Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 21,091 through 21,120 (of 47,646 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: signs, comics, memes, & other visual aids #114752
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: when can the NFL start again #114747
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114745
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: schedule #114738
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Field Yates@FieldYates
    The Seahawks are scheduled to travel the most miles in the NFL this season at 29,203, followed by the Rams (26,104) and 49ers (25,507).

    The Ravens will travel just 6,310 miles in 2020, the fewest by any NFL team in the past four seasons.

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #114734
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114733
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Stu Jackson@StuJRams
    Sean McVay talks Rams 2020 schedule:

    “The first thing that stands out is just the opportunity to open up on primetime in front of the world in the new stadium.”

    ==

    NFL Research@NFLResearch
    Tom Brady and Philip Rivers are expected to be the 5th and 6th QBs to start for new teams after having previously won 100+ starts for a different franchise.

    They will join Peyton Manning and Hall of Famers Brett Favre, Joe Montana and Johnny Unitas.

    ==

    JJ Cooper@jjcoop36
    In talking to scouts in preparation for a five round draft I heard some concerns. Notably unless they come from money a player signing for $20K or less will likely need to work full-time in offseason. Won’t be able to train in offseason same as a player receiving even $100k.

    in reply to: schedule #114732
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    McKay Coppins@mckaycoppins
    One of the weirdest features of our discourse is how people who fire off ranty, unhinged takes on Twitter then demand careful, nuanced responses from people who disagree and act like martyrs when it doesn’t happen.

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #114730
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: when can the NFL start again #114729
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets … 5/8-5/11 #114724
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #114723
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Basil #114718
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: economics & the virus #114716
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    An Epidemic of Hardship and Hunger
    Why won’t Republicans help Americans losing their jobs?

    Paul Krugman

    link https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/07/opinion/coronavirus-republicans-jobs.html

    Covid-19 has had a devastating effect on workers. The economy has plunged so quickly that official statistics can’t keep up, but the available data suggest that tens of millions of Americans have lost their jobs through no fault of their own, with more job losses to come and full recovery probably years away.

    But Republicans adamantly oppose extending enhanced unemployment benefits — such an extension, says Senator Lindsey Graham, will take place “over our dead bodies.” (Actually, over other people’s dead bodies.)

    They apparently want to return to a situation in which most unemployed workers get no benefits at all, and even those collecting unemployment insurance get only a small fraction of their previous income.

    Because most working-age Americans receive health insurance through their employers, job losses will cause a huge rise in the number of uninsured. The only mitigating factor is the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, which will allow many though by no means all of the newly uninsured to find alternative coverage.

    But the Trump administration is still trying to have the Affordable Care Act ruled unconstitutional; “We want to terminate health care under Obamacare,” declared Donald Trump, even though the administration has never offered a serious alternative.

    Bear in mind that ending Obamacare would end protection for Americans with pre-existing conditions — and that insurers would probably refuse to cover anyone who had Covid-19.

    Finally, the devastation caused by the coronavirus has left many in the world’s wealthiest major nation unable to put sufficient food on the table. Families with children under 12 are especially hard hit: According to one recent survey, 41 percent of these families are already unable to afford enough to eat. Food banks are overwhelmed, with lines sometimes a mile long.

    But Republicans are still trying to make food stamps harder to get, and fiercely oppose proposals to temporarily make food aid more generous.

    By now everyone who follows the news has a sense of how badly the Trump administration and its allies botched and continue to botch the medical side of the Covid-19 pandemic. Weeks of denial and the failure to implement remotely adequate testing allowed the virus to spread almost unchecked.

    Attempts to restart the economy even though the pandemic is far from controlled will lead to many more deaths, and will probably backfire even in purely economic terms as states are forced to lock down again.

    But we’re only now starting to get a sense of the Republican Party’s cruelty toward the economic victims of the coronavirus. In the face of what amounts to a vast natural disaster, you might have expected conservatives to break, at least temporarily, with their traditional opposition to helping fellow citizens in need. But no; they’re as determined as ever to punish the poor and unlucky.

    What’s remarkable about this determination is that the usual arguments against helping the needy, which were weak even in normal times, have become completely unsustainable in the face of the pandemic. Yet those arguments, zombielike, just keep shambling on.

