Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
znModeratorfrom 8 days after quarantine and testing negative, 142 Fort Benning soldiers test positive for COVID-19
https://connectingvets.radio.com/articles/fort-benning-confirms-142-covid-19-cases-in-2-battalions?fbclid=IwAR0VYL4RhQz63YJUw0fpwRN1Xdziv95RpUnnTK4jvF7zfKJoMEXkaQi4LmwAfter the 14-day monitoring period, training operations began with COVID-19 prevention measures in place including masks and social distancing. Despite these efforts, however, eight days after the end of the 14-day monitoring period, one recruit reported to the chain of command with COVID-19 symptoms.
All 640 recruits — which form 30th AG Battalion and 2nd Battalion, 29th Infantry Regiment — were retested for COVID-19. After all 640 tests were returned over a two-day period, that same cohort of recruits had a 22 percent COVID-positive rate with 142 positive tests.
==
from The coronavirus outbreak in Arizona is going very badly
https://www.yahoo.com/news/coronavirus-outbreak-arizona-going-very-163723467.html
Will Humble, the former director of the Arizona Department of Health Services, said last week that the surge in new cases was “definitely related” to the lifted stay-at-home order.
While the order was still in place, about 5% of statewide COVID-19 tests were positive. By early June, the rate more than doubled to 12%. The state doesn’t require people to wear masks.
“This is not an abstract number of cases,” Dr. Peter Hotez, the dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told NPR. “We’re seeing people pile into intensive care units.” Banner Health, the largest hospital in the state, also said its ICUs were “very busy” in a statement last week.
“Arizona’s COVID-19 hospitalizations are rapidly increasing,” Banner Chief Clinical Officer Dr. Marjorie Bessel said.
znModeratorCory Littleton had only one missed tackle on 1,039 defensive snaps in 2019 pic.twitter.com/HXI5jbIOJN
— PFF (@PFF) June 16, 2020
znModeratorHappy birthday, @CooperKupp! 🎉
The birthday boy's best plays from the 2019 season! pic.twitter.com/LzFdU50t1E
— Los Angeles Rams (@RamsNFL) June 16, 2020
znModeratorStu Jackson@StuJRams
Between the returning talent and addition of A’Shawn Robinson, I’m eager to see what this group will accomplish this season.How will A’Shawn Robinson impact the defense? The most immediate answer is likely in the run game because of his 6-foot-4, 330-pound frame. Overall, though, it will be fascinating to see the difference he makes, and how the attention he draws opens things up for the rest of the Rams’ defensive line.
==
from https://theramswire.usatoday.com/2020/06/15/nfl-rams-michael-brockers-aaron-donald/
“It’s a little weird,” Brockers said of playing alongside Donald, via Aaron Wilson of the Houston Chronicle. “It’s a little bit of love and hate. You love him because you know he’s going to make the play, but he’s going to make a lot of the plays.
“At the same time, it’s great to watch greatness. It has something to do with motivation. Seeing him makes me strive to do better. That’s why I like playing with him.”
==
LMU93
If Higbee produces at even half the rate he did over those final 5 games of 2019- but does so across the entire 2020 season- he’d have 69 catches for 835 yards which would be top-6 TE production. Since he averaged 8.6 catches and 104.4 yards per game over that great 5-game stretch late in the season, I calculated those numbers at half that rate x 16 games.
znModerator#Rams part of NFL-wide trend of draft-pick signing lag. All nine of their picks are unsigned. https://t.co/gN18xY8saG
— TurfShowTimes (@TurfShowTimes) June 15, 2020
znModeratorI wonder since he’s been a Ram for a year does anyone have any info on his weight and how he fits into the Rams picture going forward?
News on him is sparse. I suspect he was told to keep a low profile and just grind.
znModeratorRevisiting the Colin Kaepernick false narratives, of which there are many https://t.co/pjMpI80bS5
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) June 15, 2020
znModeratorFormer Rams All Pro kicker Jeff Wilkins was a gamer! He led the Rams in special teams tackles one season and also moved the sticks to extent Rams drives a time or two.
