Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 20,941 through 20,970 (of 47,646 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115127
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: at 136 Rams take Brycen Hopkins #115126
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115125
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Pete Prisco’s Top 100 NFL Players of 2020: https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/pete-priscos-top-100-nfl-players-of-2020-patrick-mahomes-takes-top-spot-lamar-jackson-cracks-top-10/

    1 Patrick Mahomes, Kansas City Chiefs QB
    This was an easy choice. He missed time last season, which hurt his MVP chances, but he will be right back in the race this year. He’s the best player in the league.

    2 Aaron Donald, Los Angeles Rams DE
    He continues to be a force on the inside of the Rams defense, a pocket-pushing power player who makes it tough on offenses. His sack numbers went down last year, but his play wasn’t far off.

    26 Jalen Ramsey, Los Angeles Rams CB
    He has the talent to be much higher on this list, but a bad situation in Jacksonville – some of it self-inflicted – led to a trade to the Rams during the 2019 season, which led to some adjusting on his part. I expect him to bounce back and play like a top 2 or 3 corner this season.

    97 Cooper Kupp, Los Angeles Rams WR
    He came back from a major knee injury in 2018 to catch 94 passes with 10 touchdowns.

    JUST MISSED: Robert Woods, WR, Los Angeles Rams

    in reply to: New Uniforms … update, they’re here #115124
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: Coronavirus vaccine news #115115
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    How close is a coronavirus vaccine?

    https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/may/12/how-close-coronavirus-vaccine/?fbclid=IwAR3C9KZNWoyobmHbkywCVke_bGQZ3lF8VPGUMm_xjejkmxXcNEhm-M4Vaf0

    • The long-cited 12-to-18 month timeline to an effective vaccine is probably still on track, though meeting that deadline will require everything going right.

    • There are more than 100 vaccine projects under way across the globe. At least eight efforts have moved to the early clinical trial phase.

    • Based on the emerging evidence, experts are cautiously optimistic about whether a vaccine could confer at least some immunity, and that mutations in the virus won’t be too fast to stymie vaccine development.

    Americans are counting on a safe and effective vaccine against the novel coronavirus. Two months into the pandemic, is the U.S. and the world any closer to one?

    The short answer is yes, experts say. But creating an effective vaccine will still require a lot to go right.

    There are more than 100 vaccine projects under way worldwide, according to the World Health Organization. At least eight of them have moved to the early clinical trial phase. Four of these vaccines were created in China, one in the U.K, one in the European Union, and two in the United States. Others could move to clinical trials in the coming months.

    Having so many potential vaccines in the testing phase is impressive, experts say, considering the short time scientists have known about the novel coronavirus.

    “Multiple groups from government, industry, and academia have come together to forge partnerships that advance candidate vaccines,” said Matthew B. Laurens, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Maryland School of Medicine’s Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health. “The shift from other research activities to this urgent public health crisis is both encouraging and exactly what needs to happen.”

    In early April, Kathleen M. Neuzil, director of the Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, told PolitiFact that if all went well, there might be five or six vaccines in trials within six months. Five weeks later, there are already more than that undergoing trials.

    Officials including Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, have remained consistent in their estimation of the timeline for creating a workable vaccine: 12 to 18 months. That’s a much shorter time frame than for previous vaccines, which have taken between four years and several decades. But given the intense pressure of the coronavirus pandemic, standard development and production models are being telescoped.

    Here’s the state of play on coronavirus vaccine research, and how developments in the past two months have changed the outlook.

    What are the leading vaccine candidates?
    The one that has attracted the most attention so far is being developed by researchers at Oxford University in the U.K.

    It uses a weakened version of a common cold virus that has been modified so it doesn’t cause sickness in humans. Researchers then added proteins, known as antigens, from the novel coronavirus, in the hope that these could prime the human immune system to fight the virus once it encounters it.

    Testing by the U.S. National Institutes of Health found that one dose of the vaccine prevented rhesus macaque monkeys from getting sick after being exposed to large amounts of the virus. The vaccine has now moved on to clinical trials with 6,000 volunteers.

    The Oxford team is working in partnership with global pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca to manufacture several million doses by September — an even faster timetable than the 12-to-18 month goal.

    “That’s pretty out in front, so they must be very confident,” said William Schaffner, a professor of preventive medicine and infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

    Several other vaccine efforts have moved forward as well. Some are using a different approach that uses genetic material, known as mRNA, that provides the instructions for a body to produce the needed antigens themselves. This is a relatively untested approach to vaccination, but if it works, it has aspects that could simplify the manufacturing process.

    One of the vaccine candidates using this method is being developed by the U.S. pharmaceutical company Moderna. Backed by federal funding, the vaccine has been approved for a second round of clinical trials. If successful, a third trial could come this summer. The company has partnered with a Swiss company, Lonza Ltd., to produce as many as a billion doses annually.

    Another mRNA vaccine is being developed by drug giant Pfizer and BioNTech, a German company. Clinical trials are under way.