    For example, you still hear complaints that spending on food stamps and unemployment benefits increases the deficit. Now, Republicans never really cared about budget deficits; they demonstrated their hypocrisy by cheerfully passing a huge tax cut in 2017, and saying nothing as deficits surged. But it’s just absurd to complain about the cost of food stamps even as we offer corporations hundreds of billions in loans and loan guarantees.

    But what’s even worse, if you ask me, is hearing Republicans complain that food stamps and unemployment benefits reduce the incentive to seek work. There was never serious evidence for this claim, but right now — at a time when workers can’t work, because doing their normal jobs would kill lots of people — I find it hard to understand how anyone can make this argument without gagging.

    So what explains the G.O.P.’s extraordinary indifference to the plight of Americans impoverished by this national disaster?

    One answer may be that much of America’s right has effectively decided that we should simply go back to business as usual and accept the resulting death toll. Those who want to take that route may view anything that reduces hardship, and therefore makes social distancing more tolerable, as an obstacle to their plans.

    Also, conservatives may worry that if we help those in distress, even temporarily, many Americans might decide that a stronger social safety net is a good thing in general. If your political strategy depends on convincing people that government is always the problem, never the solution, you don’t want voters to see the government actually doing good, even in times of dire need.

    Whatever the reasons, it’s becoming increasingly clear that Americans suffering from the economic consequences of Covid-19 will get far less help than they should. Having already condemned tens of thousands to unnecessary death, Trump and his allies are in the process of condemning tens of millions to unnecessary hardship.

    in reply to: schedule #114715
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: schedule #114713
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Links to some articles.

    Instant reaction to Rams 2020 schedule
    J.B. Long
    https://www.therams.com/news/instant-reaction-to-2020-schedule

    Los Angeles Rams’ schedule 2020: Opening stretch looks extremely daunting
    Lindsey Thiry
    https://www.espn.com/blog/los-angeles-rams/post/_/id/41663/los-angeles-rams-schedule-2020-opening-stretch-looks-extremely-daunting

    6 takeaways from the Rams’ 2020 schedule
    Cameron DaSilva
    6 takeaways from the Rams' 2020 schedule

    7 toughest games on the Rams’ 2020 schedule
    Cameron DaSilva
    7 toughest games on the Rams' 2020 schedule

    in reply to: OL talk, 2020 #114711
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PARAM

    I saw no reason why they should have spent high draft capital on offensive lineman in the 2020 draft.

    And no one is saying “because the Rams barely missed the playoffs” they had good O line play. The point is, they weren’t nearly as bad as the overplayed doom and gloom reviewers suggest.

    On the other hand, some people have said, it was an immediate improvement when Noteboom went down. I think that improvement was already happening despite the 3 game losing streak. The O line had a lot of issues and IMHO, those issues were the result of injuries, replacements and a lack of continuity. But the offense averaged something like 27 PPG in the first 5 games. If the defense showed up against Tampa and Zeurlein makes a kick against Seattle, we’re 11-5.

    Did they play better? Sure. Not against a good D like the Steelers though. Of course two guys go down in that game so before they get to the Chicago game, they’re down two more lineman. Whitworth and Blythe were the only two who started the season and Blythe missed a game early on, a win. So the process started all over again.

    Not against stellar competition again but Edwards, Corbett and Evans got better the more they played. We got another reprieve and took advantage of it, going 3-1. But those first two games the OL didn’t look distinctly improved. Chicago where we scored 17 points, then Baltimore where we looked like a bad O line. But facing a quick 28-0 deficit can aid in that. Against Arizona and Seattle they looked better. I thought Evans played better, faster than the other two. And they got better as a unit, playing in 7 straight.

    So there was improvement the longer the subs played together and that was over 7 games with a surrounding cast who were playing their 10th to 16th game. Hell, Edwards had 10 games to improve. The opening OL played 5 games and 1 series together with a surrounding cast playing the same.

