. They may not win the division anyway, but it was all upside to that decision.

    in reply to: ED on the Bears' game #95168
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Looked to me like McVay just kept trying to get his QB on track, believing that he would inevitably click, and get something going.

    I don’t think he held back. If the Rams had homefield advantage, they would be less likely to see the Bears. I dunno. I’d like to believe he held back something, but I don’t think he did.

    in reply to: Reactions to the Bears game #95107
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I am reminded of the game the GSOT played against the Sapp-Bucs.
    w
    v

    That same comparison entered my mind during the game.

    I kept waiting for the Proehl moment.

    But Kupp is out for the year.

    in reply to: Reactions to the Bears game #95068
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    That wasn’t good, and that’s not what you want to see, especially when gearing up for the playoffs. I was not able to give my complete attention to the game, but I saw enough to see what is obvious from the score anyway…the Rams could not get anything going on offense.

    Goff was terrible. Receivers dropped balls. Gurley ran nowhere. I saw a couple penalties on Whitworth. The OL couldn’t keep Goff clean when the Bears rushed 3 guys.

    I don’t know.

    I thought the Rams needed to win 2 of 3 against the Chiefs, Saints, and Bears, and they escaped with just one. That’s a concern. Not a hope-killer, but a concern that the Rams aren’t quite “there.” On the other side, no other team has looked inevitable, though the Saints are still showing stronger than the Rams overall.

    If the Rams struggle with Philadelphia, the confidence level will take another dip.

    Anyway. Bash on, regardless.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Regardless of all these second-rate, plebeian games, I still think that the Rams ought to win the Super Bowl this year, and so on.

    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The Bucs beat the Saints in NO the first week of the season.

    Up 14-3 at the half.

    in reply to: informal poll, Bears game #95013
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I have no idea on this one. I think your range of outcomes is reasonable.

    in reply to: NRR: Washington lost its qb & all 4 of its guards #94863
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well, FFS, don’t anybody give Colin Kaepernick a call. Not when you can get T.J. Yates.

    in reply to: reactions to the Lions game #94804
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Spielmann mentioned that Patricia gave the league the blueprint for defending against the Rams offense. It will be interesting to see how Goff and the offense responds against the Bears next week.

    What did Spielman say?

    My wife walked into the room at the exact moment the play-by-play guy asked Spielman what the blueprint is, and I didn’t catch a word of what he said.

    I thought I was seeing the Patriots redux from the Super Bowl. I don’t know how they got away with it, but they did.

    I will say, though, that the Lions DL got the better of the Rams OL all day long. Goff got pressured and hit a lot. I will keep an eye out for those numbers since I only eyeballed that rather than counted the hits, but that may show up later. A testament to Goff that he battled through that.

    Not much in the way of TE action, either. I thought we were seeing a coming out party against KC, but nope.

    in reply to: Bad family news on two fronts #94751
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Those are alarming stories. I am sorry to hear that these things happened.

    I don’t have any advice, either, but I would make a comment…those guys didn’t beat up your brother-in-law because they are Hispanic.

    They beat him up because they are assholes.

    The two things are not connected.

    in reply to: Chiefs are releasing RB Kareem Hunt #94740
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I just saw someone claim she was drunk, peed on the carpet, and hit him in the face, and wouldn’t leave his room.

    I haven’t read that in a reliable source, but even if it’s true, I feel pretty confident that a professional athlete can handle a drunken woman without kicking her.

    It just seems like for every step forward we take as a society, we also roll 1000 feet off the side of a cliff.

    Yep.

    in reply to: Chiefs are releasing RB Kareem Hunt #94738
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I don’t care if the Chiefs saw the Instant Replay or not.

    In their own statement, they said that the NFL investigated it. I do not believe that the Chiefs had nothing to go on but what Hunt told them personally. There is no way there were not lengthy conversations between the Chiefs and the NFL office, and between the NFL office and the prosecutor’s office (why no charges when the woman said she wanted to press charges?), and I don’t think there is anything in that video that changed the Chiefs understanding so dramatically that suddenly they have discovered there was Unnecessary Roughness.

    They knew. And they took their chances that it wouldn’t go public, and were already prepared with their response in the eventuality that it got out.

    in reply to: Chiefs are releasing RB Kareem Hunt #94718
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    So…law enforcement and the NFL investigated this, and nobody who knew about the video bothered to inform the Chiefs until 8 months later. I mean…that’s what you have to believe in order to come out and praise the Chiefs right now.

    That is so stupid I have no words.

Viewing 30 posts - 5,041 through 5,070 (of 8,230 total)