Here Wilkins runs a fake field goal for a first down on Monday Night football at Cleveland pic.twitter.com/T4HVNYa6Nw
— RAMS ON FILM (@RamsOnFilm) June 15, 2020
znModeratorAfter Police Board President praised police for their restraint, police beat him hours later.
Police Board president Ghian Foreman praised the police for their restraint at protests and for not hurting people. The police beat him a few hours later.
President of the Chicago Police Board Ghian Foreman said police beat him with a baton.
This came just hours after he praised police for their professionalism, and how much “restraint” they showed at protests. He continued on to tell the Chicago Police:
“I would not have had the same restraint that many of your officers showed last night,”
And just hours later, he said he happened to walk by a protest that he wasn’t participating in, and police beat him.
He released a statement on Friday saying:
“I, indeed, was one of several individuals physically hit and struck by Chicago police on Sunday as they clashed with protestors, I was not participating in the protest, but coincidentally encountered the demonstration at a moment when it became confrontational.”
He stated that the police struck him with a baton 5 times. He later filed a complaint.
Mayor Lori Lightfoot said she urged Foreman to file a complaint, stating:
“There’s no reason that should’ve happened. He is hurting physically, I think he is hurting emotionally, and what happened to him is unacceptable.”
znModeratorSome not often talked about Rams milestones. Most of these are unverified hunches.
Verified
(1) If you look at the unofficial list of all time sack leaders, which includes all players with 100 or more sacks, 7 of them were Rams at one point or another, including 3 of the top 5 (The list is here: https://mobile.twitter.com/ArifHasanNFL/status/700480918796906496/photo/1 ).
They are:
– Jones, 3rd (173.5)
– Greene, 4th (160)
– JY, 5th (150.5)
– Leslie O’Neal, 19th (132.5)
– Bacon, 21st (130)
– Carter, 43rd (104.5)
– Dryer, 46th (103)I just bet no one else has 7 total but I didn’t check. I KNOW no one else has 3 in the top 5. In fact the Rams are the only team with 3 in the top 10. 2 other teams have 2 in the top 10: Vikes (Doleman, Page) and Giants (Taylor, Strahan). If you make it top 12, Vikes have 3 (add Randle to Doleman and Page)
Hunches
(2) Most UDFAs starting on a superbowl winning team with 9. 3 are on special teams. I mean someone who enters the league as a UDFA whether that was originally with the Rams or not. They are: Jenkins, Fletcher, Jones, Farr, Gruttadauria, Warner, Wilkins, Tuten (the forgotten punter), and Horne (tied for 1st in TDs as KR that year).
(3) Related to that, I bet it’s hard to find another team that acquired 3 top qbs within 3 years (including a hall of famer) and did not draft any of them: Warner (98), Green (99), and Bulger (2000). Interesting to remember that in an era when the Rams had to trade up to pick 1 to get a qb.
(4) I didn’t check to see how unique this is or if it’s an official record, BUT, there is at least one Ram lineman in the pro bowl every single season from 1967 until 1990. In fact the Rams 68 line had 4 pro bowlers, as did the 78 line and the 85 line. That’s 12 different pro-bowl lineman across 24 consecutive years.
znModerator
znModeratorIf NFL can pull off playing 2020 season despite hurdles, expect the world to watch like never before
From COVID-19 to activism to other sports stumbling, the NFL is set for a huge TV audience, even if some won’t watchJason La Canfora
The president has vowed not to watch the NFL this season if players kneel – and they will be doing so in droves, I can assure you – but he will end up being in a distinct minority. If the NFL is able to start and complete a full season – and that is a particularly big if, in my opinion – then I anticipate ratings the likes of which we have never before seen.
This league could be positioned in a truly unique space to capture an even more monumental audience than ever before if it can pull off even a quasi-regular 2020 season. It stands primed to be perhaps the only major sports league in the world able to start sometime around when it normally would, and there could be a significant window this fall where every other league in this country – and the world for that matter – is on hiatus, with needed time off between when the completion of their 2019-2020 seasons end and before their 2020-2021 seasons begin.