    Meanwhile, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, a U.S. company, is working on a vaccine that uses a similar approach to mRNA but using DNA material instead. This effort is receiving funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Department of Defense, among others.

    Then there are the four vaccines being tested in China. Three of these use a more traditional vaccine method that involves a killed, and thus safe, version of the novel coronavirus. Another one uses a similar approach to the Oxford group.

    Other companies are expected to start trials within months.

    The pharmaceutical company Johnson & Johnson, in conjunction with a division of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, has chosen a lead candidate for its vaccine. It has not yet begun clinical trials, but executives have publicly pledged to start producing it late this year and to deliver 1 billion doses in 2021, assuming it’s shown to be safe and effective.

    And the French company Sanofi is aiming to begin clinical trials this year for a vaccine it is developing that’s a variation on one originally used against SARS, an earlier coronavirus that caused outbreaks in Asia two decades ago.

    The fact that several vaccine approaches are being tested, with more on the way, is a positive development, since it means we aren’t putting all of our eggs in one basket.

    Should we worry about recent findings about coronavirus immunity and mutations?
    One concern is whether, and how long, a person will have immunity from the coronavirus after either being infected. If the coronavirus doesn’t inspire immunity of any significant length, that would undercut the idea of attacking it with a vaccine.

    We don’t know the answer yet, but scientists are seeing preliminary evidence that infection or a vaccine could confer at least some immunity.

    For instance, a study by Chinese researchers published in Nature Medicine found that all 285 patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 had developed a specific antibody against the novel coronavirus called IgM within two to three weeks of their first symptoms. The National Institutes of Health touted the finding as suggesting that “the immune systems of people who survive COVID-19 have been primed to recognize (the virus) and possibly thwart a second infection.”

    Another concern is that the novel coronavirus, like many other viruses, is mutating over time. If the virus changes enough, that could become a problem that bedevils vaccine researchers.

    Experts hope the rate of change from mutations will stay manageable.

    “There’s some fuzziness around the edges, but basically the virus is remaining stable,” Schnaffner said. “This does not seem to be a virus that flips around and mutates a lot, like the seasonal flu. It doesn’t seem to be enough to cast a pall over the vaccine effort.”

    Is the 12-to-18 month timeline still on track?
    In normal times, a vaccine trial occurs in several phases. But the coronavirus pandemic has thrown this longstanding model out the window, with each phase of the process needing to be shorter or handled on parallel tracks. The federal government has launched “Operation Warp Speed” to fast-track vaccine efforts, with a goal of 300 million doses available by January 2021.

    Experts applaud efforts to create manufacturing and distribution capacity ahead of a vaccine being approved for wide use. Several pharmaceutical companies are moving forward with facilities, and the Gates Foundation is planning to fund factories for up to seven vaccines. A nagging problem, however, could be a shortage of appropriate packaging, akin to the shortages in swabs and reagents that have hampered the rollout of wide-scale testing.

    One possibility for shortening the timeline is the use of “human challenge” studies, in which otherwise healthy, lower-risk volunteers are deliberately infected with the virus. This can produce much faster findings than simply waiting for the volunteers to encounter the virus in ordinary life. This approach was successful in the recent FDA approval of Vaxchora, a vaccine developed to prevent cholera, Laurens said.

    All told, experts still have their eye on the 12-to-18 month goal.

    “It’s predicated on absolutely everything going right,” Schnaffner said. “So it’s optimistic. But I don’t think it’s too optimistic.

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115113
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115111
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115110
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: New Uniforms … update, they’re here #115109
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://theramswire.usatoday.com/2020/05/19/la-rams-clay-johnston-hit-power-iq/

    Johnston may not be the fastest or most athletic linebacker, but he’s a smart player who’s great against the run. Two of Johnston’s biggest strengths, according to the linebacker himself, are his hit power and intelligence on the field.

    “I think I can bring the punch if I get a good read on the play. I think I can bring some power when I hit someone, honestly, so I think that’s a decent trait,” Johnston said in a recent interview. “But I think I’m smart on the field, more than anything. I think with the help of coaches and them teaching me all the schematics, I think I can apply that – that would bear its fruit out on the field. I think that’s a strong trait of mine.”

    in reply to: Rams select Cam Akers at 52 #115107
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115105
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: NFL to update Rooney Rule #115104
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Daniel Kaplan@KaplanSportsBiz
    NFL owners today approved lending the LA Rams another $500 million for Sofi stadium development

    ==

    in reply to: New Uniforms … update, they’re here #115102
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    I asked the Rams about mixing and matching their uniforms in 2020, and they don’t plan to do that. So this combination won’t be happening.

    which combination would that be?

    C.DS was referring to this:

    So just to spell it out, they’re not going to mix and match. So there’s blue jersey/blue pants, blue jersey/yellow pants, bone jersey/bone pants. That’s it. No (for example) blue jersey/bone pants, or bone jersey/yellow pants etc.