    In 6 of our 7 losses the defense allowed 35.7 PPG. In 3 of our 7 losses the offense scored 31.3 (34, 29 and 31). You can not lose 3 games when your offense is at 30 points. It’s totally unacceptable. So we can point to the O line and they had troubles….injuries, warts, what-have-you. But I can’t in good conscience say “our biggest issue in 2019 was our O line”.

    Key point: they improved on the tail end of the season the longer the replacements played together. There is also the opponent factor. In the end, 3 different OL injuries, adjustments by the coaching staff, improvement by the replacements and we finish 9-7. It seems like it could have been much, much worse. Bottom line is this. That line, with 9 different starters played well enough to win 9 games. The line that starts this year hopefully finishes it but if there are problems I don’t think we’ll be in trouble nearly as much as last year. No greenhorns even at the backup positions. We have enough talent to win. Hell we won 9 games with that line discombobulated for at least 6 games. Hopeful? A little. Unreasonable? Absolutely not.

    Some cast doubt on Kromer. Yes it would seem everywhere Kromer goes, they do have some excellent lineman already there, but they also immediately acquire good free agent lineman and they draft lineman who are successful under his tutelage. When he got to Chicago, they acquired Bushrod (from New Orleans, Kromer’s former stop) and drafted Long and Mills. In Buffalo they acquired Incognito, who despite being a good lineman, hadn’t played in 2014 after being suspended for the half the season in 2013. I don’t remember how many teams were lined up to sign him but Buffalo ended up with him. They also drafted Miller and acquired Jordan Mills from Chicago (Kromer’s former stop). That was a good OL. Led the league in rushing yards and ypc both years. Had a rookie and a 2nd year guy on those lines. In Los Angeles, they acquired Whitworth and Sullivan. It appears more than fortuitous that Kromer are the teams that make these important OL acquisitions soon after hiring him.

    in reply to: schedule #114707
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    alyoshamucci

    Couple hard turnaround weeks and lots of time on the east coast … but the wins and losses look favorable.

    NorCalRamFan
    3 of first five games on east coast
    Four of the last six are at home
    And five of the last eight
    Rams are 2.5 points underdog against the cowboys for our home opener

    Ramsman34
    5 of 6 divisional games are after the Bye. we should be a well oiled machine by then. and, the first divisional game is week 6 against the whiners.

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    I could see anything from 7-9 to 11-5

    LindseyThiry@LindseyThiry
    Right now, mostly based on departures and unproven replacements, I have them at 8-8. It’s a brutal division, and a pretty tough schedule.

    Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
    There are collapsible elements to the schedule (all teams share a bye with their Week 2 opponents).

    All shows this a preference: moving back things over shortening

    Another thing that I didn’t know beforehand: As part of the bid process, cities contending to host Super Bowls must have contingency dates cleared in case the NFL has to delay the game.

    So Tampa has those for Super Bowl LV.

    Darren Rovell@darrenrovell
    Spoke to some big brokers tonight.

    Secondary sales of NFL tickets are roughly 15 percent of what they normally are when the schedule is released.

    ==

    in reply to: schedule #114703
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://www.estabrooksonline.com/cart/default.asp

    the Rams maxed out their allotment of prime-time games in 2020, as they’re scheduled to play five night games next season.

    They’re among eight teams that will play five prime-time games.

    The Rams’ night games are as follows:

    Week 1 vs. Cowboys (Sunday night)
    Week 6 at 49ers (Sunday night)
    Week 7 vs. Bears (Monday night)
    Week 11 at Buccaneers (Monday night)
    Week 14 vs. Patr///iots (Thursday night)

    ==

    Andrew Siciliano@AndrewSiciliano
    Eight teams have the maximum of 5 primetime games:

    Ravens
    Cowboys
    Packers
    Chiefs
    Rams
    Patriots
    49ers
    Buccaneers

    ==

    in reply to: White Privilege to Terrorize #114695
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Stadium Update #114691
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Timelapse video of SoFi Stadium shows how far it has come

    ==

    in reply to: tweets n other bits … 5/5 thru 5/7 #114689
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    PFF LA Rams@PFF_Rams
    #LARams CB Troy Hill stepped up and had a career year in 2019 following some significant turnover in the #LA secondary

    Among all defensive backs with at least 500 snaps, Hill ranked 14th in NFL Passer Rating when Targeted and 25th in Overall Defensive Grade

    in reply to: tweets n other bits … 5/5 thru 5/7 #114688
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’m expecting Cam Akers to be a game changer. Thoughts?

    Jourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
    My thoughts are you might be right. Here’s the thing: One of the most sustainably successful systems in recent memory for a deep-running playoff team was a two-back system (Saints; Kamara/Ingram). Teams want to be able to use versatile backs to throw a ton of looks out there, keep defenses running side-to-side and backwards as much as possible (expending more energy; keeping them on the field). I really like the idea of Akers-Henderson.

    what are your general thoughts on realistic expectations for the 2020 season.

    Jourdan Rodrigue@JourdanRodrigue
    Realistically, I think everybody needs to measure their expectations – across the league – for 2020. It’s going to be a “redshirt year” in many ways for most teams.

    I honestly feel like this season will be a wash for a lot of teams, in light of our global situation. Really, the best a team can hope for is to use this time as a development year – coach up new talent, try new strategies and essentially grow inside and out, and come out ready to kick ass in 2021.

    in reply to: tweets n other bits … 5/5 thru 5/7 #114683
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Former Cardinals QB Carson Palmer recalls when he realized Rams DT Aaron Donald was special

    Former Cardinals QB Carson Palmer recalls when he realized Rams DT Aaron Donald was special

    Appearing on Arizona Sports 98.7 FM, Palmer recalled when he and his teammates realized it.

    It was in 2015 and the final game the Cardinals would ever play in St. Louis. It was a 27-3 win that improved the Cardinals to 10-2 that year en route to their division title.

    Palmer recalled near the end of the game after Donald was seemingly in the backfield in every play, asking his teammates in the huddle to try and block No. 99.

    Lyle Sendlein, the team’s center, according to Palmer, responded by saying, “Block him? I can’t even see him!”

    Donald finished the game with seven tackles, two for loss, a sack and five quarterback hits. “He was in the backfield every single play,” Palmer said.

    in reply to: Rams select Cam Akers at 52 #114676
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://theramswire.usatoday.com/2020/05/07/nfl-draft-rams-cam-akers-total-package/

    The Rams shared a behind-the-scenes view of the pre-draft conference calls held by Snead and scouts, and on one of them, scout Michael Pierce said Akers is a complete package at running back.

    He even wouldn’t be surprised if Akers is more productive than Swift a few years from now.

    “I really like him. if he’s there, I would love to have him on our team,” he said. “I think he can do it all. He can run inside, he can run outside, he can catch the ball well, he’s elusive. I think he’s the total package as a back and I wouldn’t be surprised if we look back a few years from now and say he’s more productive than Swift. He just does everything – he does everything well.”

    in reply to: tweets n other bits … 5/5 thru 5/7 #114673
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ==

    from https://theramswire.usatoday.com/2020/05/07/nfl-draft-rams-cam-akers-total-package/

    Snead has changed his view in the draft and has tried to avoid getting cute by trading down to add more picks, while potentially missing out on a player the team really likes.

    “I call it the ‘Bobby Wagner Rule. There’s a lot of ways to carve a draft strategy … but the ‘Bobby Wagner Rule’ would be, if a player falls to you and you really want that human being, don’t get cute and don’t worry about those extra draft picks,” he said. “Just take that human being and the rest will take care of itself. Some of the best lessons in this business are learned the hard way.”

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    J.B. Long@JB_Long
    This is over an hour, but offers some really unique insight.

    Elvis

    I can’t possibly recap the whole thing.

    Brian Hill talking about Jordan Fuller. Apparently Hill gave Fuller a grade he’s only given 5 or 7 players in his career and they’re all successful NFL players according to Snead.

    Obviously it was all positive but it was cool to hear from the different scouts. James Gladstone has a mini-Snead thing going on, has definitely picked up some of his mannerism and phrases.

    We had 5 players identified as players we’d take at 52 and ended up with two of them with our first two picks…

    in reply to: signs, comics, memes, & other visual aids #114666
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

Viewing 30 posts - 21,091 through 21,120 (of 47,646 total)