Consider as well the growing concerns about being able to play anything close to normal fall collegiate sports schedules, with so many states in various stages of openness and normalcy regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and the fact that schools like the University of Houston have already had to send all kids home from voluntary spring work, and the fact that the Alabama football program had a rash of positive tests when players gathered there. The potential for serious liability risks are particularly acute for these “amateur” sports that make big bucks.
What type of a waiver would you have to put before these young men to sign in order to get them on a football field – at a time when some campuses may be all virtual or certainly limited due to the virus – and how could you expect any of them to sign it without compensation? Sorry, the scholarship argument doesn’t carry weight in the best of times, and it is a particular sham in an instance like this, with so much risk involved in gathering in large groups and playing and practicing a sport like football every day.
Even if major college football gets started, if the numbers mount, things will have to scrapped. These are kids we are talking about; not adult professionals. I believe it will take a Herculean effort to get through an NFL season … a college season may be pure folly.
As for baseball, insomuch as baseball was a threat to the NFL at all for eyeballs these days, well, the MLB is doing an excellent job of killing what remains of its fanbase. Its “negotiations” with the union have been a sordid mess from the onset, the worst-case scenario of a totally bastardized 48-game schedule played with games only between certain divisions now seems like a best case scenario, hopes of an expanded playoff field seem bleak and more owners are letting on privately that they’d rather not play at all. A fake MLB playoff up against huge NFL regular season games? Yeah, NFL ratings would be massive.
The NBA will be on pause for a good bit of the NFL season, and it remains to be seen how many of their starters sit out the tournament-style relaunch that the NBA and its union have agreed to. Will guys be going through the motions after a four-month shutdown? The prospect of moving to Orlando for a few months seems to be producing waning enthusiasm, for good reason.
As for other outlets – movie theaters are in dire shape, forget about any concerts or normal musicals and Broadway shows until 2021. Yes, it is an election year, and that tends to make a dent, but the NFL has become directly tied to the discourse of race and police brutality and the democratic process in this country, and it is fair to reason that if Roger Goodell is kneeling with players and if the NFL continues on the track it is on, that people who might otherwise ignore the league will now be incentivized to watch. Sure, some will stop … but even in 2016 and 2017 the NFL had ratings the other sports could only hope for, and clearly the country is moving in a different direction from then – in the streets and even on Wall Street, with corporate America increasingly embracing Black Lives Matter.
With a movement and activism in the air, some owner might finally get around to giving Colin Kaepernick a workout should a need emerge at quarterback – and in a league as punishing as this, it certainly will somewhere – and that would immediately be a huge international news story and media event. Even Kaepernick holding a clipboard on the sidelines would bring global attention to the league. And if Kaepernick actually got in a game? Forget about it. Maybe the highest rated regular season game in years.
Furthermore, I can’t imagine there are fans in the stands this season (which also means you don’t have to worry about protests at the stadium on game day if Kaepernick is signed) so all of those people will be watching games at home, and quite likely not just the game their team is participating in. With the other leagues on hiatus, think of how much more money will be gambled on football (not that it wasn’t already king) and what the daily fantasy handles might be. Plus, with many not comfortable being in bar atmospheres or large gatherings, it’s not a leap to think more people will be watching from home – which means more ratings.
Sure, the NFL revenues would be altered by the loss of ticket sales and game-day hauls from all those beers and hot dogs and jerseys from the team store, but from a TV ratings and revenue perspective, playing a full season might mean numbers the likes of which we haven’t seen.
Of course, with 32 teams requiring over 50 players and a large support staff required in order for those players to practice and eat and work out and meet on a daily basis, I have my reservations about teams being able to travel and play a normal 16-game schedule. If this pandemic has taught us anything, it’s that we still don’t know enough about coronavirus and what it does and how and when and where it might spike again.