    The only combinations are the 3 you see here:

    in reply to: NFL to update Rooney Rule #115097
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jim Trotter@JimTrotter_NFL
    NFL owners have voted to approve the resolution that would prevent teams from blocking assistant coaches from interviewing for coordinator positions, per sources. This is an important step.

    John McMullen@JFMcMullen
    Enhancements to the Rooney Rule include on & off-field changed. Clubs required to interview at least two external minority candidates for head coach; at least one minority candidate for any of the three coordinator vacancies; & at least one external minority candidate for GM #NF

    Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero
    Amidst other news: For the first time, all 32 NFL clubs will host a coaching fellowship program geared towards minority candidates — full-time positions for 1-2 years, providing NFL Legends, minority and female participants with hands-on training. Another opportunity created.

    Ian Rapoport@RapSheet
    NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell on a conference call discussing the Rooney Rule enhancements: “We’re not satisfied with where we are, we know we can and should do better. That’s why this package of 7 initiatives is very significant.” He mentioned, “Our work here is not done.”

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115096
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: New Uniforms … update, they’re here #115095
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    I asked the Rams about mixing and matching their uniforms in 2020, and they don’t plan to do that. So this combination won’t be happening.

    in reply to: I admit it. I’ve become a cynic #115089
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115087
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    The Rams are one of the only teams that has not yet announced the dates of their preseason games. Have to imagine that’s because 3 games will be at SoFi Stadium and the 4th will be at Allegiant in Vegas

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115084
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115082
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #115081
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: tweets n similar things … 5/18 thru 5/20 #115080
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #115078
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    in reply to: NFL to update Rooney Rule #115077
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Tony Dungy fears “unintended consequences” of proposed Rooney Rule expansion

    link: https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/05/18/tony-dungy-fears-unintended-consequences-of-proposed-rooney-rule-expansion/

    On Tuesday, the NFL and its owners will consider an expansion of the Rooney Rule that, among other things, would give teams that hire a minority coach or a minority G.M. a boost in the draft a year after the hire is made. Hall of Fame coach Tony Dungy addressed the proposal during a Monday edition of the #PFTPM podcast.

    Coach Dungy, who has been involved directly in efforts to enhance diversity in NFL coaching, does not support the proposal.

    “In my mind, this is drastic,” Dungy said. “I don’t think personally it’s the right thing to do, but I think it should spur some, really, consideration and some communication and conversation and people say, ‘OK, this might not be it, but maybe we can do that [instead].’”

    Dungy supports the portion of the proposal that would allow minority coaches to leave one team to accept a promotion with another team, explaining that this will address concerns regarding the supply of qualified minority coaches. However, he draws the line at giving teams a reward for hiring a minority coach or G.M.

    “I just have never been in favor of rewarding people for doing the right thing,” Dungy said. “And so I think there’s going to be some unintended consequences. To me it’s almost like the pass interference rule. Yeah, we need to do something. I don’t know if this is exactly it. We need to keep working until we find out what that best thing is to do.”

    Dungy isn’t speaking only for himself. He said that he has spoken to several African-American coaches in the NFL in order to understand their concerns regarding the proposal.

    “There’s three things that they’re worried about,” Dungy said. “Number one, how does this put me in my relationship with the other coaches that I work with, and other white coaches? Are they thinking I’m getting an advantage now? Number two, when that General Manager or owner hires me, is he hiring me because he thinks I’m the best person, or is he hiring me to move his draft choice up a little bit? And then the third thing this is nobody feels like they want anything special . . . . Don’t hire me and then say I’m going to give you more draft choices later on because you need help. And I know that’s not the reason why the proposal is being put in, I know that’s not what they’re driving at, but that’s still the end result. And so there’s still some things the league needs to think about, about this proposal.”

    Dungy sees the proposal the same way that many others do: As an effort to move away from imposing discipline on those who fail to adhere to the rules regarding interviewing minority candidates and to give a tangible benefit to those who actually hire minority candidates.

    “I think the league is looking and saying, ‘Hey, punitive things haven’t worked. Let’s look at incentives.’ And maybe that’s the right way to go. But I don’t know if this is the right incentive,” Dungy said.

    It remains to be seen whether the opposition to the proposal keeps at least 24 owners from voting for it. Of all the voices that have chimed in, however, Dungy’s should be regarded as the most influential.

    “When I looked at it, I didn’t see how it would pass,” Dungy said. “A lot of people are telling me that it will. I think if it does pass, it’ll end up being like the pass interference review rule. We’ll see in a little while some unintended consequences that we’ll say, ‘Gosh, this may not be the best idea.’”

    So maybe the best idea is to talk it through and table it, while searching for an alternative that doesn’t raise the concerns spelled out by Coach Dungy and others. The next hiring cycle doesn’t begin for months; there’s no reason to adopt a proposal like this now, in light of these concerns.

    in reply to: virus news … (+ some dark humor) #115075
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

Viewing 30 posts - 20,941 through 20,970 (of 47,646 total)