It may prove naïve and ambitious to think any of these sports can survive in 2020, much less prosper. But if the NFL is able to pull it off, I believe the world will be watching in ways we have not seen before. Even if the president stays away.
znModeratorWell, i think you’d get different numbers on all the other ones too, if you change a word here or there, or offer another option, etc. Like i say, i dont trust these kinds of polls. I wish i could.
w
vThere ARE several polls on the other ones and it holds up. The numbers vary but it is always a majority.
June 15, 2020 at 10:37 am in reply to: “black on black crime” is THE reactionary response to anti-police brutality #116571
znModeratorIgnoring the Intersectionality of Gun Violence
link https://harvardcrcl.org/ignoring-the-intersectionality-of-gun-violence/
It should come as no surprise that America has a gun violence problem. The number of deaths in the United States caused by guns has been steadily rising for the last five years, and in 2019 there have been more mass shootings than there are days in the year. Gun violence and gun control are divisive issues that are increasingly partisan and are a hot topic in this year’s Democratic primary debates.
With all the attention that gun violence has in American politics (and, unfortunately, in American households), conversations about the intersectionality of gun violence are not nearly as prevalent as they should be. Conversations of mass shootings frequently dismiss the motivations of the shooter as something related to a mental health issue. Black men who are shot accidentally by police officers are treated as victims of a random tragedy. These conversations overlook the fact that, more often than not, gun violence is the result of a deeply rooted hatred of particular groups of people, particularly racial, ethnic, and religious minorities, the LGBTQ+ community, and women.
Intersectionality and Disproportionate Impacts
Gun violence in the United States is statistically linked to violence against women, particularly domestic violence. Women who are victims of domestic violence in the United States are 21 times more likely to be killed with a firearm than women in other similarly developed countries. Approximately 57% of domestic violence that led to the death of a female romantic partner involved use of a firearm, and women whose male partners own firearms are five times more likely to be killed.
There is also evidence that many mass shooters share a common hatred of women. Many mass shooters cite their rage toward women (usually stemming from rejection) as a motivating factor for their murderous rampages or have targeted specific women who rejected them. Many mass shooters also have a history of domestic violence, stalking, and other threatening and violent acts toward women. There have also been a number of mass shootings in locales frequented or solely attended by women, including a yoga studio in Florida and a Planned Parenthood. The history of guns being used to further violence against women, both on an intimate level and on a massive scale, indicates that gun violence is not indiscriminate.
A similar trend presents itself in the context of gun violence against the LGBTQ+ community. According to the FBI, sexual orientation is one of the three most common characteristics that sparks hate crimes, alongside race and religion. Members of the LGBTQ+ community have been targets of some of the largest mass shootings in the history of the United States, from the Upstairs Lounge shooting in the 1970s to the Pulse Nightclub shooting just a few years ago which resulted in almost 50 people being killed. LGBTQ+ people are frequently victims of intimate partner violence, which further increases their chances of a gun-related death. Gun violence also includes suicide, and the rates of suicide are higher within the LGBTQ+ community than they are within the general population.
Violence against transgender individuals is particularly high, and transgender women of color represent perhaps the most shocking and clear depiction of how gun violence is intersectional. Transgender women of color are disproportionately impacted by hate crimes; in May of this past year, three trans women of color were the victims of gun violence in one week. In the past, victims were often thought of as individual tragedies; only now is society starting to view their deaths as part of a larger systemic problem regarding hatred and gun violence in America.
This systemic problem has been a cause of death for racial and ethnic minorities in America for decades, but recently the violence seems to be ramping up. A recent mass shooting in Texas was committed by a white man who wanted to halt an “invasion” of Mexican immigrants into the United States. In the United States, African Americans are 10 times more likely to die from gun violence than white people. Black men are increasingly the victims of gun violence at the hands of police officers, who frequently receive very little punishment. Gun violence is also much more concentrated in poor urban areas in America, which (due to a number of troubling societal forces) are commonly racially segregated; this has a huge role to play in the fact that African Americans make up more than 50% of the number of people murdered with guns each year.
The discourse surrounding gun violence against racial and ethnic minorities is also troubling. Sometimes, the discourse involves blatant racist hypocrisy. When a shooting occurs in a predominantly white area, activists are praised; when people support the Black Lives Matter movement and fight to protect black Americans from gun violence, they are viewed as “extremists.” Other times, the discourse that should be occurring simply doesn’t happen. For example, Native Americans face similar violence at the hands of police officers, who have a 12% greater chance of being shot by law enforcement than African Americans do, but who do not receive the same media coverage.
Gun violence against religious minorities has also increased in recent years; most troublingly, this increase seems to be manifesting itself in the form of mass shootings. Perhaps most famously, a shooting occurred in a historic black church in Charleston; the killer was a white man. Similar shootings have occurred in synagogues in San Diego and in Pittsbugh, both the products of anti-Semitism. Gun violence against Muslims in the United States has been on the rise since 9/11 and since the election of Donald Trump, both of which added fuel to a hatred of Islam; the violence has ranged from holding families at gunpoint in a grocery store to firing shots into a mosque.
The Hard Conversation Lawmakers Don’t Want to Have
The most important thing to note about trends in gun violence is that gun violence is intersectional. The statistics do not lie. Gun violence negatively impacts individuals with one or more marginalized identities, and mass shootings are most often committed by those whose identities are in the majority; statistically, straight white Christian men.
This is the very reason why gun violence will continue to grow in the United States. Although conversations are finally being had on a national level regarding the intersectionality of gun violence, the only individuals who are in a position to do anything to make positive systemic change are members of the federal government, who are (you guessed it) predominantly straight white Christian men.
I’m not going to argue that members of the federal government are intentionally allowing the continuation of gun violence against minorities, although one could make that argument and indeed some people have. What I will say is this: more often than not, those who are the strongest advocates against gun control are the very individuals who are the least likely to be victims of gun violence. This statistic evidences a severe disconnect in the political system, one that is actually killing thousands of marginalized people. Yet the majority, those who are safe from gun violence, are not ready to hear that they need to take a back seat on the topic and make room for the voices of people who are most likely to die as a result of gun violence.
It’s easier to say that a young black man who was shot by a police officer is the victim of a tragic mistake than it is to recognize systemic racism that runs rampant among American police. It’s easier to say that a woman who was shot by her domestic partner is in a better place now that she is out of an abusive relationship, and that nobody could have known it would happen to her, than it is to acknowledge the link between a domestic violence and gun violence. It’s easier to categorize a mass shooter as a mentally ill person suffering some sort of psychotic break than it is to recognize that said mass shooter likely had a deeply rooted hatred of certain classes of marginalized people.
It’s easier to write off each bout of gun violence as a one-time tragedy, and forget about it until then next one, than it is to address the ways that gun violence disproportionately kills women, racial, ethnic and religious minorities, and members of the LGBTQ+ community.
Until members of government begin to have a personal stake in the game and are willing to have brutally honest conversations about the intersectionality of gun violence, gun violence will continue to kill the very Americans who do not have a voice in most discussions about gun control.
June 15, 2020 at 10:31 am in reply to: “black on black crime” is THE reactionary response to anti-police brutality #116570
znModeratorInstead of rejecting the entire notion as a method of deflection and privilege, we will attempt to formally dismiss the conversation forever by laying out the facts about why white America never hears us talk about black-on-black crime.
It’s not a thing.
According to the FBI’s uniform crime-reporting data for 2016, 90.1 percent of black victims of homicide were killed by other blacks, while 83.5 percent of whites were killed by other whites. While no life is inconsequential, the statistical evidence shows that—just as for blacks when it comes to black-on-black crime—whites are mostly victimized by other whites, with the vast majority of white murders committed by whites. This is because most victims of crime personally know their assailants. And while this is a truth across racial boundaries, no one ever talks about “white-on-white crime.”
Furthermore, the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ arrest data analysis tool shows that less than 1 percent of blacks overall (about 2 percent of black men) commit a violent crime in any given year. This means, factoring in interracial violent offenses, 99 percent of black men do not commit black-on-black crime.
This is a terrible argument. Way more black people are murdered by guns every year than white people. I picked the random dates of 2015-1018 and, according to the CDC, 10,000 more black people were shot and killed than white people for the time period.
If 1% of black men are committing violent crimes every year, THAT is a lot. That would be near 200,000 people committing violent crimes every year, right?
I know black on black on violence is probably a distraction Fox News is using right now, but the violence ties right in with the class and race jumble that is important to discuss.
Just dismissing important trends with some bogus arguments like this one source is frustrating to me.
I don’t know that choosing one kind of crime (violence with guns) is enough to reject the overall point:
The overall pattern of poor persons having the highest rates of violent victimization was consistent for both whites and blacks.”
When you scratch the police tendency to stop, search, arrest, and kill blacks at a higher rate, the justification underneath it always turns out to be that blacks are more criminal. So debunking the myth is important in a lot of ways.
znModeratorA Morning Consult poll showed 58% of Americans either strongly or somewhat supported the idea of “calling in the U.S. military to supplement city police forces.”
You get different answers about that one, depending on the poll. For example there’s this:
Americans 49% to 34% reject use of military for crowd control amid George Floyd protests, poll finds
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/polling/americans-49-34-reject-use-military-crowd-control-wake-floyd-protests-poll
znModeratorJerry Jones is really taking his time when it comes to addressing the country's issues on social injustice: https://t.co/0njX5cPd60
— Sports Illustrated (@SInow) June 15, 2020
znModeratorJune 14, 2020 at 8:19 pm in reply to: police culture & training, including former police speak out #116556
znModeratorOh my goodness. Stick with it for the 18-19 minute mark. Excellent stuff.
w
vAnother WV find. That’s good stuff.
znModeratorCandidates for 2nd string include Allen, Trewyn, Brewer, Anchrum, Corbett, and Noteboom.
Tremayne Anchrum is the same guy.
I was talking about OC Nate Trewyn, 2019 practice squad guy. He gets mentioned in this thread, near the end of page one. You can find that post by searching “Tony Pauline” since he is quoted in that post.
znModeratorThe OL splits in half and the dividing line starts with the Steelers game. After the Steelers game the OL is starting 3 inexperienced injury replacements–which normally is the kiss of death. But in the 7 games after the change, the Rams gave up 6 sacks, or 0.857 sacks per game. Across 16 games that would be 13-14 sacks, which would be the lowest amount allowed by a team since the Colts in 2009 (13). The previous 9 games they allowed 16 sacks, which is 1.77 a game, which across 16 games would be 28.4…and in 2019 that would be ranked 8th.
So they weren’t doing so bad before, when it comes to sacks. Though they were allowing pressures all year.
IMO when a team allows pressures but not sacks, the biggest difference is the qb. The qb is being coached on how not to give up sacks, plus of course he has the ability to avoid them by moving in the pocket or throwing more quickly etc. ‘
—
I think the signs are pointing to it being this…though “this” depends on Hav getting back to form.
LOT Whitworth
LOG Evans
OC Blythe
ROG Edwards
ROT HavCandidates for 2nd string include Allen, Trewyn, Brewer, Anchrum, Corbett, and Noteboom.
Blythe is an experienced veteran who has played the position. Unless someone takes a huge leap in development, it’s not likely he gets displaced.
If Hav can’t go at ROT then Evans is the ROT and Corbett is probably in line to play LOG.
znModeratorfrom https://www.therams.com/news/lirim-hajrullahu-at-last-gets-nfl-chance-rams
Hajrullah said the Seahawks brought him in for a tryout after kicker Sebastian Janikowski suffered a hamstring injury on a missed 57-yard field goal try in their 2019 Wild Card playoff game, but nothing came out of it. He also had a couple NFL opportunities pop up last December, but his CFL team would not give him permission to try out, so he asked for his release to pursue his NFL dream uninhibited.
The gamble seemed to pay off. He felt he performed well at kicking coach Gary Zauner’s NFL free agent combine, and that confidence was justified when the Rams “and a few other teams” expressed interest in him.
znModerator… Because of BLM as of right now the majority of the country believes that the police help uphold an underlying systemic racism that is everywhere. That has never happened before, that I know of, in USA history.
…
==============
Well, I’ve seen those polls, and i wish i could believe them. But i don’t.
They remind me of the universal health care polls.
I think the country is much more evenly divided on this law-and-order stuff.w
vThere’s no reason to disbelieve the polls. The issue is translation into action. A majority does support universal health insurance, when asked. But in that case it did not translate into a fair and open fight between Dem primary candidates.
So it remains to be seen what actions come out of the new mindset where, unlike previously, a majority of whites see and “get” systemic racism in policing.
….
==================
Well, i dunno. I do question the poll numbers. Part of the reason i question them, is because i think we live in a corporotacracy-idiocracy. I dont think half the people in this country even know what ‘systemic racism’ IS. I think people answer black-and-white questions on poll questions in ways that dont necessarily reflect what they really think. Heck oftentimes idiot-propagandized-humans believe things that are completely at odds with one another.No, i dont trust ‘any’ of the numbers on these complex issues. But, i dunno.
w
vTaibbi:”…As Cotton points out in the piece, he was advancing a view arguably held by a majority of the country. A Morning Consult poll showed 58% of Americans either strongly or somewhat supported the idea of “calling in the U.S. military to supplement city police forces.” That survey included 40% of self-described “liberals” and 37% of African-Americans. To declare a point of view held by that many people not only not worthy of discussion, but so toxic that publication of it without even necessarily agreeing requires dismissal, is a dramatic reversal for a newspaper that long cast itself as the national paper of record.
Incidentally, that same poll cited by Cotton showed that 73% of Americans described protecting property as “very important,” while an additional 16% considered it “somewhat important.” This means the Philadelphia Inquirer editor was fired for running a headline – “Buildings matter, too” – that the poll said expressed a view held by 89% of the population, including 64% of African-Americans.
(Would I have run the Inquirer headline? No. In the context…”
THe polls did not ask “do you believe in systemic racism.” The polls asked if the Floyd murder was an isolated incident or represented a deeper pattern of racial injustice.
I do see a shift in consciousness on these things. That is probably because we are all deeply influenced to believe in human rights and equality before the law, and now more people are open to seeing police injustices, which automatically touches the “human rights” nerve. So perceptions like that have an ideological garden bed to grow in.
…
znModerator… Because of BLM as of right now the majority of the country believes that the police help uphold an underlying systemic racism that is everywhere. That has never happened before, that I know of, in USA history.
…
==============
Well, I’ve seen those polls, and i wish i could believe them. But i don’t.
They remind me of the universal health care polls.
I think the country is much more evenly divided on this law-and-order stuff.w
vThere’s no reason to disbelieve the polls. The issue is translation into action. A majority does support universal health insurance, when asked. But in that case it did not translate into a fair and open fight between Dem primary candidates.
So it remains to be seen what actions come out of the new mindset where, unlike previously, a majority of whites see and “get” systemic racism in policing.
….
znModeratorAndrew Whitworth only allowed 𝟏 sack on 662 pass-blocking snaps in 2019 pic.twitter.com/ZQhdUr2F9E
— PFF (@PFF) June 14, 2020
znModeratorThe importance of knowing your rights – and having a camera…pic.twitter.com/CkPeIhTUp0
— Rex Chapman🏇🏼 (@RexChapman) June 14, 2020
znModeratorYes…these are horrible terrorists. How dare they watch a movie 🤣 #capitolhillautonomouszone pic.twitter.com/3xhgoETTx8
— Raina 🌧 (@rain_with_an_a) June 11, 2020
znModerator“Christopher Columbus statue pulled down Minnesota State Capitol”
==
This one is about a different statue, but close enough.
==

znModerator#Tulsa the streets of Tulsa safer now that these evil jaywalkers got a police ass kicking? https://t.co/uOQstCUk6W
— Jeff Kwatinetz (@JeffKwatinetz) June 13, 2020
-
AuthorPosts

